Nabble - Mono - General

Re: Qestions on winform

2009-12-18T00:54:47Z

I work like this :
open your winform solution under linux, add an .desktop file to it,
ensure in project property, the feature "create a linux script/file"
is checked, make a right click on your solution , in the treeview, in
the contex menu use "Tool/generate make file".
So like that you will have now 2 solution :
- In the root dir of your solution : ./configure or ./autogen.sh
(depend of your preview choice) --prefix=/usr && make && sudo make
install
- Or Use my tool MonoOSC to build RPM and DEB of your software, this
is like that i deploy my win/linux app :-)

2009/12/17 Stifu <stifu@...>:

>
> If I understand correctly, you just don't want your user to have to type
> command lines to start your application... Is that right? If so, this isn't
> a WinForms question at all, but a packaging / deployment one, or something.
>
> It's possible to create packages for your app (so they can be launched like
> native apps), but the method depends on the target OS.
>
> Have a look at this page:
> http://www.mono-project.com/Guide:Running_Mono_Applications
>
>
> kxw102 wrote:
>>
>> Dear all, I am very glad to know this forum.
>> I am a windows user and a beginner to the MONO. Now I am tring to make the
>> first winform application, but it seems the .exe files is opend always
>> with the CMD window at backside? Could anyone to help me not to show this
>> CMD window?
>>
>> Thank you.:working:
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Qestions-on-winform-tp26834994p26836176.html
> Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>

--
Cordially.

Small Eric Quotations of the days:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious
_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

Re: Malfunction of the DataGridView.

2009-12-17T14:54:21Z

Bad news indeed !
It is perhaps better go to bed right away ...

Regards

Re: Malfunction of the DataGridView.

2009-12-17T14:34:54Z

Oh. Then you'll be delighted to find out WinForms on Mac works worse than on Windows. :D
Sorry for the bad news.

Amyco wrote:

Thank you for your reply.

I am only a first step in porting my application to Mono, with Mac as final target. I currently use Mono on Windows PC. Is in this environment I finds malfunction.

Regards

Re: Qestions on winform

2009-12-17T14:28:51Z

If I understand correctly, you just don't want your user to have to type command lines to start your application... Is that right? If so, this isn't a WinForms question at all, but a packaging / deployment one, or something.

It's possible to create packages for your app (so they can be launched like native apps), but the method depends on the target OS.

Have a look at this page: http://www.mono-project.com/Guide:Running_Mono_Applications

kxw102 wrote:

Dear all, I am very glad to know this forum.
I am a windows user and a beginner to the MONO. Now I am tring to make the first winform application, but it seems the .exe files is opend always with the CMD window at backside? Could anyone to help me not to show this CMD window?

Thank you.

Cpu usage [iFolder]

2009-12-17T14:27:37Z

Hello,

I have installed Mono on a sparc server that runs linux debian
(mono 2.4.3). I have installed iFolder and it works fine, but I don't
understand how Mono takes 100% of a CPU when it is idle :

PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM P COMMAND
18625 www-data 20 0 166m 51m 12m S 100 1.3 6 mono

I have tried to add MONO_MANAGED_WATCHER=disable without any success.
Memory size is growing until apache kills mono and cycle restarts.

I have found some posts but they don't fix this trouble:
http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-list/2008-October/040036.html
http://go-mono.com/forums/#nabble-td25897858

Is there any issue ? Laybe have I done a mistake in my configuration...

Thanks in advance,

JKB
_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

Re: Malfunction of the DataGridView.

2009-12-17T14:25:34Z

Thank you for your reply.

I am only a first step in porting my application to Mono, with Mac as final target. I currently use Mono on Windows PC. Is in this environment I finds malfunction.

Regards

Re: mono 2.6 build

2009-12-17T14:20:55Z

Im using 64bit redhat in a vmware virtual machine. I can build older versions of mono like mono 2.4 but for some reason 2.6 doesnt want to compile so Im not really sure whats different with it. Is there something with posix thats changed?

scott

Rodrigo Kumpera wrote:

What setup are you using to compile mono?

