Nabble - Jikes RVM

[jira] Commented: (RVM-845) Primitive write barrier support

2009-12-21T19:23:55Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/RVM-845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=203766#action_203766 ]

Steve Blackburn commented on RVM-845:
-------------------------------------

Laurence,

It looks good. I'm going to go ahead and performance test it.

I only saw one significant issue (trivial to fix). You have applied this pattern of change to Barriers.java:

{code}
- if (NEEDS_BOOLEAN_GC_WRITE_BARRIER) {
+ if (NEEDS_BOOLEAN_PUTFIELD_BARRIER) {
{code}

That change is an error; it breaks some intentional abstraction:

* {{NEEDS_BOOLEAN_PUTFIELD_BARRIER}} encapsulates the idea that the VM is required to insert a barrier. It intentionally abstracts over the _reason_ for that barrier being required. The VM (compilers, classloader, etc etc) should only ever refer to the constants of this form when deciding whether a barrier is required. The nomenclature here is Java-specific.
* {{NEEDS_BOOLEAN_GC_WRITE_BARRIER}} is private to Barriers.java and exposes a (conditional) _reason_ for the requirement to have a barrier. In the current code base, this is the _only_ reason why a VM barrier might be required, but this is not generally the case. There exist important non-GC rationales for implementing barriers (something like arraylets is one example). These other cases need not be mutually exclusive nor one-to-one with GC requirements. The nomenclature here is language-neutral.

So the code above deals separately with each reason for including a barrier. I anticipate the addition of other non-GC cases in the near term (the code exists...). So we would then see as set of variables in the form of {{NEEDS_BOOLEAN_FOOBAR_WRITE_BARRIER}}, etc. I realize that without the other cases in place the code probably looks strange

One other minor trivial issue: you should probably change {{Magic_Store64_MD}} etc to {{Magic_Store64MD}}. AFAIK, the {{Magic_}} prefix is a special one to denote a particular set of classes, but otherwise we're supposed to avoid underbars in class names.

> Primitive write barrier support
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: RVM-845
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/RVM-845
> Project: RVM
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Compiler: Baseline, Compiler: Optimizing, MMTk
> Reporter: Laurence Hellyer
> Assignee: Steve Blackburn
> Fix For: 3.1.1
>
> Attachments: 00-barrier-refactor.patch, 01-barrier-refactor.patch, primitiveWriteBarriers.patch, primitiveWriteBarriersV2.patch, RVM-845-20091211.patch.0, RVM-845-20091211.patch.1, RVM845-20091003.patch, RVM845-20091005.patch, statementOfContribution.txt, usePrimitiveWriteBarriers.patch
>
>
> Certain classes of garbage collection require write barriers on primitives as well as references. This patch adds the required support to JikesRVM and MMTk for primitive write barriers on both Intel and PowerPC using either the Baseline or Opt compiler.
> Specifically this patch adds support for write barriers on primitive putfields and primitive array stores. Object cloning and reflection code has been updated to use primitive write barriers as required. A separate patch can be made available that provides a collector that demonstrates using primitive write barriers if desired.
> As would be expected, applying this patch to trunk (r15745) results in no measurable slowdown to configurations that do not require primitive write barriers - the optimising compiler removes all primitive write barrier specific code (detailed measurements below).
> In adding primitive write barriers to the compilers, a number of enhancements were made to Magic operations that should be of benefit to all users:
> * Address.store can now store a boolean with optional offset
> * Added Magic.setFloatAtOffset and setBooleanAtOffset (with optional locationMetadata)
> * Optional locationMetadata argument for Magic.setByteAtOffset, setCharAtOffset, setShortAtOffset, setLongAtOffset, setDoubleAtOffset and setIntAtOffset
> It was decided to use the Java type system to provide a separate MMTk write barrier for each Java type (char, short etc.) rather than abuse the type system by having a different barrier for each field size (byte, short, word and double word). Whilst this approach leads to a larger patch, we believe that:
> a) preserving type safety is important
> b) it improves readability of the code
> c) this technique allows for accounting by type
> d) as the barriers are inlined, the runtime cost to the compiler of extra barrier methods will be small and there should be no additional mutator overhead (although this has not been measured)
> The code styles for the IA32 and PowerPC compilers are very different and this patch attempts to implement the primitive write barriers in a native style for each compiler. Where possible helper methods have been used to reduce the size of code and reduce boiler plate. For a change of this size I fully support a review of the code and it being signed off by the compiler maintainers before it enters trunk.
> Quick performance numbers:
> The performance of a clean checkout of trunk was compared to the performance of trunk with the patch applied on a number of ia32 machines. Each benchmark was run with 3x minimum heap for 6 iterations within a single RVM invocation, this was repeated for a total of 5 invocations per build/benchmark. A compiler advice file was used to keep the compiler workload constant and the machines had their networks down. The geomean of total execution time for each build/benchmark was calculated and used to calculate the overhead between builds:
> Benchmark: Relative overhead with patch applied:
> Antlr 1.002
> Bloat 1.005
> Fop 1.003
> Hsqldb 0.984
> Jython 1.005
> Luindex 1.011
> Lusearch 1.002
> Pmd 0.997
> Xalan 1.008

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Jikesrvm-issues mailing list
Jikesrvm-issues@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jikesrvm-issues

From forum: jikesrvm-issues

[jira] Commented: (RVM-845) Primitive write barrier support

2009-12-21T18:40:55Z

[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/RVM-845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=203763#action_203763 ]

Steve Blackburn commented on RVM-845:
-------------------------------------

Laurence, thanks for your patience. I'm working on it now. Just slowly walking through the 227KB patch.

However, I noticed that it failed the pre-commit test. Error message below. I will continue going through the patch, but if you get the chance to look into the error below before I do, that would be nice.

---

===================== Results =====================
Total Success Rate 122/124

Subversion Revision: 15804M

Result Configuration Group Test Run Reason
FAILURE prototype.default basic TestFieldReflection Unexpected exit code.
FAILURE development.Opt_1 basic TestFieldReflection Unexpected exit code.

===================================================

---

Testing on getFields
Values: true 127 1.0 1.0 1 1 1 true 127 1.0 1.0 1 1 1
Set booleans to false +!!!!!!+!!!!!!
Values: false 127 1.0 1.0 1 1 1 false 127 1.0 1.0 1 1 1
Set bytes to 12 !++++++!+vm internal error at:
Thread #12
-- Stack --
at [0x67d85c80, 0x5b336bfa] Lorg/jikesrvm/VM; sysFail(Ljava/lang/String;)V at line 2275
at [0x67d85ca0, 0x5b336cff] Lorg/jikesrvm/VM; _assertionFailure(Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/String;)V at line 613
at [0x67d85cc8, 0x5b336d8d] Lorg/jikesrvm/VM; _assert(ZLjava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/String;)V at line 596
at [0x67d85cec, 0x5b24a73b] Lorg/jikesrvm/VM; _assert(Z)V at line 574
at [0x67d85d0c, 0x5b01a4bb] Lorg/jikesrvm/runtime/Statics; setSlotContents(Lorg/vmmagic/unboxed/Offset;Ljava/lang/Object;)V at line 625
at [0x67d85d38, 0x5b23c80d] Lorg/jikesrvm/classloader/RVMField; setDoubleValueUnchecked(Ljava/lang/Object;D)V at line 573
at [0x67d85d6c, 0x5b23cd3f] Ljava/lang/reflect/VMCommonLibrarySupport; setByteInternal(Ljava/lang/Object;BLorg/jikesrvm/classloader/RVMField;)V at line 795
at [0x67d85da0, 0x5b0a21bd] Ljava/lang/reflect/VMCommonLibrarySupport; setByte(Ljava/lang/Object;BLorg/jikesrvm/classloader/RVMField;Ljava/lang/reflect/Field;Lorg/jikesrvm/classloader/RVMClass;)V at line 726
at [0x67d85dd8, 0x5b0a0e5c] Ljava/lang/reflect/VMField; setByte(Ljava/lang/reflect/Field;Ljava/lang/Object;B)V at line 113
at [0x67d85e08, 0x6783e581] Ljava/lang/reflect/Field; setByte(Ljava/lang/Object;B)V at line 540
at [0x67d85e44, 0x678350cd] Ltest/org/jikesrvm/basic/core/reflect/TestFieldReflection; testByte(Ljava/lang/Object;[Ljava/lang/reflect/Field;)V at line 154
at [0x67d85e6c, 0x6782c193] Ltest/org/jikesrvm/basic/core/reflect/TestFieldReflection; testFieldReflection(Ljava/lang/Object;Ljava/lang/Class;[Ljava/lang/reflect/Field;)V at line 80
at [0x67d85e90, 0x678310f9] Ltest/org/jikesrvm/basic/core/reflect/TestFieldReflection; testFieldReflection(Ljava/lang/Class;)V at line 66
at [0x67d85eac, 0x5b2d6a36] Ltest/org/jikesrvm/basic/core/reflect/TestFieldReflection; main([Ljava/lang/String;)V at line 60
at [0x67d85ec4, 0x5b267ddc] <invisible method>
at [0x67d85f38, 0x5b268240] Lorg/jikesrvm/runtime/Reflection; outOfLineInvoke(Lorg/jikesrvm/classloader/RVMMethod;Ljava/lang/Object;[Ljava/lang/Object;Z)Ljava/lang/Object; at line 194
at [0x67d85f70, 0x5b1ae7e9] Lorg/jikesrvm/runtime/Reflection; invoke(Lorg/jikesrvm/classloader/RVMMethod;Lorg/jikesrvm/runtime/ReflectionBase;Ljava/lang/Object;[Ljava/lang/Object;Z)Ljava/lang/Object; at line 76
at [0x67d85fb0, 0x5b29df07] Lorg/jikesrvm/scheduler/MainThread; run()V at line 201
at [0x67d85fd8, 0x5b322039] Lorg/jikesrvm/scheduler/RVMThread; run()V at line 2491
at [0x67d85ff8, 0x080501e5] Lorg/jikesrvm/scheduler/RVMThread; startoff()V at line 2535
********************************************************************************
* Abnormal termination of Jikes RVM *
* Jikes RVM terminated abnormally indicating a problem in the virtual machine. *
* Jikes RVM relies on community support to get debug information. Help improve *
* Jikes RVM for everybody by reporting this error. Please see: *
* http://jikesrvm.org/Reporting+Bugs *
********************************************************************************

From forum: jikesrvm-issues

[rvm-regress] [core-ppc64.12480] 6 FAILURES

2009-12-21T17:43:18Z

Regression summary for core-ppc64 (r15804) on piccolo.watson.ibm.com, Mon Dec 21 19:13:35 UTC 2009

See the Full Report Statistics Report

Revisions covered by this test run: 15804

Test Runs covered by this report: core-ppc64.12296 (r15799), core-ppc64.12311 (r15799), core-ppc64.12339 (r15799), core-ppc64.12366 (r15799), core-ppc64.12380 (r15799), core-ppc64.12394 (r15799), core-ppc64.12410 (r15799), core-ppc64.12437 (r15804), core-ppc64.12465 (r15804), core-ppc64.12480 (r15804)

Failed 6/660 (0%)

0 new failures this run

0 missing tests this run

0 new successes this run

11 intermittent failures over this week

4 consistent failures over this week

Performance Statistics

	08/12	09/12	11/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	18/12	20/12	21/12
Success Rate	653/660	652/660	653/660	653/660	654/660	651/660	655/660	655/660	653/660	654/660
dacapo: antlr	30762	53924 (+104%)	45539 (+72%)	26575	52454 (+98%)	33848	27223	44184 (+67%)	26367	34133
dacapo: bloat	14719 (+6%)	14585 (+5%)	14683 (+5%)	14495 (+4%)	14169 (+2%)	14249 (+2%)	14489 (+4%)	14870 (+7%)	14472 (+4%)	14555 (+4%)
dacapo: eclipse	179309 (+45%)	182991 (+48%)	175992 (+42%)	138159	147339	276631 (+124%)	206570 (+67%)	149459	141817	181399 (+46%)
dacapo: fop	5119 (+6%)	5079 (+5%)	5099 (+5%)	5056 (+5%)	5111 (+6%)	5100 (+6%)	5084 (+5%)	5101 (+6%)	5136 (+6%)	5214 (+8%)
dacapo: hsqldb	6320	6445 (+6%)	6386 (+5%)	6488 (+7%)	6222	6140	6469 (+6%)	6321	6351 (+4%)	7360 (+21%)
dacapo: jython	16571 (+5%)	16356 (+4%)	16229 (+3%)	16372 (+4%)	16285 (+4%)	16721 (+6%)	16426 (+5%)	16200 (+3%)	16078 (+2%)	16750 (+7%)
dacapo: luindex	59847 (+19%)	66838 (+33%)	64162 (+28%)	62490 (+25%)	70669 (+41%)	53803	65924 (+31%)	63354 (+26%)	50505	67814 (+35%)
dacapo: lusearch	21144 (+247%)	8359	9527 (+56%)	7718	7117	8507	9026	9475 (+55%)	7876	8835
dacapo: pmd	11648 (+6%)	11550 (+5%)	11522 (+5%)	11350 (+3%)	11357 (+3%)	11401 (+4%)	11553 (+5%)	11789 (+7%)	11542 (+5%)	11288 (+3%)
dacapo: xalan	11581 (+29%)	10807 (+20%)	11192 (+25%)	9368	10745 (+20%)	11057 (+23%)	11326 (+26%)	11079 (+24%)	9327	11081 (+24%)
SPECjbb2000		26487 (-37%)	37712	41255	13544 (-67%)	25715 (-39%)			39897
SPECjbb2005	3802 (-13%)	4122 (-5%)	3789 (-13%)	4250	3989 (-8%)	4253	4232	3898 (-10%)	4275	4257
SPECjvm98	182.29 (-1%)	179.03 (-3%)	178.87 (-3%)	180.21 (-2%)	180.15 (-2%)	180.19 (-2%)	179.35 (-3%)	183.65 (-0%)	180.38 (-2%)	177.57 (-4%)

Build Configuration By Test Run

	08/12	09/12	11/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	18/12	20/12	21/12
prototype-opt	98%	98%	99%	98%	98%	97%	99%	99%	99%	99%
prototype	98%	98%	99%	99%	98%	98%	99%	99%	99%	99%
production	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%
development	99%	99%	99%	99%	100%	99%	100%	99%	99%	99%

Test Case By Test Run

	08/12	09/12	11/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	18/12	20/12	21/12
TestNestedGC	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%
TestParallelHardwareTrap	71%	57%	57%	71%	71%	71%	86%	86%	71%	71%
eclipse	75%	75%	100%	100%	100%	75%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Exhaust	100%	100%	100%	86%	100%	86%	100%	100%	100%	100%
xalan	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	75%	100%
ReferenceStress	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	86%	100%	100%	100%	100%

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Jikesrvm-regression mailing list
Jikesrvm-regression@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jikesrvm-regression

From forum: jikesrvm-regression

Re: [rvm-core] a object copying related problem

2009-12-21T15:56:04Z

Hi Da Feng,

Try putting a watch on object 332, ie watchObject=332.

You might also try watching the relevant addresses, ie

watchAddress=0x201AFDBC,0x201AFDC0,0x201AFDC4,0x201AFDC8,0x201AFDCC

and perhaps the source addresses - the MMTk harness has a 5-word object
header, and the allocation site is in the 2nd word after the GC header.

btw, I think this is a discussion better suited to the
jikesrvm-researchers list.

cheers,
Robin

Da Feng wrote:

> Hello:
> when I copy an object to an different address, the allocation site went
> wrong.
> The collector works in way similar to Gen-MarkCompact. this happens when
> compacting mature heap. Can any one give me some clue?
> ============================
> [Full heap][GC 7 Start 3459.95 ms 1956KB [COLLECT] Computing roots for
> mutators
> [COLLECT] mutators to scan: 1
> [COLLECT] Computing roots for mutator
> [ROOTS] Tracing root 0x20040018
> [ROOTS] new value of 0x20040018
> [ROOTS] Tracing root 0x20040030
> [ROOTS] new value of 0x20040030
> [ROOTS] Tracing root 0x20040070
> [ROOTS] new value of 0x20040070
> [ROOTS] Tracing root 0x200400B0
> [ROOTS] new value of 0x200400B0
> [ROOTS] Tracing root 0x200400F0
> [ROOTS] new value of 0x200400F0
> [ROOTS] Tracing root 0x20040130
> [ROOTS] new value of 0x20040130
> [ROOTS] Tracing root 0x20040170
> [ROOTS] new value of 0x20040170
> [ROOTS] Tracing root 0x200401B0
> [ROOTS] new value of 0x200401B0
> [ROOTS] Tracing root 0x200401F0
> [ROOTS] new value of 0x200401F0
> [ROOTS] Tracing root 0x20040230
> [ROOTS] new value of 0x20040230
> [ROOTS] Tracing root 0x20040270
> [ROOTS] new value of 0x20040270
> [ROOTS] Tracing root 0x8CC23E48
> [COLLECT] Copying object [332@24:9] from 0x8CC23E48/nursery to 0x201AFDB8/mw
> [ROOTS] new value of 0x201AFDB8
> [ROOTS] Tracing root 0x201AFDB8
> [ROOTS] new value of 0x201AFDB8
> [ROOTS] Locals: 13
> [COLLECT] mutators to scan: 0
> [COLLECT] Copying object [322@24:9] from 0x8CC0BF78/nursery to 0x201B2400/mw
> [COLLECT] Copying object [323@24:9] from 0x8CC0E5C0/nursery to 0x201B4A48/mw
> [COLLECT] Copying object [324@24:9] from 0x8CC10C08/nursery to 0x201B7090/mw
> [COLLECT] Copying object [325@24:9] from 0x8CC13250/nursery to 0x201B96D8/mw
> [COLLECT] Copying object [326@24:9] from 0x8CC15898/nursery to 0x201BBD20/mw
> [COLLECT] Copying object [327@24:9] from 0x8CC17EE0/nursery to 0x201C0018/mw
> [COLLECT] Copying object [328@24:9] from 0x8CC1A528/nursery to 0x201C2660/mw
> [COLLECT] Copying object [329@24:9] from 0x8CC1CB70/nursery to 0x201C4CA8/mw
> [COLLECT] Copying object [330@24:9] from 0x8CC1F1B8/nursery to 0x201C72F0/mw
> [COLLECT] Copying object [331@24:9] from 0x8CC21800/nursery to 0x201C9938/mw
> [COLLECT] Computing roots for mutators
> [COLLECT] mutators to scan: 1
> [COLLECT] Computing roots for mutator
> [ROOTS] Tracing root 0x20040018
> [ROOTS] new value of 0x20002660
> [ROOTS] Tracing root 0x20040030
> [ROOTS] new value of 0x20002678
> [ROOTS] Tracing root 0x20040070
> [ROOTS] new value of 0x200026B8
> [ROOTS] Tracing root 0x200400B0
> [ROOTS] new value of 0x200026F8
> [ROOTS] Tracing root 0x200400F0
> [ROOTS] new value of 0x20002738
> [ROOTS] Tracing root 0x20040130
> [ROOTS] new value of 0x20002778
> [ROOTS] Tracing root 0x20040170
> [ROOTS] new value of 0x200027B8
> [ROOTS] Tracing root 0x200401B0
> [ROOTS] new value of 0x200027F8
> [ROOTS] Tracing root 0x200401F0
> [ROOTS] new value of 0x20002838
> [ROOTS] Tracing root 0x20040230
> [ROOTS] new value of 0x20002878
> [ROOTS] Tracing root 0x20040270
> [ROOTS] new value of 0x200028B8
> [ROOTS] Tracing root 0x201AFDB8
> [ROOTS] new value of 0x20000018
> [ROOTS] Tracing root 0x20000018
> [ROOTS] new value of 0x20000018
> [ROOTS] Locals: 13
> [COLLECT] mutators to scan: 0
> [COLLECT] Copying object [332@24:9] from 0x201AFDB8/mw to 0x20000018/mw
> Object 0x201AFDB8[332@24:9]<530,20000018>
> java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index: 2444, Size: 12
> at java.util.ArrayList.RangeCheck(ArrayList.java:547)
> at java.util.ArrayList.get(ArrayList.java:322)
> at
> org.mmtk.harness.lang.runtime.AllocationSite.getSite(AllocationSite.java:36)
> at org.mmtk.harness.Mutator.getSiteName(Mutator.java:397)
> at
> org.mmtk.harness.vm.ObjectModel.dumpObjectHeader(ObjectModel.java:747)
> at org.mmtk.harness.vm.ObjectModel.copyTo(ObjectModel.java:422)
> at org.mmtk.policy.MarkSwapLocal.swap(MarkSwapLocal.java:529)
> at
> org.mmtk.plan.generational.markswap.GenMWMutator.collectionPhase(GenMWMutator.java:65)
> at org.mmtk.plan.Phase.processPhaseStack(Phase.java:441)
> at org.mmtk.plan.Phase.beginNewPhaseStack(Phase.java:351)
> at
> org.mmtk.plan.StopTheWorldCollector.collect(StopTheWorldCollector.java:39)
> at org.mmtk.harness.Collector.collect(Collector.java:275)
> at org.mmtk.harness.Collector.run(Collector.java:172)
> at
> org.mmtk.harness.scheduler.javathreads.CollectorThread.run(CollectorThread.java:35)
>
>
> DaFENG
> Coder
> Telecommunication && Network Industry
> Pudong
> Shanghai
> China
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
> Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
> A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
> Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jikesrvm-core mailing list
> Jikesrvm-core@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jikesrvm-core

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Jikesrvm-core mailing list
Jikesrvm-core@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jikesrvm-core

From forum: jikesrvm-core

Re: [rvm-research] [rvm-core] a object copying related problem

2009-12-21T15:56:04Z

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Jikesrvm-researchers mailing list
Jikesrvm-researchers@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jikesrvm-researchers

From forum: jikesrvm-researchers

[rvm-regress] [perf.12479] SUCCESS

2009-12-21T13:57:50Z

Regression summary for perf (r15804) on habanero.anu.edu.au, Mon Dec 21 17:05:26 UTC 2009

See the Full Report Statistics Report Performance Report

Revisions covered by this test run: 15804

Test Runs covered by this report: perf.12444 (r15804), perf.12449 (r15804), perf.12451 (r15804), perf.12454 (r15804), perf.12457 (r15804), perf.12464 (r15804), perf.12466 (r15804), perf.12471 (r15804), perf.12474 (r15804), perf.12479 (r15804)

Failed 0/436 (0%)

0 new failures this run

0 missing tests this run

0 new successes this run

8 intermittent failures over this week

0 consistent failures over this week

Performance Statistics

	19/12 11:05	19/12 17:05	19/12 23:05	20/12 05:05	20/12 11:05	20/12 17:05	20/12 23:05	21/12 05:05	21/12 11:05	21/12 17:05
Success Rate	434/436	435/436	435/436	435/436	436/436	435/436	436/436	434/436	434/436	436/436

Test Case By Test Run

	19/12 11:05	19/12 17:05	19/12 23:05	20/12 05:05	20/12 11:05	20/12 17:05	20/12 23:05	21/12 05:05	21/12 11:05	21/12 17:05
jess-3GC	83%	100%	83%	83%	100%	83%	100%	83%	83%	100%
lusearch-10	100%	83%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	83%	100%
lusearch-3GC	83%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
xalan-1	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	83%	100%	100%

From forum: jikesrvm-regression

[rvm-regress] [sanity-tier2.12478] 79 FAILURES

2009-12-21T11:17:28Z

Regression summary for sanity-tier2 (r15804) on jalapeno.anu.edu.au, Mon Dec 21 17:13:00 UTC 2009

See the Full Report Statistics Report

Revisions covered by this test run: 15804

Test Runs covered by this report: sanity-tier2.12351 (r15799), sanity-tier2.12363 (r15799), sanity-tier2.12378 (r15799), sanity-tier2.12392 (r15799), sanity-tier2.12407 (r15799), sanity-tier2.12421 (r15801), sanity-tier2.12435 (r15804), sanity-tier2.12448 (r15804), sanity-tier2.12462 (r15804), sanity-tier2.12478 (r15804)

Failed 79/312 (25%)

2 new failures this run

FastAdaptiveStickyImmix	default	dacapo	fop	OVERTIME	Details
FastAdaptiveStickyImmix	default	SPECjvm98	_228_jack	OVERTIME	Details

0 missing tests this run

0 new successes this run

16 intermittent failures over this week

73 consistent failures over this week

Performance Statistics

	12/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	17/12	18/12	19/12	20/12	21/12
Success Rate	234/312	234/312	236/312	235/312	235/312	232/312	231/312	234/312	234/312	233/312

Build Configuration By Test Run

	12/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	17/12	18/12	19/12	20/12	21/12
BaseBaseMarkCompact	64%	64%	64%	64%	64%	64%	64%	64%	64%	64%
FullAdaptiveMarkCompact	65%	65%	65%	65%	65%	65%	65%	65%	65%	65%
FastAdaptiveStickyImmix	95%	95%	97%	96%	96%	93%	92%	95%	95%	94%

Test Case By Test Run

	12/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	17/12	18/12	19/12	20/12	21/12
SPECjbb2005	0%	0%	33%	0%	0%	0%	0%	33%	0%	0%
bloat	0%	33%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	33%	0%	33%
SPECjbb2000	0%	33%	0%	33%	33%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%
xalan	0%	0%	0%	0%	33%	33%	0%	0%	33%	33%
eclipse	0%	33%	33%	33%	0%	0%	0%	33%	0%	33%
luindex	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	0%	0%	33%	0%
lusearch	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	0%	33%	0%	33%	0%
jBYTEmark	33%	0%	33%	33%	0%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
jython	33%	0%	33%	33%	33%	33%	0%	33%	33%	33%
_228_jack	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	0%
chart	33%	0%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
dom.Counter	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	0%	33%	33%	33%
fop	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	0%
hsqldb	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	0%	33%	33%	33%	33%
Ipsixql	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	0%	33%
pmd	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	0%	33%	33%
soot.Main	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	0%	33%	33%	33%	33%
tInstance	33%	33%	33%	0%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
_200_check	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
_201_compress	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
_202_jess	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
_209_db	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
_213_javac	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
_222_mpegaudio	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
_227_mtrt	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
antlr	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
CaffeineMark	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
JLex.Main	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
RVM_708	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
sax.Counter	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
t3GT3	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
tClass	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
TestBackEdgeGC	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
TestDispatch	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
TestGC	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
TestNestedGC	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
TestParallelHardwareTrap	67%	67%	67%	67%	67%	67%	67%	67%	67%	67%

From forum: jikesrvm-regression

[rvm-regress] [sanity.12477] 3 FAILURES

2009-12-21T09:27:35Z

Regression summary for sanity (r15804) on jalapeno.anu.edu.au, Mon Dec 21 11:00:49 UTC 2009

See the Full Report Statistics Report

Revisions covered by this test run: 15804

Test Runs covered by this report: sanity.12349 (r15799), sanity.12361 (r15799), sanity.12377 (r15799), sanity.12390 (r15799), sanity.12405 (r15799), sanity.12418 (r15801), sanity.12433 (r15804), sanity.12446 (r15804), sanity.12460 (r15804), sanity.12477 (r15804)

Failed 3/2240 (0%)

0 new failures this run

0 missing tests this run

0 new successes this run

19 intermittent failures over this week

0 consistent failures over this week

Performance Statistics

	12/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	17/12	18/12	19/12	20/12	21/12
Success Rate	2237/2240	2237/2240	2235/2240	2239/2240	2237/2240	2238/2240	2235/2240	2235/2240	2239/2240	2237/2240
dacapo: antlr	2020 (+6%)	1957 (+2%)	1938 (+1%)	1959 (+2%)	1940 (+1%)	1999 (+4%)	1931	1924	1961 (+2%)	2016 (+5%)
dacapo: bloat	7059 (+4%)	6974 (+3%)	7011 (+3%)	7075 (+4%)	6826	7137 (+5%)	6945 (+2%)	6880 (+1%)	7044 (+4%)	6940 (+2%)
dacapo: chart	8143 (+1%)	8185 (+1%)	8171 (+1%)	8074	8225 (+2%)	8202 (+1%)	8179 (+1%)	8127 (+0%)	8162 (+1%)	8153 (+1%)
dacapo: eclipse	28098 (+2%)	27550	28529 (+3%)	28457 (+3%)	28905 (+5%)	28397 (+3%)	27791	29041 (+5%)	27883 (+1%)	28084 (+2%)
dacapo: fop	2386 (+18%)	2047	2371 (+17%)	2379 (+18%)	2050	2401 (+19%)	2408 (+19%)	2380 (+18%)	2034	2067
dacapo: hsqldb	3045 (+12%)	2881 (+6%)	2856 (+5%)	2876 (+6%)	2947 (+8%)	3010 (+10%)	2972 (+9%)	2995 (+10%)	2924 (+7%)	2956 (+8%)
dacapo: jython	6505 (+1%)	6589 (+3%)		6523 (+2%)	6570 (+2%)	6589 (+3%)	6547 (+2%)	6628 (+3%)	6660 (+4%)	6665 (+4%)
dacapo: luindex	7943 (+4%)	7626	7865 (+3%)	7937 (+4%)	7847 (+3%)	7944 (+4%)	7863 (+3%)	7752 (+2%)	7644	7785 (+2%)
dacapo: lusearch	3463 (+11%)	3674 (+17%)	3576 (+14%)	3665 (+17%)	3782 (+21%)	3622 (+16%)	3514 (+12%)	3604 (+15%)	3733 (+19%)	3938 (+26%)
dacapo: pmd	4682	4915 (+6%)	4986 (+8%)	5035 (+9%)	4853 (+5%)	4865 (+5%)	5089 (+10%)	4941 (+7%)	5016 (+8%)	4683
dacapo: xalan	3673 (+2%)	3729 (+3%)	3728 (+3%)	3749 (+4%)		3809 (+6%)	3816 (+6%)		3787 (+5%)	3789 (+5%)
SPECjbb2000	95283	94066	63127 (-34%)	94961	94820	95082	62697 (-34%)	94800	95452	95312
SPECjbb2005	13495 (-5%)	13374 (-5%)	12522 (-11%)	13100 (-7%)	13622 (-4%)	13006 (-8%)	13191 (-7%)	13346 (-6%)	13151 (-7%)	13445 (-5%)
SPECjvm98	359.17 (-1%)	358.25 (-1%)	357.96 (-1%)	357.34 (-1%)	354.71 (-2%)	356.79 (-1%)	358.65 (-1%)	358.54 (-1%)	359.7 (-1%)	361.22 (-0%)

Build Configuration By Test Run

	12/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	17/12	18/12	19/12	20/12	21/12
FastAdaptiveSemiSpace	100%	100%	100%	83%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
FullAdaptivePoisoned	99%	98%	99%	100%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%
production	99%	100%	99%	100%	99%	100%	99%	99%	100%	100%
FullAdaptiveStickyMS	100%	100%	98%	100%	100%	100%	100%	99%	100%	99%
BaseBaseSemiSpace	99%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	99%
FullAdaptiveCopyMS	100%	99%	100%	100%	100%	100%	99%	100%	100%	100%
BaseBaseGenCopy	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	99%	100%	100%	100%	100%
BaseBaseMarkSweep	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	99%	100%	100%
FullAdaptiveGenCopy	100%	100%	100%	100%	99%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
FullAdaptiveGenImmix	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	99%	100%	100%	100%
prototype	100%	100%	99%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
prototype-opt	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	99%	100%	100%	100%

Test Case By Test Run

	12/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	17/12	18/12	19/12	20/12	21/12
AtomicLongArrayTest	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	0%	100%	100%
xalan	94%	88%	94%	100%	88%	94%	81%	81%	100%	88%
SPECjbb2005	94%	94%	94%	100%	94%	94%	94%	94%	94%	94%
ReferenceStress	100%	100%	100%	75%	100%	100%	75%	100%	100%	100%
Exhaust	75%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
eclipse	100%	100%	94%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Ipsixql	100%	100%	94%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
jython	100%	100%	94%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%

From forum: jikesrvm-regression

[rvm-regress] [core-ppc32.12476] 2 FAILURES

2009-12-21T09:20:03Z

Regression summary for core-ppc32 (r15804) on piano.watson.ibm.com, Mon Dec 21 13:00:43 UTC 2009

See the Full Report Statistics Report

Revisions covered by this test run: 15804

Test Runs covered by this report: core-ppc32.12334 (r15799), core-ppc32.12348 (r15799), core-ppc32.12360 (r15799), core-ppc32.12376 (r15799), core-ppc32.12389 (r15799), core-ppc32.12404 (r15799), core-ppc32.12419 (r15803), core-ppc32.12432 (r15804), core-ppc32.12459 (r15804), core-ppc32.12476 (r15804)

Failed 2/660 (0%)

1 new failures this run

development

Opt_1

gctest

Exhaust

OVERTIME

Details

0 missing tests this run

0 new successes this run

5 intermittent failures over this week

0 consistent failures over this week

Performance Statistics

	11/12	12/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	17/12	18/12	20/12	21/12
Success Rate	659/660	660/660	660/660	660/660	660/660	659/660	659/660	658/660	660/660	658/660
dacapo: antlr	5472 (+29%)	9503 (+124%)	5296	4884	6254 (+47%)	5329	4879	4962	4886	4520
dacapo: bloat	12888 (+7%)	12868 (+6%)	12515	12771 (+6%)	12767 (+6%)	14861 (+23%)	13853 (+15%)	12603	12931 (+7%)	12209
dacapo: eclipse	61546 (+3%)	62696 (+5%)	63433 (+7%)	60162	59545	59710	63736 (+7%)	60461	61667 (+4%)	59942
dacapo: fop	5578	5632 (+2%)	5677 (+3%)	5624 (+2%)	5594 (+2%)	5609 (+2%)	6046 (+10%)	5586 (+2%)	5636 (+3%)	5653 (+3%)
dacapo: hsqldb	6141 (+11%)	6325 (+14%)	6077 (+10%)	5836 (+5%)	5880 (+6%)	6141 (+11%)	6495 (+17%)	6246 (+13%)	6073 (+10%)	6032 (+9%)
dacapo: jython	15812 (+4%)	16691 (+10%)	15602	15221	15518	15802 (+4%)	16779 (+10%)	15267	15396	15570
dacapo: luindex	14428	15852 (+12%)	14451	15169 (+7%)	16722 (+18%)	14491	16132 (+14%)	14437	14589	14602
dacapo: lusearch	7902	10719 (+74%)	8659 (+41%)	6805	7785	8519 (+39%)	14628 (+138%)	7796	7949	7279
dacapo: pmd	9207	10282 (+13%)	9291	9241	9473 (+4%)	9354	10330 (+14%)	9243	9231	9423 (+4%)
dacapo: xalan	9665 (+33%)	12665 (+75%)	9952 (+37%)	7443	9161	9589 (+32%)	16573 (+129%)	9470 (+31%)	8879	7438
SPECjbb2000			27185 (-48%)	51832		34122 (-35%)	32358 (-38%)	40497 (-23%)	40188 (-23%)	51765
SPECjbb2005	7216 (-21%)	7485 (-18%)	7484 (-18%)	8495 (-7%)	6486 (-29%)	7081 (-22%)	7300 (-20%)	8175 (-10%)	8068 (-12%)	8762
SPECjvm98	223.85 (-1%)	216.37 (-5%)	222.28 (-2%)	222.51 (-2%)	222.67 (-2%)	223.74 (-1%)	220.16 (-3%)	221.42 (-2%)	221.16 (-3%)	224.68 (-1%)

Build Configuration By Test Run

	11/12	12/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	17/12	18/12	20/12	21/12
prototype-opt	99%	100%	100%	100%	100%	99%	100%	99%	100%	99%
production	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	99%	100%	100%

Test Case By Test Run

	11/12	12/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	17/12	18/12	20/12	21/12
xalan	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	75%	100%	100%	100%	75%
Exhaust	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	86%	100%	86%
ReferenceStress	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	86%	100%	100%	100%
ReferenceTest	86%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
TestTimedWait	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	86%	100%	100%

From forum: jikesrvm-regression

[rvm-regress] [sanity.12475] 1 FAILURE

2009-12-21T08:20:40Z

Regression summary for sanity (r15804) on paprika.anu.edu.au, Mon Dec 21 06:47:00 UTC 2009

See the Full Report Statistics Report

Revisions covered by this test run: 15804

Test Runs covered by this report: sanity.12347 (r15799), sanity.12359 (r15799), sanity.12375 (r15799), sanity.12388 (r15799), sanity.12403 (r15799), sanity.12417 (r15801), sanity.12431 (r15804), sanity.12445 (r15804), sanity.12458 (r15804), sanity.12475 (r15804)

Failed 1/2224 (0%)

0 new failures this run

0 missing tests this run

0 new successes this run

9 intermittent failures over this week

1 consistent failures over this week

Performance Statistics

	12/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	17/12	18/12	19/12	20/12	21/12
Success Rate	2222/2224	2220/2224	2223/2224	2221/2224	2222/2224	2222/2224	2223/2224	2220/2224	2222/2224	2223/2224
dacapo: antlr	3691 (+5%)	3611 (+3%)	3642 (+4%)	3721 (+6%)	3762 (+7%)	3745 (+7%)	3591 (+2%)	3667 (+5%)	3635 (+4%)	3577 (+2%)
dacapo: bloat	10016 (+5%)	10181 (+7%)	9983 (+5%)	9904 (+4%)	9739 (+3%)	9782 (+3%)	9720 (+2%)	9716 (+2%)	9771 (+3%)	9691 (+2%)
dacapo: eclipse	72000 (+17%)	71511 (+16%)	66735 (+8%)	71869 (+17%)	65369 (+6%)	69431 (+13%)	70049 (+14%)	70818 (+15%)	70062 (+14%)	70205 (+14%)
dacapo: fop	4129	4150 (+1%)	4229 (+3%)	4266 (+4%)	4156 (+2%)	4346 (+6%)	4163 (+2%)	4156 (+2%)	4175 (+2%)	4325 (+6%)
dacapo: hsqldb	4335 (+10%)	4377 (+11%)	4402 (+12%)	3911	4274 (+9%)	4263 (+9%)	4637 (+18%)	4398 (+12%)	4358 (+11%)	4212 (+7%)
dacapo: jython	9330 (+7%)	9321 (+7%)	8941 (+2%)	9050 (+4%)	8950 (+2%)	9094 (+4%)	8947 (+2%)	9343 (+7%)	9210 (+5%)	8952 (+2%)
dacapo: luindex	12277	12346	20368 (+68%)	21759 (+80%)	17786 (+47%)	18894 (+56%)	12294	21046 (+74%)	21607 (+78%)	22705 (+88%)
dacapo: lusearch	10321 (+10%)	10352 (+10%)	10154 (+8%)	9863 (+5%)	9802 (+5%)	10136 (+8%)	10954 (+17%)	10346 (+10%)	9974 (+6%)	10025 (+7%)
dacapo: pmd	8626 (+28%)	7308 (+8%)	6821	7045	6979	7208 (+7%)	7498 (+11%)	6972	6945	6757
dacapo: xalan	9482	9580 (+3%)	9591 (+3%)	10319 (+11%)	10213 (+9%)	9729 (+4%)	9875 (+6%)	9473	10265 (+10%)	9428
SPECjbb2000	38330 (-3%)	39071 (-1%)	38619 (-2%)	38516 (-2%)	38497 (-2%)	38863 (-1%)	38956 (-1%)	38201 (-3%)	38566 (-2%)	38396 (-3%)
SPECjbb2005	9556 (-3%)	9236 (-6%)	9808	9046 (-8%)	9546 (-3%)	9758	9237 (-6%)	9209 (-6%)	8792 (-10%)	9143 (-7%)
SPECjvm98	243.06 (-1%)	241.27 (-2%)	244.71 (-0%)	244.4 (-0%)	239.47 (-2%)	243.08 (-1%)	238.27 (-3%)	240.17 (-2%)	239.61 (-2%)	240.92 (-2%)

Build Configuration By Test Run

	12/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	17/12	18/12	19/12	20/12	21/12
FastAdaptiveSemiSpace	83%	83%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	83%	100%
FullAdaptivePoisoned	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%
FullAdaptiveStickyMS	100%	99%	100%	99%	100%	100%	100%	99%	100%	100%
FullAdaptiveImmix	100%	99%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	99%	100%	100%
BaseBaseMarkSweep	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	99%	100%	100%	100%	100%
BaseBasePoisoned	100%	100%	100%	99%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%

Test Case By Test Run

	12/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	17/12	18/12	19/12	20/12	21/12
SPECjbb2005	94%	94%	94%	94%	94%	94%	94%	94%	94%	94%
Exhaust	75%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	75%	100%
ReferenceStress	100%	75%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
eclipse	100%	88%	100%	94%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
bloat	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	88%	100%	100%
xalan	100%	100%	100%	94%	100%	94%	100%	100%	100%	100%
TestStop	100%	100%	100%	100%	96%	100%	100%	96%	100%	100%

From forum: jikesrvm-regression

[rvm-regress] [perf.12474] 2 FAILURES

2009-12-21T07:57:44Z

Regression summary for perf (r15804) on habanero.anu.edu.au, Mon Dec 21 11:05:11 UTC 2009

See the Full Report Statistics Report Performance Report

Revisions covered by this test run: 15804

Test Runs covered by this report: perf.12441 (r15804), perf.12444 (r15804), perf.12449 (r15804), perf.12451 (r15804), perf.12454 (r15804), perf.12457 (r15804), perf.12464 (r15804), perf.12466 (r15804), perf.12471 (r15804), perf.12474 (r15804)

Failed 2/436 (0%)

1 new failures this run

production

default

perf-dacapo

lusearch-10

FAILURE

Details

0 missing tests this run

0 new successes this run

8 intermittent failures over this week

0 consistent failures over this week

Performance Statistics

	19/12 05:05	19/12 11:05	19/12 17:05	19/12 23:05	20/12 05:05	20/12 11:05	20/12 17:05	20/12 23:05	21/12 05:05	21/12 11:05
Success Rate	434/436	434/436	435/436	435/436	435/436	436/436	435/436	436/436	434/436	434/436

Test Case By Test Run

	19/12 05:05	19/12 11:05	19/12 17:05	19/12 23:05	20/12 05:05	20/12 11:05	20/12 17:05	20/12 23:05	21/12 05:05	21/12 11:05
jess-3GC	67%	83%	100%	83%	83%	100%	83%	100%	83%	83%
lusearch-10	100%	100%	83%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	83%
lusearch-3GC	100%	83%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
xalan-1	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	83%	100%

From forum: jikesrvm-regression

[rvm-regress] [core-ppc32.12473] 2 FAILURES

2009-12-21T05:28:23Z

Regression summary for core-ppc32 (r15804) on piccolo.watson.ibm.com, Mon Dec 21 07:10:07 UTC 2009

See the Full Report Statistics Report

Revisions covered by this test run: 15804

Test Runs covered by this report: core-ppc32.11554 (r15788), core-ppc32.11569 (r15788), core-ppc32.11584 (r15788), core-ppc32.11599 (r15788), core-ppc32.11800 (r15792), core-ppc32.11816 (r15792), core-ppc32.11873 (r15792), core-ppc32.11888 (r15792), core-ppc32.12456 (r15804), core-ppc32.12473 (r15804)

Failed 2/660 (0%)

0 new failures this run

0 missing tests this run

0 new successes this run

14 intermittent failures over this week

0 consistent failures over this week

Performance Statistics

	20/10	21/10	22/10	23/10	06/11	07/11	11/11	12/11	20/12	21/12
Success Rate	660/660	658/660	659/660	658/660	652/660	632/634	656/660	659/660	657/660	658/660
dacapo: antlr	26496	26294	27442	26145	26449	31923 (+23%)	26319	32632 (+25%)	26056	25924
dacapo: bloat	13315 (+8%)	13058 (+6%)	12986 (+5%)	13080 (+6%)	12818 (+4%)	12638 (+3%)	12626 (+2%)	12612 (+2%)	12572 (+2%)	12470
dacapo: eclipse	144867	252114 (+110%)	136361	183368 (+52%)	179554 (+49%)	133191	139676	138732	168911 (+40%)	121748
dacapo: fop	4632 (+2%)	4640 (+3%)	4595 (+2%)	4611 (+2%)	4631 (+2%)	4673 (+3%)	4566 (+1%)	4577 (+1%)	4626 (+2%)	4638 (+3%)
dacapo: hsqldb	5660 (+14%)	5626 (+13%)	5152 (+4%)	5742 (+16%)	5705 (+15%)	5228 (+5%)	5252 (+6%)	5398 (+9%)	5590 (+13%)	5606 (+13%)
dacapo: jython	14617 (+3%)	14607 (+3%)	14623 (+3%)	14670 (+3%)	14732 (+4%)	14838 (+4%)	14597 (+3%)	14537 (+2%)	14687 (+3%)	14735 (+4%)
dacapo: luindex	49098	60196 (+25%)	57142 (+19%)	57023 (+18%)	57313 (+19%)	59969 (+24%)	48853	59183 (+23%)	60123 (+25%)	58516 (+21%)
dacapo: lusearch	6713 (+20%)	6919 (+24%)	6824 (+22%)	6487 (+16%)	6621 (+18%)	7453 (+33%)	6810 (+22%)	6645 (+19%)	6954 (+24%)	6744 (+21%)
dacapo: pmd	8950 (+3%)	9444 (+8%)	9087 (+4%)	9172 (+5%)	9049 (+4%)	9243 (+6%)	9314 (+7%)	9055 (+4%)	9147 (+5%)	9010 (+3%)
dacapo: xalan	8256 (+9%)	8266 (+9%)	8384 (+10%)	8096 (+7%)		8597 (+13%)		7795 (+3%)	8450 (+11%)	8239 (+9%)
SPECjbb2000	44967	46278	45260	46870	45126	46437	46666	44648	46964	19941 (-58%)
SPECjbb2005	4524 (-0%)	4498 (-1%)	4435 (-2%)	4556	4528 (-0%)		4491 (-1%)	4499 (-1%)	4550	4514 (-1%)
SPECjvm98	206.15 (-2%)	207.7 (-2%)	207.84 (-1%)	208.35 (-1%)	210.8		210.69	207.94 (-1%)	207.55 (-2%)	204.56 (-3%)

Build Configuration By Test Run

	20/10	21/10	22/10	23/10	06/11	07/11	11/11	12/11	20/12	21/12
prototype-opt	100%	99%	100%	99%	97%	100%	100%	99%	100%	99%
prototype	100%	99%	100%	99%	98%	100%	99%	100%	99%	100%
development	100%	100%	100%	100%	99%	99%	99%	100%	99%	100%
production	100%	100%	100%	100%	99%	100%	99%	100%	100%	100%

Test Case By Test Run

	20/10	21/10	22/10	23/10	06/11	07/11	11/11	12/11	20/12	21/12
TestParallelHardwareTrap	100%	86%	100%	100%	86%	71%	71%	86%	71%	71%
eclipse	100%	75%	100%	50%	75%	100%	75%	100%	100%	100%
xalan	100%	100%	100%	100%	25%	100%	75%	100%	75%	100%
SPECjvm98	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	0%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Exhaust	100%	100%	100%	100%	71%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
SPECjbb2005	100%	100%	80%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
TestTimedWait	100%	100%	100%	100%	86%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%

From forum: jikesrvm-regression

[rvm-regress] [sanity-harmony.12472] 196 FAILURES

2009-12-21T04:01:00Z

Regression summary for sanity-harmony (r15804) on cayenne.anu.edu.au, Sun Dec 20 23:30:40 UTC 2009

See the Full Report Statistics Report

Revisions covered by this test run: 15804

Test Runs covered by this report: sanity-harmony.12345 (r15799), sanity-harmony.12357 (r15799), sanity-harmony.12373 (r15799), sanity-harmony.12386 (r15799), sanity-harmony.12401 (r15799), sanity-harmony.12415 (r15799), sanity-harmony.12429 (r15803), sanity-harmony.12443 (r15804), sanity-harmony.12455 (r15804), sanity-harmony.12472 (r15804)

Failed 196/2196 (8%)

0 new failures this run

0 missing tests this run

0 new successes this run

44 intermittent failures over this week

181 consistent failures over this week

Performance Statistics

	11/12	12/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	17/12	18/12	19/12	20/12
Success Rate	1999/2196	2001/2196	1998/2196	1997/2196	1997/2196	1995/2196	2001/2196	2000/2196	2004/2196	2000/2196
dacapo: antlr	4071	5922 (+54%)	3937	6943 (+81%)	6752 (+76%)	4531	6008 (+56%)	4183	4435	4817 (+25%)
dacapo: eclipse						77106 (+24%)	65754
dacapo: fop	6977 (+52%)	4753	5130	6660 (+45%)	6168 (+34%)	6795 (+48%)	6329 (+38%)	7338 (+60%)	5990 (+31%)	4904
dacapo: hsqldb	7032 (+5%)	7103 (+6%)	7220 (+8%)	7151 (+7%)	6929 (+4%)	7373 (+10%)	7191 (+8%)	7677 (+15%)	7050 (+5%)	7332 (+10%)
dacapo: luindex	18212 (+13%)	18066 (+12%)	18094 (+12%)	18150 (+13%)	18488 (+15%)	18311 (+14%)	17910 (+11%)	18491 (+15%)	17844 (+11%)	18045 (+12%)
dacapo: lusearch	15903 (+14%)	14514 (+4%)	15865 (+14%)	15422 (+11%)	15269 (+9%)	16385 (+17%)	15471 (+11%)	15674 (+12%)	15700 (+13%)	16067 (+15%)
dacapo: pmd	12960 (+37%)	13168 (+40%)	13226 (+40%)	13248 (+41%)	13455 (+43%)	12834 (+36%)	12998 (+38%)	13247 (+41%)	13137 (+39%)	12978 (+38%)
dacapo: xalan		32188 (+120%)
SPECjbb2000	26309 (-7%)	26665 (-6%)	26921 (-5%)	26400 (-7%)	26744 (-6%)	26655 (-6%)	27244 (-4%)	27029 (-5%)	26819 (-5%)	27066 (-5%)
SPECjbb2005	9137 (-9%)	9082 (-10%)	9238 (-8%)	8993 (-11%)		9026 (-10%)		9116 (-9%)	9251 (-8%)	9143 (-9%)
SPECjvm98	183.17 (-3%)	175.95 (-6%)	175.39 (-7%)	180.12 (-4%)	184.18 (-2%)	179.15 (-5%)	185.44	180.8 (-4%)	169.41 (-10%)	168.8 (-10%)

Build Configuration By Test Run

	11/12	12/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	17/12	18/12	19/12	20/12
prototype-opt	88%	88%	90%	88%	88%	88%	89%	88%	89%	89%
FullAdaptiveStickyMS	89%	89%	88%	89%	88%	88%	89%	90%	90%	88%
FullAdaptiveCopyMS	89%	89%	88%	89%	89%	89%	89%	89%	89%	89%
FullAdaptiveMarkSweep	89%	89%	89%	90%	88%	88%	89%	90%	88%	89%
BaseBaseMarkSweep	89%	89%	89%	89%	89%	89%	89%	89%	89%	89%
FullAdaptivePoisoned	89%	90%	89%	88%	89%	89%	88%	89%	90%	90%
FullAdaptiveGenCopy	90%	90%	90%	89%	91%	88%	90%	88%	90%	90%
FullAdaptiveGenImmix	90%	89%	90%	90%	89%	90%	91%	90%	90%	89%
BaseBaseSemiSpace	90%	90%	90%	90%	90%	89%	90%	90%	90%	90%
BaseBasePoisoned	90%	90%	90%	90%	90%	90%	90%	90%	90%	90%
BaseBaseCopyMS	91%	91%	91%	91%	91%	90%	91%	91%	91%	91%
FullAdaptiveImmix	91%	89%	91%	90%	92%	91%	92%	91%	91%	91%
production	92%	93%	92%	92%	91%	93%	91%	92%	92%	91%
BaseBaseGenCopy	92%	92%	92%	92%	92%	92%	92%	92%	92%	92%
FullAdaptiveRefCount	92%	92%	92%	92%	92%	92%	92%	93%	92%	92%
development	92%	93%	92%	92%	92%	92%	92%	92%	93%	92%
BaseBaseGenRC	93%	93%	93%	93%	93%	93%	93%	93%	93%	93%
BaseBaseRefCount	93%	93%	93%	93%	93%	93%	93%	93%	93%	93%
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	93%	93%	93%	93%	93%	93%	93%	93%	93%	93%
FullAdaptiveGenRC	93%	93%	93%	93%	93%	93%	93%	93%	93%	93%
prototype	93%	93%	93%	93%	93%	93%	93%	93%	93%	93%
FastAdaptiveSemiSpace	83%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%

Test Case By Test Run

	11/12	12/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	17/12	18/12	19/12	20/12
chart	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%
jython	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%
StringRegion	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%
TestAgent	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%
TestJNIDirectBuffers	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%
TestResolveOnCheckcast	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%
TestResolveOnInstanceof	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%
TestResolveOnInvokeInterface	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%
bloat	31%	31%	31%	31%	31%	25%	31%	44%	31%	44%
eclipse	44%	38%	38%	38%	25%	38%	56%	31%	44%	38%
lusearch	69%	69%	69%	69%	69%	69%	69%	69%	69%	69%
xalan	75%	88%	69%	69%	75%	56%	75%	69%	75%	69%
SPECjbb2005	76%	82%	82%	82%	71%	82%	76%	82%	94%	82%
tClass	96%	96%	100%	96%	96%	96%	96%	96%	96%	96%
TestBackEdgeGC	96%	96%	96%	96%	96%	96%	96%	100%	96%	96%
SPECjbb2000	100%	94%	88%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	88%
Exhaust	75%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
luindex	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	94%	94%	100%	100%	100%
soot.Main	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	94%	94%	100%	100%
TestClassHierarchy	100%	100%	100%	96%	100%	100%	100%	96%	100%	100%
hsqldb	100%	100%	94%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Ipsixql	100%	100%	100%	94%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
t3GT3	100%	100%	100%	94%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
_222_mpegaudio	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	95%	100%	100%	100%	100%
_228_jack	100%	95%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
TestStop	96%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%

From forum: jikesrvm-regression

[rvm-regress] [perf.12471] 2 FAILURES

2009-12-21T01:57:42Z

Regression summary for perf (r15804) on habanero.anu.edu.au, Mon Dec 21 05:05:25 UTC 2009

See the Full Report Statistics Report Performance Report

Revisions covered by this test run: 15804

Test Runs covered by this report: perf.12438 (r15804), perf.12441 (r15804), perf.12444 (r15804), perf.12449 (r15804), perf.12451 (r15804), perf.12454 (r15804), perf.12457 (r15804), perf.12464 (r15804), perf.12466 (r15804), perf.12471 (r15804)

Failed 2/436 (0%)

1 new failures this run

production

default

perf-dacapo

xalan-1

FAILURE

Details

0 missing tests this run

0 new successes this run

7 intermittent failures over this week

0 consistent failures over this week

Performance Statistics

	18/12	19/12 05:05	19/12 11:05	19/12 17:05	19/12 23:05	20/12 05:05	20/12 11:05	20/12 17:05	20/12 23:05	21/12
Success Rate	436/436	434/436	434/436	435/436	435/436	435/436	436/436	435/436	436/436	434/436

Test Case By Test Run

	18/12	19/12 05:05	19/12 11:05	19/12 17:05	19/12 23:05	20/12 05:05	20/12 11:05	20/12 17:05	20/12 23:05	21/12
jess-3GC	100%	67%	83%	100%	83%	83%	100%	83%	100%	83%
lusearch-10	100%	100%	100%	83%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
lusearch-3GC	100%	100%	83%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
xalan-1	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	83%

From forum: jikesrvm-regression

[rvm-regress] [x87.12470] SUCCESS

2009-12-21T01:10:18Z

Regression summary for x87 (r15804) on jalapeno.anu.edu.au, Mon Dec 21 09:00:24 UTC 2009

See the Full Report Statistics Report

Revisions covered by this test run: 15804

Test Runs covered by this report: x87.12343 (r15799), x87.12355 (r15799), x87.12371 (r15799), x87.12384 (r15799), x87.12398 (r15799), x87.12427 (r15804), x87.12440 (r15804), x87.12453 (r15804), x87.12470 (r15804)

Failed 0/123 (0%)

0 new failures this run

0 missing tests this run

0 new successes this run

0 intermittent failures over this week

0 consistent failures over this week

Performance Statistics

	12/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	18/12	19/12	20/12	21/12
Success Rate	123/123	123/123	123/123	123/123	123/123	123/123	123/123	123/123	123/123

From forum: jikesrvm-regression

[rvm-regress] [stress.12469] 3 FAILURES

2009-12-20T23:27:05Z

Regression summary for stress (r15804) on jalapeno.anu.edu.au, Sun Dec 20 23:00:23 UTC 2009

See the Full Report Statistics Report

Revisions covered by this test run: 15804

Test Runs covered by this report: stress.12325 (r15799), stress.12341 (r15799), stress.12368 (r15799), stress.12381 (r15799), stress.12397 (r15799), stress.12409 (r15799), stress.12423 (r15803), stress.12442 (r15804), stress.12450 (r15804), stress.12469 (r15804)

Failed 3/104 (2%)

0 new failures this run

0 missing tests this run

0 new successes this run

8 intermittent failures over this week

1 consistent failures over this week

Performance Statistics

	10/12	11/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	17/12	18/12	19/12	20/12
Success Rate	102/104	100/104	101/104	101/104	99/104	103/104	102/104	100/104	102/104	101/104

Build Configuration By Test Run

	10/12	11/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	17/12	18/12	19/12	20/12
gcstress	98%	96%	97%	97%	95%	99%	98%	96%	98%	97%

Test Case By Test Run

	10/12	11/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	17/12	18/12	19/12	20/12
eclipse	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%
lusearch	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	100%	0%	100%	0%	100%
xalan	100%	100%	0%	100%	0%	100%	100%	0%	100%	0%
soot.Main	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	0%	100%	0%
SPECjbb2000	100%	100%	100%	0%	0%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
jython	100%	100%	100%	100%	0%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
luindex	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	0%	100%	100%
pmd	100%	0%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
TestTimedWait	100%	0%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%

From forum: jikesrvm-regression

[rvm-regress] [dna-ppc32.12468] SUCCESS

2009-12-20T22:32:04Z

Regression summary for dna-ppc32 (r15804) on piano.watson.ibm.com, Mon Dec 21 04:00:53 UTC 2009

See the Full Report Statistics Report

Revisions covered by this test run: 15799, 15800, 15801, 15802, 15803, 15804

Test Runs covered by this report: dna-ppc32.11537 (r15788), dna-ppc32.11640 (r15788), dna-ppc32.11742 (r15788), dna-ppc32.11843 (r15792), dna-ppc32.11953 (r15793), dna-ppc32.12074 (r15793), dna-ppc32.12173 (r15796), dna-ppc32.12272 (r15799), dna-ppc32.12370 (r15799), dna-ppc32.12468 (r15804)

Failed 0/8 (0%)

0 new failures this run

0 missing tests this run

0 new successes this run

0 intermittent failures over this week

0 consistent failures over this week

Performance Statistics

	19/10	26/10	02/11	09/11	16/11	23/11	30/11	07/12	14/12	21/12
Success Rate	8/8	8/8	8/8	8/8	8/8	8/8	8/8	8/8	8/8	8/8

From forum: jikesrvm-regression

[rvm-regress] [core-ppc64.12467] 6 FAILURES

2009-12-20T21:23:25Z

Regression summary for core-ppc64 (r15804) on piano.watson.ibm.com, Mon Dec 21 01:00:48 UTC 2009

See the Full Report Statistics Report

Revisions covered by this test run: 15804

Test Runs covered by this report: core-ppc64.12342 (r15799), core-ppc64.12353 (r15799), core-ppc64.12369 (r15799), core-ppc64.12383 (r15799), core-ppc64.12396 (r15799), core-ppc64.12412 (r15799), core-ppc64.12425 (r15803), core-ppc64.12439 (r15804), core-ppc64.12452 (r15804), core-ppc64.12467 (r15804)

Failed 6/660 (0%)

2 new failures this run

development	Opt_2	gctest	ReferenceStress	OVERTIME	Details
prototype-opt	default	gctest	Exhaust	FAILURE	Details

0 missing tests this run

0 new successes this run

8 intermittent failures over this week

4 consistent failures over this week

Performance Statistics

	12/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	17/12	18/12	19/12	20/12	21/12
Success Rate	655/660	654/660	654/660	654/660	654/660	655/660	656/660	655/660	655/660	654/660
dacapo: antlr	4871	5209 (+15%)	6590 (+46%)	5056	5638 (+25%)	6229 (+38%)	5490 (+21%)	5695 (+26%)	4528	6457 (+43%)
dacapo: bloat	14213 (+7%)	14531 (+10%)	14060 (+6%)	13978 (+5%)	14098 (+6%)	13659 (+3%)	14876 (+12%)	13759 (+4%)	13708 (+3%)	14293 (+8%)
dacapo: eclipse	68487 (+7%)	68843 (+7%)	69759 (+9%)	66043 (+3%)	67477 (+5%)	68385 (+7%)	69895 (+9%)	66469 (+4%)	70057 (+9%)	70958 (+11%)
dacapo: fop	5893 (+4%)	5863 (+3%)	5839 (+3%)	6003 (+6%)	5846 (+3%)	5935 (+4%)	6004 (+6%)	5833 (+3%)	5977 (+5%)	5928 (+4%)
dacapo: hsqldb	6876 (+11%)	6968 (+13%)	7213 (+17%)	7107 (+15%)	6756 (+9%)	6415 (+4%)	7270 (+18%)	7029 (+14%)	6523 (+6%)	6489 (+5%)
dacapo: jython	17221 (+4%)	17132 (+3%)	16911 (+2%)	17109 (+3%)	17035 (+3%)	16855 (+2%)	17245 (+4%)	17163 (+4%)	16812 (+2%)	17324 (+5%)
dacapo: luindex	17111 (+9%)	16694 (+7%)	17962 (+15%)	16303 (+4%)	16684 (+7%)	17228 (+10%)	17376 (+11%)	16296 (+4%)	16805 (+7%)	17928 (+15%)
dacapo: lusearch	10207 (+65%)	8013 (+29%)	8411 (+36%)	8725 (+41%)	9210 (+49%)	8830 (+42%)	8904 (+44%)	8983 (+45%)	10982 (+77%)	8237 (+33%)
dacapo: pmd	11148 (+3%)	11098 (+3%)	11387 (+5%)	11250 (+4%)	11034 (+2%)	11722 (+8%)	11841 (+9%)	11203 (+3%)	11505 (+6%)	11323 (+5%)
dacapo: xalan	10266 (+22%)	10867 (+29%)	10392 (+23%)	10117 (+20%)	10186 (+21%)	10321 (+22%)	10580 (+25%)	10263 (+22%)	10691 (+27%)	10492 (+24%)
SPECjbb2000	35320 (-22%)	35133 (-23%)	37181 (-18%)	36192 (-20%)	36853 (-19%)	36196 (-20%)	36834 (-19%)	36561 (-20%)	36923 (-19%)	37325 (-18%)
SPECjbb2005	7183 (-16%)	6743 (-21%)	8017 (-6%)	8033 (-6%)	7786 (-9%)	8289	7806 (-8%)	7807 (-8%)	8016 (-6%)	8010 (-6%)
SPECjvm98	194.88 (-2%)	192.55 (-3%)	193.3 (-2%)	194.24 (-2%)	193.4 (-2%)	195.29 (-1%)	194.13 (-2%)	193.2 (-2%)		194.01 (-2%)

Build Configuration By Test Run

	12/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	17/12	18/12	19/12	20/12	21/12
prototype-opt	99%	98%	98%	99%	98%	99%	99%	98%	99%	98%
prototype	99%	99%	99%	98%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%
production	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%
development	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	100%	100%	100%	100%	99%

Test Case By Test Run

	12/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	17/12	18/12	19/12	20/12	21/12
TestNestedGC	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%
ReferenceStress	86%	86%	86%	86%	71%	86%	100%	86%	100%	86%
SPECjvm98	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	0%	100%
xalan	100%	75%	75%	75%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Exhaust	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	86%

From forum: jikesrvm-regression

[rvm-regress] [perf.12466] SUCCESS

2009-12-20T19:57:51Z

Regression summary for perf (r15804) on habanero.anu.edu.au, Sun Dec 20 23:05:19 UTC 2009

See the Full Report Statistics Report Performance Report

Revisions covered by this test run: 15804

Test Runs covered by this report: perf.12436 (r15804), perf.12438 (r15804), perf.12441 (r15804), perf.12444 (r15804), perf.12449 (r15804), perf.12451 (r15804), perf.12454 (r15804), perf.12457 (r15804), perf.12464 (r15804), perf.12466 (r15804)

Failed 0/436 (0%)

0 new failures this run

0 missing tests this run

0 new successes this run

8 intermittent failures over this week

0 consistent failures over this week

Performance Statistics

	18/12 17:05	18/12 23:05	19/12 05:05	19/12 11:05	19/12 17:05	19/12 23:05	20/12 05:05	20/12 11:05	20/12 17:05	20/12 23:05
Success Rate	434/436	436/436	434/436	434/436	435/436	435/436	435/436	436/436	435/436	436/436

Test Case By Test Run

	18/12 17:05	18/12 23:05	19/12 05:05	19/12 11:05	19/12 17:05	19/12 23:05	20/12 05:05	20/12 11:05	20/12 17:05	20/12 23:05
jess-3GC	100%	100%	67%	83%	100%	83%	83%	100%	83%	100%
lusearch-10	83%	100%	100%	100%	83%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
lusearch-3GC	100%	100%	100%	83%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
xalan-3GC	83%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%

From forum: jikesrvm-regression

[rvm-regress] [core-ppc64.12465] 7 FAILURES

2009-12-20T17:18:22Z

Regression summary for core-ppc64 (r15804) on piccolo.watson.ibm.com, Sun Dec 20 19:12:13 UTC 2009

See the Full Report Statistics Report

Revisions covered by this test run: 15804

Test Runs covered by this report: core-ppc64.12282 (r15799), core-ppc64.12296 (r15799), core-ppc64.12311 (r15799), core-ppc64.12339 (r15799), core-ppc64.12366 (r15799), core-ppc64.12380 (r15799), core-ppc64.12394 (r15799), core-ppc64.12410 (r15799), core-ppc64.12437 (r15804), core-ppc64.12465 (r15804)

Failed 7/660 (1%)

1 new failures this run

development

default

dacapo

xalan

FAILURE

Details

0 missing tests this run

0 new successes this run

11 intermittent failures over this week

4 consistent failures over this week

Performance Statistics

	07/12	08/12	09/12	11/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	18/12	20/12
Success Rate	652/660	653/660	652/660	653/660	653/660	654/660	651/660	655/660	655/660	653/660
dacapo: antlr	26460	30762	53924 (+104%)	45539 (+72%)	26575	52454 (+98%)	33848	27223	44184 (+67%)	26367
dacapo: bloat	14549 (+4%)	14719 (+6%)	14585 (+5%)	14683 (+5%)	14495 (+4%)	14169 (+2%)	14249 (+2%)	14489 (+4%)	14870 (+7%)	14472 (+4%)
dacapo: eclipse	194454 (+57%)	179309 (+45%)	182991 (+48%)	175992 (+42%)	138159	147339	276631 (+124%)	206570 (+67%)	149459	141817
dacapo: fop	5139 (+6%)	5119 (+6%)	5079 (+5%)	5099 (+5%)	5056 (+5%)	5111 (+6%)	5100 (+6%)	5084 (+5%)	5101 (+6%)	5136 (+6%)
dacapo: hsqldb	6831 (+12%)	6320 (+4%)	6445 (+6%)	6386 (+5%)	6488 (+7%)	6222 (+2%)	6140	6469 (+6%)	6321 (+4%)	6351 (+4%)
dacapo: jython	16610 (+6%)	16571 (+5%)	16356 (+4%)	16229 (+3%)	16372 (+4%)	16285 (+4%)	16721 (+6%)	16426 (+5%)	16200 (+3%)	16078 (+2%)
dacapo: luindex	70215 (+40%)	59847 (+19%)	66838 (+33%)	64162 (+28%)	62490 (+25%)	70669 (+41%)	53803	65924 (+31%)	63354 (+26%)	50505
dacapo: lusearch	9214	21144 (+247%)	8359	9527 (+56%)	7718	7117	8507	9026	9475 (+55%)	7876
dacapo: pmd	11592 (+6%)	11648 (+6%)	11550 (+5%)	11522 (+5%)	11350 (+3%)	11357 (+3%)	11401 (+4%)	11553 (+5%)	11789 (+7%)	11542 (+5%)
dacapo: xalan	11495 (+28%)	11581 (+29%)	10807 (+20%)	11192 (+25%)	9368	10745 (+20%)	11057 (+23%)	11326 (+26%)	11079 (+24%)	9327
SPECjbb2000			26487 (-37%)	37712	41255	13544 (-67%)	25715 (-39%)			39897
SPECjbb2005	3955 (-9%)	3802 (-13%)	4122 (-5%)	3789 (-13%)	4250	3989 (-8%)	4253	4232	3898 (-10%)	4275
SPECjvm98	178.91 (-3%)	182.29 (-1%)	179.03 (-3%)	178.87 (-3%)	180.21 (-2%)	180.15 (-2%)	180.19 (-2%)	179.35 (-3%)	183.65 (-0%)	180.38 (-2%)

Build Configuration By Test Run

	07/12	08/12	09/12	11/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	18/12	20/12
prototype-opt	98%	98%	98%	99%	98%	98%	97%	99%	99%	99%
prototype	98%	98%	98%	99%	99%	98%	98%	99%	99%	99%
production	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%
development	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	100%	99%	100%	99%	99%

Test Case By Test Run

	07/12	08/12	09/12	11/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	18/12	20/12
TestNestedGC	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%
TestParallelHardwareTrap	86%	71%	57%	57%	71%	71%	71%	86%	86%	71%
eclipse	50%	75%	75%	100%	100%	100%	75%	100%	100%	100%
Exhaust	86%	100%	100%	100%	86%	100%	86%	100%	100%	100%
xalan	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	75%
ReferenceStress	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	86%	100%	100%	100%

From forum: jikesrvm-regression

[rvm-regress] [perf.12464] 1 FAILURE

2009-12-20T14:18:28Z

Regression summary for perf (r15804) on habanero.anu.edu.au, Sun Dec 20 17:05:25 UTC 2009

See the Full Report Statistics Report Performance Report

Revisions covered by this test run: 15804

Test Runs covered by this report: perf.12430 (r15804), perf.12436 (r15804), perf.12438 (r15804), perf.12441 (r15804), perf.12444 (r15804), perf.12449 (r15804), perf.12451 (r15804), perf.12454 (r15804), perf.12457 (r15804), perf.12464 (r15804)

Failed 1/436 (0%)

1 new failures this run

production

default

perf-jvm98

jess-3GC

FAILURE

Details

0 missing tests this run

0 new successes this run

7 intermittent failures over this week

0 consistent failures over this week

Performance Statistics

	18/12 11:05	18/12 17:05	18/12 23:05	19/12 05:05	19/12 11:05	19/12 17:05	19/12 23:05	20/12 05:05	20/12 11:05	20/12 17:05
Success Rate	435/436	434/436	436/436	434/436	434/436	435/436	435/436	435/436	436/436	435/436

Test Case By Test Run

	18/12 11:05	18/12 17:05	18/12 23:05	19/12 05:05	19/12 11:05	19/12 17:05	19/12 23:05	20/12 05:05	20/12 11:05	20/12 17:05
jess-3GC	83%	100%	100%	67%	83%	100%	83%	83%	100%	83%
lusearch-10	100%	83%	100%	100%	100%	83%	100%	100%	100%	100%
lusearch-3GC	100%	100%	100%	100%	83%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
xalan-3GC	100%	83%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%

From forum: jikesrvm-regression

[rvm-regress] [dna-ppc64.12463] SUCCESS

2009-12-20T13:27:02Z

Regression summary for dna-ppc64 (r15804) on piccolo.watson.ibm.com, Sun Dec 20 16:10:45 UTC 2009

See the Full Report Statistics Report

Revisions covered by this test run: 15799, 15800, 15801, 15802, 15803, 15804

Test Runs covered by this report: dna-ppc64.11531 (r15788), dna-ppc64.11634 (r15788), dna-ppc64.11736 (r15788), dna-ppc64.11838 (r15792), dna-ppc64.11954 (r15793), dna-ppc64.12067 (r15793), dna-ppc64.12168 (r15796), dna-ppc64.12265 (r15799), dna-ppc64.12364 (r15799), dna-ppc64.12463 (r15804)

Failed 0/8 (0%)

0 new failures this run

0 missing tests this run

0 new successes this run

0 intermittent failures over this week

0 consistent failures over this week

Performance Statistics

	18/10	25/10	01/11	08/11	15/11	22/11	29/11	06/12	13/12	20/12
Success Rate	8/8	7/7	8/8	8/8	8/8	8/8	8/8	8/8	8/8	8/8

Build Configuration By Test Run

	18/10	25/10	01/11	08/11	15/11	22/11	29/11	06/12	13/12	20/12
production_Opt_2	100%	0%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%

From forum: jikesrvm-regression

[rvm-regress] [sanity-tier2.12462] 78 FAILURES

2009-12-20T10:52:22Z

Regression summary for sanity-tier2 (r15804) on jalapeno.anu.edu.au, Sun Dec 20 17:13:25 UTC 2009

See the Full Report Statistics Report

Revisions covered by this test run: 15804

Test Runs covered by this report: sanity-tier2.12337 (r15799), sanity-tier2.12351 (r15799), sanity-tier2.12363 (r15799), sanity-tier2.12378 (r15799), sanity-tier2.12392 (r15799), sanity-tier2.12407 (r15799), sanity-tier2.12421 (r15801), sanity-tier2.12435 (r15804), sanity-tier2.12448 (r15804), sanity-tier2.12462 (r15804)

Failed 78/312 (25%)

1 new failures this run

FastAdaptiveStickyImmix

default

ipsixql

Ipsixql

OVERTIME

Details

0 missing tests this run

0 new successes this run

15 intermittent failures over this week

73 consistent failures over this week

Performance Statistics

	11/12	12/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	17/12	18/12	19/12	20/12
Success Rate	233/312	234/312	234/312	236/312	235/312	235/312	232/312	231/312	234/312	234/312

Build Configuration By Test Run

	11/12	12/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	17/12	18/12	19/12	20/12
BaseBaseMarkCompact	64%	64%	64%	64%	64%	64%	64%	64%	64%	64%
FullAdaptiveMarkCompact	65%	65%	65%	65%	65%	65%	65%	65%	65%	65%
FastAdaptiveStickyImmix	94%	95%	95%	97%	96%	96%	93%	92%	95%	95%

Test Case By Test Run

	11/12	12/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	17/12	18/12	19/12	20/12
bloat	0%	0%	33%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	33%	0%
SPECjbb2005	0%	0%	0%	33%	0%	0%	0%	0%	33%	0%
SPECjbb2000	0%	0%	33%	0%	33%	33%	0%	0%	0%	0%
xalan	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	33%	33%	0%	0%	33%
eclipse	33%	0%	33%	33%	33%	0%	0%	0%	33%	0%
lusearch	0%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	0%	33%	0%	33%
jBYTEmark	33%	33%	0%	33%	33%	0%	33%	33%	33%	33%
jython	33%	33%	0%	33%	33%	33%	33%	0%	33%	33%
luindex	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	0%	0%	33%
pmd	0%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	0%	33%
chart	33%	33%	0%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
dom.Counter	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	0%	33%	33%
hsqldb	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	0%	33%	33%	33%
Ipsixql	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	0%
soot.Main	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	0%	33%	33%	33%
tInstance	33%	33%	33%	33%	0%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
_200_check	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
_201_compress	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
_202_jess	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
_209_db	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
_213_javac	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
_222_mpegaudio	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
_227_mtrt	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
_228_jack	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
antlr	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
CaffeineMark	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
fop	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
JLex.Main	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
RVM_708	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
sax.Counter	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
t3GT3	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
tClass	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
TestBackEdgeGC	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
TestDispatch	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
TestGC	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
TestNestedGC	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%	33%
TestParallelHardwareTrap	67%	67%	67%	67%	67%	67%	67%	67%	67%	67%

From forum: jikesrvm-regression

[rvm-regress] [sanity-ppc64.12461] 60 MISSING; 20 FAILURES

2009-12-20T10:30:34Z

Regression summary for sanity-ppc64 (r15804) on piano.watson.ibm.com, Sun Dec 20 04:01:14 UTC 2009

See the Full Report Statistics Report

Revisions covered by this test run: 15804

Test Runs covered by this report: sanity-ppc64.12166 (r15796), sanity-ppc64.12209 (r15796), sanity-ppc64.12237 (r15799), sanity-ppc64.12264 (r15799), sanity-ppc64.12308 (r15799), sanity-ppc64.12336 (r15799), sanity-ppc64.12362 (r15799), sanity-ppc64.12406 (r15799), sanity-ppc64.12434 (r15804), sanity-ppc64.12461 (r15804)

Failed 20/2164 (0%)

0 new failures this run

60 missing tests this run

ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	ImageSizes
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	R1644449
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	R1644460
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	R1644460_B
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	R1657236
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	R1722506
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	RVM_550
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	RVM_703
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	RVM_708
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	tArray
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	tClass
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestAgent
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestAnnotationInheritance
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestAnnotations
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestArithmetic
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestArrayAccess
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestBackEdgeGC
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestClassHierarchy
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestClassInitializer
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestClassLoading
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestClone
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestCompare
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestConstants
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestDispatch
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestFieldAccess
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestFieldReflection
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestFileChannel
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestFinally
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestFloatingRem
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestInstanceOf
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestInterruptAndSpin
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestInterruptedSleep
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestInterruptedSleep2
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestInterruptedWait
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestInvoke
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestLoadingWithoutName
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestMath
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestMiranda
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestNotification
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestParallelHardwareTrap
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestResolveOnCheckcast
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestResolveOnInstanceof
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestResolveOnInvokeInterface
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestReturn
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestSerialization
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestShutdownHook
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestShutdownHookAfterExit
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestStop
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestSuspend
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestSwitch
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestThrownException
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestTimedWait
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestTimeSlicing
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	TestUTF8
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	tInstance
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	basic	tNewInstance
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	CaffeineMark	CaffeineMark
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	javalex	JLex.Main
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	jBYTEmark	jBYTEmark
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	default	opttests	InvokeReflect

