Mime types: Inode types are not subclassable

View: New views
2 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

Mime types: Inode types are not subclassable

by Alberto Ruiz-5 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hello,

Is there any particular reason for inode types (non streamable) for not
being subclassable? I can think of GNUstep  *.app directories as an
example of useful subclass of an inode/directory class.

Would it be possible to update the spec on this regard?

Cheers,
Alberto Ruiz
_______________________________________________
xdg mailing list
xdg@...
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg

Re: Mime types: Inode types are not subclassable

by Bugzilla from faure@kde.org :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Sunday 21 June 2009, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there any particular reason for inode types (non streamable) for not
> being subclassable? I can think of GNUstep  *.app directories as an
> example of useful subclass of an inode/directory class.
>
> Would it be possible to update the spec on this regard?

For the record, (I think you're the one who talked to me about this on irc),
the spec doesn't say (anymore?) that inode/directory is not subclassable.

Which is good, since we subclass it too (for smb servers and workgroups).

--
David Faure, faure@..., sponsored by Qt Software @ Nokia to work on KDE,
Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org).
_______________________________________________
xdg mailing list
xdg@...
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg