tag:old.nabble.com,2006:forum-1499Nabble - Gnu - Binutils2009-11-25T22:35:19ZThe <a href="http://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/" target="_top" rel="nofollow">GNU Binutils</a> are a collection of binary tools.
<br><br>» Check the DISCUSSION list <a href="http://www.nabble.com/Sourceware---binutils-f12158.html" target="_top">HERE</a>.tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26524895[Bug ld/11024] -L no longer influences how ld finds linker scripts when not using -T2009-11-25T22:35:19Z2009-11-25T22:35:19ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org<br>------- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2009-11-26 06:35 -------
<br>No there isn't a chance of reverting this fix. Having ld search in -L paths for
<br>scripts was a bad idea. It has resulted in a number of very confused users over
<br>the years, who installed a new version of ld to /usr/local but were unwittingly
<br>picking up old ld scripts when passing -L /usr/lib to ld.
<br><br>--
<br> What |Removed |Added
<br>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<br> Status|NEW |RESOLVED
<br> Resolution| |WONTFIX
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11024" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11024</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26524895&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26523502[Bug ld/11024] New: -L no longer influences how ld finds linker scripts when not using -T2009-11-25T18:20:15Z2009-11-25T18:20:15ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.orgThe following change, between binutils 2.18 and 2.20, removed the ability of
<br>ld's -L option to influence how linker scripts are located:
<br><a href="http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2009-04/msg00044.html" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2009-04/msg00044.html</a><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-04/msg00107.html" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-04/msg00107.html</a><br><br>As far as I can tell, there is no longer a way to add to the search path for
<br>finding (for example) ldscripts/elf_i386.x, ldscripts/elf_i386.xs etc.
<br><br>The -T option is not a very good substitute because it only supplies a fixed
<br>linker script. When using -T, the linker will not choose between scripts
<br>according to whether an executable is being linked (elf_i386.x) or a library is
<br>being linked (elf_i386.xs), which it would do using -L.
<br><br>This is a partial regression. I say partial because in the past I had to
<br>disable binutils' compiling-in of linker scripts in order to use -L this way.
<br>(See
<br><a href="http://repo.or.cz/w/nacl-binutils.git/commit/885d51de41658d6752f28c0c4c2dca56cb5e4c1c" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://repo.or.cz/w/nacl-binutils.git/commit/885d51de41658d6752f28c0c4c2dca56cb5e4c1c</a>)
<br><br>Is there any chance of reverting this change? I don't really understand why the
<br>change was made given that it makes ld less flexible.
<br><br>--
<br> Summary: -L no longer influences how ld finds linker scripts when
<br> not using -T
<br> Product: binutils
<br> Version: 2.20
<br> Status: NEW
<br> Severity: normal
<br> Priority: P2
<br> Component: ld
<br> AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
<br> ReportedBy: mrs at mythic-beasts dot com
<br> CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11024" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11024</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26523502&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26512047[Bug binutils/11017] PAGE_SIZE redefined in dlltool.c2009-11-25T04:44:40Z2009-11-25T04:44:40ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org<br>------- Additional Comments From jerker dot back at gmail dot com 2009-11-25 12:44 -------
<br>(In reply to comment #1)
<br>> Random comment coming out of the woodwork:
<br>> I can't help thinking that you should change this and all uses to
<br>> TARGET_PAGE_SIZE and TARGET_PAGE_MASK, and the problem would probably be
<br>solved.
<br>> If you *really* need the host page size...no you don't.
<br><br>That is an idea. TARGET_PAGE_SIZE=0x1000 is set by all targets using dlltool
<br>(AFAICS), but it is defined by the ld/emulparams scripts and used only in ld
<br>scripts. BTW HOST is TARGET, although dlltool is not currently used by
<br>Interix. It favours its own PE shared library solution.
<br><br><br>--
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11017" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11017</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26512047&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26510441[Bug gold/11019] New: Xindex::initialize_symtab_xindex in object.cc is not instantiated2009-11-25T02:26:08Z2009-11-25T02:26:08ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.orgIt become inlined into Sized_relobj::do_initialize_xindex when compiling with
<br>-O3. But initialize_symtab_xindex is also used by
<br>Sized_dynobj::do_initialize_xindex in dynobj.cc. This causes undefined reference
<br>errors.
<br><br>--
<br> Summary: Xindex::initialize_symtab_xindex in object.cc is not
<br> instantiated
<br> Product: binutils
<br> Version: 2.21 (HEAD)
<br> Status: NEW
<br> Severity: normal
<br> Priority: P2
<br> Component: gold
<br> AssignedTo: ian at airs dot com
<br> ReportedBy: d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
<br> CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11019" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11019</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26510441&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26503788[Bug binutils/11014] PAGE_SIZE redefined in dlltool.c2009-11-24T13:42:15Z2009-11-24T13:42:15ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org<br>------- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2009-11-24 21:42 -------
<br><br><br>*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 11017 ***
<br><br>--
<br> What |Removed |Added
<br>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<br> Status|NEW |RESOLVED
<br> Resolution| |DUPLICATE
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11014" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11014</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26503788&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26503794[Bug binutils/11017] PAGE_SIZE redefined in dlltool.c2009-11-24T13:42:15Z2009-11-24T13:42:15ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org<br>------- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2009-11-24 21:42 -------
<br>*** Bug 11014 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
<br><br>--
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11017" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11017</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26503794&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26503782[Bug binutils/11016] PAGE_SIZE redefined in dlltool.c2009-11-24T13:41:16Z2009-11-24T13:41:16ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org<br>------- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2009-11-24 21:41 -------
<br><br><br>*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 11017 ***
<br><br>--
<br> What |Removed |Added
<br>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<br> Status|NEW |RESOLVED
<br> Resolution| |DUPLICATE
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11016" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11016</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26503782&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26503785[Bug binutils/11017] PAGE_SIZE redefined in dlltool.c2009-11-24T13:41:16Z2009-11-24T13:41:16ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org<br>------- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2009-11-24 21:41 -------
<br>*** Bug 11016 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
<br><br>--
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11017" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11017</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26503785&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26503762[Bug binutils/11017] PAGE_SIZE redefined in dlltool.c2009-11-24T13:39:56Z2009-11-24T13:39:56ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org<br>------- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2009-11-24 21:39 -------
<br>Random comment coming out of the woodwork:
<br>I can't help thinking that you should change this and all uses to
<br>TARGET_PAGE_SIZE and TARGET_PAGE_MASK, and the problem would probably be solved.
<br>If you *really* need the host page size...no you don't.
<br><br>--
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11017" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11017</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26503762&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26503549[Bug binutils/11017] New: PAGE_SIZE redefined in dlltool.c2009-11-24T13:24:00Z2009-11-24T13:24:00ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.orgdlltool.c(244) defines PAGE_SIZE
<br><br>The PAGE_SIZE symbol is/should be defined in limits.h on a POSIX system (see
<br><a href="http://www.opengroup.org" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://www.opengroup.org</a>). NT POSIX subsystem (SUA) defines it to 0x10000
<br>(10*0x1000). In my headers PAGE_SIZE is defined as an enum and dlltool.c
<br>generates a compiler error due to PAGE_SIZE is defined before including system
<br>headers.
<br><br>I need advise how to fix this.
<br>Assuming setting PAGE_SIZE to 0x1000 is preferable, we can let dlltool.c set an
<br>explicit value after including the system headers, like this:
<br><br>Index: dlltool.c
<br>===================================================================
<br>RCS file: /cvs/src/src/binutils/dlltool.c,v
<br>retrieving revision 1.97
<br>diff -d -u -p -r1.97 dlltool.c
<br>--- dlltool.c 28 Oct 2009 17:21:36 -0000 1.97
<br>+++ dlltool.c 24 Nov 2009 17:27:50 -0000
<br>@@ -241,9 +241,6 @@
<br>
<br> #define show_allnames 0
<br>
<br>-#define PAGE_SIZE ((bfd_vma) 4096)
<br>-#define PAGE_MASK ((bfd_vma) (-4096))
<br>-
<br> #include "sysdep.h"
<br> #include "bfd.h"
<br> #include "libiberty.h"
<br>@@ -259,6 +256,9 @@
<br> #include <stdarg.h>
<br> #include <assert.h>
<br>
<br>+#define PAGE_SIZE ((bfd_vma) 4096)
<br>+#define PAGE_MASK ((bfd_vma) (-4096))
<br>+
<br><br>--
<br> Summary: PAGE_SIZE redefined in dlltool.c
<br> Product: binutils
<br> Version: 2.21 (HEAD)
<br> Status: NEW
<br> Severity: normal
<br> Priority: P2
<br> Component: binutils
<br> AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
<br> ReportedBy: jerker dot back at gmail dot com
<br> CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
<br> GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-interix6.1
<br> GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-interix6.1
<br>GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-interix6.1
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11017" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11017</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26503549&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26503544[Bug binutils/11016] New: PAGE_SIZE redefined in dlltool.c2009-11-24T13:23:45Z2009-11-24T13:23:45ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.orgdlltool.c(244) defines PAGE_SIZE
<br><br>The PAGE_SIZE symbol is/should be defined in limits.h on a POSIX system (see
<br><a href="http://www.opengroup.org" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://www.opengroup.org</a>). NT POSIX subsystem (SUA) defines it to 0x10000
<br>(10*0x1000). In my headers PAGE_SIZE is defined as an enum and dlltool.c
<br>generates a compiler error due to PAGE_SIZE is defined before including system
<br>headers.
<br><br>I need advise how to fix this.
<br>Assuming setting PAGE_SIZE to 0x1000 is preferable, we can let dlltool.c set an
<br>explicit value after including the system headers, like this:
<br><br>Index: dlltool.c
<br>===================================================================
<br>RCS file: /cvs/src/src/binutils/dlltool.c,v
<br>retrieving revision 1.97
<br>diff -d -u -p -r1.97 dlltool.c
<br>--- dlltool.c 28 Oct 2009 17:21:36 -0000 1.97
<br>+++ dlltool.c 24 Nov 2009 17:27:50 -0000
<br>@@ -241,9 +241,6 @@
<br>
<br> #define show_allnames 0
<br>
<br>-#define PAGE_SIZE ((bfd_vma) 4096)
<br>-#define PAGE_MASK ((bfd_vma) (-4096))
<br>-
<br> #include "sysdep.h"
<br> #include "bfd.h"
<br> #include "libiberty.h"
<br>@@ -259,6 +256,9 @@
<br> #include <stdarg.h>
<br> #include <assert.h>
<br>
<br>+#define PAGE_SIZE ((bfd_vma) 4096)
<br>+#define PAGE_MASK ((bfd_vma) (-4096))
<br>+
<br><br>--
<br> Summary: PAGE_SIZE redefined in dlltool.c
<br> Product: binutils
<br> Version: 2.21 (HEAD)
<br> Status: NEW
<br> Severity: normal
<br> Priority: P2
<br> Component: binutils
<br> AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
<br> ReportedBy: jerker dot back at gmail dot com
<br> CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
<br> GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-interix6.1
<br> GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-interix6.1
<br>GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-interix6.1
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11016" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11016</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26503544&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26502098[Bug ld/10144] mips/ld: non-dynamic relocations refer to dynamic symbol2009-11-24T11:34:13Z2009-11-24T11:34:13ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org<br>------- Additional Comments From rsandifo at nildram dot co dot uk 2009-11-24 19:34 -------
<br>The problem is that the .debug_info section in thr-objc_gc.o references
<br>thread_cancel. How did you compile that file?
<br><br>--
<br> What |Removed |Added
<br>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<br> CC| |rsandifo at nildram dot co
<br> | |dot uk
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10144" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10144</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26502098&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26500666[Bug binutils/11014] New: PAGE_SIZE redefined in dlltool.c2009-11-24T09:37:09Z2009-11-24T09:37:09ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.orgdlltool.c(244) defines PAGE_SIZE
<br><br>The PAGE_SIZE symbol is/should be defined in limits.h on a POSIX system (see
<br><a href="http://www.opengroup.org" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://www.opengroup.org</a>). NT POSIX subsystem (SUA) defines it to 0x10000
<br>(10*0x1000). In my headers PAGE_SIZE is defined as an enum and dlltool.c
<br>generates a compiler error due to PAGE_SIZE is defined before including system
<br>headers.
<br><br>I need advise how to fix this.
<br>Assuming setting PAGE_SIZE to 0x1000 is preferable, we can let dlltool.c set an
<br>explicit value after including the system headers, like this:
<br><br>Index: dlltool.c
<br>===================================================================
<br>RCS file: /cvs/src/src/binutils/dlltool.c,v
<br>retrieving revision 1.97
<br>diff -d -u -p -r1.97 dlltool.c
<br>--- dlltool.c 28 Oct 2009 17:21:36 -0000 1.97
<br>+++ dlltool.c 24 Nov 2009 17:27:50 -0000
<br>@@ -241,9 +241,6 @@
<br>
<br> #define show_allnames 0
<br>
<br>-#define PAGE_SIZE ((bfd_vma) 4096)
<br>-#define PAGE_MASK ((bfd_vma) (-4096))
<br>-
<br> #include "sysdep.h"
<br> #include "bfd.h"
<br> #include "libiberty.h"
<br>@@ -259,6 +256,9 @@
<br> #include <stdarg.h>
<br> #include <assert.h>
<br>
<br>+#define PAGE_SIZE ((bfd_vma) 4096)
<br>+#define PAGE_MASK ((bfd_vma) (-4096))
<br>+
<br><br>--
<br> Summary: PAGE_SIZE redefined in dlltool.c
<br> Product: binutils
<br> Version: 2.21 (HEAD)
<br> Status: NEW
<br> Severity: normal
<br> Priority: P2
<br> Component: binutils
<br> AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
<br> ReportedBy: jerker dot back at gmail dot com
<br> CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
<br> GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-interix6.1
<br> GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-interix6.1
<br>GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-interix6.1
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11014" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11014</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26500666&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26498853[Bug ld/10956] Missing --no-relax option2009-11-24T08:17:37Z2009-11-24T08:17:37ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org<br>------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-24 16:17 -------
<br>- bfd_boolean relax;
<br>+ signed int disable_target_specific_optimizations;
<br><br>Why rename it to "target_specific_optimizations"? It's still relaxation.
<br>I do like the macros though. You could stand to use them in the main ld
<br>files as well as the target files.
<br><br>The patch otherwise looks much better.
<br><br>--
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10956" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10956</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26498853&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26498143[Bug ld/10956] Missing --no-relax option2009-11-24T07:16:06Z2009-11-24T07:16:06ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org<br>------- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-11-24 15:16 -------
<br>Hi Richard,
<br><br> How about this patch ?
<br><br>Cheers
<br> Nick
<br><br><br>--
<br> What |Removed |Added
<br>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<br> Status|NEW |WAITING
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10956" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10956</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26498143&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26498139[Bug ld/10956] Missing --no-relax option2009-11-24T07:15:23Z2009-11-24T07:15:23ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org<br>------- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-11-24 15:15 -------
<br>Created an attachment (id=4414)
<br> --> (<a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4414&action=view" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4414&action=view</a>)
<br>Implement --no-relax as a generic linker command line option
<br><br><br>--
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10956" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10956</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26498139&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26494285[Bug gas/11013] New: Incorrect Thumb2 encoding for saturating addition and subtraction2009-11-24T03:25:09Z2009-11-24T03:25:09ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.orgThe following code produces incorrect op-codes:
<br><br>@ start
<br>.syntax unified
<br>.thumb
<br><br>qadd r1,r2,r3
<br>qdadd r1,r2,r3
<br>qsub r1,r2,r3
<br>qdsub r1,r2,r3
<br>@ finish
<br><br>gas gives
<br><br>FA82F183
<br>FA82F193
<br>FA82F1A3
<br>FA82F1B3
<br><br>whereas it should give
<br><br>FA83F182
<br>FA83F192
<br>FA83F1A2
<br>FA83F1B2
<br><br>--
<br> Summary: Incorrect Thumb2 encoding for saturating addition and
<br> subtraction
<br> Product: binutils
<br> Version: 2.20
<br> Status: NEW
<br> Severity: normal
<br> Priority: P2
<br> Component: gas
<br> AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
<br> ReportedBy: anthony dot fox at cl dot cam dot ac dot uk
<br> CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
<br> GCC host triplet: i386-redhat-linux
<br>GCC target triplet: arm-elf
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11013" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11013</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26494285&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26493653[Bug ld/11012] New: -Wl, -z, nocombreloc doesn't work with IRELATIVE relocations2009-11-24T02:35:06Z2009-11-24T02:35:06ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.orgAll prelink ifunc* tests fail on powerpc64 when doing make check-cycle
<br>(in the pass with -Wl,-z,nocombreloc). The failures are in all ld.so modes, ldd
<br>-d -r ./ifunc1lib1.so, LD_TRACE_PRELINKING=1 ./ld64.so.1 ./ifunc1lib1.so or
<br>when just doing ./ld64.so.1 ./ifunc1lib1.so, even without prelinking being done
<br>on the library or any other involved object.
<br>The problem is that powerpc64 dl-machine.h assumes that if map == sym_map, then
<br>relative relocations for the current library have been already processed, but
<br>that isn't necessarily the case with -Wl,-z,nocombreloc.
<br><br>Not sure what can be done about this though, perhaps linker could enforce some
<br>ordering of .rela.* sections which would make sure the needed relative
<br>relocations are processed before the IRELATIVE/JMP_IREL ones. Looking at
<br>ifunc1lib1.so it would be perhaps enough to force .rela.opd to be emitted as the
<br>first .rela.* section.
<br><br>--
<br> Summary: -Wl,-z,nocombreloc doesn't work with IRELATIVE
<br> relocations
<br> Product: binutils
<br> Version: unspecified
<br> Status: NEW
<br> Severity: normal
<br> Priority: P2
<br> Component: ld
<br> AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
<br> ReportedBy: jakub at redhat dot com
<br> CC: amodra at bigpond dot net dot au,bug-binutils at gnu dot
<br> org
<br>GCC target triplet: powerpc64-linux
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11012" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11012</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26493653&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26492784[Bug gas/11011] New: gas/config/tc-arm.c:2489: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement2009-11-24T01:05:34Z2009-11-24T01:05:34ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.orgOS: Windows XP (cygwin)
<br>GCC: 4.4.2
<br><br>configure args: ../../src/binutils-2.20/configure --target=arm-elf
<br>--prefix=/opt/arm --enable-interwork --enable-multilib
<br><br>these configure args are recommended at <a href="http://www.gnuarm.com/support.html#build" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://www.gnuarm.com/support.html#build</a><br><br>Buld log (after the second "make", the first was "make -j3" so logs are interlaced):
<br><br>make[4]: Entering directory `/cygdrive/d/GNU/build-arm/binutils-2.20/gas'
<br>gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../src/binutils-2.20/gas -I.
<br>-I../../../src/binutils-2.20/gas -I../bfd
<br>-I../../../src/binutils-2.20/gas/config
<br>-I../../../src/binutils-2.20/gas/../include -I../../../src/binutils-2.20/gas/..
<br>-I../../../src/binutils-2.20/gas/../bfd -DLOCALEDIR="\"/opt/arm/share/locale\""
<br> -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Werror -g -O2 -MT tc-arm.o
<br>-MD -MP -MF .deps/tc-arm.Tpo -c -o tc-arm.o `test -f 'config/tc-arm.c' || echo
<br>'../../../src/binutils-2.20/gas/'`config/tc-arm.c
<br>cc1: warnings being treated as errors
<br>../../../src/binutils-2.20/gas/config/tc-arm.c: In function 'make_mapping_symbol':
<br>../../../src/binutils-2.20/gas/config/tc-arm.c:2489: error: suggest braces
<br>around empty body in an 'if' statement
<br><br>--
<br> Summary: gas/config/tc-arm.c:2489: error: suggest braces around
<br> empty body in an 'if' statement
<br> Product: binutils
<br> Version: 2.20
<br> Status: NEW
<br> Severity: normal
<br> Priority: P2
<br> Component: gas
<br> AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
<br> ReportedBy: jksgfv at tut dot by
<br> CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11011" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11011</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26492784&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26489089Re: Error while compiling Binutils-2.202009-11-23T17:21:53Z2009-11-23T17:21:53ZBill Zhao<blockquote class="quote light-black dark-border-color"><div class="quote light-border-color">
<div class="quote-author" style="font-weight: bold;">Nick Clifton wrote:</div>
<div class="quote-message shrinkable-quote">Hi Marco,
<br><br>> libtool: link: ar rc .libs/libbfd.a archive.o archures.o bfd.o bfdio.o bfdwin.o cache.o coffgen.o corefile.o format.o init.o libbfd.o opncls.o reloc.o section.o syms.o targets.o hash.o linker.o srec.o binary.o tekhex.o ihex.o stabs.o stab-syms.o merge.o dwarf2.o simple.o compress.o verilog.o elf32-i386.o elf-ifunc.o elf-vxworks.o elf32.o elf.o elflink.o elf-attrs.o elf-strtab.o elf-eh-frame.o dwarf1.o i386linux.o aout32.o pei-i386.o peigen.o cofflink.o elf32-gen.o cpu-i386.o trad-core.o
<br>> ar: symbol lookup error: ar: undefined symbol: bfd_plugin_set_program_name
<br>
<br>I tried to reproduce this problem, but failed. :-(
<br><br>The bfd_plugin_set_program_name symbol is defined in plugin.o which
<br>should be included in the libbfd.a library mentioned above. Can you
<br>check to see if it is there, or if the bfd/plugin.c file was
<br>mis-compiled somehow ?
<br><br>Cheers
<br> Nick
<br><br><br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br>bug-binutils@gnu.org
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a></div>
</div></blockquote>
<br><br>I also met this problem, hope some guy can help !!!
<br><br>BillZ
<br><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26486105[Bug binutils/11003] arm-elf-objdump gives format not recognized with this elf-formatted file2009-11-23T13:05:34Z2009-11-23T13:05:34ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org<br>------- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2009-11-23 21:05 -------
<br>Your accept.ox is broken. It has a REL section with entsize of 12 which is the
<br>size for a RELA section.
<br><br>--
<br> What |Removed |Added
<br>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<br> Status|NEW |RESOLVED
<br> Resolution| |INVALID
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11003" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11003</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26486105&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26484612[Bug ld/11006] New: A "relaxed" link order of libraries is requested for improved compatibilty2009-11-23T11:45:55Z2009-11-23T11:45:55ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.orgThe GNU ld linker requires the user to specify libraries after any object
<br>files which use them. For example:
<br><br>$ cat main.c
<br>void sub();
<br>main() {
<br> sub();
<br>}
<br>$ gcc -c sub.c
<br>$ ar rv libsub.a sub.o
<br>ar: creating libsub.a
<br>a - sub.o
<br>$ gcc -L . -lsub main.c ### FAILS !!!
<br>/tmp/cccN9Qxp.o: In function `main':
<br>main.c:(.text+0xa): undefined reference to `sub'
<br>collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
<br>$ gcc main.c -L . -lsub ### WORKS !!!
<br>$
<br><br>The linking order requirement is not needed by AIX, so this has been an issue
<br>for users migrating from an AIX system to Linux. This enhancement bug is being
<br>submitted for the benefit of these users.
<br><br>---------------------
<br><br>I am aware of the following workaround:
<br><br>$ gcc -Wl,--start -lsub -L. main.c -Wl,--end
<br>$
<br><br>--
<br> Summary: A "relaxed" link order of libraries is requested for
<br> improved compatibilty
<br> Product: binutils
<br> Version: 2.16
<br> Status: NEW
<br> Severity: enhancement
<br> Priority: P2
<br> Component: ld
<br> AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
<br> ReportedBy: geir at cray dot com
<br> CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11006" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11006</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26484612&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26482730[Bug binutils/11003] arm-elf-objdump gives format not recognized with this elf-formatted file2009-11-23T09:32:12Z2009-11-23T09:32:12ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org<br>------- Additional Comments From ben dot baron at sun dot com 2009-11-23 17:32 -------
<br>Files are now attached. Please let me know if I can provide other details.
<br><br>--
<br> What |Removed |Added
<br>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<br> Summary|arm-elf-objdump gives format|arm-elf-objdump gives format
<br> |not recognized with this |not recognized with this
<br> |elf-formatted file |elf-formatted file
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11003" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11003</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26482730&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26482719[Bug binutils/11003] arm-elf-objdump gives format not recognized with this elf-formatted file2009-11-23T09:30:22Z2009-11-23T09:30:22ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org<br>------- Additional Comments From ben dot baron at sun dot com 2009-11-23 17:30 -------
<br>Created an attachment (id=4410)
<br> --> (<a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4410&action=view" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4410&action=view</a>)
<br>accept.ox - file under test - fails with "File format not recognized"
<br><br><br>--
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11003" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11003</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26482719&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26482572[Bug binutils/11003] arm-elf-objdump gives format not recognized with this elf-formatted file2009-11-23T09:25:59Z2009-11-23T09:25:59ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org<br>------- Additional Comments From ben dot baron at sun dot com 2009-11-23 17:25 -------
<br>Created an attachment (id=4409)
<br> --> (<a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4409&action=view" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4409&action=view</a>)
<br>cross-compiled version of objdump from 2.20 binutils
<br><br><br>--
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11003" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11003</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26482572&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26482567[Bug binutils/11003] New: arm-elf-objdump gives format not recognized with this elf-formatted file2009-11-23T09:24:14Z2009-11-23T09:24:14ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.orgon
<br>SunOS ttuff 5.10 Generic_138888-08 sun4v sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-T200
<br>with binutils 2.20, cross-compiler version of binutils (--target=arm-elf) the
<br>below file (which is verified to be linkable) gets:
<br><br>/proj/vulture/wrk/baronbj/../tools/bin/arm-elf-objdump: accept.o: File format
<br>not recognized
<br><br>I include a hexdump of the object file below. Please let me know if there is a
<br>way to send the binary version so you can retest.
<br><br><br>----------------- accept.o hexdump -----------------------
<br>00000000: 7f 45 4c 46, 01 02 01 00, 00 00 00 00, 00 00 00 00 ;.ELF............
<br>00000010: 00 01 00 28, 00 00 00 01, 00 00 00 00, 00 00 00 00 ;...(............
<br>00000020: 00 00 01 60, 00 00 00 00, 00 34 00 00, 00 00 00 28 ;...`.....4.....(
<br>00000030: 00 05 00 01, 00 00 00 00, 43 24 24 63, 6f 64 65 00 ;........C$$code.
<br>00000040: 73 63 5f 61, 63 63 65 70, 74 00 63 70, 75 5f 69 6e ;sc_accept.cpu_in
<br>00000050: 74 65 72 72, 75 70 74 5f, 64 69 73 61, 62 6c 65 00 ;terrupt_disable.
<br>00000060: 63 70 75 5f, 69 6e 74 65, 72 72 75 70, 74 5f 72 65 ;cpu_interrupt_re
<br>00000070: 73 74 6f 72, 65 00 4c 69, 62 24 24 52, 65 71 75 65 ;store.Lib$$Reque
<br>00000080: 73 74 24 24, 61 72 6d 6c, 69 62 24 24, 5f 63 2e 33 ;st$$armlib$$_c.3
<br>00000090: 32 62 00 2e, 73 74 72 74, 61 62 00 2e, 73 79 6d 74 ;2b..strtab..symt
<br>000000a0: 61 62 00 2e, 72 65 6c 43, 24 24 63 6f, 64 65 00 00 ;ab..relC$$code..
<br>000000b0: 00 00 00 00, 00 00 00 00, 00 00 00 00, 00 00 00 00 ;................
<br>000000c0: 00 00 00 04, 00 00 00 00, 00 00 00 40, 03 00 00 03 ;...........@....
<br>000000d0: 00 00 00 0c, 00 00 00 00, 00 00 00 00, 12 00 00 03 ;................
<br>000000e0: 00 00 00 16, 00 00 00 00, 00 00 00 00, 11 00 00 00 ;................
<br>000000f0: 00 00 00 2c, 00 00 00 00, 00 00 00 00, 11 00 00 00 ;...,............
<br>00000100: 00 00 00 42, 00 00 00 00, 00 00 00 00, 10 00 ff f1 ;...B..........ÿñ
<br>00000110: e1 a0 c0 0d, e9 2d d8 70, e2 4c b0 04, e1 a0 40 00 ;á À.é-ØpâL°.á @.
<br>00000120: e1 a0 50 01, eb ff ff f9, e3 a0 10 00, e5 94 60 00 ;á P.ëÿÿùã ..å.`.
<br>00000130: e5 84 10 00, eb ff ff f5, e3 36 00 00, 03 a0 00 0b ;å...ëÿÿõã6... ..
<br>00000140: 13 a0 00 00, e5 85 00 00, e1 a0 00 06, e9 1b a8 70 ;. ..å...á ..é.¨p
<br>00000150: 00 00 00 14, 00 00 03 fb, 00 00 00 24, 00 00 04 fb ;.......û...$...û
<br>00000160: 00 00 00 00, 00 00 00 00, 00 00 00 00, 00 00 00 00 ;................
<br>00000170: 00 00 00 00, 00 00 00 00, 00 00 00 00, 00 00 00 00 ;................
<br>00000180: 00 00 00 00, 00 00 00 00, 00 00 00 5f, 00 00 00 03 ;..........._....
<br>00000190: 00 00 00 00, 00 00 00 00, 00 00 00 34, 00 00 00 7b ;...........4...{
<br>000001a0: 00 00 00 00, 00 00 00 00, 00 00 00 04, 00 00 00 01 ;................
<br>000001b0: 00 00 00 67, 00 00 00 02, 00 00 00 00, 00 00 00 00 ;...g............
<br>000001c0: 00 00 00 b0, 00 00 00 60, 00 00 00 01, 00 00 00 02 ;...°...`........
<br>000001d0: 00 00 00 04, 00 00 00 10, 00 00 00 04, 00 00 00 01 ;................
<br>000001e0: 00 00 00 06, 00 00 00 00, 00 00 01 10, 00 00 00 40 ;...............@
<br>000001f0: 00 00 00 00, 00 00 00 00, 00 00 00 04, 00 00 00 00 ;................
<br>00000200: 00 00 00 6f, 00 00 00 09, 00 00 00 00, 00 00 00 00 ;...o............
<br>00000210: 00 00 01 50, 00 00 00 10, 00 00 00 02, 00 00 00 03 ;...P............
<br>00000220: 00 00 00 04, 00 00 00 0c ;........
<br><br>--
<br> Summary: arm-elf-objdump gives format not recognized with this
<br> elf-formatted file
<br> Product: binutils
<br> Version: 2.20
<br> Status: NEW
<br> Severity: normal
<br> Priority: P2
<br> Component: binutils
<br> AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
<br> ReportedBy: ben dot baron at sun dot com
<br> CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11003" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11003</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26482567&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26479386[Bug binutils/11002] ld string merge does not respect symbol size2009-11-23T06:48:42Z2009-11-23T06:48:42ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org<br>------- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2009-11-23 14:48 -------
<br>> a = 'ab\0b\0'
<br><br>This is not a valid zero-terminated string.
<br><br>--
<br> What |Removed |Added
<br>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<br> Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
<br> Resolution| |INVALID
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11002" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11002</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26479386&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26479291[Bug binutils/11002] ld string merge does not respect symbol size2009-11-23T06:40:55Z2009-11-23T06:40:55ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org<br>------- Additional Comments From nunoplopes at sapo dot pt 2009-11-23 14:40 -------
<br>(In reply to comment #1)
<br>> The contents of "MS" sections must be zero-terminated strings.
<br><br>which they are:
<br>a = 'ab\0b\0'
<br>b = 'b\0'
<br><br>--
<br> What |Removed |Added
<br>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<br> Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
<br> Resolution|INVALID |
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11002" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11002</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26479291&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26477122[Bug binutils/11002] ld string merge does not respect symbol size2009-11-23T04:19:38Z2009-11-23T04:19:38ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org<br>------- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2009-11-23 12:19 -------
<br>The contents of "MS" sections must be zero-terminated strings.
<br><br>--
<br> What |Removed |Added
<br>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<br> Status|NEW |RESOLVED
<br> Resolution| |INVALID
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11002" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11002</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26477122&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26476209[Bug binutils/11002] New: ld string merge does not respect symbol size2009-11-23T03:12:56Z2009-11-23T03:12:56ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org$ cat a.s
<br> .file "a.c"
<br> .type a,@object
<br> .section .rodata.str1.1,"aMS",@progbits,1
<br> .globl a
<br>a:
<br> .size a, 5 # note that size is 5!
<br> .align 8
<br> .byte 0x61
<br> .byte 0x62
<br> .zero 1
<br> .type b,@object
<br> .globl b
<br>b:
<br> .size b, 2
<br> .byte 0x62
<br> .zero 1
<br><br> .section .note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
<br><br>$ as -o a.o a.s
<br>$ ld -shared -o a.so a.o
<br>$ readelf -a a.o
<br>(...)
<br> 7: 00000000 5 OBJECT GLOBAL DEFAULT 4 a
<br> 8: 00000003 2 OBJECT GLOBAL DEFAULT 4 b
<br>(note that 'a' has size 5)
<br><br>$ objdump -s a.so
<br>Contents of section .rodata:
<br> 0160 61620000 00000000 ab......
<br><br>As you can see, the value for the symbol 'a' is broken. It should be 'ab\0b\0'.
<br><br>--
<br> Summary: ld string merge does not respect symbol size
<br> Product: binutils
<br> Version: 2.19
<br> Status: NEW
<br> Severity: normal
<br> Priority: P2
<br> Component: binutils
<br> AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
<br> ReportedBy: nunoplopes at sapo dot pt
<br> CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11002" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11002</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26476209&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26476152[Bug ld/10961] Map file generated too late2009-11-23T03:09:14Z2009-11-23T03:09:14ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org<br>------- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-11-23 11:09 -------
<br>Hi Richard,
<br><br>Doh! Bogus patch obsoleted.
<br><br>I'll rework the patch as you suggested and upload it to the proper PR.
<br><br>Cheers
<br> Nick
<br><br><br><br>--
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10961" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10961</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26476152&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26476085[Bug ld/10961] Map file generated too late2009-11-23T03:08:12Z2009-11-23T03:08:12ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org<br><br>--
<br> What |Removed |Added
<br>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<br>Attachment #4404 is|0 |1
<br> obsolete| |
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10961" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10961</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26476085&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26467194[Bug binutils/10924] Bug in objdump when disassembling raw armv4t binaries2009-11-22T09:12:34Z2009-11-22T09:12:34ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org<br>------- Additional Comments From chris at seberino dot org 2009-11-22 17:12 -------
<br>Subject: Re: Bug in objdump when disassembling raw
<br> armv4t binaries
<br><br>On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 04:43:12AM -0000, drow at sources dot redhat dot com wrote:
<br>>
<br>> ------- Additional Comments From drow at sources dot redhat dot com 2009-11-22 04:43 -------
<br>> Thanks. I don't see why we need to print a positive zero offset (it's not
<br>> ambiguous with anything),
<br><br>I think Nick is right. I don't think we have to. My ARM book seems to agree.
<br><br>although [r0, #0]! is a sufficiently odd addressing
<br>> mode that it does seem sensible.
<br><br>Not sure about ! situation yet.
<br><br>cs
<br><br><br>--
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10924" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10924</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26467194&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26462810[Bug binutils/10924] Bug in objdump when disassembling raw armv4t binaries2009-11-21T20:43:12Z2009-11-21T20:43:12ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org<br>------- Additional Comments From drow at sources dot redhat dot com 2009-11-22 04:43 -------
<br>Thanks. I don't see why we need to print a positive zero offset (it's not
<br>ambiguous with anything), although [r0, #0]! is a sufficiently odd addressing
<br>mode that it does seem sensible.
<br><br>--
<br> What |Removed |Added
<br>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<br> CC| |drow at sources dot redhat
<br> | |dot com
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10924" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10924</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26462810&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>tag:old.nabble.com,2006:post-26451000[Bug binutils/10964] objdump disassembles "lpm rX, Z" wrongly2009-11-20T14:02:44Z2009-11-20T14:02:44ZBugzilla from sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org<br>------- Additional Comments From elrond+sourceware dot org at samba-tng dot org 2009-11-20 22:02 -------
<br>Hi Nick,
<br><br>I just redownloaded and reinstalled the binutils-avr 2.20-2 package for
<br>Debian/testing on i386.
<br><br> avr% avr-objdump -d bug-lpm.o
<br> 00000000 <try_asm>:
<br> 0: 25 91 lpm r18, Z+
<br> 2: 24 91 lpm r18, Z+
<br> 4: 08 95 ret
<br> avr% avr-objdump --version
<br> GNU objdump (GNU Binutils) 2.20
<br><br>So you suggest, that this is a bug in the debian packaging?
<br><br>--
<br><br><br><a href="http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10964" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10964</a><br><br>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
<br>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>bug-binutils mailing list
<br><a href="http://old.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=post&post=26451000&i=0" target="_top" rel="nofollow">bug-binutils@...</a>
<br><a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils" target="_top" rel="nofollow">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils</a><br><p>From forum: <a href="http://old.nabble.com/Gnu---Binutils---Bugs-f1500.html" embed="fixTarget[1500]" target="_top" >Gnu - Binutils - Bugs</a></p>