0 new successes this run

20 intermittent failures over this week

17 consistent failures over this week

Performance Statistics

	29/11	02/12	04/12	06/12	09/12	11/12	13/12	16/12	18/12	20/12
Success Rate	2144/2164	2142/2164	2139/2164	2142/2164	2141/2164	2143/2164	2142/2164	2144/2164	2204/2224	2144/2164
dacapo: antlr	5112 (+14%)	5916 (+32%)	5224 (+16%)	6009 (+34%)	6000 (+34%)	5065 (+13%)	6648 (+48%)	5583 (+24%)	5404 (+20%)	5085 (+13%)
dacapo: bloat	13853 (+3%)	14409 (+7%)	13938 (+4%)	13578	14009 (+4%)	14355 (+7%)	13864 (+3%)	13904 (+4%)	14643 (+9%)	13600
dacapo: eclipse	65199	67104	66662	72042 (+10%)	69040 (+6%)	65448	71864 (+10%)	71020 (+9%)	67223 (+3%)	68821 (+5%)
dacapo: fop	5715 (+0%)	5792 (+2%)	5785 (+2%)	5750 (+1%)	5809 (+2%)	5837 (+2%)	5816 (+2%)	5868 (+3%)	5754 (+1%)	5864 (+3%)
dacapo: hsqldb	6887 (+10%)	6876 (+9%)	6717 (+7%)	6794 (+8%)	6913 (+10%)	7048 (+12%)	6999 (+11%)	7311 (+16%)	6862 (+9%)	6429
dacapo: jython	17132 (+3%)	17371 (+5%)	16993 (+2%)	17013 (+3%)	16943 (+2%)	17078 (+3%)	17003 (+2%)	17010 (+2%)	17176 (+4%)	17132 (+3%)
dacapo: luindex	16287 (+3%)	17378 (+9%)	16731 (+5%)	17210 (+8%)	17148 (+8%)	16343 (+3%)	17978 (+13%)	16709 (+5%)	16458 (+4%)	16084
dacapo: lusearch	7854 (+24%)	7734 (+22%)	7922 (+25%)	8076 (+27%)	7754 (+22%)	7648 (+20%)	7755 (+22%)	7608 (+20%)	7679 (+21%)	7669 (+21%)
dacapo: pmd	11096 (+3%)	11416 (+6%)	10955 (+2%)	10847	11475 (+6%)	11324 (+5%)	11270 (+4%)	11316 (+5%)	11000 (+2%)	11451 (+6%)
dacapo: xalan		8620 (+6%)	8390 (+3%)	8916 (+9%)	8563 (+5%)	8624 (+6%)	8591 (+5%)	8596 (+5%)	8424 (+3%)	8608 (+5%)
SPECjbb2000	45826 (-1%)	45522 (-2%)	45706 (-2%)	45902 (-1%)	45979 (-1%)	45677 (-2%)	45873 (-1%)	45614 (-2%)	46016 (-1%)	45868 (-1%)
SPECjbb2005	8090 (-6%)	8427 (-2%)	8232 (-4%)	8107 (-6%)	8080 (-6%)	8352 (-3%)	8429 (-2%)	8146 (-5%)	8557	8202 (-5%)
SPECjvm98	197.75 (-0%)	193.25 (-3%)	196.64 (-1%)	194.3 (-2%)	196.27 (-1%)	196.89 (-1%)	194.54 (-2%)	192.49 (-3%)	197.28 (-1%)	194.53 (-2%)

Build Configuration By Test Run

	29/11	02/12	04/12	06/12	09/12	11/12	13/12	16/12	18/12	20/12
ExtremeAssertionsOptAdaptiveCopyMS	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	100%	0%
FastAdaptiveSemiSpace	100%	83%	100%	100%	100%	67%	83%	83%	100%	100%
BaseBasePoisoned	98%	98%	98%	98%	98%	98%	98%	98%	98%	98%
BaseBaseCopyMS	98%	98%	97%	98%	98%	99%	98%	98%	99%	98%
FullAdaptiveImmix	99%	98%	98%	97%	98%	98%	98%	98%	99%	98%
FullAdaptivePoisoned	99%	98%	97%	99%	98%	99%	98%	99%	99%	99%
BaseBaseSemiSpace	99%	99%	98%	99%	98%	99%	98%	99%	99%	99%
FullAdaptiveGenCopy	99%	98%	98%	99%	98%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%
BaseBaseGenCopy	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	98%	99%	99%	98%	99%
BaseBaseMarkSweep	98%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%
FullAdaptiveStickyMS	99%	99%	99%	99%	98%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%
prototype	99%	99%	99%	98%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%
prototype-opt	99%	99%	99%	98%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%
FullAdaptiveCopyMS	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%
FullAdaptiveGenImmix	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%
FullAdaptiveMarkSweep	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%
production	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%
development	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	99%	100%

Test Case By Test Run

	29/11	02/12	04/12	06/12	09/12	11/12	13/12	16/12	18/12	20/12
TestNestedGC	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%
eclipse	88%	88%	88%	88%	88%	94%	88%	88%	94%	88%
ReferenceStress	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	75%	100%	100%	75%	75%
ReferenceTest	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	75%	75%	75%	100%	100%
xalan	88%	100%	81%	88%	94%	94%	94%	100%	94%	100%
bloat	100%	94%	94%	94%	88%	94%	94%	94%	100%	94%
SPECjbb2005	100%	88%	88%	94%	88%	100%	94%	100%	94%	100%
Exhaust	100%	75%	75%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%

From forum: jikesrvm-regression

[rvm-regress] [sanity.12460] 1 FAILURE

2009-12-20T09:25:56Z

Regression summary for sanity (r15804) on jalapeno.anu.edu.au, Sun Dec 20 11:00:54 UTC 2009

See the Full Report Statistics Report

Revisions covered by this test run: 15804

Test Runs covered by this report: sanity.12335 (r15799), sanity.12349 (r15799), sanity.12361 (r15799), sanity.12377 (r15799), sanity.12390 (r15799), sanity.12405 (r15799), sanity.12418 (r15801), sanity.12433 (r15804), sanity.12446 (r15804), sanity.12460 (r15804)

Failed 1/2240 (0%)

0 new failures this run

0 missing tests this run

0 new successes this run

20 intermittent failures over this week

0 consistent failures over this week

Performance Statistics

	11/12	12/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	17/12	18/12	19/12	20/12
Success Rate	2233/2240	2237/2240	2237/2240	2235/2240	2239/2240	2237/2240	2238/2240	2235/2240	2235/2240	2239/2240
dacapo: antlr	1991 (+4%)	2020 (+6%)	1957 (+2%)	1938 (+1%)	1959 (+2%)	1940 (+1%)	1999 (+4%)	1931 (+1%)	1924	1961 (+2%)
dacapo: bloat	7260 (+7%)	7059 (+4%)	6974 (+3%)	7011 (+3%)	7075 (+4%)	6826	7137 (+5%)	6945 (+2%)	6880 (+1%)	7044 (+4%)
dacapo: chart	8174 (+1%)	8143 (+1%)	8185 (+1%)	8171 (+1%)	8074	8225 (+2%)	8202 (+1%)	8179 (+1%)	8127 (+0%)	8162 (+1%)
dacapo: eclipse	27983 (+1%)	28098 (+2%)	27550	28529 (+3%)	28457 (+3%)	28905 (+5%)	28397 (+3%)	27791	29041 (+5%)	27883 (+1%)
dacapo: fop	2392 (+18%)	2386 (+18%)	2047	2371 (+17%)	2379 (+18%)	2050	2401 (+19%)	2408 (+19%)	2380 (+18%)	2034
dacapo: hsqldb	2996 (+10%)	3045 (+12%)	2881 (+6%)	2856 (+5%)	2876 (+6%)	2947 (+8%)	3010 (+10%)	2972 (+9%)	2995 (+10%)	2924 (+7%)
dacapo: jython	6705 (+4%)	6505 (+1%)	6589 (+3%)		6523 (+2%)	6570 (+2%)	6589 (+3%)	6547 (+2%)	6628 (+3%)	6660 (+4%)
dacapo: luindex	7919 (+4%)	7943 (+4%)	7626	7865 (+3%)	7937 (+4%)	7847 (+3%)	7944 (+4%)	7863 (+3%)	7752 (+2%)	7644
dacapo: lusearch	4048 (+29%)	3463 (+11%)	3674 (+17%)	3576 (+14%)	3665 (+17%)	3782 (+21%)	3622 (+16%)	3514 (+12%)	3604 (+15%)	3733 (+19%)
dacapo: pmd	5067 (+10%)	4682	4915 (+6%)	4986 (+8%)	5035 (+9%)	4853 (+5%)	4865 (+5%)	5089 (+10%)	4941 (+7%)	5016 (+8%)
dacapo: xalan	3833 (+6%)	3673 (+2%)	3729 (+3%)	3728 (+3%)	3749 (+4%)		3809 (+6%)	3816 (+6%)		3787 (+5%)
SPECjbb2000	63345 (-34%)	95283	94066	63127 (-34%)	94961	94820	95082	62697 (-34%)	94800	95452
SPECjbb2005	13201 (-7%)	13495 (-5%)	13374 (-5%)	12522 (-11%)	13100 (-7%)	13622 (-4%)	13006 (-8%)	13191 (-7%)	13346 (-6%)	13151 (-7%)
SPECjvm98	358.95 (-1%)	359.17 (-1%)	358.25 (-1%)	357.96 (-1%)	357.34 (-1%)	354.71 (-2%)	356.79 (-1%)	358.65 (-1%)	358.54 (-1%)	359.7 (-1%)

Build Configuration By Test Run

	11/12	12/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	17/12	18/12	19/12	20/12
FastAdaptiveSemiSpace	100%	100%	100%	100%	83%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
FullAdaptivePoisoned	99%	99%	98%	99%	100%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%
production	100%	99%	100%	99%	100%	99%	100%	99%	99%	100%
FullAdaptiveStickyMS	99%	100%	100%	98%	100%	100%	100%	100%	99%	100%
BaseBaseMarkSweep	99%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	99%	100%
FullAdaptiveCopyMS	100%	100%	99%	100%	100%	100%	100%	99%	100%	100%
FullAdaptiveGenCopy	99%	100%	100%	100%	100%	99%	100%	100%	100%	100%
FullAdaptiveGenImmix	99%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	99%	100%	100%
prototype	99%	100%	100%	99%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
BaseBaseGenCopy	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	99%	100%	100%	100%
BaseBaseSemiSpace	100%	99%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
FullAdaptiveImmix	99%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
prototype-opt	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	99%	100%	100%

Test Case By Test Run

	11/12	12/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	17/12	18/12	19/12	20/12
xalan	69%	94%	88%	94%	100%	88%	94%	81%	81%	100%
AtomicLongArrayTest	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	0%	100%
SPECjbb2005	94%	94%	94%	94%	100%	94%	94%	94%	94%	94%
ReferenceStress	100%	100%	100%	100%	75%	100%	100%	75%	100%	100%
Exhaust	100%	75%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
eclipse	94%	100%	100%	94%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Ipsixql	100%	100%	100%	94%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
jython	100%	100%	100%	94%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%

From forum: jikesrvm-regression

[rvm-regress] [core-ppc32.12459] SUCCESS

2009-12-20T09:03:26Z

Regression summary for core-ppc32 (r15804) on piano.watson.ibm.com, Sun Dec 20 13:01:28 UTC 2009

See the Full Report Statistics Report

Revisions covered by this test run: 15804

Test Runs covered by this report: core-ppc32.12320 (r15799), core-ppc32.12334 (r15799), core-ppc32.12348 (r15799), core-ppc32.12360 (r15799), core-ppc32.12376 (r15799), core-ppc32.12389 (r15799), core-ppc32.12404 (r15799), core-ppc32.12419 (r15803), core-ppc32.12432 (r15804), core-ppc32.12459 (r15804)

Failed 0/660 (0%)

0 new failures this run

0 missing tests this run

0 new successes this run

5 intermittent failures over this week

0 consistent failures over this week

Performance Statistics

	10/12	11/12	12/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	17/12	18/12	20/12
Success Rate	660/660	659/660	660/660	660/660	660/660	660/660	659/660	659/660	658/660	660/660
dacapo: antlr	4935	5472 (+29%)	9503 (+124%)	5296	4884	6254 (+47%)	5329	4879	4962	4886
dacapo: bloat	12645 (+5%)	12888 (+7%)	12868 (+6%)	12515	12771 (+6%)	12767 (+6%)	14861 (+23%)	13853 (+15%)	12603	12931 (+7%)
dacapo: eclipse	60807 (+2%)	61546 (+3%)	62696 (+5%)	63433 (+7%)	60162	59545	59710	63736 (+7%)	60461 (+2%)	61667 (+4%)
dacapo: fop	5647 (+3%)	5578	5632 (+2%)	5677 (+3%)	5624 (+2%)	5594 (+2%)	5609 (+2%)	6046 (+10%)	5586 (+2%)	5636 (+3%)
dacapo: hsqldb	5814 (+5%)	6141 (+11%)	6325 (+14%)	6077 (+10%)	5836 (+5%)	5880 (+6%)	6141 (+11%)	6495 (+17%)	6246 (+13%)	6073 (+10%)
dacapo: jython	16206 (+6%)	15812 (+4%)	16691 (+10%)	15602	15221	15518	15802 (+4%)	16779 (+10%)	15267	15396
dacapo: luindex	14563	14428	15852 (+12%)	14451	15169 (+7%)	16722 (+18%)	14491	16132 (+14%)	14437	14589
dacapo: lusearch	11815 (+92%)	7902	10719 (+74%)	8659 (+41%)	6805	7785	8519 (+39%)	14628 (+138%)	7796	7949
dacapo: pmd	9750 (+7%)	9207	10282 (+13%)	9291	9241	9473 (+4%)	9354	10330 (+14%)	9243	9231
dacapo: xalan	11158 (+54%)	9665 (+33%)	12665 (+75%)	9952 (+37%)	7443	9161	9589 (+32%)	16573 (+129%)	9470 (+31%)	8879
SPECjbb2000	32550 (-38%)			27185 (-48%)	51832		34122 (-35%)	32358 (-38%)	40497 (-23%)	40188 (-23%)
SPECjbb2005	6870 (-25%)	7216 (-21%)	7485 (-18%)	7484 (-18%)	8495 (-7%)	6486 (-29%)	7081 (-22%)	7300 (-20%)	8175 (-10%)	8068 (-12%)
SPECjvm98	219.33 (-3%)	223.85 (-1%)	216.37 (-5%)	222.28 (-2%)	222.51 (-2%)	222.67 (-2%)	223.74 (-1%)	220.16 (-3%)	221.42 (-2%)	221.16 (-3%)

Build Configuration By Test Run

	10/12	11/12	12/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	17/12	18/12	20/12
prototype-opt	100%	99%	100%	100%	100%	100%	99%	100%	99%	100%
production	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	99%	100%

Test Case By Test Run

	10/12	11/12	12/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	17/12	18/12	20/12
xalan	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	75%	100%	100%	100%
Exhaust	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	86%	100%
ReferenceStress	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	86%	100%	100%
ReferenceTest	100%	86%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
TestTimedWait	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	86%	100%

From forum: jikesrvm-regression

[rvm-regress] [sanity.12458] 2 FAILURES

2009-12-20T08:25:32Z

Regression summary for sanity (r15804) on paprika.anu.edu.au, Sun Dec 20 06:46:55 UTC 2009

See the Full Report Statistics Report

Revisions covered by this test run: 15804

Test Runs covered by this report: sanity.12333 (r15799), sanity.12347 (r15799), sanity.12359 (r15799), sanity.12375 (r15799), sanity.12388 (r15799), sanity.12403 (r15799), sanity.12417 (r15801), sanity.12431 (r15804), sanity.12445 (r15804), sanity.12458 (r15804)

Failed 2/2224 (0%)

0 new failures this run

0 missing tests this run

0 new successes this run

10 intermittent failures over this week

1 consistent failures over this week

Performance Statistics

	11/12	12/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	17/12	18/12	19/12	20/12
Success Rate	2222/2224	2222/2224	2220/2224	2223/2224	2221/2224	2222/2224	2222/2224	2223/2224	2220/2224	2222/2224
dacapo: antlr	3624 (+3%)	3691 (+5%)	3611 (+3%)	3642 (+4%)	3721 (+6%)	3762 (+7%)	3745 (+7%)	3591 (+2%)	3667 (+5%)	3635 (+4%)
dacapo: bloat	9826 (+3%)	10016 (+5%)	10181 (+7%)	9983 (+5%)	9904 (+4%)	9739 (+3%)	9782 (+3%)	9720 (+2%)	9716 (+2%)	9771 (+3%)
dacapo: eclipse	71814 (+17%)	72000 (+17%)	71511 (+16%)	66735 (+8%)	71869 (+17%)	65369 (+6%)	69431 (+13%)	70049 (+14%)	70818 (+15%)	70062 (+14%)
dacapo: fop	4258 (+4%)	4129 (+1%)	4150 (+1%)	4229 (+3%)	4266 (+4%)	4156 (+2%)	4346 (+6%)	4163 (+2%)	4156 (+2%)	4175 (+2%)
dacapo: hsqldb	4219 (+7%)	4335 (+10%)	4377 (+11%)	4402 (+12%)	3911	4274 (+9%)	4263 (+9%)	4637 (+18%)	4398 (+12%)	4358 (+11%)
dacapo: jython	8932 (+2%)	9330 (+7%)	9321 (+7%)	8941 (+2%)	9050 (+4%)	8950 (+2%)	9094 (+4%)	8947 (+2%)	9343 (+7%)	9210 (+5%)
dacapo: luindex	20645 (+71%)	12277	12346	20368 (+68%)	21759 (+80%)	17786 (+47%)	18894 (+56%)	12294	21046 (+74%)	21607 (+78%)
dacapo: lusearch	9965 (+6%)	10321 (+10%)	10352 (+10%)	10154 (+8%)	9863 (+5%)	9802 (+5%)	10136 (+8%)	10954 (+17%)	10346 (+10%)	9974 (+6%)
dacapo: pmd	7142	8626 (+28%)	7308 (+8%)	6821	7045	6979	7208 (+7%)	7498 (+11%)	6972	6945
dacapo: xalan	9718 (+4%)	9482	9580 (+3%)	9591 (+3%)	10319 (+11%)	10213 (+9%)	9729 (+4%)	9875 (+6%)	9473	10265 (+10%)
SPECjbb2000	38442 (-3%)	38330 (-3%)	39071 (-1%)	38619 (-2%)	38516 (-2%)	38497 (-2%)	38863 (-1%)	38956 (-1%)	38201 (-3%)	38566 (-2%)
SPECjbb2005	9338 (-5%)	9556 (-3%)	9236 (-6%)	9808	9046 (-8%)	9546 (-3%)	9758	9237 (-6%)	9209 (-6%)	8792 (-10%)
SPECjvm98	240.35 (-2%)	243.06 (-1%)	241.27 (-2%)	244.71 (-0%)	244.4 (-0%)	239.47 (-2%)	243.08 (-1%)	238.27 (-3%)	240.17 (-2%)	239.61 (-2%)

Build Configuration By Test Run

	11/12	12/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	17/12	18/12	19/12	20/12
FastAdaptiveSemiSpace	100%	83%	83%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	83%
FullAdaptivePoisoned	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%
FullAdaptiveStickyMS	100%	100%	99%	100%	99%	100%	100%	100%	99%	100%
FullAdaptiveImmix	100%	100%	99%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	99%	100%
BaseBaseMarkSweep	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	99%	100%	100%	100%
BaseBasePoisoned	100%	100%	100%	100%	99%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
production	99%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%

Test Case By Test Run

	11/12	12/12	13/12	14/12	15/12	16/12	17/12	18/12	19/12	20/12
SPECjbb2005	94%	94%	94%	94%	94%	94%	94%	94%	94%	94%
Exhaust	100%	75%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	75%
ReferenceStress	75%	100%	75%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
eclipse	100%	100%	88%	100%	94%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
bloat	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	88%	100%
xalan	100%	100%	100%	100%	94%	100%	94%	100%	100%	100%
TestStop	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	96%	100%	100%	96%	100%

From forum: jikesrvm-regression

[rvm-regress] [perf.12457] SUCCESS

2009-12-20T07:57:45Z

Regression summary for perf (r15804) on habanero.anu.edu.au, Sun Dec 20 11:05:13 UTC 2009

See the Full Report Statistics Report Performance Report

Revisions covered by this test run: 15804

Test Runs covered by this report: perf.12428 (r15804), perf.12430 (r15804), perf.12436 (r15804), perf.12438 (r15804), perf.12441 (r15804), perf.12444 (r15804), perf.12449 (r15804), perf.12451 (r15804), perf.12454 (r15804), perf.12457 (r15804)

Failed 0/436 (0%)

0 new failures this run

0 missing tests this run

0 new successes this run

7 intermittent failures over this week

0 consistent failures over this week

Performance Statistics

	18/12 05:05	18/12 11:05	18/12 17:05	18/12 23:05	19/12 05:05	19/12 11:05	19/12 17:05	19/12 23:05	20/12 05:05	20/12 11:05
Success Rate	436/436	435/436	434/436	436/436	434/436	434/436	435/436	435/436	435/436	436/436

Test Case By Test Run

	18/12 05:05	18/12 11:05	18/12 17:05	18/12 23:05	19/12 05:05	19/12 11:05	19/12 17:05	19/12 23:05	20/12 05:05	20/12 11:05
jess-3GC	100%	83%	100%	100%	67%	83%	100%	83%	83%	100%
lusearch-10	100%	100%	83%	100%	100%	100%	83%	100%	100%	100%
lusearch-3GC	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	83%	100%	100%	100%	100%
xalan-3GC	100%	100%	83%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%

From forum: jikesrvm-regression

[rvm-regress] [core-ppc32.12456] 3 FAILURES

2009-12-20T05:13:20Z

Regression summary for core-ppc32 (r15804) on piccolo.watson.ibm.com, Sun Dec 20 07:09:50 UTC 2009

See the Full Report Statistics Report

Revisions covered by this test run: 15792, 15793, 15794, 15795, 15796, 15797, 15798, 15799, 15800, 15801, 15802, 15803, 15804

Test Runs covered by this report: core-ppc32.11540 (r15788), core-ppc32.11554 (r15788), core-ppc32.11569 (r15788), core-ppc32.11584 (r15788), core-ppc32.11599 (r15788), core-ppc32.11800 (r15792), core-ppc32.11816 (r15792), core-ppc32.11873 (r15792), core-ppc32.11888 (r15792), core-ppc32.12456 (r15804)

Failed 3/660 (0%)

0 new failures this run

0 missing tests this run

0 new successes this run

14 intermittent failures over this week

0 consistent failures over this week

Performance Statistics

	19/10	20/10	21/10	22/10	23/10	06/11	07/11	11/11	12/11	20/12
Success Rate	659/660	660/660	658/660	659/660	658/660	652/660	632/634	656/660	659/660	657/660
dacapo: antlr	26087	26496	26294	27442	26145	26449	31923 (+22%)	26319	32632 (+25%)	26056
dacapo: bloat	12273	13315 (+8%)	13058 (+6%)	12986 (+5%)	13080 (+6%)	12818 (+4%)	12638 (+3%)	12626 (+2%)	12612 (+2%)	12572 (+2%)
dacapo: eclipse	134976	144867	252114 (+110%)	136361	183368 (+52%)	179554 (+49%)	133191	139676	138732	168911 (+40%)
dacapo: fop	4741 (+5%)	4632 (+2%)	4640 (+3%)	4595 (+2%)	4611 (+2%)	4631 (+2%)	4673 (+3%)	4566 (+1%)	4577 (+1%)	4626 (+2%)
dacapo: hsqldb	5637 (+13%)	5660 (+14%)	5626 (+13%)	5152 (+4%)	5742 (+16%)	5705 (+15%)	5228 (+5%)	5252 (+6%)	5398 (+9%)	5590 (+13%)
dacapo: jython	14403 (+1%)	14617 (+3%)	14607 (+3%)	14623 (+3%)	14670 (+3%)	14732 (+4%)	14838 (+4%)	14597 (+3%)	14537 (+2%)	14687 (+3%)
dacapo: luindex	60381 (+25%)	49098	60196 (+25%)	57142 (+19%)	57023 (+18%)	57313 (+19%)	59969 (+24%)	48853	59183 (+23%)	60123 (+25%)
dacapo: lusearch	6475 (+16%)	6713 (+20%)	6919 (+24%)	6824 (+22%)	6487 (+16%)	6621 (+18%)	7453 (+33%)	6810 (+22%)	6645 (+19%)	6954 (+24%)
dacapo: pmd	8908 (+2%)	8950 (+3%)	9444 (+8%)	9087 (+4%)	9172 (+5%)	9049 (+4%)	9243 (+6%)	9314 (+7%)	9055 (+4%)	9147 (+5%)
dacapo: xalan	8370 (+10%)	8256 (+9%)	8266 (+9%)	8384 (+10%)	8096 (+7%)		8597 (+13%)		7795 (+3%)	8450 (+11%)
SPECjbb2000		44967 (-5%)	46278 (-3%)	45260 (-5%)	46870 (-1%)	45126 (-5%)	46437 (-2%)	46666 (-2%)	44648 (-6%)	46964 (-1%)
SPECjbb2005	4497 (-1%)	4524 (-0%)	4498 (-1%)	4435 (-2%)	4556	4528 (-0%)		4491 (-1%)	4499 (-1%)	4550
SPECjvm98	206.57 (-2%)	206.15 (-2%)	207.7 (-2%)	207.84 (-1%)	208.35 (-1%)	210.8		210.69	207.94 (-1%)	207.55 (-2%)

Build Configuration By Test Run

	19/10	20/10	21/10	22/10	23/10	06/11	07/11	11/11	12/11	20/12
prototype	100%	100%	99%	100%	99%	98%	100%	99%	100%	99%
prototype-opt	100%	100%	99%	100%	99%	97%	100%	100%	99%	100%
development	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	99%	99%	99%	100%	99%
production	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	99%	100%	99%	100%	100%

Test Case By Test Run

	19/10	20/10	21/10	22/10	23/10	06/11	07/11	11/11	12/11	20/12
TestParallelHardwareTrap	86%	100%	86%	100%	100%	86%	71%	71%	86%	71%
eclipse	100%	100%	75%	100%	50%	75%	100%	75%	100%	100%
xalan	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	25%	100%	75%	100%	75%
SPECjvm98	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	0%	100%	100%	100%
Exhaust	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	71%	100%	100%	100%	100%
SPECjbb2005	100%	100%	100%	80%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
TestTimedWait	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	86%	100%	100%	100%	100%

From forum: jikesrvm-regression