|
View:
New views
1 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Latencia del ping dentro de una máquina virtual Xen HVMHola lista,
A ver si alguien me puede echar un cable: Desde una máquina etch virtualizada por hardware (la pasaré a software cuando pueda, pero de mientras ...) # ping -c20 10.12.6.1 PING 10.12.6.1 (10.12.6.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.377 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=4.15 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=4.15 ms Si ejecuto el tcpdump mientras hago el ping: Si el tcpdump escribe en salida standard ejecutandose en primer plano (y en otra consola el ping): # ping -n -c20 10.12.6.1 PING 10.12.6.1 (10.12.6.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.448 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.421 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.405 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.418 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.423 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.414 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.411 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.400 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=0.427 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=0.408 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=0.461 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=0.420 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=0.389 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=0.424 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=0.412 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=16 ttl=64 time=0.398 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=0.388 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=18 ttl=64 time=0.403 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=19 ttl=64 time=0.413 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=20 ttl=64 time=0.404 ms --- 10.12.6.1 ping statistics --- 20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19000ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.388/0.414/0.461/0.024 ms Si el tcpdump escribe en un fichero: # ping -n -c20 10.12.6.1 PING 10.12.6.1 (10.12.6.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=2.35 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=4.11 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=4.12 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=4.16 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=4.16 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.398 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=4.18 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=4.16 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=4.16 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=4.15 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=4.15 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=4.15 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=4.19 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=4.16 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=4.16 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=16 ttl=64 time=4.16 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=4.15 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=18 ttl=64 time=4.14 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=19 ttl=64 time=4.18 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=20 ttl=64 time=4.15 ms --- 10.12.6.1 ping statistics --- 20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19003ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.398/3.881/4.197/0.893 ms Sin tcpdump el resultado es igual que escribiendo en un fichero: # ping -n -c20 10.12.6.1 PING 10.12.6.1 (10.12.6.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1.26 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=4.13 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=4.16 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=4.16 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=4.16 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=4.00 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=4.16 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=4.13 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=4.16 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=4.15 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=4.16 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=4.16 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=4.16 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=4.13 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=4.15 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=16 ttl=64 time=4.16 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=4.16 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=18 ttl=64 time=4.16 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=19 ttl=64 time=4.16 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=20 ttl=64 time=4.12 ms --- 10.12.6.1 ping statistics --- 20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19002ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1.260/4.003/4.164/0.630 ms Estoy rayado con el tema ... Por ahí he leido sobre que puede ser la cpu que no le da suficiente prioridad para procesar los datos que llegan a la tarjeta de red, pero no sé como verlo si es tema de interrupciones o qué. La carga no parece alta: load average: 0.24, 0.16, 0.18 No sé si estará relacionado, pero tambien se me da en caso que en una de las máquinas HVM la hora se me va hacia el pasado. Esta máquina tiene un zoneminder, que sí que puede que cargue la máquina. He probado varias cosas (como pasar acpi=off y noapic al kernel) pero la hora se sigue yendo (esa máquina aparece con la pantalla por vnc en negro periódicamente (cada mes o algo así). ¿Alguien me puede orientar? Muchas gracias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |