Insertable=false only being respected if updated=false also present

[tch]

I need a sanity check. I've run into a problem recently on two
different entities where in my @Column annotation insertable=false is
ignored and the column included in an insert statement unless
updateable=false is also included in the annotation.

This is the first time I've tried insertable=false by itself. Am I
missing something here? I create my entity, call persist on it, then
commit. This seems a bit too major of a bug to still be around, so I'm
thinking I must have a misconception somewhere.

Perhaps I have some misconception about these attributes, could  but
they seemed pretty straight forward to me. Any ideas before I file a
bug report? (I'm on 1.0 osgi branch)

Thanks,
Tim
_______________________________________________
eclipselink-users mailing list
eclipselink-users@...
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users

[James Sutherland]

This is true, EclipseLink only has a read-only setting, which both setting map to.  If you do not wish to insert the field because you are defaulting in the database, you may wish to look into the ReturningPolicy or instead default the attribute value in Java.

Feel free to log the bug though.

Tim Hollosy wrote:

I need a sanity check. I've run into a problem recently on two
different entities where in my @Column annotation insertable=false is
ignored and the column included in an insert statement unless
updateable=false is also included in the annotation.

This is the first time I've tried insertable=false by itself. Am I
missing something here? I create my entity, call persist on it, then
commit. This seems a bit too major of a bug to still be around, so I'm
thinking I must have a misconception somewhere.

Perhaps I have some misconception about these attributes, could  but
they seemed pretty straight forward to me. Any ideas before I file a
bug report? (I'm on 1.0 osgi branch)

Thanks,
Tim

[tch]

The default values I'm using are special to the DB vendor, so they
have to be set on the DB side. I think I'll file a bug, since it seems
like it should work either-or by my reading of the JPA spec.

Thanks for the reply.

./tch



On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 9:31 AM, James Sutherland <jamesssss@...> wrote:

>
> This is true, EclipseLink only has a read-only setting, which both setting
> map to.  If you do not wish to insert the field because you are defaulting
> in the database, you may wish to look into the ReturningPolicy or instead
> default the attribute value in Java.
>
> Feel free to log the bug though.
>
>
>
> Tim Hollosy wrote:
>>
>> I need a sanity check. I've run into a problem recently on two
>> different entities where in my @Column annotation insertable=false is
>> ignored and the column included in an insert statement unless
>> updateable=false is also included in the annotation.
>>
>> This is the first time I've tried insertable=false by itself. Am I
>> missing something here? I create my entity, call persist on it, then
>> commit. This seems a bit too major of a bug to still be around, so I'm
>> thinking I must have a misconception somewhere.
>>
>> Perhaps I have some misconception about these attributes, could  but
>> they seemed pretty straight forward to me. Any ideas before I file a
>> bug report? (I'm on 1.0 osgi branch)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tim
>>
>
>
> -----
> ---
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/User:James.sutherland.oracle.com James Sutherland
> http://www.eclipse.org/eclipselink/
>  EclipseLink ,  http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/ias/toplink/
> TopLink
> Wiki:  http://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink EclipseLink ,
> http://wiki.oracle.com/page/TopLink TopLink
> Forums:  http://forums.oracle.com/forums/forum.jspa?forumID=48 TopLink ,
> http://www.nabble.com/EclipseLink-f26430.html EclipseLink
> Book:  http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Java_Persistence Java Persistence
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Insertable%3Dfalse-only-being-respected-if-updated%3Dfalse-also-present-tp18832156p18851250.html
> Sent from the EclipseLink - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> eclipselink-users mailing list
> eclipselink-users@...
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users
>

_______________________________________________
eclipselink-users mailing list
eclipselink-users@...
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users