|
View:
New views
3 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Keeping executable bits on files (Buildr::Filter)[ This mail is a repost, but it didn't seem to make it. At least not
to the archive ] Hi When copying files using Buildr:Filter, any executable bit set on files disappear. This is somewhat annoying :-). Is there a way to fix this? Also, is there an easy way to roll up several sub-projects into a single directory (for release or deployment) Currently I'm doing this filter, but there might be an easier way. And two unrelated questions: 1.3.4 gets a bit verbose to stdout, even with --silent (e.g., clean emits alot of rm -fr command) Is there a way to make it as silent as 1.3.3? 1.3.4 didn't really speed up things. Maybe the actual task execution, but there is still a ~10 second startup delay. jirb takes around 2 seconds to start. Is this common, or is JRuby misconfigured somehow? Sorry for packing all the question into a single mail. -- - Henrik |
|
|
Re: Keeping executable bits on files (Buildr::Filter)Hi Henrik,
Late reply but I guess better than no reply at all! On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 1:00 AM, Henrik Thostrup Jensen <thostrup@...>wrote: > When copying files using Buildr:Filter, any executable bit set on > files disappear. > This is somewhat annoying :-). Is there a way to fix this? Yes, but it sounds like we'll need a volunteer to write the fix and test it. Feel free to open a Jira and give it your best shot if you have the guts for it. Also, is there an easy way to roll up several sub-projects into a > single directory (for release or deployment) > Currently I'm doing this filter, but there might be an easier way. I'm not 100% clear about what you mean. Typically the form of packaging you use (.war, .ear, ...) addresses this. > And two unrelated questions: > > 1.3.4 gets a bit verbose to stdout, even with --silent (e.g., clean > emits alot of rm -fr command) > Is there a way to make it as silent as 1.3.3? Do you want to send in a patch? :) > 1.3.4 didn't really speed up things. Maybe the actual task execution, > but there is still a ~10 second startup delay. jirb takes around 2 > seconds to start. Is this common, or is JRuby misconfigured somehow? I have an 5-8 second delay on my system. I think it's within the expected norms without knowing more about your system configuration. alex |
|
|
Re: Keeping executable bits on files (Buildr::Filter)On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Alex Boisvert <boisvert@...>wrote:
> Hi Henrik, > > Late reply but I guess better than no reply at all! > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 1:00 AM, Henrik Thostrup Jensen > <thostrup@...>wrote: > > > When copying files using Buildr:Filter, any executable bit set on > > files disappear. > > This is somewhat annoying :-). Is there a way to fix this? > > > Yes, but it sounds like we'll need a volunteer to write the fix and test > it. Feel free to open a Jira and give it your best shot if you have the > guts for it. Here's the issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-144 Assaf > > > Also, is there an easy way to roll up several sub-projects into a > > single directory (for release or deployment) > > Currently I'm doing this filter, but there might be an easier way. > > > I'm not 100% clear about what you mean. Typically the form of packaging > you use (.war, .ear, ...) addresses this. > > > > > And two unrelated questions: > > > > 1.3.4 gets a bit verbose to stdout, even with --silent (e.g., clean > > emits alot of rm -fr command) > > Is there a way to make it as silent as 1.3.3? > > > Do you want to send in a patch? :) > > > > 1.3.4 didn't really speed up things. Maybe the actual task execution, > > but there is still a ~10 second startup delay. jirb takes around 2 > > seconds to start. Is this common, or is JRuby misconfigured somehow? > > > I have an 5-8 second delay on my system. I think it's within the expected > norms without knowing more about your system configuration. > > alex > |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |