Good C++ libraries ?
|
View:
New views
15 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
Good C++ libraries ?
by Xavier Miller
::
Rate this Message:
Hello,
I tried OSCpack, which is the recommended C++ library by opensoundcontrol.org But, the code of the version 1.0.2 doesn't compile and I needed to add necessary #include in the source. And I also needed to write a makefile, split the source and the headers in order to have something more "professional". Are there other OSC C/C++ libraries in the OSC world, that run "out of the box"? Kind regards, Xavier Miller. _______________________________________________ OSC_dev mailing list OSC_dev@... http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/osc_dev |
|
|
Re: Good C++ libraries ?
by Gaspard Bucher
::
Rate this Message:
I have no issue with OSCpack. It's a mature library.
Maybe you should just send a mail to the author so you can fix the issue you are facing ? Gaspard On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Xavier Miller <xavier.miller@...> wrote: > Hello, > > I tried OSCpack, which is the recommended C++ library by > opensoundcontrol.org > > But, the code of the version 1.0.2 doesn't compile and I needed to add > necessary #include in the source. > And I also needed to write a makefile, split the source and the headers > in order to have something more "professional". > > Are there other OSC C/C++ libraries in the OSC world, that run "out of > the box"? > > Kind regards, > Xavier Miller. > _______________________________________________ > OSC_dev mailing list > OSC_dev@... > http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/osc_dev > OSC_dev mailing list OSC_dev@... http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/osc_dev |
|
|
Re: Good C++ libraries ?
by Xavier Miller
::
Rate this Message:
Hello,
Which version do you use ? Xavier. Gaspard Bucher a écrit : > I have no issue with OSCpack. It's a mature library. > > Maybe you should just send a mail to the author so you can fix the > issue you are facing ? > > Gaspard > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Xavier Miller <xavier.miller@...> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I tried OSCpack, which is the recommended C++ library by >> opensoundcontrol.org >> >> But, the code of the version 1.0.2 doesn't compile and I needed to add >> necessary #include in the source. >> And I also needed to write a makefile, split the source and the headers >> in order to have something more "professional". >> >> Are there other OSC C/C++ libraries in the OSC world, that run "out of >> the box"? >> >> Kind regards, >> Xavier Miller. >> _______________________________________________ >> OSC_dev mailing list >> OSC_dev@... >> http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/osc_dev >> > _______________________________________________ > OSC_dev mailing list > OSC_dev@... > http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/osc_dev OSC_dev mailing list OSC_dev@... http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/osc_dev |
|
|
Re: Good C++ libraries ?
by Xavier Miller
::
Rate this Message:
I checked the SVN version, which is OK. I will take it.
Xavier. Xavier Miller a écrit : > Hello, > > Which version do you use ? > > Xavier. > > Gaspard Bucher a écrit : >> I have no issue with OSCpack. It's a mature library. >> >> Maybe you should just send a mail to the author so you can fix the >> issue you are facing ? >> >> Gaspard >> >> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Xavier Miller <xavier.miller@...> wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I tried OSCpack, which is the recommended C++ library by >>> opensoundcontrol.org >>> >>> But, the code of the version 1.0.2 doesn't compile and I needed to add >>> necessary #include in the source. >>> And I also needed to write a makefile, split the source and the headers >>> in order to have something more "professional". >>> >>> Are there other OSC C/C++ libraries in the OSC world, that run "out of >>> the box"? >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Xavier Miller. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OSC_dev mailing list >>> OSC_dev@... >>> http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/osc_dev >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> OSC_dev mailing list >> OSC_dev@... >> http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/osc_dev > _______________________________________________ > OSC_dev mailing list > OSC_dev@... > http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/osc_dev OSC_dev mailing list OSC_dev@... http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/osc_dev |
|
|
Re: Good C++ libraries ?
by Gaspard Bucher
::
Rate this Message:
I am using 1.0.2.
The only thing that annoys me with OSCpack is that it extensively uses the Implementation pattern which I find a stupid choice for a fast library that is not meant to change that much. Gaspard On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Xavier Miller <xavier.miller@...> wrote: > I checked the SVN version, which is OK. I will take it. > > Xavier. > > Xavier Miller a écrit : >> Hello, >> >> Which version do you use ? >> >> Xavier. >> >> Gaspard Bucher a écrit : >>> I have no issue with OSCpack. It's a mature library. >>> >>> Maybe you should just send a mail to the author so you can fix the >>> issue you are facing ? >>> >>> Gaspard >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Xavier Miller <xavier.miller@...> wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I tried OSCpack, which is the recommended C++ library by >>>> opensoundcontrol.org >>>> >>>> But, the code of the version 1.0.2 doesn't compile and I needed to add >>>> necessary #include in the source. >>>> And I also needed to write a makefile, split the source and the headers >>>> in order to have something more "professional". >>>> >>>> Are there other OSC C/C++ libraries in the OSC world, that run "out of >>>> the box"? >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> Xavier Miller. >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> OSC_dev mailing list >>>> OSC_dev@... >>>> http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/osc_dev >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OSC_dev mailing list >>> OSC_dev@... >>> http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/osc_dev >> _______________________________________________ >> OSC_dev mailing list >> OSC_dev@... >> http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/osc_dev > _______________________________________________ > OSC_dev mailing list > OSC_dev@... > http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/osc_dev > OSC_dev mailing list OSC_dev@... http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/osc_dev |
|
|
Re: Good C++ libraries ?
by Jamie Bullock
::
Rate this Message:
Hi Xavier, On 2 Mar 2009, at 08:07, Xavier Miller wrote: > Hello, > > I tried OSCpack, which is the recommended C++ library by > opensoundcontrol.org > > But, the code of the version 1.0.2 doesn't compile and I needed to add > necessary #include in the source. > And I also needed to write a makefile, split the source and the > headers > in order to have something more "professional". > > Are there other OSC C/C++ libraries in the OSC world, that run "out of > the box"? > > Kind regards, > Xavier Miller. Are you specifically looking for something with C++ style semantics? Otherwise liblo should do. I think it's perfectly possible to use liblo from a C++ app. http://liblo.sourceforge.net/ Jamie -- http://www.jamiebullock.com _______________________________________________ OSC_dev mailing list OSC_dev@... http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/osc_dev |
|
|
Re: Good C++ libraries ?
by Xavier Miller
::
Rate this Message:
Hi Jamie,
C is also fine, I'll take a look :) Xavier. Jamie Bullock a écrit : > > Are you specifically looking for something with C++ style semantics? > Otherwise liblo should do. I think it's perfectly possible to use > liblo from a C++ app. > > http://liblo.sourceforge.net/ > > Jamie _______________________________________________ OSC_dev mailing list OSC_dev@... http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/osc_dev |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Good C++ libraries ?
by Xavier Miller
::
Rate this Message:
GPL. I cannot use it.
Xavier Miller a écrit : > Hi Jamie, > > C is also fine, I'll take a look :) > > Xavier. > > Jamie Bullock a écrit : >> Are you specifically looking for something with C++ style semantics? >> Otherwise liblo should do. I think it's perfectly possible to use >> liblo from a C++ app. >> >> http://liblo.sourceforge.net/ >> >> Jamie > > _______________________________________________ > OSC_dev mailing list > OSC_dev@... > http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/osc_dev OSC_dev mailing list OSC_dev@... http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/osc_dev |
|
|
Re: Good C++ libraries ?
by Xavier Miller
::
Rate this Message:
Hello,
I will keep OSCpack, which is really easy to implement and use, and its licence permit its use in commercial applications. Kind regards, Xavier. Jeff Glatt a écrit : > If C is fine, and if you need it to compile cleanly on both > Windows and Linux, try EasyOSC: > > http://home.roadrunner.com/~jgglatt/tech/easyosc.zip > _______________________________________________ > OSC_dev mailing list > OSC_dev@... > http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/osc_dev _______________________________________________ OSC_dev mailing list OSC_dev@... http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/osc_dev |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Good C++ libraries ?
by Damian Stewart
::
Rate this Message:
Xavier Miller wrote:
> Are there other OSC C/C++ libraries in the OSC world, that run "out of > the box"? i don't know what your context is, but for graphics-based (GLUT) work try openFrameworks + the ofxOsc addon. it's built on top of oscpack but provides all sorts of things nicely for you. openFrameworks is an OSX/Windows/Linux/(iPhone) toolset for making artistic applications using C++; basically openFrameworks is to C++ as Processing (Proce55ing) is to Java. -- damian stewart | skype: damiansnz | damian@... frey | live art with machines | http://www.frey.co.nz _______________________________________________ OSC_dev mailing list OSC_dev@... http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/osc_dev |
|
|
Re: Good C++ libraries ?
by Steve Harris-12
::
Rate this Message:
On 3 Mar 2009, at 16:49, Jeff Glatt wrote:
> EasyOSC is what we call in the Windows world a "dynamic link > library" ("shared lib" in Linux parlance). Unlike some other > implementations, it's not statically linked, and therefore does not > become part of your application. Erm, static libraries are rather rare nowadays. > You can link to GPL'ed dynamic/shared libraries from commercial > software without needing to release your commercial source, for > example how you typically link to Linux's GNU-based C lib. What > you can't do is modify the library source itself, and re-release it > binary-only. I think you should check this. 1) It is my understanding that you can only link to GPL'd libraries from non-GPL compatible software if you don't distribute the software, which somewhat defeats the point. 2) Linux's C library is not under the GPL, but the Lesser GPL[1], which is very different. - Steve [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_C_Library _______________________________________________ OSC_dev mailing list OSC_dev@... http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/osc_dev |
|
|
Re: Good C++ libraries ?
by Damian Stewart
::
Rate this Message:
Jeff Glatt wrote:
> You can link to GPL'ed dynamic/shared libraries from commercial > software without needing to release your commercial source, for > example how you typically link to Linux's GNU-based C lib. What > you can't do is modify the library source itself, and re-release it > binary-only. no - you can do this if the dynamic/shared library is LGPL (Lesser GPL or 'Library' GPL), but if the dynamic/shared library is pure GPL, your application that links to it needs to be pure GPL as well. -- damian stewart | skype: damiansnz | damian@... frey | live art with machines | http://www.frey.co.nz _______________________________________________ OSC_dev mailing list OSC_dev@... http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/osc_dev |
|
|
Re: Good C++ libraries ?
by Xavier Miller
::
Rate this Message:
In fact, the EasyOsc licence is too vague, it is not explicitely GPL,
nor LGPL but "GPL-like" and I cannot use it without legal problem. And technically, I prefer OSCpack which is easier to use, without defining a lot of callback functions. Xavier. Damian Stewart a écrit : > Jeff Glatt wrote: >> You can link to GPL'ed dynamic/shared libraries from commercial >> software without needing to release your commercial source, for >> example how you typically link to Linux's GNU-based C lib. What >> you can't do is modify the library source itself, and re-release it >> binary-only. > > no - you can do this if the dynamic/shared library is LGPL (Lesser GPL or > 'Library' GPL), but if the dynamic/shared library is pure GPL, your > application that links to it needs to be pure GPL as well. > OSC_dev mailing list OSC_dev@... http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/osc_dev |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
