|

GCJ and Lingo

View: New views

3 Messages — Rating Filter: Alert me

	GCJ and Lingo by Titus :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message I haven't tried it. Is there any a priori reason to not do so? Has anyone actually used Lingo from C++?
	Re: GCJ and Lingo by Sanjiv Jivan :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message I have the C++ process embed a JVM which in turns loads the Spring Lingo application context file that creates the client proxy bean as usual. Calls from the C++ process are delegated to the Lingo client proxy and callbacks and return values passed back to C++ via the JNI bridge. Its working out really well for us. Sanjiv On 12/19/06, Titus <titus@...> wrote: I haven't tried it. Is there any a priori reason to not do so? Has anyone actually used Lingo from C++? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/GCJ-and-Lingo-tf2847786.html#a7953095 Sent from the lingo - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
	Re: GCJ and Lingo by James.Strachan :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message On 12/19/06, Sanjiv Jivan <sanjiv.jivan@...> wrote: > I have the C++ process embed a JVM which in turns loads the Spring Lingo > application context file that creates the client proxy bean as usual. Calls > from the C++ process are delegated to the Lingo client proxy and callbacks > and return values passed back to C++ via the JNI bridge. Its working out > really well for us. Awesome! :) -- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email