Load Balancer setup with remedy
|
View:
New views
4 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
Load Balancer setup with remedy
by patchsk
::
Rate this Message:
Hi,
We are trying to setup Load balancer in our new environement. We created a 'remedyvip' for loadbalancer and created rules to route the traffic to rem1/rem2 arservers which use 44629 as the tcp port. But we don't want to use the port number with the vip. That is any connection coming to remedyvip (port is optional and can be null or anything) should be directed to rem1 or rem2 and to port: 44629 Our SA told the CSS rules are written to look at connections coming to 44629 and direct those connections to rem1 or rem2. He does not know how to configure CSS rules so that any connection coming to remedyvip to be directed to rem1 or rem2 to port 44629. We tried enabling the portmapper in rem1/rem2 but still does not work with remedyvip, it did work when we use the actual server name to login with no port number. What is the default port remedy user tool uses when no port number is specified? Any one has this kind of setup and some hints? Thanks, Vamsi _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor:rmisolutions@... ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" |
|
|
AW: Load Balancer setup with remedy
by Conny Martin
::
Rate this Message:
Hi,
there is no default port number. If you don't configure a port in WUT or WAT then the client tries to use the portmapper to determine the correct port. You have to create a rule for Port 111(UDP) to be directed to rem1 or rem2. This works for us. It should look something like this remedyvip:44629 remedyvip:111(UDP) | | | | | | / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ rem1:44629 rem2:44629 rem1:111(UDP) rem2:111(UDP) HTH Kind Regards Conny -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@...] Im Auftrag von patchsk Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. November 2009 10:07 An: arslist@... Betreff: Load Balancer setup with remedy Hi, We are trying to setup Load balancer in our new environement. We created a 'remedyvip' for loadbalancer and created rules to route the traffic to rem1/rem2 arservers which use 44629 as the tcp port. But we don't want to use the port number with the vip. That is any connection coming to remedyvip (port is optional and can be null or anything) should be directed to rem1 or rem2 and to port: 44629 Our SA told the CSS rules are written to look at connections coming to 44629 and direct those connections to rem1 or rem2. He does not know how to configure CSS rules so that any connection coming to remedyvip to be directed to rem1 or rem2 to port 44629. We tried enabling the portmapper in rem1/rem2 but still does not work with remedyvip, it did work when we use the actual server name to login with no port number. What is the default port remedy user tool uses when no port number is specified? Any one has this kind of setup and some hints? Thanks, Vamsi _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor:rmisolutions@... ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor:rmisolutions@... ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" |
|
|
Re: Load Balancer setup with remedy
by patchsk
::
Rate this Message:
But our users don't want to use port number in the user tool.
So your suggestion still works without a portnumber. I need something like this. remedyvip | | | / \ / \ / \ rem1:44629 rem2:44629 On Nov 11, 1:18 am, Conny Martin <Conny.Mar...@...> wrote: > Hi, > > there is no default port number. If you don't configure a port in WUT or WAT then the client tries to use the portmapper to determine the correct port. You have to create a rule for Port 111(UDP) to be directed to rem1 or rem2. > > This works for us. > > It should look something like this > > remedyvip:44629 remedyvip:111(UDP) > | | > | | > | | > / \ / \ > / \ / \ > / \ / \ > rem1:44629 rem2:44629 rem1:111(UDP) rem2:111(UDP) > > HTH > > Kind Regards Conny > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@...] Im Auftrag von patchsk > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. November 2009 10:07 > An: arsl...@... > Betreff: Load Balancer setup with remedy > > Hi, > We are trying to setup Load balancer in our new environement. > We created a 'remedyvip' for loadbalancer and created rules to route the traffic to rem1/rem2 arservers which use 44629 as the tcp port. > > But we don't want to use the port number with the vip. > That is any connection coming to remedyvip (port is optional and can be null or anything) should be directed to rem1 or rem2 and to port: > 44629 > > Our SA told the CSS rules are written to look at connections coming to > 44629 and direct those connections to rem1 or rem2. > He does not know how to configure CSS rules so that any connection coming to remedyvip to be directed to rem1 or rem2 to port 44629. > > We tried enabling the portmapper in rem1/rem2 but still does not work with remedyvip, it did work when we use the actual server name to login with no port number. > > What is the default port remedy user tool uses when no port number is specified? > Any one has this kind of setup and some hints? > > Thanks, > Vamsi > > _______________________________________________________________________________ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives atwww.arslist.orgPlatinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@... ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" > > _______________________________________________________________________________ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives atwww.arslist.org > Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@... ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor:rmisolutions@... ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" |
|
|
Re: Load Balancer setup with remedy
by Walters, Mark
::
Rate this Message:
The users don't need to specify a port number but you do need to make sure the server has both register with portmapper set to true AND a specific port set. This way your clients can use the portmapper to find the fixed port that the server is using (and the load balancers are redirecting).
Mark -----Original Message----- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@...] On Behalf Of patchsk Sent: 11 November 2009 09:42 To: arslist@... Subject: Re: Load Balancer setup with remedy But our users don't want to use port number in the user tool. So your suggestion still works without a portnumber. I need something like this. remedyvip | | | / \ / \ / \ rem1:44629 rem2:44629 On Nov 11, 1:18 am, Conny Martin <Conny.Mar...@...> wrote: > Hi, > > there is no default port number. If you don't configure a port in WUT or WAT then the client tries to use the portmapper to determine the correct port. You have to create a rule for Port 111(UDP) to be directed to rem1 or rem2. > > This works for us. > > It should look something like this > > remedyvip:44629 remedyvip:111(UDP) > | | > | | > | | > / \ / \ > / \ / \ > / \ / \ > rem1:44629 rem2:44629 rem1:111(UDP) rem2:111(UDP) > > HTH > > Kind Regards Conny > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@...] Im Auftrag von patchsk > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. November 2009 10:07 > An: arsl...@... > Betreff: Load Balancer setup with remedy > > Hi, > We are trying to setup Load balancer in our new environement. > We created a 'remedyvip' for loadbalancer and created rules to route the traffic to rem1/rem2 arservers which use 44629 as the tcp port. > > But we don't want to use the port number with the vip. > That is any connection coming to remedyvip (port is optional and can be null or anything) should be directed to rem1 or rem2 and to port: > 44629 > > Our SA told the CSS rules are written to look at connections coming to > 44629 and direct those connections to rem1 or rem2. > He does not know how to configure CSS rules so that any connection coming to remedyvip to be directed to rem1 or rem2 to port 44629. > > We tried enabling the portmapper in rem1/rem2 but still does not work with remedyvip, it did work when we use the actual server name to login with no port number. > > What is the default port remedy user tool uses when no port number is specified? > Any one has this kind of setup and some hints? > > Thanks, > Vamsi > > _______________________________________________________________________________ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives atwww.arslist.orgPlatinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@... ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" > > _______________________________________________________________________________ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives atwww.arslist.org > Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@... ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor:rmisolutions@... ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor:rmisolutions@... ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
