LaTeX completion
|
View:
New views
16 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
LaTeX completion
by Alex Ross-9
::
Rate this Message:
LaTeX users:
My plan is to remove most of the completion commands and latex snippets from the LaTeX bundle. They will be replaced by a single command. I have a prototype under construction, you can see how it works here: http://lasersox.net/LaTeXCompletion.m4v Basically there is a tree of completions, and you can navigate them just by typing. We can work citation completion, and all existing snippets into this system. Thoughts? _______________________________________________ textmate mailing list textmate@... http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate |
|
|
Re: LaTeX completion
by David Whetstone-6
::
Rate this Message:
Completion is nice, as long as it works like ⌘T, i.e. type any
sequence of characters and not just the starting sequence. That way I could still type 'enum' to expand an enumerate block, for example. On Oct 9, 2009, at 7:30 PM, Alex Ross wrote: > LaTeX users: > > My plan is to remove most of the completion commands and latex > snippets from the LaTeX bundle. They will be replaced by a single > command. I have a prototype under construction, you can see how it > works here: > > http://lasersox.net/LaTeXCompletion.m4v > > Basically there is a tree of completions, and you can navigate them > just by typing. We can work citation completion, and all existing > snippets into this system. > > Thoughts? > > _______________________________________________ > textmate mailing list > textmate@... > http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate _______________________________________________ textmate mailing list textmate@... http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate |
|
|
Re: LaTeX completion
by Alex Ross-9
::
Rate this Message:
I'm afraid I can't support that kind of workflow, due to the
limitations of the way the Dialog plugin works. The work flow that I can support is typing: \b⇥e⇥ for enumerate \b⇥i⇥ for itemize etc. this is the same number of keystrokes as “enum⇥”, but has the advantage of being sort of mneumonic. It will also suggest it to you everytime you press “\” so you won't forget to do it, which is the problem that I always have with completion. Additionally, it can support MANY different snippets and you won't have to remember all the different key combinations. On Oct 9, 2009, at 9:16 PM, David Whetstone wrote: > Completion is nice, as long as it works like ⌘T, i.e. type any > sequence of characters and not just the starting sequence. That way I > could still type 'enum' to expand an enumerate block, for example. > > On Oct 9, 2009, at 7:30 PM, Alex Ross wrote: > >> LaTeX users: >> >> My plan is to remove most of the completion commands and latex >> snippets from the LaTeX bundle. They will be replaced by a single >> command. I have a prototype under construction, you can see how it >> works here: >> >> http://lasersox.net/LaTeXCompletion.m4v >> >> Basically there is a tree of completions, and you can navigate them >> just by typing. We can work citation completion, and all existing >> snippets into this system. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> textmate mailing list >> textmate@... >> http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate > > > _______________________________________________ > textmate mailing list > textmate@... > http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate _______________________________________________ textmate mailing list textmate@... http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: LaTeX completion
by Piero D'Ancona
::
Rate this Message:
Alex Ross <j <at> lasersox.net> writes:
> > The work flow that I can support is typing: > > \b⇥e⇥ for enumerate > \b⇥i⇥ for itemize > I love this. Add an easy way to customize it (e.g. a text file containing the tree of completions) and for me it's perfect. Piero _______________________________________________ textmate mailing list textmate@... http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate |
|
|
Re: LaTeX completion
by Édouard Gilbert
::
Rate this Message:
Le 10 oct. 09 à 07:23, Alex Ross a écrit : > The work flow that I can support is typing: > > \b⇥e⇥ for enumerate > \b⇥i⇥ for itemize > > On Oct 9, 2009, at 9:16 PM, David Whetstone wrote: > >> Completion is nice, as long as it works like ⌘T, i.e. type any >> sequence of characters and not just the starting sequence. That >> way I >> could still type 'enum' to expand an enumerate block, for example. >> >> On Oct 9, 2009, at 7:30 PM, Alex Ross wrote: >> >>> LaTeX users: >>> >>> My plan is to remove most of the completion commands and latex >>> snippets from the LaTeX bundle. They will be replaced by a single >>> command. I have a prototype under construction, you can see how it >>> works here: >>> >>> http://lasersox.net/LaTeXCompletion.m4v >>> >>> Basically there is a tree of completions, and you can navigate them >>> just by typing. We can work citation completion, and all existing >>> snippets into this system. >>> >>> Thoughts? Yes. First of all, I hope the snippets content won’t actually change. I’m quite used to the current ones and find most of them pleasing. I’d have no use for \begin{figure} \end{figure} And I actually love the \section{Title} % (fold) \label{title} % title (end) And, perhaps more importantly, I’m worried of the systematic use of backslash. It’s a three-key on my french keyboard. Moreover, not three key I acces the most easily. So overuse of it, while logical when using LaTeX, would actually be quite a pain to use for me. Édouard GILBERT edouard.gilbert@... [=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C9douard_Gilbert.vcf?=] BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:3.0 N:Gilbert;Ãdouard;;; FN:Ãdouard Gilbert ORG:Université Charles de Gaulle â Lille 3; EMAIL;type=INTERNET;type=WORK;type=pref:edouard.gilbert@... TEL;type=WORK:+33 3 59 57 78 63 item1.ADR;type=WORK:;;INRIA Lille â Nord Europe\nParc Scientifique de la Haute Borne\nPark Plaza - Bât A - 40 avenue Halley;Villeneuve d'Ascq;;59650;France item1.X-ABADR:fr X-JABBER;type=WORK:edouard.gilbert@... X-ABUID:C65CA7A2-8CEF-45B5-82FF-EA0F5934F3DE\:ABPerson END:VCARD _______________________________________________ textmate mailing list textmate@... http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate |
|
|
Re: LaTeX completion
by Alex Ross-9
::
Rate this Message:
On Oct 11, 2009, at 7:14 AM, Édouard Gilbert wrote:
> Yes. First of all, I hope the snippets content won’t actually > change. I’m quite used to the current ones and find most of them > pleasing. I’d have no use for Well, I'm not terribly interested in rewriting all the snippets. I'm mostly interesting in making them more accessible. > \begin{figure} > \end{figure} Snippets will be configurable as they are now. you'll be able to disable the ones you don't like. > And I actually love the > > \section{Title} % (fold) > \label{title} > > % title (end) You use the folding comments then? > > And, perhaps more importantly, I’m worried of the systematic use of > backslash. It’s a three-key on my french keyboard. Moreover, not > three key I acces the most easily. So overuse of it, while logical > when using LaTeX, would actually be quite a pain to use for me. I agree this is sort of a problem, but it's not one I know how to solve for everyone. If you don't like using the “\” key you can just remap some other key to call the command (which will insert the backlash for you and bring up the completion suggestions). I doubt there is one particular key which will work for every different layout, and there is only one command you would have to change. _______________________________________________ textmate mailing list textmate@... http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate |
|
|
Re: LaTeX completion
by Piero D'Ancona
::
Rate this Message:
On a related note: I have both the LaTeX and the
LaTeX 2 bundles installed (I guess this means I installed your newer version side by side with the official one). When LaTeX 2 is active, pressing a left paren ( inserts the matching open-close () as expected, but NOT when in mathematical mode. In math mode, only a left paren is inserted. If I filter out LaTeX 2 and leave only LaTeX.tmbundle active, the standard () is inserted also when in math mode. Is this a feature or a bug? Thanks, Piero _______________________________________________ textmate mailing list textmate@... http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate |
|
|
Re: LaTeX completion
by Guido Governatori-3
::
Rate this Message:
On 17/10/2009, at 6:22 PM, Piero D'Ancona wrote: > On a related note: I have both the LaTeX and the > LaTeX 2 bundles installed (I guess this means I > installed your newer version side by side with the > official one). > > When LaTeX 2 is active, pressing a left paren ( > inserts the matching open-close () as expected, > but NOT when in mathematical mode. In math > mode, only a left paren is inserted. > > If I filter out LaTeX 2 and leave only LaTeX.tmbundle > active, the standard () is inserted also when > in math mode. > > Is this a feature or a bug? > The smart typic pair is disabled in math mode. If you enable it again you get \( \)) when you use the complete feature. I have tried the LaTeX 2 bundle and the complete feature. But is seems it does not work for environments. \b completes to \begin{} but then when I insert e or i they do not complete. By the way, I had a document, spilt in several files, where watch document did not work after I have installed the LaTeX 2 bundle. It worked with the standard LaTeX bundle. All the best Guido -- Guido Governatori http://www.governatori.net/Textmate _______________________________________________ textmate mailing list textmate@... http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate |
|
|
Re: LaTeX completion
by Alain Matthes-2
::
Rate this Message:
