|
View:
New views
14 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Issues with devel/boost-* on Sparc64HI folks!
As I know, currently devel/boost-libs port fails to build on sparc64. I had a discussion of this in September. The root cause is unknown for me. To investigate into this further I need either access to a sparc64 box or a person who has access and whom I may instruct with the actions to perform. Are there any plans to fix ports for sparc64 before the release? Sincerely, Alexander Churanov, maintainer of devel/boost-* _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@... mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@..." |
|
|
Re: Issues with devel/boost-* on Sparc64Alexander Churanov wrote:
> HI folks! > > As I know, currently devel/boost-libs port fails to build on sparc64. > I had a discussion of this in September. The root cause is unknown for > me. To investigate into this further I need either access to a sparc64 > box or a person who has access and whom I may instruct with the > actions to perform. > > Are there any plans to fix ports for sparc64 before the release? > > Sincerely, > Alexander Churanov, > maintainer of devel/boost-* > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@... mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@..." > (4 x 300 MHz) running 8.0-BETA. -Boris _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@... mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@..." |
|
|
Re: Issues with devel/boost-* on Sparc64Boris,
This would be very handy. Just tell me at what time I can use it. I mean at anytime during a week or just several hours when the box is free? If there is a specific time, I should prepare for it. Please, e-mail me the details privately. Thank you for co-operation. Sincerely, Alexander Churanov, maintainer of devel/boost-* _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@... mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@..." |
|
|
Re: Issues with devel/boost-* on Sparc64On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 09:11:56PM -0500, Boris Kochergin wrote:
> Are there any plans to fix ports for sparc64 before the release? I had been planning to do this but other breakage, and paying work, has kept me from getting to it. I'd be happy to see someone else take a look at it, and I'll also be happy to re-run the sparc64 8.0 package set when the fix is ready. mcl _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@... mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@..." |
|
|
Re: Issues with devel/boost-* on Sparc64OK, Mark, no problems.
Alexander Churanov _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@... mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@..." |
|
|
Re: Issues with devel/boost-* on Sparc64Boris, good day.
Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 09:11:56PM -0500, Boris Kochergin wrote: > Alexander Churanov wrote: > > HI folks! > > > > As I know, currently devel/boost-libs port fails to build on sparc64. > > I had a discussion of this in September. The root cause is unknown for > > me. To investigate into this further I need either access to a sparc64 > > box or a person who has access and whom I may instruct with the > > actions to perform. > > > > Are there any plans to fix ports for sparc64 before the release? > > > > Sincerely, > > Alexander Churanov, > > maintainer of devel/boost-* > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-ports@... mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@..." > > > Ahoy. I can give you shell access to a reasonably-speedy sparc64 machine > (4 x 300 MHz) running 8.0-BETA. in the attachment. -- Eygene _ ___ _.--. # \`.|\..----...-'` `-._.-'_.-'` # Remember that it is hard / ' ` , __.--' # to read the on-line manual )/' _/ \ `-_, / # while single-stepping the kernel. `-'" `"\_ ,_.-;_.-\_ ', fsc/as # _.-'_./ {_.' ; / # -- FreeBSD Developers handbook {_.-``-' {_/ # ssh-rsa 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 rea@... _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@... mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@..." |
|
|
Re: Issues with devel/boost-* on Sparc64Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 09:11:56PM -0500, Boris Kochergin wrote:
> > As I know, currently devel/boost-libs port fails to build on sparc64. > > I had a discussion of this in September. The root cause is unknown for > > me. To investigate into this further I need either access to a sparc64 > > box or a person who has access and whom I may instruct with the > > actions to perform. From the preliminary investigations I done on the Boris's machine, it turns out that as(1) chokes on the "cas" instruction that looks like "cas [%l0+12], %g2, %g1". The instruction itself looks sane, so I'll try to understand if as(1) has some bugs inside it or something isn't good with the instruction itself. -- Eygene _ ___ _.--. # \`.|\..----...-'` `-._.-'_.-'` # Remember that it is hard / ' ` , __.--' # to read the on-line manual )/' _/ \ `-_, / # while single-stepping the kernel. `-'" `"\_ ,_.-;_.-\_ ', fsc/as # _.-'_./ {_.' ; / # -- FreeBSD Developers handbook {_.-``-' {_/ # _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@... mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@..." |
|
|
Re: Issues with devel/boost-* on Sparc64Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 04:12:01PM +0300, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 09:11:56PM -0500, Boris Kochergin wrote: > > > As I know, currently devel/boost-libs port fails to build on sparc64. > > > I had a discussion of this in September. The root cause is unknown for > > > me. To investigate into this further I need either access to a sparc64 > > > box or a person who has access and whom I may instruct with the > > > actions to perform. > > From the preliminary investigations I done on the Boris's machine, > it turns out that as(1) chokes on the "cas" instruction that looks > like "cas [%l0+12], %g2, %g1". The instruction itself looks sane, > so I'll try to understand if as(1) has some bugs inside it or something > isn't good with the instruction itself. Hmm, looks like only memory address taken straight from the register is allowed for the Sparc. So, [%l0] will be good, but [%l0+12] -- won't. So it seems to me that g++ is generating improper assembly code. Will look into it a bit further. -- Eygene _ ___ _.--. # \`.|\..----...-'` `-._.-'_.-'` # Remember that it is hard / ' ` , __.--' # to read the on-line manual )/' _/ \ `-_, / # while single-stepping the kernel. `-'" `"\_ ,_.-;_.-\_ ', fsc/as # _.-'_./ {_.' ; / # -- FreeBSD Developers handbook {_.-``-' {_/ # _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@... mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@..." |
|
|
Re: Issues with devel/boost-* on Sparc64Folks,
I've identified the root cause of the issue. Boost folks are using custom routine written in assembly language for SPARC. If the line 57 of boost/smart_ptr/detail/sp_counted_base.hpp is commented, the implementation switches to spin-locked and code compiles successfully. I will contact Boost developers in order to fix this in upstream. I'll also create a patch for devel/boost-libs port for using in the meanwhile. Alexander Churanov _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@... mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@..." |
|
|
Re: Issues with devel/boost-* on Sparc64Guys,
Boost mailing list contains a record about using CAS instruction for shared_ptr. It is of 2004. I'll investigate into it further. It is necessary to understand why that library was working before 1.39. Alexander Churanov _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@... mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@..." |
|
|
Re: Issues with devel/boost-* on Sparc64Folks,
It seems that I have found a workaround. It is to store the address of the variable in a register and then issue the "CAS" instruction, which only accepts register for an address. I am currently testing it. Alexander Churanov _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@... mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@..." |
|
|
Re: Issues with devel/boost-* on Sparc64Alexander, good day.
Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:04:59PM +0300, Alexander Churanov wrote: > It seems that I have found a workaround. It is to store the address of > the variable in a register and then issue the "CAS" instruction, which > only accepts register for an address. I am currently testing it. I hadn't seen the code you're testing, but it seems to me that the attached patch should automatically take care of making the address to be in some register (if it isn't already in the register). It compiles well, and even works as a stand-alone function, but I hadn't yet tested if boost built with such a atomic primitive really works fine. Have some $JOB to do prior to the testing. If you're storing the address in the register manually -- there is no need for it: you can use assembly constraints; this also makes less headache, because compiler decides what register should be allocated by its own and typically it is doing this job well. Anyway, I hadn't seen your patch, so may be you already doing this. -- Eygene _ ___ _.--. # \`.|\..----...-'` `-._.-'_.-'` # Remember that it is hard / ' ` , __.--' # to read the on-line manual )/' _/ \ `-_, / # while single-stepping the kernel. `-'" `"\_ ,_.-;_.-\_ ', fsc/as # _.-'_./ {_.' ; / # -- FreeBSD Developers handbook {_.-``-' {_/ # --- boost/smart_ptr/detail/sp_counted_base_gcc_sparc.hpp.orig 2009-03-02 11:22:16.000000000 -0500 +++ boost/smart_ptr/detail/sp_counted_base_gcc_sparc.hpp 2009-11-12 09:51:25.000000000 -0500 @@ -30,10 +30,10 @@ inline int32_t compare_and_swap( int32_t * dest_, int32_t compare_, int32_t swap_ ) { - __asm__ __volatile__( "cas %0, %2, %1" - : "+m" (*dest_), "+r" (swap_) - : "r" (compare_) - : "memory" ); + __asm__ __volatile__( "casa [%3] 0x80, %2, %1" + : "=m" (*dest_), "=r" (swap_) + : "r" (compare_), "r" (dest_), "1" (swap_), "m" (*dest_) + : "memory" ); return swap_; } _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@... mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@..." |
|
|
Re: Issues with devel/boost-* on Sparc64Eygene,
Your solution is clearly more appropriate. I'll test it. Mine is attached. Alexander Churanov _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@... mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@..." |
|
|
Re: Issues with devel/boost-* on Sparc64Foks,
The current status of the issue is as follows: *) I've contacted a boost team, they suggested a smaller patch *) I've applied a patch, this allows code to build, but one the tests for the patched code (in "libs/smart_ptr/test") fail. This is not one of the tests that were expected to fail when there are issues with concurrency. *) I've filed a bug in the boost issue tracker. patch: http://alexanderchuranov.com/boost-port/boost-1.41-sparc64/patch-boost_smart_ptr_detail_sp_counted_base_gcc_sparc.hpp test log: http://alexanderchuranov.com/boost-port/boost-1.41-sparc64/bjam-smart-ptr-test.log issue: https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/3678 boost mail thread: http://old.nabble.com/-1.41.0--Beta-1-available-td26196304i20.html Currently I'm waiting for the boost team to provide us with further directions. Alexander Churanov _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@... mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@..." |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |