|
View:
New views
9 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: HSQL defunct?Frederik Eaton wrote:
> Is there going to be a new maintainer for HSQL? I have submitted a > number of patches to fix some painful bugs. It's been almost a year > since my previous enquiry and the last release was December 15, 2005, > over two years ago: I think that if it's sat moribund for this long, you could reasonably declare yourself the maintainer by fiat. Some OSS communities have a formal process for declaring packages as orphaned, but I don't think we're big enough for that. If you don't mind the idea of taking the HSQL package over, perhaps you should follow the same steps Don did with the X11 package: * declare your intention to take over in a message to libraries@ * wait a week for someone to pop up with an objection * if nobody does, upload a new release with your fixes to Hackage <b _______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@... http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries |
|
|
Re: [htoolkit-users] HSQL defunct?Hi Frederik and Bryan,
The latest darcs repository for HSQL is here: http://darcs.haskell.org/HSQL/ I have to admit that I didn't have enough energy to maintain the HSQL in the last two years. If someone voluntee to take the HSQL maintaince then he is highly welcome. There are some new features like prepared statements and large binary objects that aren't completed/tested yet and this should be done before the next official release. Best regards, Krasimir On 1/20/08, Bryan O'Sullivan <bos@...> wrote: > Frederik Eaton wrote: > > > Is there going to be a new maintainer for HSQL? I have submitted a > > number of patches to fix some painful bugs. It's been almost a year > > since my previous enquiry and the last release was December 15, 2005, > > over two years ago: > > I think that if it's sat moribund for this long, you could reasonably > declare yourself the maintainer by fiat. Some OSS communities have a > formal process for declaring packages as orphaned, but I don't think > we're big enough for that. > > If you don't mind the idea of taking the HSQL package over, perhaps you > should follow the same steps Don did with the X11 package: > > * declare your intention to take over in a message to libraries@ > * wait a week for someone to pop up with an objection > * if nobody does, upload a new release with your fixes to Hackage > > <b > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > htoolkit-users mailing list > htoolkit-users@... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htoolkit-users > Libraries mailing list Libraries@... http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries |
|
|
Re: HSQL defunct?On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 04:46 +0000, Frederik Eaton wrote: > Hello all, > > Is there going to be a new maintainer for HSQL? I have submitted a > number of patches to fix some painful bugs. It's been almost a year > since my previous enquiry and the last release was December 15, 2005, > over two years ago: > > https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=65248 > > The software no longer compiles with the latest version of GHC, due to > some (seemingly gratuitous) changes in the Cabal libraries (I see > there is a September 2007 thread on libraries@). Unfortunately, I am > too busy to maintain it myself; I was probably even too busy to write > the patches in the first place, but it is sad to see them go to > waste... Gentoo has patches to make hsql-* build with ghc-6.8.x which you or any volunteer maintainer may find useful. Duncan _______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@... http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries |
|
|
Re: [htoolkit-users] HSQL defunct?Hello all,
I don't mind maintaining HSQL, if no one else will do it, but I'm not really an ideal person since I don't use the library in my current work. Any other takers? I'll wait a few days and see if someone else is interested... Best regards, Frederik On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 11:18:12AM +0100, Krasimir Angelov wrote: > Hi Frederik and Bryan, > > The latest darcs repository for HSQL is here: > > http://darcs.haskell.org/HSQL/ > > I have to admit that I didn't have enough energy to maintain the HSQL > in the last two years. If someone voluntee to take the HSQL maintaince > then he is highly welcome. There are some new features like prepared > statements and large binary objects that aren't completed/tested yet > and this should be done before the next official release. > > Best regards, > Krasimir > > > > On 1/20/08, Bryan O'Sullivan <bos@...> wrote: > > Frederik Eaton wrote: > > > > > Is there going to be a new maintainer for HSQL? I have submitted a > > > number of patches to fix some painful bugs. It's been almost a year > > > since my previous enquiry and the last release was December 15, 2005, > > > over two years ago: > > > > I think that if it's sat moribund for this long, you could reasonably > > declare yourself the maintainer by fiat. Some OSS communities have a > > formal process for declaring packages as orphaned, but I don't think > > we're big enough for that. > > > > If you don't mind the idea of taking the HSQL package over, perhaps you > > should follow the same steps Don did with the X11 package: > > > > * declare your intention to take over in a message to libraries@ > > * wait a week for someone to pop up with an objection > > * if nobody does, upload a new release with your fixes to Hackage > > > > <b > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > > htoolkit-users mailing list > > htoolkit-users@... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htoolkit-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Libraries mailing list > Libraries@... > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries > -- http://ofb.net/~frederik/ _______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@... http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries |
|
|
sourceforge and HSQLHello,
I was trying to apply my patches to the HSQL, and I noticed that Bjorn has already applied them (thanks!) in 2006, and they are visible at http://darcs.haskell.org/HSQL/ I even have emails where he tells me that he applied them to CVS, sorry for missing that! However, there is still the problem that new users who search for "HSQL haskell" will find the following sourceforge page much higher in their search results than the darcs.haskell.org URL: http://htoolkit.sourceforge.net/ and they will be directed to download the buggy, two-year-old HSQL-1.7: https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=65248 rather than the latest version at http://darcs.haskell.org/HSQL/. I have tried to find out the answers to the following questions from Krasimir and then Duncan, but no response: 1. How do we get rid of the defunct HSQL versions at sourceforge.net? 2. How does one push patches to http://darcs.haskell.org/HSQL/? Who maintains that version? At this point, it seems #1 is more important than #2, since all the patches I care about have been committed to the darcs version and the darcs version compiles with the latest GHC/Cabal... Thanks, Frederik -- http://ofb.net/~frederik/ _______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@... http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries |
|
|
Re: sourceforge and HSQLOn Sun, 2008-02-17 at 21:30 +0000, Frederik Eaton wrote: > Hello, > > I was trying to apply my patches to the HSQL, and I noticed that Bjorn > has already applied them (thanks!) in 2006, and they are visible at > > http://darcs.haskell.org/HSQL/ > > I even have emails where he tells me that he applied them to CVS, > sorry for missing that! > > However, there is still the problem that new users who search for > "HSQL haskell" will find the following sourceforge page much higher in > their search results than the darcs.haskell.org URL: > > http://htoolkit.sourceforge.net/ > > and they will be directed to download the buggy, two-year-old > HSQL-1.7: > > https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=65248 > > rather than the latest version at http://darcs.haskell.org/HSQL/. > > I have tried to find out the answers to the following questions from > Krasimir and then Duncan, but no response: Yeah, sorry, forgot. > 1. How do we get rid of the defunct HSQL versions at sourceforge.net? You can ask Krasimir to add you as a project admin. This seems the most straightforward option. In the extreme case, SourceForge do have procedures to transfer projects when their maintainers disappear but that does not seem necessary at this stage. > 2. How does one push patches to http://darcs.haskell.org/HSQL/? Who > maintains that version? Have the darcs motd redirect to a new repo on code.haskell.org. You can ask someone to do this for you. So the old one will remain but be clearly marked as defunct. > At this point, it seems #1 is more important than #2, since all the > patches I care about have been committed to the darcs version and the > darcs version compiles with the latest GHC/Cabal... Then all you need is a release on hackage that works :-) Duncan _______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@... http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries |
|
|
Re: sourceforge and HSQL > > 1. How do we get rid of the defunct HSQL versions at sourceforge.net?
> > You can ask Krasimir to add you as a project admin. This seems the most > straightforward option. In the extreme case, SourceForge do have > procedures to transfer projects when their maintainers disappear but > that does not seem necessary at this stage. If you give me Sourceforge account I will add you. > > 2. How does one push patches to http://darcs.haskell.org/HSQL/? Who > > maintains that version? Don't anyone with SSH key have a write permission to the repository? Regards, Krasimir _______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@... http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries |
|
|
Re: sourceforge and HSQLOn Mon, 2008-02-18 at 10:28 +0100, Krasimir Angelov wrote: > > > 1. How do we get rid of the defunct HSQL versions at sourceforge.net? > > > > You can ask Krasimir to add you as a project admin. This seems the most > > straightforward option. In the extreme case, SourceForge do have > > procedures to transfer projects when their maintainers disappear but > > that does not seem necessary at this stage. > > If you give me Sourceforge account I will add you. Just to be clear, it's Frederik Eaton who would like to take over maintenance. > > > 2. How does one push patches to http://darcs.haskell.org/HSQL/? Who > > > maintains that version? > > Don't anyone with SSH key have a write permission to the repository? That's true, however new accounts are not being given out so Frederik Eaton would not easily be able to get an account. The obvious choice therefore is to copy the repo to code.haskell.org. Duncan _______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@... http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |