|
View:
New views
13 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Is appassembler still actively being developed?I am using appassembler for generating jsw scripts and was
curious if there was still development being done. JSW has advanced a few
versions and it seems there is still some work that can be done for additional
configuration. Damon ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email _____________________________________________________________________ |
|
|
Re: Is appassembler still actively being developed?On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Damon Jacobsen wrote:
> I am using appassembler for generating jsw scripts and was curious if > there was still development being done. JSW has advanced a few versions > and it seems there is still some work that can be done for additional > configuration. AFAIK it still is - and I need it myself at my workplace. Please register any issues/RFE you have in JIRA. And of course patches and tests are always welcomed ;-) -- David J. M. Karlsen - +47 90 68 22 43 http://www.davidkarlsen.com http://mp3.davidkarlsen.com Sent from my bog-standard SMTP client --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email |
|
|
Re: Is appassembler still actively being developed?David, I was considering adding support for apache-daemon service scripts... thoughts?
-Stephen 2009/10/20 <david@...>
|
|
|
RE: Is appassembler still actively being developed?Stephen, I
would be interested in seeing this :) Hell I would be willing to help if you
want to help me navigate the code structure. I tried once and it seems very
complicated. Damon From: Stephen Connolly
[mailto:stephen.alan.connolly@...] David, I was considering adding
support for apache-daemon service scripts... thoughts? 2009/10/20 <david@...> On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Damon
Jacobsen wrote: I am using appassembler for generating jsw scripts and was
curious if AFAIK it still is - and I need
it myself at my workplace. ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email _____________________________________________________________________ |
|
|
Re: Is appassembler still actively being developed?On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Damon Jacobsen
<dajacobsen@...> wrote: > I am using appassembler for generating jsw scripts and was curious if there > was still development being done. JSW has advanced a few versions and it > seems there is still some work that can be done for additional > configuration. Double check the license on JSW, I vaguely recall that it was changed and that might be why the plugin is using an older version. -- Wendy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email |
|
|
Re: Is appassembler still actively being developed?didn't Jason start a fork off the codebase from just before the fork?
Sent from my [rhymes with tryPod] ;-) On 21 Oct 2009, at 18:20, Wendy Smoak <wsmoak@...> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Damon Jacobsen > <dajacobsen@...> wrote: >> I am using appassembler for generating jsw scripts and was curious >> if there >> was still development being done. JSW has advanced a few versions >> and it >> seems there is still some work that can be done for additional >> configuration. > > Double check the license on JSW, I vaguely recall that it was changed > and that might be why the plugin is using an older version. > > -- > Wendy > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email |
|
|
Re: Is appassembler still actively being developed?On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> David, I was considering adding support for apache-daemon service scripts... > thoughts? The more implementations it can support the merrier? -- David J. M. Karlsen - +47 90 68 22 43 http://www.davidkarlsen.com http://mp3.davidkarlsen.com Sent from my bog-standard SMTP client --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email |
|
|
Re: Is appassembler still actively being developed?On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Damon Jacobsen > <dajacobsen@...> wrote: >> I am using appassembler for generating jsw scripts and was curious if there >> was still development being done. JSW has advanced a few versions and it >> seems there is still some work that can be done for additional >> configuration. > > Double check the license on JSW, I vaguely recall that it was changed > and that might be why the plugin is using an older version. Seems clean? From http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.org/doc/english/licenseOverview.html "The Wrapper is available under any one of three licenses making it possible to choose to license most appropriate for a given project. " One of them is: "Community Software License Agreement: This license agreement is the popular GPLv2 license used by many open source projects. " Which seems compatible with the mojos MIT license: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_FSF_approved_software_licenses -- David J. M. Karlsen - +47 90 68 22 43 http://www.davidkarlsen.com http://mp3.davidkarlsen.com Sent from my bog-standard SMTP client --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email |
|
|
Re: Is appassembler still actively being developed?2009/10/22 <david@...>
It was a commercially liberal license... then they switched to GPL http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@.../msg74005.html From http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.org/doc/english/licenseOverview.html |
|
|
Re: Is appassembler still actively being developed?On Thu, 22 Oct 2009, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> 2009/10/22 <david@...> > >> On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Wendy Smoak wrote: >> >> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Damon Jacobsen >>> <dajacobsen@...> wrote: >>> >>>> I am using appassembler for generating jsw scripts and was curious if >>>> there >>>> was still development being done. JSW has advanced a few versions and it >>>> seems there is still some work that can be done for additional >>>> configuration. >>>> >>> >>> Double check the license on JSW, I vaguely recall that it was changed >>> and that might be why the plugin is using an older version. >>> >> Seems clean? Clean as in no licence conflicts. -- David J. M. Karlsen - +47 90 68 22 43 http://www.davidkarlsen.com http://mp3.davidkarlsen.com Sent from my bog-standard SMTP client --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email |
|
|
Re: Is appassembler still actively being developed?2009/10/22 <david@...>
IANAL but AFAIK GPL is not compatible with MIT/ASL LGPL maybe, but not GPL
|
|
|
Re: Is appassembler still actively being developed?On Thu, 22 Oct 2009, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> IANAL but AFAIK GPL is not compatible with MIT/ASL > LGPL maybe, but not GPL Neither am I - but I understand http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_FSF_approved_software_licenses and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_Licensehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License as they are in fact compatible. -- David J. M. Karlsen - +47 90 68 22 43 http://www.davidkarlsen.com http://mp3.davidkarlsen.com Sent from my bog-standard SMTP client --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email |
|
|
Re: Is appassembler still actively being developed?2009/10/22 <david@...>
One way... you can combine GPL code with MIT code and you do not have a conflict... but the combined code is now covered by GPL. You cannot go the other way
|
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |