|
View:
New views
9 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: LKB on MacBook Pro (OSX 10.4)Hi, you say you've downloaded the source files, but you don't mention compiling them - were you doing this before? If you don't have a licence for Common Lisp, then you can't compile the source and you'll need to use MacOs binaries - there's a lkb_macos.ppc.32.tgz in the test directory on the ftp server, though nothing in latest. (Using the binaries is easier even you can do the compilation.) Since I don't use MacOS, I don't know whether this will work - Stephan may be able to confirm whether it should, but maybe you could just try it? Best, Ann |
|
|
Re: LKB on MacBook Pro (OSX 10.4)Hi,
1. I tried the pre-compiled version for the Mac ppc in the <http://lingo.stanford.edu/ftp/stable/>, but it didn't work under intel, i.e., on the MacBook Pro. 2. I do not have any license for Common Lisp (and can't afford such). 3. I've tried kb_macos.ppc.32.tgz <http://lingo.stanford.edu/ftp/test/>. It doesn't work (or, may be, I do not know how to make it working): clicking on the application's image doesn't yield anything. It would be very nice if someone prepare a pre-compiled version for the intel Macs. I do not have anymore the Powerbook. I'm sure other people are switching to intel macs. Roussanka On Sun, 3 Sep 2006, Ann Copestake wrote: > > Hi, > > you say you've downloaded the source files, but you don't mention > compiling them - were you doing this before? If you don't have a > licence for Common Lisp, then you can't compile the source and you'll > need to use MacOs binaries - there's a lkb_macos.ppc.32.tgz in the > test directory on the ftp server, though nothing in latest. (Using > the binaries is easier even you can do the compilation.) Since I > don't use MacOS, I don't know whether this will work - Stephan may be > able to confirm whether it should, but maybe you could just try it? > > Best, > > Ann > -- Roussanka ------------------------------------------------ Roussanka Loukanova Computational Linguistics Dept. of Linguistics and Philology Uppsala University P.Box 635, Uppsala 751 26, Sweden Tel: +46 18 471 1342 (office) +46 18 750 0340 Email: rloukano@... URL: http://stp.ling.uu.se/~rloukano/ -------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
Re: LKB on MacBook Pro (OSX 10.4)rloukano@... said: > It would be very nice if someone prepare a pre-compiled version for the > intel Macs yes but for us too, it's a matter of having the appropriate licence and hardware - my group at Cambridge doesn't and isn't likely to get it (at least in the short term), but maybe someone else can help out, Ann |
|
|
Re: LKB on MacBook Pro (OSX 10.4)You're right, the current MCL-based version of the LKB won't run on
the new Intel-based Macs. I have a MacBook Pro myself, so this also affects me. I believe there is a port of the LKB to OpenMCL using LUI as the interface, but this would have the same problem, since OpenMCL also doesn't work on these machines. The only options I can see are to 1. use a commercial Lisp with CLIM (e.g. Allegro). I'm not going to be buying this for MacOS/Intel. 2. use sbcl (free) with LUI. I intend to trying doing this eventually but haven't got time in the next few months. 3. run the Windows version on top of Parallels or Boot Camp. John On 3 Sep 2006, at 22:21, Roussanka Loukanova wrote: > Hi, > > 1. I tried the pre-compiled version for the Mac ppc in the <http:// > lingo.stanford.edu/ftp/stable/>, but it didn't work under intel, > i.e., on the MacBook Pro. > > 2. I do not have any license for Common Lisp (and can't afford such). > > 3. I've tried kb_macos.ppc.32.tgz <http://lingo.stanford.edu/ftp/ > test/>. It doesn't work (or, may be, I do not know how to make it > working): clicking on the application's image doesn't yield anything. > > It would be very nice if someone prepare a pre-compiled version for > the intel Macs. I do not have anymore the Powerbook. I'm sure other > people are switching to intel macs. > > Roussanka > > On Sun, 3 Sep 2006, Ann Copestake wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> you say you've downloaded the source files, but you don't mention >> compiling them - were you doing this before? If you don't have a >> licence for Common Lisp, then you can't compile the source and you'll >> need to use MacOs binaries - there's a lkb_macos.ppc.32.tgz in the >> test directory on the ftp server, though nothing in latest. (Using >> the binaries is easier even you can do the compilation.) Since I >> don't use MacOS, I don't know whether this will work - Stephan may be >> able to confirm whether it should, but maybe you could just try it? >> >> Best, >> >> Ann >> > > -- > Roussanka > ------------------------------------------------ > Roussanka Loukanova > Computational Linguistics > Dept. of Linguistics and Philology > Uppsala University > P.Box 635, Uppsala 751 26, Sweden > > Tel: +46 18 471 1342 (office) > +46 18 750 0340 > Email: rloukano@... > URL: http://stp.ling.uu.se/~rloukano/ > -------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
Re: LKB on MacBook Pro (OSX 10.4)> 2. use sbcl (free) with LUI. I intend to trying doing this eventually but
> haven't got time in the next few months. This seems the option for me, but I do not know who to do it. I even do not know what is LUI. Is there someone who has done this and can give help instructions? Roussanka > > 3. run the Windows version on top of Parallels or Boot Camp. > > John > > On 3 Sep 2006, at 22:21, Roussanka Loukanova wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> 1. I tried the pre-compiled version for the Mac ppc in the <http:// >> lingo.stanford.edu/ftp/stable/>, but it didn't work under intel, i.e., on >> the MacBook Pro. >> >> 2. I do not have any license for Common Lisp (and can't afford such). >> >> 3. I've tried kb_macos.ppc.32.tgz <http://lingo.stanford.edu/ftp/test/>. >> It doesn't work (or, may be, I do not know how to make it working): >> clicking on the application's image doesn't yield anything. >> >> It would be very nice if someone prepare a pre-compiled version for the >> intel Macs. I do not have anymore the Powerbook. I'm sure other people are >> switching to intel macs. >> >> Roussanka >> >> On Sun, 3 Sep 2006, Ann Copestake wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> you say you've downloaded the source files, but you don't mention >>> compiling them - were you doing this before? If you don't have a >>> licence for Common Lisp, then you can't compile the source and you'll >>> need to use MacOs binaries - there's a lkb_macos.ppc.32.tgz in the >>> test directory on the ftp server, though nothing in latest. (Using >>> the binaries is easier even you can do the compilation.) Since I >>> don't use MacOS, I don't know whether this will work - Stephan may be >>> able to confirm whether it should, but maybe you could just try it? >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Ann >>> >> >> -- >> Roussanka >> ------------------------------------------------ >> Roussanka Loukanova >> Computational Linguistics >> Dept. of Linguistics and Philology >> Uppsala University >> P.Box 635, Uppsala 751 26, Sweden >> >> Tel: +46 18 471 1342 (office) >> +46 18 750 0340 >> Email: rloukano@... >> URL: http://stp.ling.uu.se/~rloukano/ >> -------------------------------------------------- > -- Roussanka ------------------------------------------------ Roussanka Loukanova Computational Linguistics Dept. of Linguistics and Philology Uppsala University P.Box 635, Uppsala 751 26, Sweden Tel: +46 18 471 1342 (office) +46 18 750 0340 Email: rloukano@... URL: http://stp.ling.uu.se/~rloukano/ -------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
Re: LKB on MacBook Pro (OSX 10.4)rloukano@... said: > This seems the option for me, but I do not know who to do it. I even do not > know what is LUI. Is there someone who has done this and can give help > instructions? unfortunately the current version of the LKB isn't compiling with sbcl apparently - if that gets sorted out, then we'll announce it, and you can look at the wiki for instructions re the LUI. But I don't think there's any point trying the SBCL compilation now unless you have some knowledge of Lisp programming and compiler macros. Ann |
|
|
Re: LKB on MacBook Pro (OSX 10.4)> 3. run the Windows version on top of Parallels or Boot Camp.
Or 3'. run the Linux version on top of Parallels or Boot Camp. I've done the former (with Ubuntu) and it works fine. Using Linux has two advantages: you don't need to buy the OS, and you can run [incr tsdb()] as well. Parallels, at least, is much cheaper than ACL/CLIM. For those who haven't played with Parallels: it's a virtual machine set up, so you don't have to reboot to switch between MacOS and the other environment. Additionally, it's reasonably easy to move files back and forth between the environments. Emily |
|
|
Re: LKB on MacBook Pro (OSX 10.4)Hi Emily,
It seems that your suggestion is very good. But, having in mind that (hopefully) soon I'll have to get the OSX 10.5, it would be too much to pay for Parallels too. Most likely, I'll wait for John to get a version for the intel Macs. Until then, I'll try to manage in the labs with the grammars that I already have. Until soon, Rosi On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Emily M. Bender wrote: >> 3. run the Windows version on top of Parallels or Boot Camp. > > Or 3'. run the Linux version on top of Parallels or Boot Camp. > I've done the former (with Ubuntu) and it works fine. Using Linux > has two advantages: you don't need to buy the OS, and you can > run [incr tsdb()] as well. Parallels, at least, is much cheaper > than ACL/CLIM. > > For those who haven't played with Parallels: it's a virtual machine > set up, so you don't have to reboot to switch between MacOS and the > other environment. Additionally, it's reasonably easy to move > files back and forth between the environments. > > Emily > |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |