Html Tags Vs Tomahawk Tags

[Vinaya Tirikkovalluru]

Hi,

 

Would there be any difference/advantage in using Html tags Vs Tomahawk
Tags where ever possible?

For Example:

 

I can use

<Table> instead of <t:panelGrid> in many cases.

 

Vinaya



This electronic message is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) named above and may contain information which is privileged and/or confidential.  If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution, dissemination or use of the contents of this message is prohibited.  If you received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately.

[Andrew Robinson-5]

There is not much benefit to using components other than the rendered
attribute. If you aren't changing that, I would just use HTML. There
may be times that components are useful, like when the JSF response
writer is special-handling the written content for example, but that
is not too often. So you have to weigh the ease of using HTML in-line
with a smaller component tree, or having JSF components that render
using the response writer methods.

BTW, I strongly recommend facelets over JSP if you are using in-line HTML

-Andrew

On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Vinaya Tirikkovalluru
<vinaya.tirikkovalluru@...> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> Would there be any difference/advantage in using Html tags Vs Tomahawk
> Tags where ever possible?
>
> For Example:
>
>
>
> I can use
>
> <Table> instead of <t:panelGrid> in many cases.
>
>
>
> Vinaya
>
>
>
> This electronic message is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) named above and may contain information which is privileged and/or confidential.  If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution, dissemination or use of the contents of this message is prohibited.  If you received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately.
>

[Vinaya Tirikkovalluru]

Thanks Andrew,

I am using facelets.
I strongly feel that there is ease in using HTML.
As you said, I would not want to use components unless necessary.
But.. apart from the ease of development, would there be any other advantage? Like more speed in rendering the pages as there is no back process needed to convert the components into HTML tags.

Vinaya




-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Robinson [mailto:andrew.rw.robinson@...]
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 4:00 PM
To: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: Re: Html Tags Vs Tomahawk Tags

There is not much benefit to using components other than the rendered
attribute. If you aren't changing that, I would just use HTML. There
may be times that components are useful, like when the JSF response
writer is special-handling the written content for example, but that
is not too often. So you have to weigh the ease of using HTML in-line
with a smaller component tree, or having JSF components that render
using the response writer methods.

BTW, I strongly recommend facelets over JSP if you are using in-line HTML

-Andrew

On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Vinaya Tirikkovalluru
<vinaya.tirikkovalluru@...> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> Would there be any difference/advantage in using Html tags Vs Tomahawk
> Tags where ever possible?
>
> For Example:
>
>
>
> I can use
>
> <Table> instead of <t:panelGrid> in many cases.
>
>
>
> Vinaya
>
>
>
> This electronic message is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) named above and may contain information which is privileged and/or confidential.  If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution, dissemination or use of the contents of this message is prohibited.  If you received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately.
>

This electronic message is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) named above and may contain information which is privileged and/or confidential.  If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution, dissemination or use of the contents of this message is prohibited.  If you received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately.