It looks like we don't map atom.entry.content entries to the SyndFeed.description field (we map atom.entry.summary instead).
Is this the best thing to do? I'd note that blogger Atom feeds use .content, so people can't get any content from blogger without dropping down to the WireFeed level.
I'd like to propose we do the following:
1) If entry.summary exists, then use that
2) If no summary was found then look for entry.content.
Nick
IMPORTANT: This e-mail, including any attachments, may contain private or confidential information. If you think you may not be the intended recipient, or if you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete all copies of this e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not reproduce any part of this e-mail or disclose its contents to any other party. This email represents the views of the individual sender, which do not necessarily reflect those of Education.au except where the sender expressly states otherwise. It is your responsibility to scan this email and any files transmitted with it for viruses or any other defects. education.au limited will not be liable for any loss, damage or consequence caused directly or indirectly by this email.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@...
