|
View:
New views
2 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Maven versions plugin - Questions regarding updating versions in branches2009/10/30 Børge Haugsdal <borge.haugsdal@...>:
> > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Børge Haugsdal <borge.haugsdal@...> > Date: 2009/10/30 > Subject: Maven versions plugin - Questions regarding updating versions in > branches > To: user@... > > > We have now more that 50 multi-module projects to manage each with 2-10 > sub-modules. > The list is growing fast. > > In out project we have a lot of dependencies between projects, so tagging > and version management makes a lot of work, and creates a lot of hassle. > > And we have right now 4 complete branches to manage at the same time. > > I have tried now making scripts (shell and .bat) to handle the tagging > process. And it works. > I must say that the versions plugin has saved us for a lot of work. > All version information is stored in properties like > <logging.version>33.1.1</logging.version> in each multimodule pom.xml the main use-case for properties defining versions is where you have a suite of dependencies which must have their version aligned. If you are not in that use-case I would use the http://mojo.codehaus.org/versions-maven-plugin/examples/advancing-dependency-versions.html goals as they support filtering exactly which groupId/artifactIds to advance, and can limit advancing to minor updates only > All groupIds in our internal projects is made in the format > <groupId>no.mycompany.area</groupId> > > Tagging TRUNK using scripts - solved > When we tag the TRUNK we always tag all code if changes has been made in a > module, and updates all modules to the latest versions of our internal > dependencies. > So, we are able to automate the process just by listing the projects to tag > in a given order, and then calling scripts to tag and update versions > dependencies. > So the TRUNK is no problem anymore, much thanks to the maven versions > plugin. > > Tagging BRANCHES using scripts - still a problem > When it comes to the BRANCHES we still have problems. > I know that in the versions plugin it is possible to update to the newest > versions using ranges defined in the poms. > But it seems to me like have to change each pom for each time we create a > branch with range information, and add our dependencies twice in the pom, > once in dependency list and once in the plugin def. itself. > As far as I have understood the process... > So the pom grows and it becomes more work to manage it. . > I hope I can do this without doing a lot of changes in the poms. > > I hope I can script tagging of branches too. > When we are working in trunk we have the same majorVersion and minorVersion > in all projects. Like 33.1.X > When we create a new branch from trunk, we update the versions in the TRUNK > poms. Like 34.1.0 > > So in our branch coming from the trunk version 33.1.X we want to always use > the latest release or snapshot versions in the range 33.1.0.0 to 34.0.0 > > So (finally) my question is: > Is there a way that I from a script/command-line can specify that for a > given groupId I want to update all versions stored in the pom (in > <properties>) for all of our dependencies, with versions higher that > 33.1.0.0 and less that 34.0.0 > > Example update to latest RELEASE version of all our artifacts in the branch: > mvn versions:update-properties -DGroupId=no.<mycompany> > -DVersionRange=[33.1.0.0,34.0.0) > > Example update to latest SNAPSHOT version of all our artifacts in the > branch: > mvn versions:update-properties -DGroupId=no.<mycompany> > -DVersionRange=[33.1.0,34.0.0) -DallowSnapshot > -DexcludePeroperties="XX.version,YY.version" > > Is something like this possible? > What is the best solution for this? > > I hope you can help me out here. > > Another, and less important question. > It would be nice to have a command like this: > mvn versions:update-properties -DGroupId=no.<mycompany> > -DVersionRange=[33.1.0,33.2.0) -DallowSnapshots > -DexcludeGroupIds="no-<mycompany>.common" > Right now the excludeProterties is growing fast. > All of our modules always in stable versions has a common groupId like > above. The list with dependencies to exclude is growing, so I hope for an > easier way. > > I hope you have time for my questions... > > Best Regards > > Børge Haugsdal > > > > > -- > Hilsen > > Børge Haugsdal > > > > -- > Hilsen > > Børge Haugsdal > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |