|

Scala Programming Language

»

Scalax - The Scala Community Library

Make InputStreamResource parameterless

View: New views

7 Messages — Rating Filter: Alert me

	Make InputStreamResource parameterless by Stepan Koltsov :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Hi, all. I'd like to make InputStreamResource and friends parameterless (i. e. WriterResource will work only with Writer). I find parametrization useless, and code using this class unnecessary complex. What do you think? S.
	Re: Make InputStreamResource parameterless by Stepan Koltsov :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message OK, nobody against, I'll it :) S. On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 02:51, Stepan Koltsov <yozh@...> wrote: > Hi, all. > > I'd like to make InputStreamResource and friends parameterless (i. e. > WriterResource will work only with Writer). > > I find parametrization useless, and code using this class unnecessary complex. > > What do you think?
	Re: Re: Make InputStreamResource parameterless by Jorge Ortiz-3 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Those types are passed on to ManagedResource which uses them in a fair number of methods. I guess I'm not sure exactly what your proposing. Make a patch and e-mail it to the list before committing any major changes? --j On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Stepan Koltsov <yozh@...> wrote: OK, nobody against, I'll it :) S. On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 02:51, Stepan Koltsov <yozh@...> wrote: > Hi, all. > > I'd like to make InputStreamResource and friends parameterless (i. e. > WriterResource will work only with Writer). > > I find parametrization useless, and code using this class unnecessary complex. > > What do you think?
	Re: Re: Make InputStreamResource parameterless by Jorge Ortiz-3 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Also, what code do you find unnecessarily complex? Code in scalax or your own code? On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Jorge Ortiz <jorge.ortiz@...> wrote: Those types are passed on to ManagedResource which uses them in a fair number of methods. I guess I'm not sure exactly what your proposing. Make a patch and e-mail it to the list before committing any major changes? --j On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Stepan Koltsov <yozh@...> wrote: OK, nobody against, I'll it :) S. On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 02:51, Stepan Koltsov <yozh@...> wrote: > Hi, all. > > I'd like to make InputStreamResource and friends parameterless (i. e. > WriterResource will work only with Writer). > > I find parametrization useless, and code using this class unnecessary complex. > > What do you think?
	Re: Re: Make InputStreamResource parameterless by Stepan Koltsov :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Hi, sorry for the late answer. === def readXml(isr: InputStreamResoure[InputStream]) = ... === Is too long (unnecessary complex). === def readXml(isr: InputStreamResource) = ... === is much easier to write. I'm proposing to make InputStreamResource work only with InputStream, not BufferedInputStream or any other InputStream. Currenly InputStreamResource is: === abstract class InputStreamResource[+I <: InputStream] ... === I'd like to make it: === abstract class InputStreamResource ... === S. On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 22:11, Jorge Ortiz <jorge.ortiz@...> wrote: > Also, what code do you find unnecessarily complex? Code in scalax or your > own code? > > On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Jorge Ortiz <jorge.ortiz@...> wrote: >> >> Those types are passed on to ManagedResource which uses them in a fair >> number of methods. >> >> I guess I'm not sure exactly what your proposing. Make a patch and e-mail >> it to the list before committing any major changes? >> >> --j >> >> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Stepan Koltsov <yozh@...> wrote: >>> >>> OK, nobody against, I'll it :) >>> >>> S. >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 02:51, Stepan Koltsov <yozh@...> wrote: >>> > Hi, all. >>> > >>> > I'd like to make InputStreamResource and friends parameterless (i. e. >>> > WriterResource will work only with Writer). >>> > >>> > I find parametrization useless, and code using this class unnecessary >>> > complex. >>> > >>> > What do you think?
	Re: Re: Make InputStreamResource parameterless by Stepan Koltsov :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Jorge, everyone else, what do you think? S. On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 17:17, Stepan Koltsov <yozh@...> wrote: > sorry for the late answer. > > === > def readXml(isr: InputStreamResoure[InputStream]) = ... > === > > Is too long (unnecessary complex). > > === > def readXml(isr: InputStreamResource) = ... > === > > is much easier to write. > > I'm proposing to make InputStreamResource work only with InputStream, > not BufferedInputStream or any other InputStream. > > Currenly InputStreamResource is: > > === > abstract class InputStreamResource[+I <: InputStream] ... > === > > I'd like to make it: > > === > abstract class InputStreamResource ... > === > > S. > > On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 22:11, Jorge Ortiz <jorge.ortiz@...> wrote: >> Also, what code do you find unnecessarily complex? Code in scalax or your >> own code? >> >> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Jorge Ortiz <jorge.ortiz@...> wrote: >>> >>> Those types are passed on to ManagedResource which uses them in a fair >>> number of methods. >>> >>> I guess I'm not sure exactly what your proposing. Make a patch and e-mail >>> it to the list before committing any major changes? >>> >>> --j >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Stepan Koltsov <yozh@...> wrote: >>>> >>>> OK, nobody against, I'll it :) >>>> >>>> S. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 02:51, Stepan Koltsov <yozh@...> wrote: >>>> > Hi, all. >>>> > >>>> > I'd like to make InputStreamResource and friends parameterless (i. e. >>>> > WriterResource will work only with Writer). >>>> > >>>> > I find parametrization useless, and code using this class unnecessary >>>> > complex. >>>> > >>>> > What do you think? >
	Re: Re: Make InputStreamResource parameterless by Jorge Ortiz-3 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Sounds good to me. On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Stepan Koltsov <yozh@...> wrote: Jorge, everyone else, what do you think? S. On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 17:17, Stepan Koltsov <yozh@...> wrote: > sorry for the late answer. > > === > def readXml(isr: InputStreamResoure[InputStream]) = ... > === > > Is too long (unnecessary complex). > > === > def readXml(isr: InputStreamResource) = ... > === > > is much easier to write. > > I'm proposing to make InputStreamResource work only with InputStream, > not BufferedInputStream or any other InputStream. > > Currenly InputStreamResource is: > > === > abstract class InputStreamResource[+I <: InputStream] ... > === > > I'd like to make it: > > === > abstract class InputStreamResource ... > === > > S. > > On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 22:11, Jorge Ortiz <jorge.ortiz@...> wrote: >> Also, what code do you find unnecessarily complex? Code in scalax or your >> own code? >> >> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Jorge Ortiz <jorge.ortiz@...> wrote: >>> >>> Those types are passed on to ManagedResource which uses them in a fair >>> number of methods. >>> >>> I guess I'm not sure exactly what your proposing. Make a patch and e-mail >>> it to the list before committing any major changes? >>> >>> --j >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Stepan Koltsov <yozh@...> wrote: >>>> >>>> OK, nobody against, I'll it :) >>>> >>>> S. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 02:51, Stepan Koltsov <yozh@...> wrote: >>>> > Hi, all. >>>> > >>>> > I'd like to make InputStreamResource and friends parameterless (i. e. >>>> > WriterResource will work only with Writer). >>>> > >>>> > I find parametrization useless, and code using this class unnecessary >>>> > complex. >>>> > >>>> > What do you think? >