Grape Lane (euph.)

View: New views
11 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

Grape Lane (euph.)

by David Gerard-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

I can hardly believe there was no angst here, of all places, on
yesterday's featured article. Did someone fail to think of the
fictional children?

Good discussion on Raul's talk page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Raul654#Today.27s_featured_article


- d.

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Re: Grape Lane (euph.)

by geni :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

2009/7/10 David Gerard <dgerard@...>:

> I can hardly believe there was no angst here, of all places, on
> yesterday's featured article. Did someone fail to think of the
> fictional children?
>
> Good discussion on Raul's talk page:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Raul654#Today.27s_featured_article
>
>
> - d.

It got 207K pageviews over the day. Previous days featured article
only got 31.9K. Apparently our readership in general likes 13th
century British history.



--
geni

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Re: Grape Lane (euph.)

by Anthony Simone :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

geni wrote:

> 2009/7/10 David Gerard <dgerard@...>:
>  
>> I can hardly believe there was no angst here, of all places, on
>> yesterday's featured article. Did someone fail to think of the
>> fictional children?
>>
>> Good discussion on Raul's talk page:
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Raul654#Today.27s_featured_article
>>
>>
>> - d.
>>    
>
> It got 207K pageviews over the day. Previous days featured article
> only got 31.9K. Apparently our readership in general likes 13th
> century British history.
>
>
>
>  

A lot of the discussion was at Talk:Main Page, with some more at the
article talk page. Note, though, that almost all the people who
seriously objected to it were IPs and users with very few edits. So, it
seems to have gone over pretty well with our users, most of whom
probably didn't care enough to comment one way or the other.


Firestorm

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Re: Grape Lane (euph.)

by Tim Starling-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Anthony Simone wrote:
> A lot of the discussion was at Talk:Main Page, with some more at the
> article talk page. Note, though, that almost all the people who
> seriously objected to it were IPs and users with very few edits. So, it
> seems to have gone over pretty well with our users, most of whom
> probably didn't care enough to comment one way or the other.

I suspect frequent editors of Wikipedia have long since become
desensitized to obscene language, thanks to the constant stream of it
that gets inserted into articles as vandalism, and written all over
their user talk pages as revenge for reverting that vanadalism. I for
one enjoy reading about history and etymology, and have read articles
on obscene words and euphemism sequences with interest.

The featured article choices that really rile me are the pop culture
trivia, like individual episodes from TV series.

But whatever offends you about a feature article choice, regular
Wikipedians probably know that there's not much point trying to
convince Raul654 of anything.

-- Tim Starling


_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Re: Grape Lane (euph.)

by David Gerard-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

2009/7/10 geni <geniice@...>:

> It got 207K pageviews over the day. Previous days featured article
> only got 31.9K. Apparently our readership in general likes 13th
> century British history.


Damn you that was a coffee moment.


- d.

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Re: Grape Lane (euph.)

by Charles Matthews :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Tim Starling wrote:
> But whatever offends you about a feature article choice, regular
> Wikipedians probably know that there's not much point trying to
> convince Raul654 of anything.
>  
I did like the bit in the Signpost where he complained that Andrew Lih's
book only mentioned FA twice.

Charles


_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Re: Grape Lane (euph.)

by Carcharoth :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Charles
Matthews<charles.r.matthews@...> wrote:
> Tim Starling wrote:
>> But whatever offends you about a feature article choice, regular
>> Wikipedians probably know that there's not much point trying to
>> convince Raul654 of anything.
>>
> I did like the bit in the Signpost where he complained that Andrew Lih's
> book only mentioned FA twice.

Do you have a date or link for that?

Carcharoth

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Re: Grape Lane (euph.)

by Carcharoth :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 1:31 AM, David Gerard<dgerard@...> wrote:
> I can hardly believe there was no angst here, of all places, on
> yesterday's featured article. Did someone fail to think of the
> fictional children?
>
> Good discussion on Raul's talk page:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Raul654#Today.27s_featured_article

There was a nice FAQ at the top of the article talk page as well.
Well, when I say nice, it did take a bit of an exasperated tone, and
was at times a bit casual in the language used, but it was a nice
thought to have a FAQ to head off objections and answer questions.

Carcharoth

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Re: Grape Lane (euph.)

by Jussi-Ville Heiskanen :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Tim Starling wrote:
>
> I suspect frequent editors of Wikipedia have long since become
> desensitized to obscene language, thanks to the constant stream of it
> that gets inserted into articles as vandalism, and written all over
> their user talk pages as revenge for reverting that vanadalism. I for
> one enjoy reading about history and etymology, and have read articles
> on obscene words and euphemism sequences with interest.
>  
A good recommendation on those lines, is our article on the
man who coined the phrase "Make love, not war."

That phrase is not all he is known for. [[Gershon Legman]]s
brick sized work on dirty jokes is one of the most cherished
treasures I found as a pre-teen, while playing hookie from
school, and spending leisurely days combing through the
bookshelves of the Helsinki University Library.

> The featured article choices that really rile me are the pop culture
> trivia, like individual episodes from TV series.
>
> But whatever offends you about a feature article choice, regular
> Wikipedians probably know that there's not much point trying to
> convince Raul654 of anything.
>  

+1


Yours,

Jussi-Ville Heiskanen


_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Re: Grape Lane (euph.)

by Charles Matthews :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Carcharoth wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Charles
> Matthews<charles.r.matthews@...> wrote:
>  
>> Tim Starling wrote:
>>    
>>> But whatever offends you about a feature article choice, regular
>>> Wikipedians probably know that there's not much point trying to
>>> convince Raul654 of anything.
>>>
>>>      
>> I did like the bit in the Signpost where he complained that Andrew Lih's
>> book only mentioned FA twice.
>>    
>
> Do you have a date or link for that?
>  
[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-20/Wikipedia Revolution]], just
after he says Lih overstates the importance of Meatball Wiki.

Charles





_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Re: Grape Lane (euph.)

by Durova :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

If anyone is inspired to try a sequel there was a Mount Whoredom in colonial
Boston.  Center left, second hill from the shoreline.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Boston,_1775bsmall1.png

-Durova

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 5:19 AM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <cimonavaro@...
> wrote:

> Tim Starling wrote:
> >
> > I suspect frequent editors of Wikipedia have long since become
> > desensitized to obscene language, thanks to the constant stream of it
> > that gets inserted into articles as vandalism, and written all over
> > their user talk pages as revenge for reverting that vanadalism. I for
> > one enjoy reading about history and etymology, and have read articles
> > on obscene words and euphemism sequences with interest.
> >
> A good recommendation on those lines, is our article on the
> man who coined the phrase "Make love, not war."
>
> That phrase is not all he is known for. [[Gershon Legman]]s
> brick sized work on dirty jokes is one of the most cherished
> treasures I found as a pre-teen, while playing hookie from
> school, and spending leisurely days combing through the
> bookshelves of the Helsinki University Library.
>
> > The featured article choices that really rile me are the pop culture
> > trivia, like individual episodes from TV series.
> >
> > But whatever offends you about a feature article choice, regular
> > Wikipedians probably know that there's not much point trying to
> > convince Raul654 of anything.
> >
>
> +1
>
>
> Yours,
>
> Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l@...
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>



--
http://durova.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l