|
View:
New views
3 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Mapping bugzilla bugs to RDF as EvoOnt BOM ontology : RFCHello.
(I was not subscribed to the list, and started over to overcome moderation issues, sorry for potential duplicate, then.) FYI, as part of our work on the Helios project [0], we've devised a prototype of a small app based on triplify [1] to export data about Bugzilla bugs as RDF, using the EvoOnt BOM [2] ontology (and extensions). We now have a prototype which can take a Bugzilla's DB and output RDF, that will model relationships between people, bugs, comments, together with some bugs properties. We'd like to ask for review of interested people, and maybe try and attract interest of bugzilla owners that would be willing to test this, in order to validate the use of the ontologies, and see if we can contribute to the Semantic Web and LinkedData [3]. Ultimately, we seek at improving the work of OpenSource maintainers in allowing bug data to be found on the Semantic Web, in order to facilitate the development of applications through the interoperability offered by RDF and standard ontologies. Example of such applications could be the monitoring of remote bugs status changes (thanks to the recently added "see also" feature in bugzilla 3.4 ;), much like what bts-link does in Debian. You'll find more details at : https://picoforge.int-evry.fr/cgi-bin/twiki/view/Helios_wp3/Web/TriplifyBugzillaToRdf and a protoype online at : http://kilauea.int-evry.fr:8081/triplify/bugzilla/ (starting point here for instance : http://kilauea.int-evry.fr:8081/triplify/bugzilla/person/1 ) Of course, RDF triples are best viewed with appropriate tools like Firefox plugins like Tabulator. Btw, there's a maybe more realistic prototype working on Debian bugs data available at : http://kilauea.int-evry.fr:8081/triplify/UDD/ (more details here : https://picoforge.int-evry.fr/cgi-bin/twiki/view/Helios_wp3/Web/TriplifyUddToRdf ) Should you whish to test triplify on your Bugzilla, the code is available here : [4]. Any comments, remarks, and flames (yes, triplify is PHP ;) much welcome. Best regards, [0] : https://picoforge.int-evry.fr/cgi-bin/twiki/view/Helios_wp3/Web/ [1] : http://triplify.org/ [2] : http://www.ifi.uzh.ch/ddis/evo/ [3] : http://LinkedData.org/ [4] : http://picoforge.int-evry.fr/websvn/listing.php?repname=helios_wp3&path=%2Ftrunk%2Ftriplify%2Fbugzilla%2F&rev=0&sc=0 P.S.: all our development are to be published as Free Software, btw. -- Olivier BERGER <olivier.berger@...> http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 1024D/6B829EEC Ingénieur Recherche - Dept INF Institut TELECOM, SudParis (http://www.it-sudparis.eu/), Evry (France) - To view or change your list settings, click here: <http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=lists@...> |
|
|
Re: Mapping bugzilla bugs to RDF as EvoOnt BOM ontology : RFCOlivier Berger wrote:
> FYI, as part of our work on the Helios project [0], we've devised a > prototype of a small app based on triplify [1] to export data about > Bugzilla bugs as RDF, using the EvoOnt BOM [2] ontology (and > extensions). Hey Olivier! I think the first question that we'd have is--could you explain to us how the RDF generated by triplify is different and more useful than the RDF normally generated by Bugzilla itself for a buglist? I don't think any of us (or at least, very few of us) are familiar with triplify. -Max -- http://www.everythingsolved.com/ Competent, Friendly Bugzilla and Perl Services. Everything Else, too. - To view or change your list settings, click here: <http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=lists@...> |
|
|
[long] Re: Mapping bugzilla bugs to RDF as EvoOnt BOM ontology : RFCLe mardi 04 août 2009 à 17:05 -0700, Max Kanat-Alexander a écrit :
> Olivier Berger wrote: > > FYI, as part of our work on the Helios project [0], we've devised a > > prototype of a small app based on triplify [1] to export data about > > Bugzilla bugs as RDF, using the EvoOnt BOM [2] ontology (and > > extensions). > > Hey Olivier! I think the first question that we'd have is--could you > explain to us how the RDF generated by triplify is different and more > useful than the RDF normally generated by Bugzilla itself for a buglist? > I don't think any of us (or at least, very few of us) are familiar with > triplify. > Yes, obvious questions, of course. To make it short, we're trying to produce "real" standard-based RDF, containing resources, classes, etc. and using ontologies that are not application specific, in order to foster interoperability, and make sure that such RDF can participate the LinkedData ecosystem. Here triplify is just one such tool that can do RDBMS to RDF conversion, to serve as a demonstrator, but of course this is just to have a reference, and such RDF should ideally be produced by Bugzilla itself, IMHO. Long version bellow. Pardon me in advance if I'm a bit pedantic... as I'll try and explain what I find great in RDF and standard ontologies. <RDF lesson> RDF is just about triples like "subject verb object". And the magic of it is to allow to embed, in the same document (for instance as XML+RDF) several schema/ontologies which describe the same object/resource. On which ontologies are used to do so, depend the usefulness of such data, and its ability to interlink resources on the Semantic Web. Compared to traditional XML (with DTDs for instance), RDF brings *semantics*, which can be agreed on, in turn benefiting to interoperability. </RDF lesson> In the case of the bugzilla RDF (which if I understand it well, is acquired by using &ctype=rdf in some CGIs), it's RDF, but it's not so much more interesting, I would say, than what you get in the classical XML output. For instance, the severity, priority, status and other such fields are not typed... <bz:bug rdf:about="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177692"> <bz:id nc:parseType="Integer">177692</bz:id> <bz:bug_severity>normal</bz:bug_severity> <bz:priority>--</bz:priority> <bz:op_sys>All</bz:op_sys> <bz:assigned_to>general@bugzilla.bugs</bz:assigned_to> <bz:bug_status>NEW</bz:bug_status> <bz:resolution></bz:resolution> <bz:short_desc>normalize column names and make them consistent with those reflected externally in RDF</bz:short_desc> </bz:bug> Here, there's not much semantics that you can extract from it, as it doesn't relate to standard ontologies, nor to real Semantic Web resources. By comparison, we're seeking to provide RDF which would use more Semantically-defined ontologies, which would help render such RDF consuming applications interoperable with any bugtracker. We're trying to reuse as much as possible standard ontologies (FOAF, SIOC, DC etc.), and to propose a standard for bugs description (based on EvoOnt BOM) For instance, when dealing with relationships between user accounts on the bugzilla and (real) people, and the bugs they submitted, we implement links between a resource in a bug ontology (EvoOnt BOM's "Issue" class), an account (SIOC's "User" class) and a person (FOAF's "Person" class). It gives things like (converted from the triplify output): <rdf:RDF xmlns:bom="http://www.ifi.uzh.ch/ddis/evoont/2008/11/bom#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:helios_bt="http://picoforge.int-evry.fr/projects/svn/helios_wp3/helios_bt.owl#" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:sioc="http://rdfs.org/sioc/ns#"> <foaf:Person rdf:about="http://kilauea.int-evry.fr:8081/triplify/bugzilla/person/1"> <s:seeAlso rdf:resource="http://kilauea.int-evry.fr:8081/triplify/bugzilla/user/1"/> <foaf:holdsAccount rdf:resource="http://kilauea.int-evry.fr:8081/triplify/bugzilla/user/1"/> <foaf:mbox_sha1sum>6688a14521cd97db162af8f9757f2e2232300e50</foaf:mbox_sha1sum> <foaf:name>Olivier Berger</foaf:name> </foaf:Person> <sioc:User rdf:about="http://kilauea.int-evry.fr:8081/triplify/bugzilla/user/1"> <sioc:email_sha1>6688a14521cd97db162af8f9757f2e2232300e50</sioc:email_sha1> <bom:isReporterOf rdf:resource="http://kilauea.int-evry.fr:8081/triplify/bugzilla/issue/1"/> <s:label>Olivier Berger</s:label> <s:seeAlso rdf:resource="http://kilauea.int-evry.fr:8081/triplify/bugzilla/person/1"/> </sioc:User> <bom:Issue rdf:about="http://kilauea.int-evry.fr:8081/triplify/bugzilla/issue/1"> <dc:title>make_snapshot script complains on error</dc:title> <bom:bugURL>http://erty.int-evry.fr/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1</bom:bugURL> <bom:hasAssignee rdf:resource="http://kilauea.int-evry.fr:8081/triplify/bugzilla/user/1"/> <bom:hasComputerSystem rdf:resource="http://kilauea.int-evry.fr:8081/triplify/bugzilla/computersystem/42"/> <bom:hasPriority rdf:resource="http://picoforge.int-evry.fr/projects/svn/helios_wp3/helios_bt.owl#BugzillaPriorityP2"/> <bom:hasReporter rdf:resource="http://kilauea.int-evry.fr:8081/triplify/bugzilla/user/1"/> <bom:hasResolution rdf:resource="http://picoforge.int-evry.fr/projects/svn/helios_wp3/helios_bt.owl#BugzillaResolutionFIXED"/> <bom:hasSeverity rdf:resource="http://picoforge.int-evry.fr/projects/svn/helios_wp3/helios_bt.owl#BugzillaSeveritynormal"/> <bom:hasState rdf:resource="http://picoforge.int-evry.fr/projects/svn/helios_wp3/helios_bt.owl#BugzillaStateRESOLVED"/> <bom:isInProduct rdf:resource="http://kilauea.int-evry.fr:8081/triplify/bugzilla/product/2"/> <bom:isIssueOf rdf:resource="http://kilauea.int-evry.fr:8081/triplify/bugzilla/component/2"/> <s:label>Bug 1</s:label> </bom:Issue> </rdf:RDF> I hope you can see the difference (yes, I know, it's verbose ;-) Another way to see it, as turtle, may be more human friendly : @prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> . @prefix s: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>. @prefix dc: <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/>. @prefix sioc: <http://rdfs.org/sioc/ns#>. @prefix foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/>. @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#>. @prefix bom: <http://www.ifi.uzh.ch/ddis/evoont/2008/11/bom#>. @prefix helios_bt: <http://picoforge.int-evry.fr/projects/svn/helios_wp3/helios_bt.owl#>. <http://kilauea.int-evry.fr:8081/triplify/bugzilla/person/1> a foaf:Person ; foaf:name "Olivier Berger" ; foaf:mbox_sha1sum "6688a14521cd97db162af8f9757f2e2232300e50" ; foaf:holdsAccount <http://kilauea.int-evry.fr:8081/triplify/bugzilla/user/1> ; s:seeAlso <http://kilauea.int-evry.fr:8081/triplify/bugzilla/user/1> . <http://kilauea.int-evry.fr:8081/triplify/bugzilla/user/1> a sioc:User ; s:label "Olivier Berger" ; sioc:email_sha1 "6688a14521cd97db162af8f9757f2e2232300e50" ; s:seeAlso <http://kilauea.int-evry.fr:8081/triplify/bugzilla/person/1> ; bom:isReporterOf <http://kilauea.int-evry.fr:8081/triplify/bugzilla/issue/1> . <http://kilauea.int-evry.fr:8081/triplify/bugzilla/issue/1> a bom:Issue ; s:label "Bug 1" ; dc:title "make_snapshot script complains on error" ; bom:bugURL "http://erty.int-evry.fr/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1" ; bom:hasAssignee <http://kilauea.int-evry.fr:8081/triplify/bugzilla/user/1> ; bom:hasComputerSystem <http://kilauea.int-evry.fr:8081/triplify/bugzilla/computersystem/42> ; bom:hasPriority helios_bt:BugzillaPriorityP2 ; bom:hasReporter <http://kilauea.int-evry.fr:8081/triplify/bugzilla/user/1> ; bom:hasResolution helios_bt:BugzillaResolutionFIXED ; bom:hasSeverity helios_bt:BugzillaSeveritynormal ; bom:hasState helios_bt:BugzillaStateRESOLVED ; bom:isInProduct <http://kilauea.int-evry.fr:8081/triplify/bugzilla/product/2> ; bom:isIssueOf <http://kilauea.int-evry.fr:8081/triplify/bugzilla/component/2> . The real interest here will be if/when every bugtracker would start outputing facts about its bugs in the EvoOnt BOM (if agreed on), FOAF, etc. That's why we sought your opinion on what EvoOnt BOM and our extensions may provide. Thanks in advance for your comments, and sorry for the long post. Best regards, -- Olivier BERGER <olivier.berger@...> http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 1024D/6B829EEC Ingénieur Recherche - Dept INF Institut TELECOM, SudParis (http://www.it-sudparis.eu/), Evry (France) - To view or change your list settings, click here: <http://bugzilla.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr?user=lists@...> |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |