License-restricted NetBSD/i386 JDK 1.5.0 now available (tarball and pkgsrc)

View: New views
7 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

License-restricted NetBSD/i386 JDK 1.5.0 now available (tarball and pkgsrc)

by Todd Vierling-3 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

I have made JDK 1.5.0 available in binary form under the Sun Community
Source License binary redistribution terms.  This means that the
builds are not suitable for commercial use, though they should be
covered by the Research Use sublicense terms.

Tarballs are available via:

    http://www.duh.org/NetBSD/java2/

and I am adding the following packages to pkgsrc shortly:

    lang/scsl-jdk15
    lang/scsl-jre15

to provide pkgsrc-aware versions of this JDK build.  Currently I only
have builds against NetBSD/i386 2.0+, but I plan on adding more builds
(including 1.3.1 for NetBSD 1.6, the last release runnable on that
NetBSD version).

If someone out there has a speedy SPARC running NetBSD 2.x or 3.x and
would like to help out, I need a build environment to make
NetBSD/sparc JDK builds.  (Other platforms are not yet complete in the
BSD JDK patchsets, so I'm afraid those will have to wait for a while.)

--
-- Todd Vierling <tv@...> <tv@...> <todd@...>

Re: License-restricted NetBSD/i386 JDK 1.5.0 now available (tarball and pkgsrc)

by Timo Schoeler-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

thus Todd Vierling spake:

> I have made JDK 1.5.0 available in binary form under the Sun Community
> Source License binary redistribution terms.  This means that the
> builds are not suitable for commercial use, though they should be
> covered by the Research Use sublicense terms.
>
> Tarballs are available via:
>
>    http://www.duh.org/NetBSD/java2/
>
> and I am adding the following packages to pkgsrc shortly:
>
>    lang/scsl-jdk15
>    lang/scsl-jre15

i tried getting HSQL running today (on i386/2.1-stable). it seems to run
fine, but now and then a client which connects to the DBMS and hands
over some work (table select or whatever), it gets stuck. after a minute
or so the server answers. in the meanwhile the machine runs like a
charm. i used sun-jre15/sun-jdk15 for this.

any hints very appreciated as well as general reports on running java on
NetBSD.

(the guy installing an art gallery manegement system, which uses HSQL on
the i386 machine, said that it's up to the java implementation of NetBSD
that it runs crappy. don't believe him as i have a tomcat installation
running quite happily...)

> to provide pkgsrc-aware versions of this JDK build.  Currently I only
> have builds against NetBSD/i386 2.0+, but I plan on adding more builds
> (including 1.3.1 for NetBSD 1.6, the last release runnable on that
> NetBSD version).
>
> If someone out there has a speedy SPARC running NetBSD 2.x or 3.x and
> would like to help out, I need a build environment to make
> NetBSD/sparc JDK builds.  (Other platforms are not yet complete in the
> BSD JDK patchsets, so I'm afraid those will have to wait for a while.)

sparc64?

--
Timo Schoeler | http://riscworks.net/~tis | timo.schoeler@...
RISCworks -- Perfection is a powerful message
ISP | POWER & PowerPC afficinados | Networking, Security, BSD services
GPG Key fingerprint = B5F6 68A4 EC45 C309 6770  38C4 50E8 2740 9E0C F20A

There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary
and those who don't.

Re: License-restricted NetBSD/i386 JDK 1.5.0 now available (tarball and pkgsrc)

by matthew sporleder :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Very nice!
# uname -a
NetBSD gomez 3.99.17 NetBSD 3.99.17 (GOMEZ) #5: Fri Mar 31 11:04:15
EST 2006  msporleder@...:/Users/msporleder/Documents/netbsd/obj/Users/msporleder/Documents/netbsd/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GOMEZ
i386
# ./java -version
java version "1.5.0-p3"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0-p3-duh1)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0-p3-duh1, mixed mode)

On 5/15/06, Todd Vierling <tv@...> wrote:

> I have made JDK 1.5.0 available in binary form under the Sun Community
> Source License binary redistribution terms.  This means that the
> builds are not suitable for commercial use, though they should be
> covered by the Research Use sublicense terms.
>
> Tarballs are available via:
>
>     http://www.duh.org/NetBSD/java2/
>
> and I am adding the following packages to pkgsrc shortly:
>
>     lang/scsl-jdk15
>     lang/scsl-jre15
>
> to provide pkgsrc-aware versions of this JDK build.  Currently I only
> have builds against NetBSD/i386 2.0+, but I plan on adding more builds
> (including 1.3.1 for NetBSD 1.6, the last release runnable on that
> NetBSD version).
>
> If someone out there has a speedy SPARC running NetBSD 2.x or 3.x and
> would like to help out, I need a build environment to make
> NetBSD/sparc JDK builds.  (Other platforms are not yet complete in the
> BSD JDK patchsets, so I'm afraid those will have to wait for a while.)
>
> --
> -- Todd Vierling <tv@...> <tv@...> <todd@...>
>

Re: License-restricted NetBSD/i386 JDK 1.5.0 now available (tarball and pkgsrc)

by Todd Vierling-3 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On 5/15/06, Timo Schoeler <timo.schoeler@...> wrote:
> >    http://www.duh.org/NetBSD/java2/
>
> i tried getting HSQL running today (on i386/2.1-stable). it seems to run
> fine, but now and then a client which connects to the DBMS and hands
> over some work (table select or whatever), it gets stuck. after a minute
> or so the server answers.

Hm.  There are some threading peculiarities in NetBSD still, though I
haven't hit one like this yet.

> > If someone out there has a speedy SPARC running NetBSD 2.x or 3.x and
> > would like to help out, I need a build environment to make
> > NetBSD/sparc JDK builds.  (Other platforms are not yet complete in the
> > BSD JDK patchsets, so I'm afraid those will have to wait for a while.)
>
> sparc64?

32 *and* 64, preferably.  But at least one would do.  8-)

--
-- Todd Vierling <tv@...> <tv@...> <todd@...>

Re: License-restricted NetBSD/i386 JDK 1.5.0 now available (tarball and pkgsrc)

by Steven Bellovin :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Mon, 15 May 2006 13:18:32 -0400, "Todd Vierling" <tv@...> wrote:

> I have made JDK 1.5.0 available in binary form under the Sun Community
> Source License binary redistribution terms.  This means that the
> builds are not suitable for commercial use, though they should be
> covered by the Research Use sublicense terms.
>

Where is the license?  'make show-license' (for the pkgsrc version)
doesn't work.

                --Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb

Re: License-restricted NetBSD/i386 JDK 1.5.0 now available (tarball and pkgsrc)

by Todd Vierling-3 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On 5/15/06, Steven M. Bellovin <smb@...> wrote:
> > I have made JDK 1.5.0 available in binary form under the Sun Community
> > Source License binary redistribution terms.  This means that the
> > builds are not suitable for commercial use, though they should be
> > covered by the Research Use sublicense terms.
>
> Where is the license?  'make show-license' (for the pkgsrc version)
> doesn't work.

Did you update pkgsrc/licenses?  (Hint:  It's a brand new license file.  ;)

--
-- Todd Vierling <tv@...> <tv@...> <todd@...>

Re: License-restricted NetBSD/i386 JDK 1.5.0 now available (tarball and pkgsrc)

by Steven Bellovin :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Mon, 15 May 2006 22:45:04 -0400, "Todd Vierling" <tv@...> wrote:

> On 5/15/06, Steven M. Bellovin <smb@...> wrote:
> > > I have made JDK 1.5.0 available in binary form under the Sun Community
> > > Source License binary redistribution terms.  This means that the
> > > builds are not suitable for commercial use, though they should be
> > > covered by the Research Use sublicense terms.
> >
> > Where is the license?  'make show-license' (for the pkgsrc version)
> > doesn't work.
>
> Did you update pkgsrc/licenses?  (Hint:  It's a brand new license file.  ;)
>
Ah -- I thought I did, but perhaps not.  Reworking....

                --Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb