Logging multiple local RCPT TO? also, highlighting subjects causes broken linking

View: New views
3 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

Logging multiple local RCPT TO? also, highlighting subjects causes broken linking

by K Post :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

I just noticed that if a local sender (or I suppose a remote sender)
has multiple RCPT TO lines in the email, that only the first rcpt to
is logged.

Just got a call from a local user who send a message to several local
people.  At least one person claimed that he didn't get the message (I
think due to stupidity, not a technical problem).

When I went to search for the message, the maillog only showed the
first recipient, not the additional ones.

Is there any way to put all recipients in the log?  This would
definitely make searching easier though I don't know what happens if
they have 100 people in the to line...

Also, minor note, I found this message by searching for the message
subject.  I have subject logging on.  It found the line no problem
from log file 2 (yesterday), but the file wasn't clickable.   If I
turn highlighting off or search for the message ID instead of
something that matches text in the file name, the file IS clickable.
So, I think there's a small bug in the order that the lines get
highlighted / linked.  I'm guessing that it gets highlighted first,
causing the filename to not seem to appear in the folder so it doesn't
get linked.  Can we link first, then highlight?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

Antwort: Logging multiple local RCPT TO? also, highlighting subjects causes broken linking

by Thomas Eckardt/eck :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

>Is there any way to put all recipients in the log?

No  - for several reasons (1. Blockreport 2. ..... 3. ..... ) !

>So, I think there's a small bug in the order that the lines get

No BUG - > this is by design. If you click highlighting  and you search
for a part of the filename, the filename in the string is destroyed by
<span .....> .. </span> or some other html tags.
Switch off highlighting if you want click on files.

Thomas




K Post <nntp.post@...>
04.11.2009 15:55
Bitte antworten an
ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@...>


An
ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@...>
Kopie

Thema
[Assp-test] Logging multiple local RCPT TO? also,       highlighting
subjects causes         broken linking






I just noticed that if a local sender (or I suppose a remote sender)
has multiple RCPT TO lines in the email, that only the first rcpt to
is logged.

Just got a call from a local user who send a message to several local
people.  At least one person claimed that he didn't get the message (I
think due to stupidity, not a technical problem).

When I went to search for the message, the maillog only showed the
first recipient, not the additional ones.

Is there any way to put all recipients in the log?  This would
definitely make searching easier though I don't know what happens if
they have 100 people in the to line...

Also, minor note, I found this message by searching for the message
subject.  I have subject logging on.  It found the line no problem
from log file 2 (yesterday), but the file wasn't clickable.   If I
turn highlighting off or search for the message ID instead of
something that matches text in the file name, the file IS clickable.
So, I think there's a small bug in the order that the lines get
highlighted / linked.  I'm guessing that it gets highlighted first,
causing the filename to not seem to appear in the folder so it doesn't
get linked.  Can we link first, then highlight?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008
30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus
on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test




DISCLAIMER:
*******************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally
privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the

individual to whom it is addressed.
This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no
known virus in this email!
*******************************************************


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

Re: Antwort: Logging multiple local RCPT TO? also, highlighting subjects causes broken linking

by K Post :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

I should have known better than to use the word "bug."  Sorry for that.

You're the expert and I yield to you.  I was just thinking that
changing the design (not fixing a bug per se, but making it better) to
highlight AFTER linking?  Of course then you'd have to ignore the html
code to avoid breaking the links.  You've always come up with
ingenious ways of doing things, I thought it might be easy for you to
do this.


On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Thomas Eckardt/eck
<Thomas.Eckardt@...> wrote:

>>Is there any way to put all recipients in the log?
>
> No  - for several reasons (1. Blockreport 2. ..... 3. ..... ) !
>
>>So, I think there's a small bug in the order that the lines get
>
> No BUG - > this is by design. If you click highlighting  and you search
> for a part of the filename, the filename in the string is destroyed by
> <span .....> .. </span> or some other html tags.
> Switch off highlighting if you want click on files.
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
> K Post <nntp.post@...>
> 04.11.2009 15:55
> Bitte antworten an
> ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@...>
>
>
> An
> ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@...>
> Kopie
>
> Thema
> [Assp-test] Logging multiple local RCPT TO? also,       highlighting
> subjects causes         broken linking
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I just noticed that if a local sender (or I suppose a remote sender)
> has multiple RCPT TO lines in the email, that only the first rcpt to
> is logged.
>
> Just got a call from a local user who send a message to several local
> people.  At least one person claimed that he didn't get the message (I
> think due to stupidity, not a technical problem).
>
> When I went to search for the message, the maillog only showed the
> first recipient, not the additional ones.
>
> Is there any way to put all recipients in the log?  This would
> definitely make searching easier though I don't know what happens if
> they have 100 people in the to line...
>
> Also, minor note, I found this message by searching for the message
> subject.  I have subject logging on.  It found the line no problem
> from log file 2 (yesterday), but the file wasn't clickable.   If I
> turn highlighting off or search for the message ID instead of
> something that matches text in the file name, the file IS clickable.
> So, I think there's a small bug in the order that the lines get
> highlighted / linked.  I'm guessing that it gets highlighted first,
> causing the filename to not seem to appear in the folder so it doesn't
> get linked.  Can we link first, then highlight?
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008
> 30-Day
> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus
> on
> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
> Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> Assp-test@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>
>
>
>
> DISCLAIMER:
> *******************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally
> privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the
>
> individual to whom it is addressed.
> This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no
> known virus in this email!
> *******************************************************
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
> Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> Assp-test@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test