License on generated pom files(Was: [VOTE] Ivy 2.1.0 Release)

[Gilles Scokart]

Reviewing the release I found this in the pom.xml [1], just after the
license (I don't consider it blicking so I preffer to start an other
thread):

<!--
   Apache Maven 2 POM generated by Apache Ivy
   http://ant.apache.org/ivy/
   Apache Ivy version: non official version
-->


The pom is actually generated.  Usually I think that generated file doesn't
require a license header.  But can it have?  I'm not sure what is better.

Any idea?

[1]
http://people.apache.org/~maartenc/m2-staging-repo/org/apache/ivy/ivy/2.1.0/ivy-2.1.0.pom

Gilles Scokart


2009/9/30 Nicolas Lalevée <nicolas.lalevee@...>

>
> Le 28 sept. 09 à 01:25, Maarten Coene a écrit :
>
>  Hi all,
>>
>> I have built Ivy 2.1.0 and I need your vote to get it released.
>>
>> You can download it from this URL:
>> http://people.apache.org/~maartenc/ivy/staging/2.1.0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Emaartenc/ivy/staging/2.1.0/>
>>
>> A maven 2 staging repo with this release is available here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~maartenc/m2-staging-repo/<http://people.apache.org/%7Emaartenc/m2-staging-repo/>
>>
>> A staging eclipse update site with this release is available here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~maartenc/updatesite-staging/<http://people.apache.org/%7Emaartenc/updatesite-staging/>
>>
>> Do you vote for the release of these binaries?
>>
>> [ X] Yes
>> [ ] No
>>
>
> +1
>
> Nicolas
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
>
>

[Stefan Bodewig]

On 2009-10-01, Gilles Scokart <gscokart@...> wrote:

> The pom is actually generated.  Usually I think that generated file doesn't
> require a license header.  But can it have?

Yes, it can have a license, it doesn't do any harm.

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...