|
View:
New views
6 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
How to use a custom Javac taskIf you use the uiDesigner in IntelliJ IDEA, you must use a special compiler. This compiler is freely distributed by IntelliJ and is a drop in replacement for <javac> called <javac2>. I had this working with the following code:
configurations { javac2 } dependencies { javac2 'com.intellij:javac2:6.0.5' } def javac2Config = configurations.javac2 subprojects { compile.doFirst { ant.taskdef(name:'javac', classname:'com.intellij.ant.Javac2', classpath:javac2Config.asPath) } } However, that recently stopped working. I thought it was due to the source sets changes, so I tried to change the last line to "compileJava.doFirst..." but that did not help. How can I make this work now? Or is there a better way? -- John Murph Automated Logic Research Team |
|
|
Re: How to use a custom Javac taskJohn Murph wrote: > If you use the uiDesigner in IntelliJ IDEA, you must use a special > compiler. This compiler is freely distributed by IntelliJ and is a > drop in replacement for <javac> called <javac2>. I had this working > with the following code: > > configurations > { > javac2 > } > > dependencies > { > javac2 'com.intellij:javac2:6.0.5' > } > def javac2Config = configurations.javac2 > > subprojects > { > compile.doFirst { ant.taskdef(name:'javac', > classname:'com.intellij.ant.Javac2', classpath:javac2Config.asPath) } > } > > However, that recently stopped working. I thought it was due to the > source sets changes, so I tried to change the last line to > "compileJava.doFirst..." but that did not help. How can I make this > work now? It should still work (with the rename to compileJava). You could just do subprojects { ant.taskdef(name:'javac', classname:'com.intellij.ant.Javac2', classpath:javac2Config.asPath) } as all tasks in a project share the same AntBuilder instance. I tried it out and it seems to work ok. How do you know it isn't working? Do you get an error message? > Or is there a better way? > I don't think so. It's an interesting use case for when (if?) we provide native javac intergration. Adam --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email |
|
|
Re: How to use a custom Javac taskI know it's not working because I get a NPE when a field that should be injected is referenced for the first time. I previously saw this before I made those changes to get it working. It worked for a couple of months and stopped working in the last couple of days. This one has me stumped...
I'll report back if I learn anything more. -- John Murph Automated Logic Research Team |
|
|
Re: How to use a custom Javac taskJohn Murph wrote: > I know it's not working because I get a NPE when a field that should > be injected is referenced for the first time. I previously saw this > before I made those changes to get it working. It worked for a couple > of months and stopped working in the last couple of days. This one > has me stumped... > Very strange. However, I did just make some ugly changes to AntBuilder to get rid of a memory leak, so I wonder if they are to blame. Could you try using a different way of overriding the task: Classloader cl = new URLClassLoader(buildscript.classLoader, javac2Config.collect { it.toUri().toUrl() } as URL[]) Class javac2Class = cl.loadClass('com.intellij.ant.Javac2') subprojects { ant.antProject.addTaskDefinition('javac', javac2Class) } > I'll report back if I learn anything more. > > > -- > John Murph > Automated Logic Research Team --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email |
|
|
Re: How to use a custom Javac taskI'm having problems remoting into my work PC from home right now, so I'll have to try that later. Hopefully at some point this weekend I can get in.
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Adam Murdoch <a@...> wrote:
-- John Murph Automated Logic Research Team |
|
|
Re: How to use a custom Javac taskOn Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Adam Murdoch <a@...> wrote:
No effect, still the same NPE. -- John Murph Automated Logic Research Team |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |