Java 5 vs Java 6
|
View:
New views
9 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
Java 5 vs Java 6
by Marc Khouzam
::
Rate this Message:
Hi,
I noticed that the
two new plugins cdt.build and cdt.build.ui require Java 6.
I was wondering if
that was a concious decision? Are we requiring Java 6 for the CDT for
Helios?
If not necessary, I
would suggest we stick with java 5.
Thanks
Marc
_______________________________________________ cdt-dev mailing list cdt-dev@... https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev |
|
|
Re: Java 5 vs Java 6
by Doug Schaefer-4
::
Rate this Message:
I'm just whipping those together, it's just what PDE set them to. I'm not doing anything Java 6 specific in there. Feel free to change it if you need.
We should take notice though that Java 5 has been end of life'd by Sun as of Oct 31. Doug. On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@...> wrote:
_______________________________________________ cdt-dev mailing list cdt-dev@... https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev |
|
|
Re: Java 5 vs Java 6
by Nayna Jain-2
::
Rate this Message:
Hi all,
There are two tables listed here giving details about J2SE release and support dates - http://java.sun.com/products/archive/eol.policy.html Which dates among these actually matters ? Thanks & Regards, Nayna Jain Doug Schaefer <cdtdoug@... m> To Sent by: "CDT General developers list." cdt-dev-bounces@e <cdt-dev@...> clipse.org cc Subject 11/14/2009 12:26 Re: [cdt-dev] Java 5 vs Java 6 AM Please respond to "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@eclipse. org> I'm just whipping those together, it's just what PDE set them to. I'm not doing anything Java 6 specific in there. Feel free to change it if you need. We should take notice though that Java 5 has been end of life'd by Sun as of Oct 31. Doug. On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@...> wrote: Hi, I noticed that the two new plugins cdt.build and cdt.build.ui require Java 6. I was wondering if that was a concious decision? Are we requiring Java 6 for the CDT for Helios? If not necessary, I would suggest we stick with java 5. Thanks Marc _______________________________________________ cdt-dev mailing list cdt-dev@... https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev _______________________________________________ cdt-dev mailing list cdt-dev@... https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev _______________________________________________ cdt-dev mailing list cdt-dev@... https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Java 5 vs Java 6
by Doug Schaefer-4
::
Rate this Message:
Hmm. The all folder wasn't intended to be a downloadable unit. In fact we had the refactoring plug-ins in there for quite a while after their contents moved to the core. We have a team project set up on the wiki (which may be old by now) at http://wiki.eclipse.org/CDT/projectSets. Please update it if it is incorrect. It is the official way for developers to set up their workspaces.
I don't want to have to move the plug-ins later which is a pain on it's own, that's why I put them in the all folder. While they are experimental now, my intention is to make them real later, or delete them if we don't like them. Doug. On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:04 PM, John Cortell <rat042@...> wrote:
_______________________________________________ cdt-dev mailing list cdt-dev@... https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Java 5 vs Java 6
by Marc-Andre Laperle-2
::
Rate this Message:
I think it would be great to have the project set on the project page
like that: http://eclipsesource.com/blogs/2009/11/13/wheres-your-project-set-getting-eclipse-sources-easily/ Also, the update site is still Ganymede. Marc-Andre John Cortell wrote: > Ah. OK; wasn't aware of that project set. I always just grabbed what > was in 'all'. I'll use the project set from now on. > > John > > At 03:15 PM 11/16/2009, Doug Schaefer wrote: >> Hmm. The all folder wasn't intended to be a downloadable unit. In >> fact we had the refactoring plug-ins in there for quite a while after >> their contents moved to the core. We have a team project set up on >> the wiki (which may be old by now) at >> http://wiki.eclipse.org/CDT/projectSets. Please update it if it is >> incorrect. It is the official way for developers to set up their >> workspaces. >> >> I don't want to have to move the plug-ins later which is a pain on >> it's own, that's why I put them in the all folder. While they are >> experimental now, my intention is to make them real later, or delete >> them if we don't like them. >> >> Doug. >> >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:04 PM, John Cortell <rat042@... >> <mailto:rat042@...>> wrote: >> >> Doug, the build.ui plugin also has a dependency on org.eclipse.ui >> with a min version of 3.6. But CDT HEAD does not yet official >> require 3.6(M?)...this was suggested a while back but we said we >> weren't ready. >> >> Basically, developers are running into problems because these >> plugins you're whipping up are in the 'all' grouping in cvs. >> Shouldn't these experimental plugins be in a dedicated area (as >> was done with various other projects, e.g., edc, jtag, dsf), thus >> not being part of what everyone automatically downloads from cvs? >> >> John >> >> >> At 12:56 PM 11/13/2009, Doug Schaefer wrote: >>> I'm just whipping those together, it's just what PDE set >>> them to. I'm not doing anything Java 6 specific in there. >>> Feel free to change it if you need. >>> >>> We should take notice though that Java 5 has been end of >>> life'd by Sun as of Oct 31. >>> >>> Doug. >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Marc Khouzam < >>> marc.khouzam@... >>> <mailto:marc.khouzam@...>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I noticed that the two new plugins cdt.build and >>> cdt.build.ui require Java 6. >>> I was wondering if that was a concious decision? Are we >>> requiring Java 6 for the CDT for Helios? >>> If not necessary, I would suggest we stick with java 5. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Marc >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cdt-dev mailing list >>> cdt-dev@... <mailto:cdt-dev@...> >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cdt-dev mailing list >>> cdt-dev@... <mailto:cdt-dev@...> >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cdt-dev mailing list >> cdt-dev@... <mailto:cdt-dev@...> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cdt-dev mailing list >> cdt-dev@... >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > cdt-dev mailing list > cdt-dev@... > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev > _______________________________________________ cdt-dev mailing list cdt-dev@... https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev |
|
|
Re: Java 5 vs Java 6
by Doug Schaefer-4
::
Rate this Message:
Agreed. The web site really needs some attention. We get it in spurts, but falls out of date easily.
2009/11/16 Marc-Andre Laperle <malaperle@...> I think it would be great to have the project set on the project page like that: _______________________________________________ cdt-dev mailing list cdt-dev@... https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev |
|
|
|
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
