|
View:
New views
6 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Let's do a releaseAs James suggested in the 2.0 thread, let's cut a release. Are we
ready? Has trunk been updated to use G 1.1? Also, who wants to do the release? -dain --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email |
|
|
Re: Let's do a releaseAfaik, trunk is still G 1.0.
Should we drop 1.0 (create a branch now), update trunk to 1.1, release, and switch to notcm as soon as it is integrated in G svn head ? On 8/7/06,
Dain Sundstrom <dain@...> wrote: As James suggested in the 2.0 thread, let's cut a release. Are we -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet |
|
|
Re: Let's do a releaseSounds good. You want to do it?
-dain On Aug 7, 2006, at 1:12 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > Afaik, trunk is still G 1.0. > Should we drop 1.0 (create a branch now), update trunk to 1.1, > release, > and switch to notcm as soon as it is integrated in G svn head ? > > On 8/7/06, Dain Sundstrom <dain@...> wrote:As James suggested > in the 2.0 thread, let's cut a release. Are we > ready? Has trunk been updated to use G 1.1? > > Also, who wants to do the release? > > -dain > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email |
|
|
Re: Let's do a releaseMmmh.
Yeah, I will do it this week, unless someone wants to. On 8/7/06, Dain Sundstrom <dain@...> wrote:
Sounds good. You want to do it? -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet |
|
|
Re: Let's do a releaseJames, is there any changes in jencks that require 4.1, or should I revert to 4.0 ? On 8/7/06,
Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@...> wrote:
-- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet |
|
|
Re: Let's do a releaseThe examples need the activemq-rs namespace and that is only
available in amq 4.1 -dain On Aug 7, 2006, at 1:45 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > It seems svn head uses ActiveMQ 4.1-incubator-SNAPSHOT. > > James, is there any changes in jencks that require 4.1, or should I > revert > to 4.0 ? > > On 8/7/06, Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@...> wrote: > Mmmh. > Yeah, I will do it this week, unless someone wants to. > > > On 8/7/06, Dain Sundstrom < dain@...> wrote: Sounds good. You > want to do it? > > -dain > > On Aug 7, 2006, at 1:12 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > > Afaik, trunk is still G 1.0. > > Should we drop 1.0 (create a branch now), update trunk to 1.1, > > release, > > and switch to notcm as soon as it is integrated in G svn head ? > > > > On 8/7/06, Dain Sundstrom < dain@...> wrote:As James suggested > > in the 2.0 thread, let's cut a release. Are we > > ready? Has trunk been updated to use G 1.1? > > > > Also, who wants to do the release? > > > > -dain > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from this list please visit: > > > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > Guillaume Nodet > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |