Karmic UEC bugs targeted for a SRU should use the uec tag

[Mathias Gug-2]

Hi,

We're planning to prepare a few SRUs for UEC to address most important bugs
found in Karmic UEC. In order to track relevant bugs to be fixed in Karmic,
bugs should be nominated and accepted for Karmic (as every SRU) *and* tagged
with the uec tag. The uec tagged karmic bug list [1] will be used to track
which bugs should be fixed in Karmic.

[1]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+bugs?field.tag=uec

--
Mathias Gug
Ubuntu Developer  http://www.ubuntu.com


--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@...
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

[Dustin Kirkland-5]

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Mathias Gug <mathiaz@...> wrote:
> We're planning to prepare a few SRUs for UEC to address most important bugs
> found in Karmic UEC. In order to track relevant bugs to be fixed in Karmic,
> bugs should be nominated and accepted for Karmic (as every SRU) *and* tagged
> with the uec tag. The uec tagged karmic bug list [1] will be used to track
> which bugs should be fixed in Karmic.
>
> [1]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+bugs?field.tag=uec

Why would we not just "nominate-for-relase: karmic", and milestone it
against "karmic-updates"?

Is that not the point of of those two fields in Launchpad?

:-Dustin

--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@...
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

[Mathias Gug-2]

Hi Dustin,

On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 01:25:42PM -0600, Dustin Kirkland wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Mathias Gug <mathiaz@...> wrote:
> > We're planning to prepare a few SRUs for UEC to address most important bugs
> > found in Karmic UEC. In order to track relevant bugs to be fixed in Karmic,
> > bugs should be nominated and accepted for Karmic (as every SRU) *and* tagged
> > with the uec tag. The uec tagged karmic bug list [1] will be used to track
> > which bugs should be fixed in Karmic.
> >
> > [1]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+bugs?field.tag=uec
>
> Why would we not just "nominate-for-relase: karmic", and milestone it
> against "karmic-updates"?
>
> Is that not the point of of those two fields in Launchpad?
>

True. However the bugs would be lost in the noise there. The current list shows
87 bugs that have a karmic task open and milestoned for karmic-updates. Using a
tag to filter relevant bugs seems to be the easiest solution to have a workable
list of bugs to track.

--
Mathias Gug
Ubuntu Developer  http://www.ubuntu.com


--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@...
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

[Thierry Carrez-2]

Mathias Gug wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 01:25:42PM -0600, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
>> Why would we not just "nominate-for-relase: karmic", and milestone it
>> against "karmic-updates"?
>>
>> Is that not the point of of those two fields in Launchpad?
>
> True. However the bugs would be lost in the noise there. The current list shows
> 87 bugs that have a karmic task open and milestoned for karmic-updates. Using a
> tag to filter relevant bugs seems to be the easiest solution to have a workable
> list of bugs to track.

We discussed this with eucalyptus upstream and it appears it brings too
much redundancy. Rather than using a "uec" tag, we'll use the karmic
nomination (together with the karmic-updates milestoning).

In order to reduce noise, you can access the lists of eucalyptus bugs
considered for a karmic SRU at:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+source/eucalyptus

For a complete picture, this list should be combined with the list of
euca2ools bugs considered for a karmic SRU at:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+source/euca2ools

Sorry for the conflicting messages.

--
Thierry Carrez
Ubuntu server team

--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@...
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

[Mathias Gug-2]

Hi Thierry,

On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 02:59:10PM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:

> Mathias Gug wrote:
> >
> > True. However the bugs would be lost in the noise there. The current list shows
> > 87 bugs that have a karmic task open and milestoned for karmic-updates. Using a
> > tag to filter relevant bugs seems to be the easiest solution to have a workable
> > list of bugs to track.
>
> We discussed this with eucalyptus upstream and it appears it brings too
> much redundancy. Rather than using a "uec" tag, we'll use the karmic
> nomination (together with the karmic-updates milestoning).
>
> In order to reduce noise, you can access the lists of eucalyptus bugs
> considered for a karmic SRU at:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+source/eucalyptus
>
> For a complete picture, this list should be combined with the list of
> euca2ools bugs considered for a karmic SRU at:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+source/euca2ools
>

As well as the image-store-proxy bugs:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+source/image-store-proxy/

--
Mathias Gug
Ubuntu Developer  http://www.ubuntu.com

--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@...
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel