Monet Update
|
View:
New views
8 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
Monet Update
by Dalmazio Brisinda
::
Rate this Message:
Hi David,
Just thought I'd let the group know that Monet has been updated. Specifically, the main event view is completed so that all selected display parameters can be viewed and scrolled for all timings. As well, the mouse tracking (time and value) and double-click & drag scaling of the main event view is fully operational. The latest source is on SVN. I can send the latest 2.x nib to Marcello to update the GnuStep version. Best, dalmazio _______________________________________________ gnuspeech-contact mailing list gnuspeech-contact@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnuspeech-contact |
|
|
Re: Monet Update
by David Hill-6
::
Rate this Message:
Hi Dalmazio,
Thanks for the updates.
Very reasonable. Thanks. On Apr 11, 2009, at 6:00 PM, Dalmazio Brisinda wrote:
Good. Things continue to progress. Thanks. I hope soon to be able to put up a usefully working version of "Synthesizer". It won't have all the ancillary things like graphs of the nose & mouth frequency responses, graphs of the fricative & throat frequency characteristics or of the noise crossmix, but the basic tube and controls should all be working correctly. Using Pthreads turned out to be less of a problem than I feared, and solved the problems of managing the producer-consumer situation with the tube synthesis, sound output and samples for analysis. The waveguide performance is good, and I am just ironing out a few problems with the spectrograph display and doing some first cut testing of the whole system. Warm regards and thanks again for your sterling efforts. david --------- _______________________________________________ gnuspeech-contact mailing list gnuspeech-contact@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnuspeech-contact |
|
|
Re: Re: Monet Update
by Jason White-14
::
Rate this Message:
David Hill <drh@...> wrote:
>> On Apr 8, 2009, at 5:47 PM, Dalmazio Brisinda wrote: >>> >>> >>> The latest version of Monet with an additional phone string text >>> area is available in the source tree. Intonation support has also >>> been added to the text to speech server. These are both currently >>> only available in the source tree. As a point of clarification, is the intonation support already included in the GNUSpeechCLI executable that I compiled last week, or is it newly ported code that can be expected to become available shortly? In the latter case, I will gladly volunteer to recompile and test, once the code appears in the GNUStep tree. The version that I built has rising intonation, except for the last word preceding punctuation or the end of the utterance. _______________________________________________ gnuspeech-contact mailing list gnuspeech-contact@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnuspeech-contact |
|
|
Re: Re: Monet Update
by Marcelo Yassunori Matuda
::
Rate this Message:
Hi Jason,
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:29 AM, Jason White <jason@...> wrote: > As a point of clarification, is the intonation support already included in the > GNUSpeechCLI executable that I compiled last week, or is it newly ported code > that can be expected to become available shortly? In the latter case, I will > gladly volunteer to recompile and test, once the code appears in the GNUStep > tree. GNUSpeechCLI has intonation support, but there may be some differences between the OSX and GNUstep versions. Regards, Marcelo _______________________________________________ gnuspeech-contact mailing list gnuspeech-contact@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnuspeech-contact |
|
|
Re: Re: Monet Update
by Jason White-14
::
Rate this Message:
Marcelo Yassunori Matuda <marcelo.matuda@...> wrote:
> GNUSpeechCLI has intonation support, but there may be some differences > between the OSX and GNUstep versions. Thanks. Are there plans to merge the two source trees, and handle operating system dependencies with the GNU tools, or whatever the OpenStep/GNUStep equivalent is? _______________________________________________ gnuspeech-contact mailing list gnuspeech-contact@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnuspeech-contact |
|
|
Re: Re: Monet Update
by Marcelo Yassunori Matuda
::
Rate this Message:
Hi Jason,
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Jason White <jason@...> wrote: > Marcelo Yassunori Matuda <marcelo.matuda@...> wrote: > >> GNUSpeechCLI has intonation support, but there may be some differences >> between the OSX and GNUstep versions. > > Thanks. Are there plans to merge the two source trees, and handle operating > system dependencies with the GNU tools, or whatever the OpenStep/GNUStep > equivalent is? Having only one source tree would be very nice, but the code has been split because of compilation problems in the GNUstep version. The GNUstep version uses GNUstep make and the OSX version uses Xcode. A merge is not planned, but it may be done in the future, since the GNUstep build is now working. But there are kinds of differences that would not be solved with a unified tree. GnuSpeechCLI and GnuTTSServer (OSX) are not the same program. Yesterday I looked at the OSX version, and it seems that its intonation is the same. Regards, Marcelo _______________________________________________ gnuspeech-contact mailing list gnuspeech-contact@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnuspeech-contact |
|
|
Re: Re: Monet Update
by Jason White-14
::
Rate this Message:
Marcelo Yassunori Matuda <marcelo.matuda@...> wrote:
> But there are kinds of differences that would not be solved with a > unified tree. GnuSpeechCLI and GnuTTSServer (OSX) are not the same > program. True, although based on the discussion last week, I think the intention was to investigate building the speech server daemon under GNU/Linux, with the principal question being whether the distributed object APIs were available, and sufficiently compatible, to make this possible. My main concern about having two trees is the extra maintenance burden for the developers, hence the question raised. Thank you to all who are working on this project. _______________________________________________ gnuspeech-contact mailing list gnuspeech-contact@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnuspeech-contact |
|
|
Re: Re: Monet Update
by Robert J. Slover
::
Rate this Message:
On Apr 16, 2009, at 1:30 AM, Jason White wrote: > Marcelo Yassunori Matuda <marcelo.matuda@...> wrote: >> But there are kinds of differences that would not be solved with a >> unified tree. GnuSpeechCLI and GnuTTSServer (OSX) are not the same >> program. > > True, although based on the discussion last week, I think the > intention was to > investigate building the speech server daemon under GNU/Linux, with > the > principal question being whether the distributed object APIs were > available, > and sufficiently compatible, to make this possible. > > My main concern about having two trees is the extra maintenance > burden for the > developers, hence the question raised. > > Thank you to all who are working on this project. > I believe the question raised about Distributed Objects came from Dalmazio. As far as I know, the GNUStep DO implementation is complete and functional. The only incompatibility I know of is on-the-wire binary compatibility, since the Mac OS X NSPortCoder binary layout is not documented. This means a GNUStep DO implementation can't vend objects to Mac OS X, and vis-versa. Also, if I recall correctly, GNUStep DO is only enabled between objects on the same machine by default -- you need to specifically enable support for objects vended across the network (a security feature), though I shouldn't think either feature (binary compatibility or network distributed objects) would be needed by a TTS server. HTH --Robert _______________________________________________ gnuspeech-contact mailing list gnuspeech-contact@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnuspeech-contact |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
