|
View:
New views
4 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Ivy release?Hi all,
the second release candidate for Ivy is now some weeks old and it's time we decide what to do next. I'd prefer to promote this RC2 as final 2.1.0 release, but merge revision 801820 from trunk which fixes a regression introduced in RC2. Furthermore, since trunk contains fixes for some annoying bugs, we could create a 2.1.1 release candidate later this month after the 2.1.0 final release is out. I'm willing to do the 2.1.0 final release if there a no other volunteers. Maarten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: Ivy release?I'm ok for a 2.1.0 release with r801820 merged.
For a 2.1.1 I'm not sure a RC is really necessary... If we have only bug fixes without too heavy changes I think releasing 2.1.1 directly without prior RC is ok. If something goes wrong we can release a 2.1.2 and that's fine. BTW, thanks a lot Maarten for your involvement and for stepping in for this release! Xavier On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 23:36, Maarten Coene <maarten_coene@...> wrote: > Hi all, > > the second release candidate for Ivy is now some weeks old and it's time we > decide what to do next. > > I'd prefer to promote this RC2 as final 2.1.0 release, but merge revision > 801820 from trunk which fixes a regression introduced in RC2. > Furthermore, since trunk contains fixes for some annoying bugs, we could > create a 2.1.1 release candidate later this month after the 2.1.0 final > release is out. > > I'm willing to do the 2.1.0 final release if there a no other volunteers. > > Maarten > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > -- Xavier Hanin - 4SH France - http://www.4sh.fr/ BordeauxJUG creator & leader - http://www.bordeauxjug.org/ Apache Ivy Creator - http://ant.apache.org/ivy/ |
|
|
Re: Ivy release?Same here,
OK for a 2.1.0 with r801820 merge, and OK for 2.1.1 without an "external" RC first (having zip on which to vote is a suffisent "release candidate" step). Thanks, Gilles Scokart 2009/9/7 Xavier Hanin <xavier.hanin@...> > I'm ok for a 2.1.0 release with r801820 merged. > For a 2.1.1 I'm not sure a RC is really necessary... If we have only bug > fixes without too heavy changes I think releasing 2.1.1 directly without > prior RC is ok. If something goes wrong we can release a 2.1.2 and that's > fine. > > BTW, thanks a lot Maarten for your involvement and for stepping in for this > release! > > Xavier > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 23:36, Maarten Coene <maarten_coene@...> > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > the second release candidate for Ivy is now some weeks old and it's time > we > > decide what to do next. > > > > I'd prefer to promote this RC2 as final 2.1.0 release, but merge revision > > 801820 from trunk which fixes a regression introduced in RC2. > > Furthermore, since trunk contains fixes for some annoying bugs, we could > > create a 2.1.1 release candidate later this month after the 2.1.0 final > > release is out. > > > > I'm willing to do the 2.1.0 final release if there a no other volunteers. > > > > Maarten > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > > > > > > -- > Xavier Hanin - 4SH France - http://www.4sh.fr/ > BordeauxJUG creator & leader - http://www.bordeauxjug.org/ > Apache Ivy Creator - http://ant.apache.org/ivy/ > |
|
|
Re: Ivy release?idem,
+1 Nicolas Le 7 sept. 09 à 12:50, Gilles Scokart a écrit : > Same here, > OK for a 2.1.0 with r801820 merge, and OK for 2.1.1 without an > "external" RC > first (having zip on which to vote is a suffisent "release > candidate" step). > > Thanks, > > > Gilles Scokart > > > 2009/9/7 Xavier Hanin <xavier.hanin@...> > >> I'm ok for a 2.1.0 release with r801820 merged. >> For a 2.1.1 I'm not sure a RC is really necessary... If we have >> only bug >> fixes without too heavy changes I think releasing 2.1.1 directly >> without >> prior RC is ok. If something goes wrong we can release a 2.1.2 and >> that's >> fine. >> >> BTW, thanks a lot Maarten for your involvement and for stepping in >> for this >> release! >> >> Xavier >> >> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 23:36, Maarten Coene <maarten_coene@...> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> the second release candidate for Ivy is now some weeks old and >>> it's time >> we >>> decide what to do next. >>> >>> I'd prefer to promote this RC2 as final 2.1.0 release, but merge >>> revision >>> 801820 from trunk which fixes a regression introduced in RC2. >>> Furthermore, since trunk contains fixes for some annoying bugs, we >>> could >>> create a 2.1.1 release candidate later this month after the 2.1.0 >>> final >>> release is out. >>> >>> I'm willing to do the 2.1.0 final release if there a no other >>> volunteers. >>> >>> Maarten >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Xavier Hanin - 4SH France - http://www.4sh.fr/ >> BordeauxJUG creator & leader - http://www.bordeauxjug.org/ >> Apache Ivy Creator - http://ant.apache.org/ivy/ >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |