|
View:
New views
13 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
GoodbyeHi all,
I will keep my message here brief, but I am stepping down from all of my roles within the project effectively immediately. I have thought long and hard about this decision. You can read all about it on my blog at http://davehall.com.au/blog/dave/2009/10/02/goodbye-phpgroupware If people still want to continue the project I will assist with the transition. I am also available to assist with any shutdown. Thanks everyone who I have worked with trying to make phpGW as awesome as we could. Cheers Dave _______________________________________________ phpGroupWare-developers mailing list phpGroupWare-developers@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-developers |
|
|
Re: GoodbyeDave Hall wrote:
> Hi all, > > I will keep my message here brief, but I am stepping down from all of my > roles within the project effectively immediately. I have thought long > and hard about this decision. You can read all about it on my blog at > http://davehall.com.au/blog/dave/2009/10/02/goodbye-phpgroupware > > If people still want to continue the project I will assist with the > transition. I am also available to assist with any shutdown. > > Thanks everyone who I have worked with trying to make phpGW as awesome > as we could. > > Cheers > > Dave > Hi all, Dave has meant a lot to the project - and I wish him well as he steps aside. I think this is a opportunity to get out the 0.9.18 - or - why not make it 1.0 We have been busy developing the system and update the libraries in the API. Though I have to admit the work has been focused on a sub-set of applications - and some new ones. Some highlights: * It runs on php 5.3 * The UI on latest apps (and 'property') are using YUI 2.8.0 * SOAP and XMLRPC updated to latest (SOAP using native php server/client) * LDAP working * PDO - db abstraction * support for localized translations (per domain) * php functions can be invoked from templates. * sensitive information in header.inc.php is (optionally) scrambled by mcrypt * Excel/odf - export * Excel read * Interlink - linking items across the system * SMS-gateway supporting webservice (SOAP and GET) and cellular(gnokii) * Support for Help on each function (write as .odt - displayed as HTML) * integration with handhelds * and more... We have currently 6 professional developers (project based) working on two new modules - which integrates with the 'property'-module and general accounting systems. 1) Booking - (public frontend/restricted backend) to handle resources available for hire - as training facilities, concert halls, class rooms ... 2) Rental - specialized module for space rental The municipal of Bergen is currently in a pilot phase for a new organization (comprising 1 mill m2 of schools and institutions). The ramp up project is stipulated to last for at least two more years. Maybe we should have a new supersmart template engine... I propose myself as the API-koordinator. I also think we have to let parties that are willing to fund the project to play a role at some level. Regards Sigurd _______________________________________________ phpGroupWare-developers mailing list phpGroupWare-developers@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-developers |
|
|
Re: GoodbyeDave Hall wrote:
> Hi all, > > I will keep my message here brief, but I am stepping down from all of my > roles within the project effectively immediately. I have thought long > and hard about this decision. You can read all about it on my blog at > http://davehall.com.au/blog/dave/2009/10/02/goodbye-phpgroupware > > If people still want to continue the project I will assist with the > transition. I am also available to assist with any shutdown. > > Thanks everyone who I have worked with trying to make phpGW as awesome > as we could. > > Cheers > > Dave > > Sorry to see you go away from phpGroupWare from a phpGroupWare point of view. You have a very deep knowledge of phpGW internals and we'll probably find we miss this in due term. We are still maintaining ged electronic documents management module and the now stable generic flow management system. If there are enough people interrested in phpGW going on (and willing to contribute even very slightly... we also need people that are not killers in php coding) we could try to see what can be done to make it grow again instead of shutting it down. What do people think here ? (dont limit yourselves ;) ) Maât _______________________________________________ phpGroupWare-developers mailing list phpGroupWare-developers@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-developers |
|
|
Re: GoodbyeAny objections to that I take over as the maintainer of phpGroupWare? Regards Sigurd. Sent from the phpGroupWare forums @ forums.phpGroupWare.org _______________________________________________ phpGroupWare-developers mailing list phpGroupWare-developers@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-developers |
|
|
Re: [phpGroupWare-users] Re: GoodbyeHi All,
Hi Dave, Mieux vaut tard que jamais ... Maât a écrit : > Dave Hall wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I will keep my message here brief, but I am stepping down from all of my >> roles within the project effectively immediately. I have thought long >> and hard about this decision. You can read all about it on my blog at >> http://davehall.com.au/blog/dave/2009/10/02/goodbye-phpgroupware >> >> If people still want to continue the project I will assist with the >> transition. I am also available to assist with any shutdown. >> >> Thanks everyone who I have worked with trying to make phpGW as awesome >> as we could. I enjoyed working with you, and hope to see you again. Perhaps working together one day, who knows :). I know that this decision was not easy to take, but sometime people need to go ahead not only "to eat", nor feeling "good" with design choices or code base ... And yes their still a lot's of problem with the actual code base, and that's not with part time workers that this will improve ... Rewriting the full code, yeah, We think together about this ... but lack of time ... This project has an heavy history, with a lot's of forks, lot's of individuals fighting to get THE position, and when they disagreed they fork the project (even fork the fork ...). So that's Open Source too. Human story. Once again. When Sigurd ask for the "Main" Position, I recall to all of you that there's still a CT (even with Dave's resignation (?)), and that If people want to take over the project, they should be elected by the community. So if the community let us organize some kind of election, and not a "is there any objections" election, then this project could have a future ... So If contributors / users want to be "promoted" for the former Dave's Role, please let us know. Caeies, Applications Coordinator, CT Member. _______________________________________________ phpGroupWare-developers mailing list phpGroupWare-developers@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-developers |
|
|
Re: [phpGroupWare-users] Re: GoodbyeCaeies wrote:
> So If contributors / users want to be "promoted" for the former Dave's > Role, please let us know. > I'm in the race: I want to be promoted for the former Dave's Role. Regards Sigurd _______________________________________________ phpGroupWare-developers mailing list phpGroupWare-developers@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-developers |
|
|
Re: [phpGroupWare coordinators] GoodbyeHi,
Dave Hall schrieb: > I will keep my message here brief, but I am stepping down from all of my > roles within the project effectively immediately. > Obviously, we all have to respect your decision. Nevertheless, it's a pity. Thanks a lot for all your work for phpGW. > If people still want to continue the project I will assist with the > transition. I am also available to assist with any shutdown. > Well, it would be sad if we had to shut down phpGW. The code base might be a bit outdated (php4), but the concept of phpGW of being more that just calendar, mail and addressbook is stil valid and rather unique. Most "modern" groupware systems just focus on these "essentials" - it's easier to maintain. Unfortunately, I have no programming power at hand to contribute - I myself am not a programmer any more... Hope we find a way to continue Regards Christian aka bofh42 -- Dr. Christian Böttger (Dipl.Phys.) DF5OP Open Source Broker ph.: +49.5173.9249744 | fax: +49.5173.925769 | Skype: c.boettger Bentestraße 10 / 31311 Uetze / Germany E-Mail: work Christian@... E-Mail: Home c@... WWW: http://www.boettger-consulting.de/ http://www.boettger.cc/ Xing: http://www.xing.com/profile/Christian_Boettger2 LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/christianboettger https://www.linkedin.com/ppl/webprofile?action=vmi&id=1447968&trk=ppro_viewmore [christian_boettger.vcf] begin:vcard fn;quoted-printable:Dr. Christian B=C3=B6ttger n;quoted-printable:B=C3=B6ttger;Christian org;quoted-printable:Dr. B=C3=B6ttger IT_Beratung + Projektmanagement adr;quoted-printable:;;Bentestra=C3=9Fe 10;Uetze;;31311;Germany email;internet:Christian.Boettger@... tel;work:+49.5173.9249744 tel;fax:+49.5173.925769 tel;cell:+49.172.5647906 x-mozilla-html:TRUE url:http://www.boettger-consulting.de/ version:2.1 end:vcard _______________________________________________ phpGroupWare-developers mailing list phpGroupWare-developers@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-developers |
|
|
Re: [phpGroupWare coordinators] GoodbyeMy preference at this point would be to shut down the project. It seems like the codebase is just too outdated. Maybe at somepoint it would be worth picking up and starting from scratch with all thats been learned both in phpGW and across all the various projects in the open source community these last 9+ years. Anyways, if a clear vision can be had and a developer to continue it is around, then please contact me... otherwise a leaderless project is a dead one. Dan Dr. Christian Böttger wrote: Hi, Dave Hall schrieb: -- Dan Kuykendall (aka Seek3r) http://www.mightyseek.com In God we trust, all others we virus scan. Programmer - an organism that turns coffee into software. _______________________________________________ phpGroupWare-developers mailing list phpGroupWare-developers@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-developers |
|
|
RE: [phpGroupWare coordinators] Goodbye> From: Dan Kuykendall [dan@...]
Hi all,
> Sent: 2009-10-06 08:22:41 CEST > To: coordinators@... > Cc: phpGroupWare Developers [phpgroupware-developers@...], phpGroupWare Users [phpgroupware-users@...] > Subject: Re: [phpGroupWare coordinators] Goodbye > > Hi all, > > My preference at this point would be to shut down the project. It seems > like the codebase is just too outdated. Maybe at somepoint it would be > worth picking up and starting from scratch with all thats been learned > both in phpGW and across all the various projects in the open source > community these last 9+ years. > > Anyways, if a clear vision can be had and a developer to continue it is > around, then please contact me... otherwise a leaderless project is a > dead one. > > Dan I have plans for it and want to keep it alive. I think the best approach will be to focus on the system as a general application development framework - starting with the API and some core modules (admin, setup, preferences). I also think the majority of the existing applications without a minimum level of maintenance has to be put in a historical archive for future reference and a possible source of inspiration only. Important features are: * user-handling * integration capabilities (xmlrpc/soap/ldap...) * building blocks for ui as super-objects prepared to utilize common elements (as tables, lists, calendars) * mechanism for internal integration across modules I will fix the API (and core) to a usable state (running php 5.3) - and update to the latest 3-party libraries. I think that once the system is in a shape that makes is possible to install and operate - it will attract developers and users. Regards Sigurd _______________________________________________ phpGroupWare-developers mailing list phpGroupWare-developers@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-developers |
|
|
Re: Re: [phpGroupWare coordinators] GoodbyeDr. Christian Böttger wrote:
> Hi, > > Dave Hall schrieb: > >> I will keep my message here brief, but I am stepping down from all of my >> roles within the project effectively immediately. >> >> > > Obviously, we all have to respect your decision. Nevertheless, it's a pity. > > Thanks a lot for all your work for phpGW. > >> If people still want to continue the project I will assist with the >> transition. I am also available to assist with any shutdown. >> >> > > Well, it would be sad if we had to shut down phpGW. The code base might > be a bit outdated (php4), but the concept of phpGW of being more that > just calendar, mail and addressbook is stil valid and rather unique. > Agreed for phpGW being unique The code base still needs cleaning but that's not a complicated thing to do. Provided a good "cleaning guide" even beginners could get in and play with us all > Most "modern" groupware systems just focus on these "essentials" - it's > easier to maintain. > these are mainly mail+agenda-wares there are other needs (budget management, projet management, team management) that could be focused by groupware suites > Unfortunately, I have no programming power at hand to contribute - I > myself am not a programmer any more... > > I maintain what i said long ago : we lacked documentation (nice user guide, nice developper guide, nice code documentation) that prevented people to get in et slowed people adoption of phpGW We can chose to work on these things and part off them do not need killer coding skills :) we need people ready to write user documentation, people willing to install, test, detect regressions, reproduce and classify bugs before passing them to coders I think we also could do with a guy skilled with css and web "look and feel"... that would not need php > Hope we find a way to continue > > Regards > > Christian aka bofh42 There are unaddressed user needs... we could address them and try to focus on software intelligence (workflows for example) as well as ergonomy (ajaxizing phpGW for example) The main question is : are there enough of us left willing to continue or not. If the answer is "yes" we can then focus on team organization, election of a leader and so on. If the answer is "no"... hope it will be "yes" :) _______________________________________________ phpGroupWare-developers mailing list phpGroupWare-developers@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-developers |
|
|
Re: [phpGroupWare coordinators] Re: GoodbyeMaât wrote:
----8<---- > The main question is : are there enough of us left willing to continue > or not. > > If the answer is "yes" we can then focus on team organization, election > of a leader and so on. > > If the answer is "no"... > > hope it will be "yes" :) > _______________________________________________ phpGroupWare-developers mailing list phpGroupWare-developers@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-developers |
|
|
Re: [phpGroupWare coordinators] GoodbyeSigurd Nes wrote:
>> From: Dan Kuykendall [dan@...] >> Sent: 2009-10-06 08:22:41 CEST >> To: coordinators@... >> Cc: phpGroupWare Developers [phpgroupware-developers@...], phpGroupWare Users [phpgroupware-users@...] >> Subject: Re: [phpGroupWare coordinators] Goodbye >> >> Hi all, >> >> My preference at this point would be to shut down the project. It seems >> like the codebase is just too outdated. Maybe at somepoint it would be >> worth picking up and starting from scratch with all thats been learned >> both in phpGW and across all the various projects in the open source >> community these last 9+ years. >> >> Anyways, if a clear vision can be had and a developer to continue it is >> around, then please contact me... otherwise a leaderless project is a >> dead one. >> >> Dan >> > > Hi all, > > I have plans for it and want to keep it alive. > > I think the best approach will be to focus on the system as a general application development framework - starting with the API and some core modules (admin, setup, preferences). > first of them but also Symfony, drupal, eZ... If we plan to gon on their scope we are dead... > I also think the majority of the existing applications without a minimum level of maintenance has to be put in a historical archive for future reference and a possible source of inspiration only. > That makes sense but the svn system as i re-organized it just need to change the list of externals to let these module aside > Important features are: > * user-handling > Yes and there we'll need to put hard work And part of this work will involve thinking about template system : coders are often very poor interface designers And good interface designers have often very poor php and xml skills. Dreamweaver (sorry guys for the ugly word) and css and htmls are their worlds. Relying on current xsltemplate even if it's sexy on the paper will ensure that zero descent web designer will be able to get in and help us make nice looking user interfaces. As far as web design is concerned the previous phplib based template system was loads better. > * integration capabilities (xmlrpc/soap/ldap...) > Agreed > * building blocks for ui as super-objects prepared to utilize common elements (as tables, lists, calendars) > Not agreed > * mechanism for internal integration across modules > Agreed a million times > I will fix the API (and core) to a usable state (running php 5.3) - and update to the latest 3-party libraries. > Ok on the goal but if we go on we'll have to discuss the method : i don't wand to see a giant commit changing things everywhere whitout more thant "Merge from my working company tree" Suvbersion is all about keeping track of changes and helping bug hunting by the means of changelog and commit date analysis A million times okay for code fixing... but a million times not okay for giant commits impossible to check You probably did not even consider such commit... in this case please accept my apologies for this part of my mail :) > I think that once the system is in a shape that makes is possible to install and operate - it will attract developers and users. > > Regards > > Sigurd > indeed having something that installs and works would be a nice idea :) but if you want to attract devs ans users that will not be enough we'll need documentation (people willing to write it) and user + dev support (people willing to help people getting in... explaining things again and again) And till we have enough manpower to make separate teams for support and developpement and doc writing and betatesting the remaining people will have to be everywhere _______________________________________________ phpGroupWare-developers mailing list phpGroupWare-developers@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-developers |
|
|
Planning ahead - was: GoodbyeMaât wrote:
> Sigurd Nes wrote: >>> From: Dan Kuykendall [dan@...] >>> Sent: 2009-10-06 08:22:41 CEST >>> To: coordinators@... >>> Cc: phpGroupWare Developers [phpgroupware-developers@...], phpGroupWare Users [phpgroupware-users@...] >>> Subject: Re: [phpGroupWare coordinators] Goodbye >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> My preference at this point would be to shut down the project. It seems >>> like the codebase is just too outdated. Maybe at somepoint it would be >>> worth picking up and starting from scratch with all thats been learned >>> both in phpGW and across all the various projects in the open source >>> community these last 9+ years. >>> >>> Anyways, if a clear vision can be had and a developer to continue it is >>> around, then please contact me... otherwise a leaderless project is a >>> dead one. >>> >>> Dan >>> >> Hi all, >> >> I have plans for it and want to keep it alive. >> >> I think the best approach will be to focus on the system as a general application development framework - starting with the API and some core modules (admin, setup, preferences). >> > Every single framework does that... and many better than we do : Zend > first of them but also Symfony, drupal, eZ... > > If we plan to gon on their scope we are dead... > >> I also think the majority of the existing applications without a minimum level of maintenance has to be put in a historical archive for future reference and a possible source of inspiration only. >> > That makes sense but the svn system as i re-organized it just need to > change the list of externals to let these module aside > >> Important features are: >> * user-handling >> > Yes and there we'll need to put hard work > > And part of this work will involve thinking about template system : > coders are often very poor interface designers > > And good interface designers have often very poor php and xml skills. > Dreamweaver (sorry guys for the ugly word) and css and htmls are their > worlds. > > Relying on current xsltemplate even if it's sexy on the paper will > ensure that zero descent web designer will be able to get in and help > us make nice looking user interfaces. > > As far as web design is concerned the previous phplib based template > system was loads better. > A lot of work has been put into making use of yui. There is a (bit old) demo at http://beta.resight.no/login.php >> * integration capabilities (xmlrpc/soap/ldap...) >> > Agreed > >> * building blocks for ui as super-objects prepared to utilize common elements (as tables, lists, calendars) >> > Not agreed > >> * mechanism for internal integration across modules >> > Agreed a million times > >> I will fix the API (and core) to a usable state (running php 5.3) - and update to the latest 3-party libraries. >> > Ok on the goal but if we go on we'll have to discuss the method : i > don't wand to see a giant commit changing things everywhere whitout more > thant "Merge from my working company tree" > > Suvbersion is all about keeping track of changes and helping bug hunting > by the means of changelog and commit date analysis > > A million times okay for code fixing... but a million times not okay for > giant commits impossible to check > > You probably did not even consider such commit... in this case please > accept my apologies for this part of my mail :) > The work has been done over a long period of time - so it is not very easy differentiate the fixes - but some splits should be doable. One commit per app - some more for the API - Think of it as a fix of the latest mega-commit. >> I think that once the system is in a shape that makes is possible to install and operate - it will attract developers and users. >> > indeed having something that installs and works would be a nice idea :) > > but if you want to attract devs ans users that will not be enough > > we'll need documentation (people willing to write it) and user + dev > support (people willing to help people getting in... explaining things > again and again) > > And till we have enough manpower to make separate teams for support and > developpement and doc writing and betatesting the remaining people will > have to be everywhere > Well - we have to start somewhere :) Regards Sigurd _______________________________________________ phpGroupWare-developers mailing list phpGroupWare-developers@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-developers |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |