MRM-604 - Company POM for Appearance

[James William Dumay]

Hey guys,
I started working on MRM-604 last night but ran into a few conceptual
issues.

Is the company pom a good idea or not? Personally I think this feature
could be simplified so users could set their org url, name and image.

Thoughts?

Cheers
James

[Wendy Smoak-3]

On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 5:54 PM, James William Dumay
<james@...> wrote:

> Is the company pom a good idea or not? Personally I think this feature
> could be simplified so users could set their org url, name and image.

I'm with you. :)  I don't understand why we need a pom for this when a
few lines of config would suffice.

--
Wendy

[brettporter]

+1

I think we can do better company pom integration in the future  
(including some developer mapping), but for now this is more trouble  
than it is worth.

- Brett

On 22/05/2008, at 10:54 AM, James William Dumay wrote:

> Hey guys,
> I started working on MRM-604 last night but ran into a few conceptual
> issues.
>
> Is the company pom a good idea or not? Personally I think this feature
> could be simplified so users could set their org url, name and image.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Cheers
> James
>

--
Brett Porter
brett@...
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

[Fabrice Bellingard-3]

Definetely +1, James!


On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:54 AM, James William Dumay <james@...>
wrote:

> Hey guys,
> I started working on MRM-604 last night but ran into a few conceptual
> issues.
>
> Is the company pom a good idea or not? Personally I think this feature
> could be simplified so users could set their org url, name and image.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Cheers
> James
>
>

--
Fabrice
- bellingard@... -

[Deng Ching-2]

Here's my +1 too! :-)

-Deng

On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 8:54 AM, James William Dumay <james@...>
wrote:

> Hey guys,
> I started working on MRM-604 last night but ran into a few conceptual
> issues.
>
> Is the company pom a good idea or not? Personally I think this feature
> could be simplified so users could set their org url, name and image.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Cheers
> James
>
>

[Joakim Erdfelt-2]

+1 to making it simpler

The current impl always seemed odd to me too.

- Joakim

James William Dumay wrote:

> Hey guys,
> I started working on MRM-604 last night but ran into a few conceptual
> issues.
>
> Is the company pom a good idea or not? Personally I think this feature
> could be simplified so users could set their org url, name and image.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Cheers
> James
>
>