Le 17 oct. 2009 à 10:22, Piero D'Ancona a écrit : > On a related note: I have both the LaTeX and the > LaTeX 2 bundles installed (I guess this means I > installed your newer version side by side with the > official one). > > When LaTeX 2 is active, pressing a left paren ( > inserts the matching open-close () as expected, > but NOT when in mathematical mode. In math > mode, only a left paren is inserted. > > If I filter out LaTeX 2 and leave only LaTeX.tmbundle > active, the standard () is inserted also when > in math mode. > > Is this a feature or a bug? I download the bundle today and I can't reproduce the error. I use LaTeX with LaTeX 2 + LaTeXextension and LaTeX Author (my bundle). @ Alex I see a comment about the color of math function , perhaps Alex, you want something like this I need to work on the three languages that I created : latex author, tex author and tex math author. For example, all the primitives of TeX are in TeX Author. It's possible to get different syntax colors for tex primitives and latex macros. I like your autocomplete command (awesome !) Thanks Alex Best regards Alain Matthes _______________________________________________ textmate mailing list textmate@... http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate |
|
|
Re: LaTeX completion
by Alain Matthes-2
::
Rate this Message:
Le 17 oct. 2009 à 15:05, Guido Governatori a écrit : > > The smart typic pair is disabled in math mode. If you enable it again > you get Hi, How you do that ? because The smart typic pair is enabled in math mode and I have the same problem with )) and ]] > > \( \)) > > when you use the complete feature. > > I have tried the LaTeX 2 bundle and the complete feature. But is seems > it does not work for environments. > > \b > > completes to > > \begin{} > > but then when I insert e or i they do not complete. you can complete with ⎋ , \begin{e then ⎋ } > > By the way, I had a document, spilt in several files, where watch > document did not work after I have installed the LaTeX 2 bundle. It > worked with the standard LaTeX bundle. I think you need to compile from the file master actually with laTeX 2 Perhaps, LaTeX 2 don't know what to do with %!TEX root = but I think Alex can change this Best Regards Alain Matthes _______________________________________________ textmate mailing list textmate@... http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate |
|
|
Re: LaTeX completion
by Alex Ross-9
::
Rate this Message:
On Oct 25, 2009, at 5:00 PM, Alain Matthes wrote:
> > Le 17 oct. 2009 à 15:05, Guido Governatori a écrit : >> >> The smart typic pair is disabled in math mode. If you enable it again >> you get This is sort of a bug (actually a bad design decision) that is on the list of things to fix. >> \( \)) >> >> when you use the complete feature. > >> >> I have tried the LaTeX 2 bundle and the complete feature. But is >> seems >> it does not work for environments. >> >> \b >> >> completes to >> >> \begin{} >> >> but then when I insert e or i they do not complete. > > you can complete with ⎋ , \begin{e then ⎋ } The autocomplete command is depending on some patches I made to the Dialog2.tmplugin so it probably won't work properly until we get a new build of textmate. You could also checkout Dialog2.tmplugin and build it on your machine. >> >> By the way, I had a document, spilt in several files, where watch >> document did not work after I have installed the LaTeX 2 bundle. It >> worked with the standard LaTeX bundle. I'm not sure about why anyone uses the “watch document” command? It just does a new build every time you save right? But ⌘R does a save before it builds. If you want a rebuild to be triggered when you save, just rebind Typeset & View to ⌘S. > I think you need to compile from the file master actually with laTeX 2 > Perhaps, LaTeX 2 don't know what to do with > > %!TEX root = > > but I think Alex can change this I am planning a little more flexible project master system. I don't think it's very convenient setting %!TEX root = in _every_ file that is below the master. Already, you can set TM_PROJECT_MASTER=relative/ path/to/project_master.tex as a project env variable or in TextMate's preferences to set the master file. This is for the whole project though. I'd like to (optionally) have separate master files for each directory (so you can setup a special master for your tikz files and so on). Also, it would be great to have a per-language master files. So you can set TM_LATEX_MASTER and TM_RUBY_MASTER, and you'll have a different project master in latex files than in ruby files. —Alex _______________________________________________ textmate mailing list textmate@... http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate |
|
|
Re: LaTeX completion
by Stéphane Thil
::
Rate this Message:
Le 26 oct. 09 à 02:23, Alex Ross a écrit : > I'm not sure about why anyone uses the âwatch documentâ command? > It just does a new build every time you save right? But âR does a > save before it builds. If you want a rebuild to be triggered when you > save, just rebind Typeset & View to âS. Well, - it is faster than command-R (I guess it only compiles the changed parts) - I find it quite convenient to keep a continuous workflow (it runs and updates in the background), especially when working with two screens Cheers, S. -- Ce message a été vérifié par MailScanner pour des virus ou des polluriels et rien de suspect n'a été trouvé. CRI UPVD http://www.univ-perp.fr _______________________________________________ textmate mailing list textmate@... http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate |
|
|
Re: LaTeX completion
by Alex Ross-9
::
Rate this Message:
On Oct 26, 2009, at 4:19 AM, THIL Stéphane wrote:
> > Le 26 oct. 09 à 02:23, Alex Ross a écrit : > >> I'm not sure about why anyone uses the ╲watch document╡ >> command? >> It just does a new build every time you save right? But ③R >> does a >> save before it builds. If you want a rebuild to be triggered when >> you >> save, just rebind Typeset & View to ③S. > > Well, > > - it is faster than command-R (I guess it only compiles the changed > parts) I think the speed differences are due solely to the fact that the ⌘R in the LaTeX bundle is really slow. The command in my LaTeX2 bundle is much faster. > - I find it quite convenient to keep a continuous workflow (it runs > and updates in the background), especially when working with two > screens It seems to me that if ⌘S triggered a background build directly, then you wouldn't miss the “watch document” command at all? —Alex _______________________________________________ textmate mailing list textmate@... http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate |
|
|
Re: LaTeX completion
by Guido Governatori-3
::
Rate this Message:
On 27/10/2009, at 8:32 AM, Alex Ross wrote: > On Oct 26, 2009, at 4:19 AM, THIL Stéphane wrote: > >> >> Le 26 oct. 09 à 02:23, Alex Ross a écrit : >> >>> I'm not sure about why anyone uses the ╲watch document╡ >>> command? >>> It just does a new build every time you save right? But ③R >>> does a >>> save before it builds. If you want a rebuild to be triggered when >>> you >>> save, just rebind Typeset & View to ③S. >> >> Well, >> >> - it is faster than command-R (I guess it only compiles the changed >> parts) > > I think the speed differences are due solely to the fact that the ⌘R > in the LaTeX bundle is really slow. The command in my LaTeX2 bundle > is much faster. > watch seems to be faster than LaTeX2. >> - I find it quite convenient to keep a continuous workflow (it runs >> and updates in the background), especially when working with two >> screens > > It seems to me that if ⌘S triggered a background build directly, > then > you wouldn't miss the “watch document” command at all? > I think "watch document" is useful when one is editing (formatting) a document, but when one is drafting/writing compiling is not so useful. In my workflow I tend to save quite often, but in many cases I don't care (and don't want) to compile the document, often the document would not compile correctly. Guido > —Alex > > > > _______________________________________________ > textmate mailing list > textmate@... > http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate -- Guido Governatori http://www.governatori.net/Textmate _______________________________________________ textmate mailing list textmate@... http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate |
|
|
Re: LaTeX completion
by Alex Ross-9
::
Rate this Message:
On Oct 26, 2009, at 3:56 PM, Guido Governatori wrote:
> > On 27/10/2009, at 8:32 AM, Alex Ross wrote: > >> On Oct 26, 2009, at 4:19 AM, THIL Stéphane wrote: >> >>> >>> Le 26 oct. 09 à 02:23, Alex Ross a écrit : >>> >>>> I'm not sure about why anyone uses the ╲watch document╡ >>>> command? >>>> It just does a new build every time you save right? But ③R >>>> does a >>>> save before it builds. If you want a rebuild to be triggered when >>>> you >>>> save, just rebind Typeset & View to ③S. >>> >>> Well, >>> >>> - it is faster than command-R (I guess it only compiles the changed >>> parts) >> >> I think the speed differences are due solely to the fact that the >> ⌘R >> in the LaTeX bundle is really slow. The command in my LaTeX2 bundle >> is much faster. >> > Indeed the compilation from LaTeX2 is faster, but compilation from > watch seems to be faster than LaTeX2. I'll have to have a peek into the script to see why it might be faster. >>> - I find it quite convenient to keep a continuous workflow (it runs >>> and updates in the background), especially when working with two >>> screens >> >> It seems to me that if ⌘S triggered a background build directly, >> then >> you wouldn't miss the “watch document” command at all? >> > > I think "watch document" is useful when one is editing (formatting) a > document, but when one is drafting/writing compiling is not so useful. > In my workflow I tend to save quite often, but in many cases I don't > care (and don't want) to compile the document, often the document > would not compile correctly. I generally know exactly when I want to compile a document, and that I'm also usually interested in looking at the generated pdf immediately after the compilation is finished. But I can see how it might be useful to have the document re-compiled automatically after each save. But I think it would be better to hook into ⌘S so that a save _directly_ triggers a document-compile, instead of running a (perhaps delicate) background job to watch for changes. —Alex _______________________________________________ textmate mailing list textmate@... http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate |
=?windows-1252?Q?Capture_d=92=E9cran_2009-10-25_=E0_22.53.23.png?= (10K) | Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
