In place edit of CT Guidelines 1u
|
View:
New views
4 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
In place edit of CT Guidelines 1u
by Jo Rabin-2
::
Rate this Message:
Many thanks to Eduardo for his note about H.1.2 [2]. I have done an
in-place edit of the document (which therefore remains at [1] below). Jo Festina Lente. Edit in Haste, Repent at Leisure. [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2009Sep/0090.html -------- Original Message -------- Subject: CT Guidelines Version 1u Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:40:30 +0100 From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@...> To: Public BPWG <public-bpwg@...> Hi I have enacted the resolutions taken on yesterday's call in the newly released version of this document [1]. ACTION-1011, ACTION-1012, ACTION-1013, ACTION-1014 refer. [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Guidelines/090923 A reminder that we plan to take a resolution on next week's call to request elevation to Last Call unless there are any show-stoppers in between. Thanks Jo |
|
|
Re: In place edit of CT Guidelines 1u
by Francois Daoust
::
Rate this Message:
Hi Jo,
I took the liberty to do an in-place edit of the document as well to update the link to the ICS statement (which will anyway need to be updated when we publish the document for real as the editorial note suggests). Francois. Jo Rabin wrote: > Many thanks to Eduardo for his note about H.1.2 [2]. I have done an > in-place edit of the document (which therefore remains at [1] below). > > Jo > > Festina Lente. Edit in Haste, Repent at Leisure. > > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2009Sep/0090.html > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: CT Guidelines Version 1u > Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:40:30 +0100 > From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@...> > To: Public BPWG <public-bpwg@...> > > Hi > > I have enacted the resolutions taken on yesterday's call in the newly > released version of this document [1]. ACTION-1011, ACTION-1012, > ACTION-1013, ACTION-1014 refer. > > [1] > http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Guidelines/090923 > > > A reminder that we plan to take a resolution on next week's call to > request elevation to Last Call unless there are any show-stoppers in > between. > > Thanks > Jo > > > |
|
|
Re: In place edit of CT Guidelines 1u
by Jo Rabin-2
::
Rate this Message:
Hey Francois
What I forgot to mention was that a "should" has changed to a "must" in the last revision so the conformance statement needs to be regenerated. What I also forgot to do as a result of what can only be described as "extreme editorial sloppiness" is update section 3.4 in the spirit that you have already mentioned, namely that the the first "must" in the second paragraph should be emboldened, and the remaining RFC 2119 words in that para should be in quotes (as they are references to rather than uses of the terms). So if you would be so kind as to create a new ICS I will link to it and do the update and create a brand new version 1v to celebrate. I think we are on the "long tail" of changes here. Jo On 24/09/2009 08:17, Francois Daoust wrote: > Hi Jo, > > I took the liberty to do an in-place edit of the document as well to > update the link to the ICS statement (which will anyway need to be > updated when we publish the document for real as the editorial note > suggests). > > Francois. > > > Jo Rabin wrote: >> Many thanks to Eduardo for his note about H.1.2 [2]. I have done an >> in-place edit of the document (which therefore remains at [1] below). >> >> Jo >> >> Festina Lente. Edit in Haste, Repent at Leisure. >> >> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2009Sep/0090.html >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: CT Guidelines Version 1u >> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:40:30 +0100 >> From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@...> >> To: Public BPWG <public-bpwg@...> >> >> Hi >> >> I have enacted the resolutions taken on yesterday's call in the newly >> released version of this document [1]. ACTION-1011, ACTION-1012, >> ACTION-1013, ACTION-1014 refer. >> >> [1] >> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Guidelines/090923 >> >> >> A reminder that we plan to take a resolution on next week's call to >> request elevation to Last Call unless there are any show-stoppers in >> between. >> >> Thanks >> Jo >> >> >> |
|
|
Re: In place edit of CT Guidelines 1u
by Francois Daoust
::
Rate this Message:
I had seen the change, it just did not occur to me that this meant I'd
have to re-generate a new version of the ICS... Anyway. The new ICS doc is available at: http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Guidelines/ics-090923 I re-updated (in-place) the link to the ICS but now realize you are to generate a new version of the spec anyway. OK, time for coffee, it seems. Francois. Jo Rabin wrote: > Hey Francois > > What I forgot to mention was that a "should" has changed to a "must" in > the last revision so the conformance statement needs to be regenerated. > > What I also forgot to do as a result of what can only be described as > "extreme editorial sloppiness" is update section 3.4 in the spirit that > you have already mentioned, namely that the the first "must" in the > second paragraph should be emboldened, and the remaining RFC 2119 words > in that para should be in quotes (as they are references to rather than > uses of the terms). > > So if you would be so kind as to create a new ICS I will link to it and > do the update and create a brand new version 1v to celebrate. > > I think we are on the "long tail" of changes here. > > Jo > > On 24/09/2009 08:17, Francois Daoust wrote: >> Hi Jo, >> >> I took the liberty to do an in-place edit of the document as well to >> update the link to the ICS statement (which will anyway need to be >> updated when we publish the document for real as the editorial note >> suggests). >> >> Francois. >> >> >> Jo Rabin wrote: >>> Many thanks to Eduardo for his note about H.1.2 [2]. I have done an >>> in-place edit of the document (which therefore remains at [1] below). >>> >>> Jo >>> >>> Festina Lente. Edit in Haste, Repent at Leisure. >>> >>> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2009Sep/0090.html >>> >>> -------- Original Message -------- >>> Subject: CT Guidelines Version 1u >>> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:40:30 +0100 >>> From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@...> >>> To: Public BPWG <public-bpwg@...> >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> I have enacted the resolutions taken on yesterday's call in the newly >>> released version of this document [1]. ACTION-1011, ACTION-1012, >>> ACTION-1013, ACTION-1014 refer. >>> >>> [1] >>> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Guidelines/090923 >>> >>> >>> A reminder that we plan to take a resolution on next week's call to >>> request elevation to Last Call unless there are any show-stoppers in >>> between. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Jo >>> >>> >>> > |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
