M-: and C-: as M-; and C-;

[andrew mcintosh]

Whenever I type 'M-:' or 'C-:', Conkeror recognizes them as 'M-;' and 'C-;' (colons being interpreted as semicolons, but _only_ with the CTRL or META keys).

When i just type ':' (as right now, I'm doing this from Conkeror), everything's all right.  I don't get this problem in Emacs.

I'm using conkeror.mozdev.org conkeror 0.9 (commit 6944096a1af033d0aa70d8b4cc19b271e0d832b1, Debian-0.9~git080629-2) on Ubuntu 9.04.

Does anyone else get this?  Is it a bug?  Or is there a way around it?




     
_______________________________________________
Conkeror mailing list
Conkeror@...
https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/conkeror

[Deniz Dogan-3]

2009/5/2 andrew mcintosh <andrewmcintosh@...>:
>
> Whenever I type 'M-:' or 'C-:', Conkeror recognizes them as 'M-;' and 'C-;' (colons being interpreted as semicolons, but _only_ with the CTRL or META keys).
>
> When i just type ':' (as right now, I'm doing this from Conkeror), everything's all right.  I don't get this problem in Emacs.
>
> I'm using conkeror.mozdev.org conkeror 0.9 (commit 6944096a1af033d0aa70d8b4cc19b271e0d832b1, Debian-0.9~git080629-2) on Ubuntu 9.04.
>
> Does anyone else get this?  Is it a bug?  Or is there a way around it?

Sounds like a classic example of xmodmap madness. Do you use xmodmap
or anything similar?

Deniz
_______________________________________________
Conkeror mailing list
Conkeror@...
https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/conkeror

[John J. Foerch]

andrew mcintosh <andrewmcintosh@...> writes:
> Whenever I type 'M-:' or 'C-:', Conkeror recognizes them as 'M-;' and 'C-;' (colons being interpreted as semicolons, but _only_ with the CTRL or META keys).
>
> When i just type ':' (as right now, I'm doing this from Conkeror), everything's all right.  I don't get this problem in Emacs.
>
> I'm using conkeror.mozdev.org conkeror 0.9 (commit 6944096a1af033d0aa70d8b4cc19b271e0d832b1, Debian-0.9~git080629-2) on Ubuntu 9.04.
>
> Does anyone else get this?  Is it a bug?  Or is there a way around it?

What version of xulrunner do you have?

`aptitude show xulrunner-1.9' will be more informative than
`xulrunner-1.9 -version' for this question.

--
John Foerch

_______________________________________________
Conkeror mailing list
Conkeror@...
https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/conkeror