On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 08:11 -0500, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> This is particularly amusing as the editor of the document is Jeff Heflin.
>
> I suppose that an erratum is called for.
Yes, I have noted it among the errata.
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/errata#webont-req$Revision: 1.9 $ of $Date: 2005/12/15 20:56:24 $
Thanks for the careful review and problem report, Lars.
--
Dan Connolly, W3C
http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E