|

GARNOME status?

View: New views

4 Messages — Rating Filter: Alert me

	GARNOME status? by Vincent Untz :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Hi, It seems there hasn't been any 2.25 GARNOME release. Is GARNOME still alive? Just wondering because we're mentioning it in our announements... Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- garnome-list mailing list garnome-list@... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/garnome-list
	Re: GARNOME status? by David Ronis :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Karsten has been busy, so there's been no activity for some time. On the other hand, I've been updating various components of garnome's gnome, successfully, for the most part. It should be relatively easy to bring out a new version. David On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 20:20 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: > Hi, > > It seems there hasn't been any 2.25 GARNOME release. Is GARNOME still > alive? Just wondering because we're mentioning it in our announements... > > Vincent > -- garnome-list mailing list garnome-list@... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/garnome-list
	Re: GARNOME status? by Gonzalo Odiard-2 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Hello, I am a old garnome user and can collaborate with the basic stuff (updating versions, testing) if you want. Gonzalo Odiard -- garnome-list mailing list garnome-list@... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/garnome-list
	Re: GARNOME status? by Karsten Bräckelmann-2 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 20:20 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: > It seems there hasn't been any 2.25 GARNOME release. Is GARNOME still > alive? Just wondering because we're mentioning it in our announements... /me hangs his head in shame Indeed, sorry about that. As David mentioned, I've been busy -- also missing my co-maintainer and build machines... Mar 18 is quite unlikely IMHO, since there's a lot more than simply bumping versions. However, seeing some synergy and offers (Thanks! :-) only within a few hours is encouraging! I'd be happy to get GARNOME up to speed again soon-ish, with some more man-power -- though more likely after the upcoming dot zero release. I do agree that GARNOME at this point shouldn't be mentioned prominently in the release announcements, since it isn't an option to build GNOME right now. Maybe adjust to "coming soon" instead. I'll think about the future the next days. -- char t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4"; main(){ char h,m=h=t++,x=t+2h,c,i,l=x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: (c=++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)\|\|!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}} -- garnome-list mailing list garnome-list@... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/garnome-list