|
View:
New views
2 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Issues with set -e and subshellConfiguration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]: Machine: i486 OS: linux-gnu Compiler: gcc Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='i486' - DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='i486-pc-linux-gnu' - DCONF_VENDOR='pc' -DLOCALEDIR='/usr/share/locale' -DPACKAGE='bash' -DSHELL - DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../bash -I../bash/include -I../bash/lib -g -O2 -Wall uname output: Linux touchndie 2.6.18v1 #1 SMP Thu Sep 21 10:01:41 CEST 2006 i686 GNU/Linux Machine Type: i486-pc-linux-gnu Bash Version: 3.2 Patch Level: 39 Release Status: release Description: Using set -e with subshell gives unexpected results Repeat-By: Hello, First issue : # The following works fine : end is displayed ( set -e ; echo Start ; false ; echo end ) # The following works in a different way : end is not displayed ( set -e ; echo Start ; false ; echo end ) || echo ERROR # note that Bash 4 has the same behavior # (GNU bash, version 4.0.28(1)-release) Is it a bug or the expected behavior, if it is a bug, is there a workaround ? Second issue : # I expect the following to not display status but to exit the shell : set -e ; ( exit 1 ) ; echo status $? # I observed the expected behavior on Bash 4. Is there a way for Bash 3 to have the same behavior as Bash 4 ? Thanks in advance. Best regards Mario |
|
|
Re: Issues with set -e and subshellMario TRENTINI wrote:
> Bash Version: 3.2 > Patch Level: 39 > Release Status: release > > Description: Using set -e with subshell gives unexpected results > > Repeat-By: > > Hello, > > First issue : > > # The following works fine : end is displayed > ( set -e ; echo Start ; false ; echo end ) > > # The following works in a different way : end is not displayed > ( set -e ; echo Start ; false ; echo end ) || echo ERROR > > # note that Bash 4 has the same behavior > # (GNU bash, version 4.0.28(1)-release) > > Is it a bug or the expected behavior, if it is a bug, is there a workaround ? It is expected behavior. The presence of || cancels set -e for the command preceding the ||. There are always workarounds. You don't have to rely on set -e; you can structure your code so that you manually check the exit status. > Second issue : > > # I expect the following to not display status but to exit the shell : > set -e ; ( exit 1 ) ; echo status $? > > # I observed the expected behavior on Bash 4. > > Is there a way for Bash 3 to have the same behavior as Bash 4 ? Not using `set -e'. That's the essential substance of the bash-3.x- bash-4.x change: the commands whose failure cause the shell to exit were expanded from simple commands to nearly every command, including pipelines and compound commands. Chet -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU chet@... http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/ |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |