Is StompConnect still being maintained?

[Julian Scheid-3]

Hello,

I found a problem with StompConnect when run on top of JBoss Messaging.
Basically, StompConnect assumes that messages can be acked
asynchronously (on another thread.) However, JBoss Messaging gets
confused by that and the JMS spec sounds like it is not a valid assumption.

I have a patch sitting here that makes it work by handling both receives
and acks in a loop on a per-subscription thread.

Are any maintainers reading this list, is anyone interested in this patch?

Thanks,

Julian

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

[James.Strachan]

Yes!

On 05/11/2007, Julian Scheid <julian.scheid@...> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I found a problem with StompConnect when run on top of JBoss Messaging.
> Basically, StompConnect assumes that messages can be acked
> asynchronously (on another thread.) However, JBoss Messaging gets
> confused by that and the JMS spec sounds like it is not a valid assumption.
>
> I have a patch sitting here that makes it work by handling both receives
> and acks in a loop on a per-subscription thread.
>
> Are any maintainers reading this list, is anyone interested in this patch?

Definitely!
--
James
-------
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/

Open Source SOA
http://open.iona.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

[Julian Scheid-3]

James Strachan wrote:
> Yes!

Great, I filed a ticket at http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/STOMP-7.

I suppose your not answering to this other message means that you're not
interested?:
http://archive.stomp.codehaus.org/dev/46EA1E16.6070607%40rsp.com.au

Julian


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email