Model image is missing

[Allan Doyle-3]

The model image seems to be missing from the web site. I think this  
reinforces what we've talked about a few times in the past but haven't  
quite converged on - we need a spec that's a single document that  
won't change.

If we're going to write up the spec as a document, what form should it  
take?

Also, would anyone be willing to help write submit GeoRSS as an RFC to  
the NASA ESDSWG standards process? http://www.esdswg.net/spg

Josh and I are heading off to the ESDSWG meetings in Philadelphia for  
a Tuesday afternoon GeoRSS/KML session. I posted the session info on  
this list about a month ago, the info is below. It's not too late to  
come if you're close by...

http://www.harris.com/esdswg/Default.asp

Session #1  Tuesday 1:30-3:30 (brief break at 2:30)  -- KML/GeoRSS  
Talks & Discussion
· Allan Doyle – KML & GeoRSS Technology Overview
· Karl Benedict – Time-enabled KML
· Ken Keiser – Discussion of current projects at UAH employing KML &  
GeoRSS
· Brian Wilson – Use of Atom/GeoRSS and KML in search results
· Josh Lieberman – Distributed Knowledge Management with GeoRSS
· Siri Jodha – Discussion of Current  Project at  NSIDC - Cryospheric  
applications of Google Earth

Session # 2 Tuesday 4:00pm –  5:30pm  -- KML/GeoRSS continued
· Any ad-hoc  3 minute talks on KML/GeoRSS?
· Discussion topics (from Session #1))
o  How do we reuse simple, adopted standards like KML and Atom to  
exchange full metadata by standardizing more and more lightweight,  
modular schemas like GeoRSS?
o  How do we maintain interoperability between KML and other small  
metadata standards like Atom feeds?  A goal would be round-trip  
conversion between KML and Atom docs.
o  Which implementation approaches are promising for the Earth science  
community?
--
Allan Doyle
Director of Technology
MIT Museum | http://web.mit.edu/museum






_______________________________________________
georss mailing list
georss@...
http://lists.eogeo.org/mailman/listinfo/georss

[Mikel Maron]

> The model image seems to be missing from the web site. I think this  
> reinforces what we've talked about a few times in the past but haven't  
> quite converged on - we need a spec that's a single document that  
> won't change.
>
> If we're going to write up the spec as a document, what form should it  
> take?

My suggestion a couple weeks ago was moving the site to MediaWiki,
make it easier to manage. The core pages could be locked to selected
editors, and with the revision history nothing would get lost.


> Also, would anyone be willing to help write submit GeoRSS as an RFC to  
> the NASA ESDSWG standards process? http://www.esdswg.net/spg
>
> Josh and I are heading off to the ESDSWG meetings in Philadelphia for  
> a Tuesday afternoon GeoRSS/KML session. I posted the session info on  
> this list about a month ago, the info is below. It's not too late to  
> come if you're close by...

Looks interesting, but nowhere in the neighborhood...

Mikel
_______________________________________________
georss mailing list
georss@...
http://lists.eogeo.org/mailman/listinfo/georss

[Raj Singh-2]

Sounds like a good use of PDF.
---
Raj


On Oct 20, at 1:50 AM, Allan Doyle wrote:

> I think this
> reinforces what we've talked about a few times in the past but haven't
> quite converged on - we need a spec that's a single document that
> won't change.

_______________________________________________
georss mailing list
georss@...
http://lists.eogeo.org/mailman/listinfo/georss

[Raj Singh-2]

Fixed. The image was there. The problem is line breaks doing funny  
things when HTML is posted. Let me know if you find any other problems.
---
Raj


On Oct 20, at 1:50 AM, Allan Doyle wrote:

> The model image seems to be missing from the web site.

_______________________________________________
georss mailing list
georss@...
http://lists.eogeo.org/mailman/listinfo/georss