Nabble - GDome

Compile issues on Solaris 8 with Sun Studio

2009-09-11T06:57:20Z

Hi,

I had some issues when compiling gdome2 on Solaris 8 Sparc and X86
with Sun Studio 11. Essentially there were three issues:

1. gcc-specific options -Wall and -ansi should be removed
2. return and a function as argument of a function despite it is
not returning a value rises an error on Studio 11
3. DESTDIR is not fully functional in gtk-doc/

Patches for all three issues are available from the OpenCSW repository
at

<http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gar/browser/csw/mgar/pkg/gdome2/trunk/files/patch-nowall.diff
>
<http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gar/browser/csw/mgar/pkg/gdome2/trunk/files/patch-use-install.diff
>
<http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gar/browser/csw/mgar/pkg/gdome2/trunk/files/patch-doc-destdir.diff
>

Best regards

-- Dagobert
_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome

Re: Parsing HTML documents?

2009-08-20T02:11:58Z

2009/8/17 Paolo Casarini <paolo@...>:

> Hello Bradley,
>
> gdome2 works only with well formed XML documents, the only released
> modules (wrt DOM specifications) are Main, Events and XPath: the HTML module
> is an old, not working and not maintained implementation.
>
> If you deal only with well formed XHTML documents, you can use gdome2,
> otherwise, as Luca already said, libxml2 is the right choice for you.
>
> Best regards,
> Paolo.
>
> On Aug 16, 2009 10:59 PM, "Bradley Kite" <bradley.kite@...> wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> I have been looking for a C library that provides a DOM interface to
> parsed HTML documents, however I have been struggling to make it work
> the way that I'd like (probably because I'm trying to use it
> incorrectly, no doubt!).
>
> Firstly, can gdome be used to parse HTML documents? I am aware that
> its more geared towards XML, which, although similar, has obvious
> differences!
>
> In any case, I'm using one of the examples as a start, however I'm
> getting this error while calling parse():
>
> parser error : StartTag: invalid element name
> <!doctype html><head><title>
>
> I guess the main question I have, is am I using the right tool? Or
> should I be using something more suited to HTML? If so, would any body
> have any recomendations? I need to be able to modify various
> components of the DOM, and it needs to be written in C (or C++, but
> preferably C).
>
> Many thanks
> --
> Bradley Kite
> _______________________________________________
> gdome mailing list
> gdome@...
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome
>

Hi Luca and Paolo

Many thanks for your responses. I have started using libxml2 and found
it to be exactly what I require!

Kind Regards
--
Brad.
_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome

Re: Parsing HTML documents?

2009-08-17T06:23:23Z

Hello Bradley,

gdome2 works only with well formed XML documents, the only released modules (wrt DOM specifications) are Main, Events and XPath: the HTML module is an old, not working and not maintained implementation.

If you deal only with well formed XHTML documents, you can use gdome2, otherwise, as Luca already said, libxml2 is the right choice for you.

Best regards,
Paolo.

On Aug 16, 2009 10:59 PM, "Bradley Kite" <bradley.kite@...> wrote:

Hello.

I have been looking for a C library that provides a DOM interface to
parsed HTML documents, however I have been struggling to make it work
the way that I'd like (probably because I'm trying to use it
incorrectly, no doubt!).

Firstly, can gdome be used to parse HTML documents? I am aware that
its more geared towards XML, which, although similar, has obvious
differences!

In any case, I'm using one of the examples as a start, however I'm
getting this error while calling parse():

parser error : StartTag: invalid element name
<!doctype html><head><title>

I guess the main question I have, is am I using the right tool? Or
should I be using something more suited to HTML? If so, would any body
have any recomendations? I need to be able to modify various
components of the DOM, and it needs to be written in C (or C++, but
preferably C).

Many thanks
--
Bradley Kite
_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome

_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome

Re: Parsing HTML documents?

2009-08-16T22:35:00Z

Hello Bradley,

On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Bradley Kite<bradley.kite@...> wrote:
> I guess the main question I have, is am I using the right tool? Or
> should I be using something more suited to HTML? If so, would any body
> have any recomendations? I need to be able to modify various
> components of the DOM, and it needs to be written in C (or C++, but
> preferably C).

I don't remember what's the current status of HTML support in Gdome2.
Anyway, I'd recommend to have a look at libxml2:

http://xmlsoft.org/

it is the engine that underlies Gdome2 (which is just a wrapper on top
of it). For sure it does support HTML parsing. Its API is not exactly
the DOM one (which is why Gdome2 exists) but it gets very close. And
it's written in plain C.

Best regards,
--luca
_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome

Parsing HTML documents?

2009-08-16T13:59:38Z

Hello.

I have been looking for a C library that provides a DOM interface to
parsed HTML documents, however I have been struggling to make it work
the way that I'd like (probably because I'm trying to use it
incorrectly, no doubt!).

Firstly, can gdome be used to parse HTML documents? I am aware that
its more geared towards XML, which, although similar, has obvious
differences!

In any case, I'm using one of the examples as a start, however I'm
getting this error while calling parse():

parser error : StartTag: invalid element name
<!doctype html><head><title>

I guess the main question I have, is am I using the right tool? Or
should I be using something more suited to HTML? If so, would any body
have any recomendations? I need to be able to modify various
components of the DOM, and it needs to be written in C (or C++, but
preferably C).

Many thanks
--
Bradley Kite
_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome

Obama -- The Judas Goat

2009-01-25T08:04:13Z

Obama -- The Judas Goat
1/25/2009
By David Duke

Judas Goat\ A goat that leads other goats or sheep to slaughter. Also, one who entices into danger and betrays others. The name is an allusion to Judas Iscariot, who betrayed Jesus for 30 pieces of slaughter. (From Merriam Websters Dictionary)

Barack Hussein Obama is a Judas Goat.

Extremist Jews guided Barack Hussein Obamas career from day one, even all the way back to Harvard Law School. Radical Zionist hitman, David Axelrod previously orchestrated the Jewish-financed and organized defeat of perceived anti-Zionist Sen. Charles Percy. He is the man who ran Obamas campaign for President and who is his chief handler. Obamas campaign was overwhelmingly financed by the most powerful Zionist bankers in the world. His campaigns largest contribution source was the Zionist international banking firm of Goldman Sachs. (FEC campaign records). In both Obamas Senate and Presidential campaign he prostrated himself before AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) promising even more money and blood for Israels terrorism than even the supine John McCain, and even more money and blood than the previous Shabbez Goy in the White House, George Bush. Before the Israeli terrorism and mass murder in Gaza, he went to Israel and said that he supported Israels p
lanned murderous terrorism against the men, women and children of Gaza.

His first act as President-elect was to appoint a rabid Zionist, Israeli dual citizen who served in the Israeli Army as his Chief of Staff, Rahm Emmanuel. As thousands of women and children in Gaza were killed or maimed, Obama remained silent. Within a few days as President Obama supported indiscriminate American missile strikes in villages of our ally Pakistan, a clear continuation of Bushs policies. He completely supports the theft of trillions of American taxpayer dollars to the Zionist international bankers. Eighty percent of American Jews voted for Obama, and all the main leaders of the Jewish Supremacist state of Israel have proclaimed Obama as the perfect man for U.S. President.

What better for the Zionists to have their own servant perceived as a clean break from the Jewish extremist-controlled Bush administration? What better than for the Zionists than to have their Shabbez Goy be treated by the worlds press and even by much of the anti-Zionist community as a man of real change? What better for the Zionists than for the world to think that Obama will be a change from the Zionist-controlled policies when he willing to do anything that Israel demands? What better for the Zionist murderers to have their craven puppet be looked at by the whole world as a man of honor and integrity and fairness.

In the slaughterhouse, the Judas Goat is often painted with bright colors, adorned with strong, sweet scents to lure the sheep to their pens and to their death. Obama, the Judas Goat of our time, is looked upon by millions of Zionist-propagandized sheep as the man who will lead them to salvation.

Instead, he leads America, Palestine and the world to the bloody altar of Jewish Supremacism.

Any supposed anti-Zionist who praises Barack Obama is actually aiding this Judas Goat to lead us all to slaughter. Every person who truly opposes Jewish extremism must speak out and expose the Judas Goat named Barack Obama!

Dr. David Duke

Former Member of the House of Representatives

State of Louisiana

United States of America

It is up to you the people of the United States who can still think freely, and up to all of the people of the world who are able to see through the deceptions of the Zionist-influenced Global media -- to get this simple, powerful message to everyone on earth. Email this message to your friends, post it on forums and websites and put links to it on every website, facebook or other media in the world. Go and seek out media and Internet sites not controlled by Zionist power. Make youtube videos of this message, (use the short audio and find good illustrative pictures) and post it untill your fingers are worn and tired, print it and mail it to newspapers or any media outlet that has still not fallen under the propaganda of the Zionists. Let the world know the truth. Person by person, in the USA, Canada, UK, France, Germany, Italy, japan, Russia, China, Africa, Palestine, South America and across the whole world this Judas Goat must be exposed for what he is, so that when begin
s to do his evil for Israel, the whole world will know exactly what is going on and resist!

Source : http://www.davidduke.com/general/obama-the-judas-goat_7317.html

------------------------

Why is the President of Israel, the terrorist who just oversaw the Zionist mass murder and maiming of thousands of Palestinians so happy
that Obama is President of the USA?
by David Duke

Read the excerpt from the Israeli News about how President Perez and Israel think that Obamas becoming U.S. President is great day
for Israel.

"Israels President Shimon Peres ecstatic over the election of Obama"
Ronen Medzini Israel News Jan. 21

Today is a great day not only for the United States of America, but for the entire world, President Shimon Peres wrote in a letter
addressed to Barack Obama on the day of his inauguration as president of the United States.

Obama was elected by the United States, but as a matter of fact, he was chosen by the whole of humankind,

Why is Peres so ecstatic?

Why shouldnt he be, he knows that Obama is completely in the grip of the extremist Jewish Zionists in America, and he knows that the
greater Obamas popularity and idol worship, the more Obama can do for the International Zionist Cause.

Any thinking and caring human being who realizes that the Zionist-controlled American foreign policy has been a disaster for the robbed
and murdered people of Palestine, Lebanon, Iraq and a catastrophe for the 50,000 American wounded in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well
as an economic catastrophe for the hardworking Americans who pay trillions to finance these wars for Israel -- must wake up the fact that
supporting Obama and increasing his popularity will only aid Zionist terrorism, war, and their murder and oppression of the Palestinians. It
will also hasten the economic suffering of billions of people around the world as his popularity enables him to more easily aid the Zionist
International Bankers steal the wealth of the United States, Europe and the world. Obama is totally in the bloodstained and green ink-
stained hands of the Zionists. The hard truth is that the more good will and support Obama has also gives more power to support the
Zionist agenda!

Mark my words. The Obama Presidency will be disaster for America and for the world.

Obama was put into office by the Zionists. His top two cohorts for years have been the radical Jews David Axelrod and Rahm
Emmanuel. Both have long records of radical Zionism and have been attack dogs against anyone perceived as having the slightest
opposition to Israel. One such victim was Sen. Charles Percy, who both men worked to defeat and destroy because he dared to only be
99 percent rather than 100 percent pro-Israel. Rahm Emmanuel, a dual citizen of Israel who went to fight for Israel, he has a long
pedigree of Jewish extremism. His father served in the Irgun Terrorist Gang and he himself is named after an Irgun terrorist.

Zionist leaders in Chicago actually call Obama the first Jewish President and boast that Jews were key players in Obamas every step
up the ladder to President.

from the very earliest days, extremist Jews were the largest contributors to his campaign. In the beginning of his Presidential bid, three
Hollywood Jews that constantly make movies about Jewish suffering, but never about the Zionist terrorism and theft against the
Palestinian people, Steven Spielberg, David Geffen, and Jeffrey Katzenberg raised 1.2 million for Obama in a single Hollywood party.

By the time Obamas campaign was in full swing, he had huge support from the criminal Zionist International Banking firms such as
Goldman Sachs and Lehman brothers. Goldman Sachs was Obamas biggest single contributor, and his vast war chest came not from
American manufacturing firms like GM or even American oil companies, (not one was in his top twenty) it was overwhelmingly dominated
by Zionist international bankers, the same ones whose thievery and fraud are giving the world this economic depression.

For those looking for meaningful social and political change, do you really think it will come from this man who has already been bought
heart, head and soul by the most powerful czars of the international financial establishment and the biggest globalists in the world?

I know that many are desperate for change, so desperate that you want to believe anything. But in the face of these facts cant you see
that Obama will be even more dangerous to freedom and justice than even George Bush and his band of Neocons were. What better
way to wipe out George Bushs hated legacy and make the world believe that America has really changed than with the election of
Obama. But, all the real Zionist power, Zionist media power, and Zionist financial power in America is still in place, even stronger than
ever.

Many Americans and others around the world who want to do good are now telling us how wonderful Obama will be as president. What
a great change it will be from the old policies. This is because of the Zionist-Controlled media hype, promoting Obama. The fact is that
these poor sods are ignorantly helping the radical Zionist agenda in Israel and around the world.

Every day that you dont help expose Obama for the Zionist servant that he actually is, his popularity will be a greater danger to peace
and freedom.

If the Zionist terrorist Shimon Perez is happy about the coronation of Obama, then why in the hell should you be?

David Duke

Source : http://www.davidduke.com/general/7303_7303.html
-------------------------------------

You or someone using your email adress is currently subscribed to the Lawrence Auster
Newletter. If you wish to unsubscribe from our mailing list, please let us know by calling to 1 212 865 1284

Thanks,

Lawrence Auster,
238 W 101 St Apt. 3B
New York, NY 10025
Contact: lawrence.auster@...
-------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome

Wake Up World! Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss

2009-01-22T12:01:27Z

If you want to know who the real establishment is in America and around the world, the real power behind the so-called ''military-industrial complex'', the real maleficent power that has led this world to inexorable conflict, war, hatreds, destruction of real human values, morality, conscience it is the global media establishment.

This same media witnessed the Zionist slaughter of 1,300 people in Gaza, and the maiming of 6,000 more, half of them women and children. More than 20,000 homes and buildings were destroyed or damaged and thousands became homeless. This horrendous mass slaughter of Palestinians is compared to the loss of 3 Israeli civilians. Yet, the media never dare to call this slaughter exactly what it is: terrorism on a horrendous scale! This same American and global media has not informed the American people or the people of the world of the damning truth about Barack Obama.

In truth, Obama is a complete creation of extremist Jewish Zionists and he has already begun to serve Israel by his top appointments.

The Jewish-dominated media in America is promoting the Obama inauguration as akin to the Second Coming of Jesus Christ. (If you question Jewish control of the media read Who Runs the Media? and you will find documentation proving the Jewish control being far greater than you might suspect) The rest of the worlds powerful media (Which also has a powerful Jewish presence in the UK, France, Spain, Sweden, Russia, and the rest of Europe) takes its cues from the NY/Hollywood media axis, and presents Obama as kind of a superhuman agent of real change.

In fact, it is a Huge Lie!

Obama is completely controlled by the same forces that have controlled George Bush, so much so that The Chicago Tribune quotes leading Jews bragging that Obama is so in the hands of the Zionists that he is ''the first Jewish President.'' Obama received about 80 percent of the Jewish vote in the United States!

The Three critical things that made Obama President:

1)Jewish political influence

Obamas chief handler is David Axelrod, a radical Jewish Zionist whose previous claim to fame was the fact that he was the Zionist political hit man against Illinois Senator Charles Percy, who was not deemed to be pro-Israel enough. (He was only 99.9 percent Israels lackey, not the required 100 percent) Obama went to Israel and made sure he pronounced himself even more radically pro-Zionist than Bush or McCain.

2) Massive amounts of Jewish money

Obamas campaign was kicked in high gear by Jewish Hollywood and financial moguls. In just one of the early fundraising parties in Hollywood by Spielberg, Geffen and Katzenburg it raised over a million dollars for Obama. Obama raised more money than any political candidate in American history and his biggest contributors were overwhelmingly Jewish activists, Jewish international finance and banking firms and Jewish globalists. His largest single contributor was the international Jewish Banking firm of Goldman Sachs. He received more money from the same international bankers that ripped off trillions of dollars in the recent economic scandals than even John McCain. Is a man totally under the power of the most powerful financial organizations in the entire world, really an agent of ''change?''

3) Overwhelming positive support in the Jewish-dominated media

By a large margin, Jewish-owned media officially endorsed Obama, and that is not counting tens of thousands of positive articles by Jewish; owned publications and pundits.

Obamas first act as President-elect was to appoint a Jewish extremist, dual citizen, Rahm Emmanuel, as his chief of staff. As the people of Gaza were slaughtered, Obama would not make a single statement to stop this murder and maiming of thousands of innocents!

Israel, very carefully timed its terrorist attack on Gaza to be in the remaining days of the Bush Administration. The day before Obamas inauguration Israel announced that it would be completely out of Gaza by the time Obama took his oath of office.

Why?

Before Obama took office, Israel could make this terrorist slaughter against Palestinians and Obama would still be perceived as having clean hands. Because Obama is completely under their control, they want him to have an image of fairness, honor and peacefulness, and as representing a new direction of American policy, as he begins to deal with the Mideast turmoil.

Since he is Israels boy in the White House, what better scenario could they have than a President perceived as practically the Second Coming, of high moral conviction, and dedicated to fairness, but who is actually bound hand-and-foot to the Zionist agenda, just as the last presidents have been. Talk about a perfect shill. And the game is working, for even many Palestinians are filled with hope that the new President will work to end their long suffering.

With an almost godlike positive image around the world, a Barack Obama who is in reality controlled by Israel, is a much bigger danger than was even George Bush. We know what Bush is, but too many Americans and other peoples around the world are falling for the lies about the new ''savior'' of the world: Barack Obama. He already says we are to put thousands of new troops in Afghanistan and has rattled the sabers against Iran. Obama with highest positive image (created by media) in the world is in a more dangerous position to lead us into catastrophic wars than George Bush ever was.

Jewish screenwriters in Hollywood couldnt have written a better script for the Zionist agenda than what is being played out on inauguration day, USA.

Of course, why should they write it, they did it.

God save America, God save the Palestinians, God save peace and justice in the world!

david duke

Source:

http://www.davidduke.com/general/wake-up-world-meet-the-new-boss-same-as-the-old-boss_7225.html

---------------------------------------------------------------

You or someone using your email adress is currently subscribed to the Lawrence Auster
Newletter. If you wish to unsubscribe from our mailing list, please let us know by calling to 1 212 865 1284

Thanks,

Lawrence Auster,
238 W 101 St Apt. 3B
New York, NY 10025
Contact: lawrence.auster@...

---------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome

Re: [xml] cloneNode and xml:id bug?

2008-12-18T16:40:34Z

The strange thing is that if I *only* change the attribute name from "xml:id" on the DTD to "id" then everything works, except gdome_doc_getElementById. The type is kept ID for both names.
So, it is related with the attribute name.

bráulio

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Daniel Veillard <veillard@...> wrote:

On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 04:06:29PM -0200, Bráulio Barros de Oliveira wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'm having a problem that might be a bug of libxml (or unprobably gdome).
>
> When I use gdome_el_cloneNode with an element that has an xml:id attribute
> then the new cloned element get locked, in a way that xml:id can't be
> changed and is assigned to an empty string. Is this a normal behaviour? (PS:
> this occurs before the insertion of the cloned element with insertBefore.)

I don't understand what a 'locked' element means, I don't see why you
should not be able to fix the xml:id on a copied element. seems
specific to gdome.

Daniel

--
Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel@... | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/

_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome

Re: [xml] cloneNode and xml:id bug?

2008-12-17T09:21:18Z

On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 04:06:29PM -0200, Bráulio Barros de Oliveira wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'm having a problem that might be a bug of libxml (or unprobably gdome).
>
> When I use gdome_el_cloneNode with an element that has an xml:id attribute
> then the new cloned element get locked, in a way that xml:id can't be
> changed and is assigned to an empty string. Is this a normal behaviour? (PS:
> this occurs before the insertion of the cloned element with insertBefore.)

I don't understand what a 'locked' element means, I don't see why you
should not be able to fix the xml:id on a copied element. seems
specific to gdome.

Daniel

--
Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel@... | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome

cloneNode and xml:id bug?

2008-12-15T10:06:29Z

Hello.

I'm having a problem that might be a bug of libxml (or unprobably gdome).

When I use gdome_el_cloneNode with an element that has an xml:id attribute then the new cloned element get locked, in a way that xml:id can't be changed and is assigned to an empty string. Is this a normal behaviour? (PS: this occurs before the insertion of the cloned element with insertBefore.)

Regards,
bráulio

_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome

Re: gdome html support

2008-09-12T13:26:32Z

Hi,

On Sep 11, 2008, at 9:04 PM, Aaron Patterson wrote:
> Does gdome have HTML support? I see that there is a gdomehtml module,
> but I can't figure out how to enable it.

That piece of code predates the time when I started working on
gdome2. I think it is unused as of now.

Cheers,
--luca
_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome

gdome html support

2008-09-11T12:04:05Z

Hello again!

Does gdome have HTML support? I see that there is a gdomehtml module,
but I can't figure out how to enable it.

The README nor google has helped me discover how to enable the gdomehtml module.

Thank you!

--
Aaron Patterson
http://tenderlovemaking.com/
_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome

Re: building gdome on os x

2008-09-10T11:45:00Z

On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Daniel Macks <dmacks@...> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:32:22AM -0700, Aaron Patterson wrote:
>> Hi everyone!
>>
>> I'm trying to build gdome on OS X, but I got an error! I installed
>> glib from macports, and ran autoconf to generate a new configure
>> script. All the dependencies were found, but I seem to be getting a
>> linking error:
>>
>> gcc -dynamiclib -flat_namespace -undefined suppress -o
>> .libs/libgdome.0.8.1.dylib gdome.lo gdome-events.lo gdome-xpath.lo
>> gdome-util.lo gdome-private-list.lo gdome-refdebug.lo gdome-treegc.lo
>> -all_load ../libgdome/gdomecore/.libs/libgdomecore.al
>> ../libgdome/events/.libs/libgdomeevents.al
>> ../libgdome/xpath/.libs/libgdomexpath.al
>> ../libgdome/gdomecore/.libs/libgdomecore.al
>> ../libgdome/events/.libs/libgdomeevents.al
>> ../libgdome/xpath/.libs/libgdomexpath.al -L/usr/lib -lxml2 -lz
>> -lpthread -licucore -lm -L/opt/local/lib -lglib-2.0 -lintl -liconv -lc
>> -install_name /usr/local/lib/libgdome.0.dylib -compatibility_version
>> 9 -current_version 9.1
>> ld warning: duplicate dylib /usr/lib/libiconv.2.dylib
>> ld: duplicate symbol _gdome_xpath_xpnsresolv_vtab in
>> ../libgdome/xpath/.libs/libgdomexpath.al(gdome-xpath-xpeval.lo) and
>> gdome-xpath.lo
>> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>> make[3]: *** [libgdome.la] Error 1
>> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>> make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
>> [][aaron@amac gdome2-0.8.1]$
>>
>> I would appreciate any help I can get! Thank you!
>
> Fink's gdome (0.8.1) has a patch that sounds related. Look at the last
> piece of:
>
> http://fink.cvs.sourceforge.net/fink/dists/10.4/stable/main/finkinfo/gnome/libgdome0.patch?view=markup
>
> There is a packaging note:
>
> Included libtool is *very* old and buggy, so we'll just start
> over instead of trying to patch it.
>
> So make sure you are using a recent libtool (and automake, etc) and do
> 'autoreconf -fi' to force regeneration of all scripts (avoid having
> mismatched remnants of the distro ones).
>
> See the full package for more information about what worked for me
> there:
>
> http://fink.cvs.sourceforge.net/fink/dists/10.4/stable/main/finkinfo/gnome/libgdome0.info?view=markup

Perfect. Applying the patch, using a recent libtool, and running
autoreconf did the trick. Thank you very much!

--
Aaron Patterson
http://tenderlovemaking.com/
_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome

Re: building gdome on os x

2008-09-10T11:17:49Z

On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:32:22AM -0700, Aaron Patterson wrote:

> Hi everyone!
>
> I'm trying to build gdome on OS X, but I got an error! I installed
> glib from macports, and ran autoconf to generate a new configure
> script. All the dependencies were found, but I seem to be getting a
> linking error:
>
> gcc -dynamiclib -flat_namespace -undefined suppress -o
> .libs/libgdome.0.8.1.dylib gdome.lo gdome-events.lo gdome-xpath.lo
> gdome-util.lo gdome-private-list.lo gdome-refdebug.lo gdome-treegc.lo
> -all_load ../libgdome/gdomecore/.libs/libgdomecore.al
> ../libgdome/events/.libs/libgdomeevents.al
> ../libgdome/xpath/.libs/libgdomexpath.al
> ../libgdome/gdomecore/.libs/libgdomecore.al
> ../libgdome/events/.libs/libgdomeevents.al
> ../libgdome/xpath/.libs/libgdomexpath.al -L/usr/lib -lxml2 -lz
> -lpthread -licucore -lm -L/opt/local/lib -lglib-2.0 -lintl -liconv -lc
> -install_name /usr/local/lib/libgdome.0.dylib -compatibility_version
> 9 -current_version 9.1
> ld warning: duplicate dylib /usr/lib/libiconv.2.dylib
> ld: duplicate symbol _gdome_xpath_xpnsresolv_vtab in
> ../libgdome/xpath/.libs/libgdomexpath.al(gdome-xpath-xpeval.lo) and
> gdome-xpath.lo
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[3]: *** [libgdome.la] Error 1
> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
> [][aaron@amac gdome2-0.8.1]$
>
> I would appreciate any help I can get! Thank you!

Fink's gdome (0.8.1) has a patch that sounds related. Look at the last
piece of:

http://fink.cvs.sourceforge.net/fink/dists/10.4/stable/main/finkinfo/gnome/libgdome0.patch?view=markup

There is a packaging note:

Included libtool is *very* old and buggy, so we'll just start
over instead of trying to patch it.

So make sure you are using a recent libtool (and automake, etc) and do
'autoreconf -fi' to force regeneration of all scripts (avoid having
mismatched remnants of the distro ones).

See the full package for more information about what worked for me
there:

http://fink.cvs.sourceforge.net/fink/dists/10.4/stable/main/finkinfo/gnome/libgdome0.info?view=markup

dan

--
Daniel Macks
dmacks@...
http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks

_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome

building gdome on os x

2008-09-10T10:32:22Z

Hi everyone!

I'm trying to build gdome on OS X, but I got an error! I installed
glib from macports, and ran autoconf to generate a new configure
script. All the dependencies were found, but I seem to be getting a
linking error:

gcc -dynamiclib -flat_namespace -undefined suppress -o
.libs/libgdome.0.8.1.dylib gdome.lo gdome-events.lo gdome-xpath.lo
gdome-util.lo gdome-private-list.lo gdome-refdebug.lo gdome-treegc.lo
-all_load ../libgdome/gdomecore/.libs/libgdomecore.al
../libgdome/events/.libs/libgdomeevents.al
../libgdome/xpath/.libs/libgdomexpath.al
../libgdome/gdomecore/.libs/libgdomecore.al
../libgdome/events/.libs/libgdomeevents.al
../libgdome/xpath/.libs/libgdomexpath.al -L/usr/lib -lxml2 -lz
-lpthread -licucore -lm -L/opt/local/lib -lglib-2.0 -lintl -liconv -lc
-install_name /usr/local/lib/libgdome.0.dylib -compatibility_version
9 -current_version 9.1
ld warning: duplicate dylib /usr/lib/libiconv.2.dylib
ld: duplicate symbol _gdome_xpath_xpnsresolv_vtab in
../libgdome/xpath/.libs/libgdomexpath.al(gdome-xpath-xpeval.lo) and
gdome-xpath.lo
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [libgdome.la] Error 1
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
[][aaron@amac gdome2-0.8.1]$

I would appreciate any help I can get! Thank you!

--
Aaron Patterson
http://tenderlovemaking.com/
_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome

Re: Compiling GDOME on Mac OS X Leopard

2008-07-31T00:40:55Z

Hi Daniel,

Thanks for the initial response.

I need to compile the sources on Mac OS X Leopard explicitly for various other purposes.

As per your suggestion i've started installation using a freshly installed Mac OS X Leopard. Here are the steps i've followed to install the dependencies.

* Installed Fink latest version.

* installed pkg-config using Fink.

* installed glib2-dev using Fink.

* Then untarred the gdome2-0.8.1 source ( downloaded from gdome site ) and executed ./configure command.

Again got the same error.

checking for pkg-config... (cached) /sw/bin/pkg-config

checking for GLIB - version >= 2.2.0... no

*** Could not run GLIB test program, checking why...

*** The test program compiled, but did not run. This usually means

*** that the run-time linker is not finding GLIB or finding the wrong

*** version of GLIB. If it is not finding GLIB, you'll need to set your

*** LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable, or edit /etc/ld.so.conf to point

*** to the installed location Also, make sure you have run ldconfig if that

*** is required on your system

***

*** If you have an old version installed, it is best to remove it, although

*** you may also be able to get things to work by modifying LD_LIBRARY_PATH

Please help me to solve this error.

Thanks in Advance.

JanakiRam.

On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:20:13 -04000, Daniel Macks wrote:

You want fink's glib2-dev ("glib" is old, long-dead glib-1.x series).
OTOH, why not just use fink's gdome?

dan

--
Daniel Macks
dmacks@...
http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks

_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome

Re: Compiling GDOME on Mac OS X Leopard

2008-07-29T09:20:13Z

On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 09:36:54PM +0530, JanakiRam wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I'm trying to compile GDOME on Mac OS X Leopard. Downloaded the sources from
> http://gdome2.cs.unibo.it/tarball/gdome2-0.8.1.tar.gz.
>
> I'm able to compile the sources successfully on Tiger - i've used fink to
> install pkginfo,libidl & glib - dependencies for GDOME.
>
> As i'm trying to compile the same GDOME Sources on Leopard using
> ./configure,make (same approach).
>
> In the middle of ./configure execution an error related to GLib is thrown
> with the following message.
>
>
> checking for GLIB - version >= 2.2.0... no
> *** Could not run GLIB test program, checking why...
> *** The test program compiled, but did not run. This usually means
> *** that the run-time linker is not finding GLIB or finding the wrong
> *** version of GLIB. If it is not finding GLIB, you'll need to set your
> *** LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable, or edit /etc/ld.so.conf to point
> *** to the installed location Also, make sure you have run ldconfig if that
> *** is required on your system
> ***
> *** If you have an old version installed, it is best to remove it, although
> *** you may also be able to get things to work by modifying LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> configure: error: Could not find GLIB (see config.log for details).
>
> But i've installed GLib using Fink and also confirmed the same with the
> following command.
>
> --------------------------
> $ fink info glib
> --------------------------

You want fink's glib2-dev ("glib" is old, long-dead glib-1.x series).
OTOH, why not just use fink's gdome?

dan

--
Daniel Macks
dmacks@...
http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks

_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome

Compiling GDOME on Mac OS X Leopard

2008-07-29T09:06:54Z

Hi All,

I'm trying to compile GDOME on Mac OS X Leopard. Downloaded the sources fromhttp://gdome2.cs.unibo.it/tarball/gdome2-0.8.1.tar.gz.

I'm able to compile the sources successfully on Tiger - i've used fink to install pkginfo,libidl & glib - dependencies for GDOME.

As i'm trying to compile the same GDOME Sources on Leopard using ./configure,make (same approach).

In the middle of ./configure execution an error related to GLib is thrown with the following message.

checking for GLIB - version >= 2.2.0... no
*** Could not run GLIB test program, checking why...
*** The test program compiled, but did not run. This usually means
*** that the run-time linker is not finding GLIB or finding the wrong
*** version of GLIB. If it is not finding GLIB, you'll need to set your
*** LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable, or edit /etc/ld.so.conf to point
*** to the installed location Also, make sure you have run ldconfig if that
*** is required on your system
***
*** If you have an old version installed, it is best to remove it, although
*** you may also be able to get things to work by modifying LD_LIBRARY_PATH
configure: error: Could not find GLIB (see config.log for details).

But i've installed GLib using Fink and also confirmed the same with the following command.

--------------------------
$ fink info glib
--------------------------

Please help me to address the issue.

Thank in Advance.

JanakiRam.

_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome

Memory leak occurs when some node is appended to the entity reference node

2008-03-28T04:36:17Z

According to DOM specification (2.0) an entity reference node can have following nodes as its child “Element, ProcessingInstruction, Comment, Text, CDATASection, EntityReference.”

And current Gdome implementation also allows us to append a child to the entity reference node.

Consider the following scenario-

I am creating a document from scratch I create an entity reference node and add a text node as its child and finally append that entity reference node to the root element. Now when I will save the tree to a File it will simply shows an entity reference on the doc. Hence appending the child has no effect. After the entire Tree is freed there is a memory leak as the text node appended to the entity is not freed. It’s because Gdome uses the Libxml function XmlFreeDoc () to free the document tree. Now inside xmlFreeDoc () xmlFreeNodeList () is called to free the children list of doc. In side this function the node type is checked before freeing the child list. If it is of entity reference node then its children are not freed which causes the memory leak in this scenario.

As appending a child node to ER is of no use can we just make ER node as read-only so that it can’t be modified any way.

Thanks & Regards

Rabi

_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome

Fix for the memory leak Xpath Module

2008-01-29T07:18:24Z

For the memory leak problem in xpath module when the node returned by the gdome_xpath_xpresult_singleNodeValue() is a Namespace

Declaration node

Solution- In the gdome_xml_n_unref we have add one more check for the XML_NAMESPACE_DECL node like in mkref() and then call the

gdome_xml_xpns_unref(). In side the gdome_xml_xpns_unref()when the refcnt becomes 0 we have to free the corresponding xmlNode

object stored in the "n" field of the Gdome_xml_XPathNamespace object before freeing it.

The fix is given below

gdome-xml-node.c Wed Jan 23 16:35:34 2008

gdome_xml_n_unref (GdomeNode *self, GdomeException *exc)

275a276,278

> case XML_NAMESPACE_DECL:

> gdome_xml_xpns_unref(self,exc);

> return;

gdome-xml-xpns.c Wed Jan 23 16:29:34 2008

in the function gdome_xml_xpns_unref (GdomeNode *self, GdomeException *exc)

--- 111,121 ----

if (priv->refcnt > 0)

priv->refcnt--;

! if (priv->refcnt == 0)

! {

! gdome_xmlFreeNode (priv->n);

g_free (self);

! }

}

Thanks & Regards

Rabi

_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome

Memory Leak in the Xpath Module

2008-01-29T07:12:20Z

In gdome Xpath there is a memory leak problem when the node returned by the gdome_xpath_xpresult_singleNodeValue() is a Namespace

Declaration node.

Reason- gdome_xpath_xpresult_singleNodeValue()calls the gdome_xml_n_mkref() to obtain an reference to the node to be

returned. In side the gdome_xml_n_mkref() for a namespace declaration type node gdome_xml_xpns_mkref()is called

that creates node which is of type Gdome_xml_XPathNamespace. In side the gdome_xml_xpns_mkref()

a node of type xmlNode is created with the namespace as passed to the gdome_xml_xpns_mkref(). This node address is

stored in the "n" field of the Gdome_xml_XPathNamespace structure. As there is not separate API to unref the

Gdome_xml_XPathNamespace object gdome_n_unref() is called that actually calls the gdome_xml_n_unref(). In that

function the structure of type Gdome_xml_XPathNamespace is type casted to Gdome_xml_Node. After the reference count

is decremented it is checked for 0 along with the listener list field (ll) for NULL. As the Gdome_xml_XPathNamespace

don't have any listener list field(ll) the ll field of the type casted object has some garbage value that causes the condition

to be false and the xmlNode object is not freed along with the Gdome_xml_XPathNamespace object.

_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome

Replace of gdome_xml_str_mkref_own() and gdome_xml_str_mkref() by gdome_xml_mkref_xml() has incorrect behaviour

2007-12-11T01:38:32Z

Hi all

As a fix (Fixes for libxml strings) to avoid the misuse of g_free() by the gdome functions, the gdome_xml_str_mkref_own() and gdome_xml_str_mkref() were replaced by gdome_xml_str_mkref_xml() to create a GdomeDOMString object for strings allocated by libxml in some xml functions like gdome_xml_el_getAttribute() gdome_xml_cd_appendData etc. But this causes segmentation faults as the gdome_xml_str_mkref_xml() do not make any copy of the string passed to it. And the gdome_xml_str_unref_xml() frees the memory by xmlFree(self->str) that is allocated by Libxml and this causes the problem when libxml again tries to free the same memory location.

_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome

SVN Base Path

2007-11-19T23:21:56Z

Hi All

I want to know the address of the SVN base for GDOME where the new patches are committed.

Any body please mail me that path

Thanks & Regards

Rabi

Innovation Never Stops !

***************************************************************************************
This e-mail and attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient's) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it!

_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome

The children field of an DTD node should be NULL

2007-10-25T07:45:28Z

Hi

I found this thing when i print all the fields of an instance of xmlDTD. I parsed a simple xml document containg an internal DTD subset. I obtain a reference to the DTD node in the DOC and print all its field then i found that the children and last field have some address. According to the DOM specification the DTD node should not have any child node hence it should be NULL. Its not a problem as it is not affecting the API. But i am not understanding why this deviation has been done.

Thanks & Regards

Rabi

Re: gdome_xml_str_isEmpty() is showing incorrect behaviour

2007-10-23T03:01:53Z

On Oct 23, 2007, at 6:26 AM, Rabi_huawei wrote:
> I am testing GDOME while doing the same i came across an anamoly in
> the above
> function. When i pass an GdomeDOMString object containing an empty
> string it
> shows that the string is not empty and vice versa.

you're right, the return values of this function appear to be
swapped. I guess nobody has ever noticed this before because this is
a non standard method which is not described in the DOM specification
and is used nowhere (within the library).

I have committed the patch.

Thanks,
--luca

_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome

gdome_xml_str_isEmpty() is showing incorrect behaviour

2007-10-19T00:56:52Z

I am testing GDOME while doing the same i came across an anamoly in the above function. When i pass an GdomeDOMString object containing an empty string it shows that the string is not empty and vice versa.

Any clarification regarding the same will be appreciated.

Regards
Rabi

Re: Setting Attribute Values - Using Integers

2007-09-10T05:06:15Z

Hello Gupta,

On Jun 26, 2007, at 10:56 PM, Gupta, Raman wrote:
> 1) Somehow tell gdome to use my schema so that it will
> automatically make it an integer
no
> 2) Tell gdome to set an integer value for the attribute?

no. Gdome is totally oblivious to the schema of the document being
accessed or modified, and it performs no automatic conversion of
data. You have to use strings and do the conversion yourself. As far
as I know, all (most?) DOM implementations behave like this.

Best,
--luca

_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome

Re: Query

2007-07-25T03:03:31Z

On Jul 19, 2007, at 11:25 AM, Jaya Kumar wrote:

> It is mentioned in the website “http://gdome2.cs.unibo.it/
> make.html” that –
>
> Compiling gdome2 requires:
>
> · libxml2 version 2.4.3
>
> · glib version 1.2.0
>
> Can’t advanced versions of Libxml2 like 2.6.28 be used?

Daniel Veillard (the main developer of libxml) has always been
particularly concerned with backward compatibility. My guess is that
advanced versions of libxml can be used without problems.

Cheers,
--luca

_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome

Query

2007-07-19T03:25:55Z

Hi,

It is mentioned in the website “http://gdome2.cs.unibo.it/make.html” that –

Compiling gdome2 requires:

· libxml2 version 2.4.3

· glib version 1.2.0

Can’t advanced versions of Libxml2 like 2.6.28 be used?

Thanks & Regds.,

Jaya Kumar

_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome

Setting Attribute Values - Using Integers

2007-06-26T14:56:34Z

Hi,

First, I want to apologize in advance if this is the wrong place to be asking this question.

I am currently using the gdome library to write and parse XML data which should follow a predefined schema. The schema specifies that some of the attributes are to be entered as integers, but as I understand the API, I can only set attribute values as strings. I thought that maybe GdomeDOMString would somehow figure out what data type the attribute should be, but I could not find how to point gdome to the schema so it would have no idea that the attribute should be an integer and not a string.

So my question is, can I:

1) Somehow tell gdome to use my schema so that it will automatically make it an integer

2) Tell gdome to set an integer value for the attribute?

I hope my question is clear enough, and if it is not, please let me know and I will do my best to phrase it better. Thanks in advance for your help!

Raman Gupta

_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome

Re: [gnome] gdome_di_createDocFromMemory Memory Leak

2006-11-17T14:31:18Z

On 11/16/06, Himalay Gopu <Himalay.Gopu@...> wrote:
> Thanks Gustavo
>
> We have a function which creates the singleton for every transaction and
> processes the XML so this should be causing the leak -- AM I RIGHT

weird... how are you creatinga singleton for every transaction?
Singletons should be... singletons, single instances.

> BTW what are the singleton classes in gdome -- GdomeDOMImplementation
> Does making these classes singleton hinder the performance of the
> application in threaded environment?

the singletons here are just the vtable stuff, used to dispatch the
methods. It could be done in other ways, like static or even better
gdome guys could use c++ and let compiler does that.

--
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
--------------------------------------
Jabber: barbieri@...
MSN: barbieri@...
ICQ#: 17249123
Skype: gsbarbieri
Mobile: +55 (81) 9927 0010
Phone: +1 (347) 624 6296; 08122692@...
GPG: 0xB640E1A2 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome

Re: [gnome] gdome_di_createDocFromMemory Memory Leak

2006-11-16T17:39:52Z

Thanks Gustavo

We have a function which creates the singleton for every transaction and
processes the XML so this should be causing the leak -- AM I RIGHT

BTW what are the singleton classes in gdome -- GdomeDOMImplementation
Does making these classes singleton hinder the performance of the
application in threaded environment?

I will try out recompiling the libs and test

Thanks
Himalay
-----Original Message-----
From: Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri [mailto:barbieri@...]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 8:26 PM
To: Himalay Gopu
Cc: gdome@...
Subject: Re: [gdome] gdome_di_createDocFromMemory Memory Leak

On 11/16/06, Himalay Gopu <Himalay.Gopu@...> wrote:
> We are developing a threaded module (15 transactions per second) with
gdome
> and we need to get the xml from memory and parse the same
>
> But when we try to use gdome_di_createDocFromMemory there seems to be
a
> memory leak almost 6144 bytes for every transaction
>
> The leak starts from here

Some points:
- gdome is not thread safe. while using it in a threaded environment,
I've found some bugs, one of them is creating singletons. I fixed the
one that did hurt at that point, but it was not making it thread safe,
instead I reordered the instructions so it would leak, but not crash.
Anyway, this shouldn't be the case, since the singleton is just
created once, and you may get no more than just few leaks (between:
'create singleton instance' and 'global = singleton-instance')
- gdome uses glib and libxml and they do their own memory management
and do cache. You need to compile these with options like
--enable-gc-friendly and --disable-mem-pool, see Glib user guide and
look at 'running glib applications', something like 'G_SLICER'

then you need to recheck your tests. :-)

--
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
--------------------------------------
Jabber: barbieri@...
MSN: barbieri@...
ICQ#: 17249123
Skype: gsbarbieri
Mobile: +55 (81) 9927 0010
Phone: +1 (347) 624 6296; 08122692@...
GPG: 0xB640E1A2 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome

Re: gdome_di_createDocFromMemory Memory Leak

2006-11-16T17:25:31Z

On 11/16/06, Himalay Gopu <Himalay.Gopu@...> wrote:
> We are developing a threaded module (15 transactions per second) with gdome
> and we need to get the xml from memory and parse the same
>
> But when we try to use gdome_di_createDocFromMemory there seems to be a
> memory leak almost 6144 bytes for every transaction
>
> The leak starts from here

Some points:
- gdome is not thread safe. while using it in a threaded environment,
I've found some bugs, one of them is creating singletons. I fixed the
one that did hurt at that point, but it was not making it thread safe,
instead I reordered the instructions so it would leak, but not crash.
Anyway, this shouldn't be the case, since the singleton is just
created once, and you may get no more than just few leaks (between:
'create singleton instance' and 'global = singleton-instance')
- gdome uses glib and libxml and they do their own memory management
and do cache. You need to compile these with options like
--enable-gc-friendly and --disable-mem-pool, see Glib user guide and
look at 'running glib applications', something like 'G_SLICER'

then you need to recheck your tests. :-)

--
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
--------------------------------------
Jabber: barbieri@...
MSN: barbieri@...
ICQ#: 17249123
Skype: gsbarbieri
Mobile: +55 (81) 9927 0010
Phone: +1 (347) 624 6296; 08122692@...
GPG: 0xB640E1A2 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome

gdome_di_createDocFromMemory Memory Leak

2006-11-16T08:36:37Z

We are developing a threaded module (15 transactions per second) with gdome and we need to get the xml from memory and parse the same

But when we try to use gdome_di_createDocFromMemory there seems to be a memory leak almost 6144 bytes for every transaction

The leak starts from here

response_document = gdome_di_createDocFromMemory (domimpl, response.body, GDOME_LOAD_VALIDATING, &exception);

return ((Gdome_xml_DOMImplementation *)self)->vtab->createDocFromMemory

(self, buffer, mode, exc); -> gdome.c

ret = (GdomeDocument *)gdome_xml_n_mkref ((xmlNode *)xmlParseMem

ory (buffer, size)); - > gdome_xml-domimp.c

and then libxml.so

I am freeing up the memory used by xml doc (response_document) using

gdome_doc_unref at the end of the each transaction

Is this a BUG in memory management of gdome?

I have compiled the code with newer versions of libxml and gdome still the memory leak exists

I am kind of struck at this stage

Any help is appreciated

Thanks

Himalay Gopu

Openwave Systems

Phone: 571 241 8006

_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome

Re: Fix thread issues

2006-10-09T04:02:32Z

On 10/9/06, Srinivas R Thota <srinivas_thota@...> wrote:
> But there can be leak if preempted by the system after allocation
>
> + n = g_new0 (Gdome_xml_DOMImplementation, 1);

yes, it can leak but will still work. I just reordered stuff to avoid
stupid bugs.

--
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
--------------------------------------
Jabber: barbieri@...
MSN: barbieri@...
ICQ#: 17249123
Skype: gsbarbieri
Mobile: +55 (81) 9927 0010
Phone: +1 (347) 624 6296; 08122692@...
GPG: 0xB640E1A2 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
_______________________________________________
gdome mailing list
gdome@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gdome