Which OS and version? 32 or 64 bits? Is it a virtual machine? Which one?

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 5:01 PM, srf <Scott.Fluto@cmgl.ca> wrote:

>
> I was trying to compile mono 2.6 and Im getting this error:
>
> MCS [net_1_1] Mono.Posix.dll
> /bin/sh: line 1: 11917 Illegal instruction
> MONO_PATH="./../../class/lib/net_1_1:$MONO_PATH"
> /disk2/mono/Mono2.6/mono-2.6/mono-2.6/runtime/mono-wrapper
> ./../../class/lib/net_1_1/mcs.exe /codepage:65001 -optimize -d:NET_1_1
> -d:ONLY_1_1 -debug /noconfig /unsafe /r:mscorlib.dll /r:System.dll
> /nowarn:0618,612 -target:library
> -out:../../class/lib/net_1_1/Mono.Posix.dll
> @Mono.Posix.dll.sources
>
>
> does anyone know what the problem would be? is it something to do with
> @Mono.Posix.dll.sources?
>
> thanks
>
> scott
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/mono-2.6-build-tp26833240p26833240.html
> Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>

_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

Re: mono 2.6 build

2009-12-17T13:52:54Z

What setup are you using to compile mono?

Which OS and version? 32 or 64 bits? Is it a virtual machine? Which one?

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 5:01 PM, srf <Scott.Fluto@...> wrote:

I was trying to compile mono 2.6 and Im getting this error:

MCS [net_1_1] Mono.Posix.dll
/bin/sh: line 1: 11917 Illegal instruction
MONO_PATH="./../../class/lib/net_1_1:$MONO_PATH"
/disk2/mono/Mono2.6/mono-2.6/mono-2.6/runtime/mono-wrapper
./../../class/lib/net_1_1/mcs.exe /codepage:65001 -optimize -d:NET_1_1
-d:ONLY_1_1 -debug /noconfig /unsafe /r:mscorlib.dll /r:System.dll
/nowarn:0618,612 -target:library -out:../../class/lib/net_1_1/Mono.Posix.dll
@Mono.Posix.dll.sources

does anyone know what the problem would be? is it something to do with
@Mono.Posix.dll.sources?

thanks

scott
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/mono-2.6-build-tp26833240p26833240.html
Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

Re: Entity Framework status

2009-12-17T13:15:48Z

On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 20:17 +0100, Tomi wrote:
> can someone tell me what is the current status of Entity Framework in
> Mono? I found this link (http://www.mono-project.com/EntityFramework)
> but don't know how old it is. Thanks alot.

Development has not started in any fashion. Partial development may
start (in a "bent" form) next year; the forthcoming DbLinq 0.19
announcement will provide more details.

- Jon

_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

Qestions on winform

2009-12-17T13:09:54Z

Dear all, I am very glad to know this forum.
I am a windows user and a beginner to the MONO. Now I am tring to make the first winform application, but it seems the .exe files is opend always with the CMD window at backside? Could anyone to help me not to show this CMD window?

Thank you.

Re: HttpHandler and 2.4.3+

2009-12-17T12:37:32Z

Hi

thanks! That was indeed the solution. I can't find anything on MSDN about this behaviour, so I guess this is the right one.. thanks allot!

Cheers

Peter

On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 11:12 -0600, Tiaan Geldenhuys wrote:

I think it should not have worked previously with your config.  Try something like...

<httpHandlers>
<add verb="*" path="remote/*/*/*,remote/*/*,remote/*,remote" type="Willow.Cms.Common.WebServiceHandler, Willow.Cms.Common" />
</httpHandlers>

If that doesn't work, then it might be a bug.




From: mono-list-bounces@... [mono-list-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Peter Hagen
Sent: 17 December 2009 3:50 AM
To: mono-list@...
Subject: [Mono-list] HttpHandler and 2.4.3+

Goodday

Last week I have upgraded my systems to 2.4.3 and one to the new 2.6, together with monodevelop 2.2. First of all, it works like a breeze! Very cool, and I'm very happy with these releases, and thanks allot to the Mono team! But, I do think I found a possible bug. Before i was running 2.0.1 and a 2.4.2-3. I created a HttpHandler system in which I can dynamically add services. One of these services is a trackback system for a mailinglist. The mailing has an url in it to an image, which is handled by the service. Such an url looks like this:

http://www.willow-net.nl/remote/trackmm/5,493,989/tb.gif

The idea is that "remote" is the httphandler, and trackmm is a dynamically added service to this. This service can 'decode' the id's, do some database action and reply with a 1x1 gif image. This works on 2.0.1 till 2.4.2-3. In apache i have an empty folder named remote, so it can send the request to mono. No problem here. Now i have the 2.4.3 and 2.6 mono installed, and I get an 'The resource cannot be found' exception when calling this url. After testing, i noticed that calling "http://www.willow-net.nl/remote/trackmm" does call the service, but when i add an / to it, it wont. So, it looks like, the newer versions doesn't allow any extra's in the path. Here is my httphandler definition in Web.Config:

<httpHandlers>
<add verb="*" path="remote/*" type="Willow.Cms.Common.WebServiceHandler, Willow.Cms.Common" />
</httpHandlers>

So, now its the question, is this a bug? Or is this the way it should have been working in the past?

Cheers

Peter

_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

Re: Malfunction of the DataGridView.

2009-12-17T11:25:30Z

Were the bugs you mentioned with Mac OS? If so, try running your application this way:
MONO_MWF_MAC_FORCE_X11=1 mono yourapp.exe

You may get better results. It's worth giving a try.

I think GTK# is the most popular and mature alternative to WinForms that Mono has to offer (although it works better on Linux than on Mac... If Mac is your primary target, you may want to try Cocoa# or something like that). How difficult the port will be, I can't say, and other than the size of the application, it also depends on how nice the original application source code is (ie: whether business code is mixed with UI code, and so on...).
What some developers do is have an interface for the GUI, then use a different toolkit depending on the OS (like WinForms on Windows, Cocoa# on OS X...). But that means duplicated efforts / extra work.

Oh, and to report bugs, see: http://www.mono-project.com/Bugs
Once on bugzilla, pick: "Mono", "Mono: Class Libraries", "Windows.Forms".

Amyco wrote:

Thank you for this answer to understanding the current situation.
It's a pity for me and the users of my application requesting the portability on Mac OS.

Do you know if it is difficult to make a WinForm application developed in Visual Studio under a different GUI? Which GUI is better?

I think the best place to post bugs is the forum WinForm. Correct?

Regards

Entity Framework status

2009-12-17T11:17:47Z

Hi folks,

can someone tell me what is the current status of Entity Framework in Mono? I found this link (http://www.mono-project.com/EntityFramework) but don't know how old it is. Thanks alot.

_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

mono 2.6 build

2009-12-17T11:01:26Z

I was trying to compile mono 2.6 and Im getting this error:

MCS [net_1_1] Mono.Posix.dll
/bin/sh: line 1: 11917 Illegal instruction MONO_PATH="./../../class/lib/net_1_1:$MONO_PATH" /disk2/mono/Mono2.6/mono-2.6/mono-2.6/runtime/mono-wrapper ./../../class/lib/net_1_1/mcs.exe /codepage:65001 -optimize -d:NET_1_1 -d:ONLY_1_1 -debug /noconfig /unsafe /r:mscorlib.dll /r:System.dll /nowarn:0618,612 -target:library -out:../../class/lib/net_1_1/Mono.Posix.dll @Mono.Posix.dll.sources

does anyone know what the problem would be? is it something to do with @Mono.Posix.dll.sources?

thanks

scott

Re: HttpHandler and 2.4.3+

2009-12-17T09:12:21Z

I think it should not have worked previously with your config. Try something like...

<httpHandlers>
<add verb="*" path="remote/*/*/*,remote/*/*,remote/*,remote" type="Willow.Cms.Common.WebServiceHandler, Willow.Cms.Common" />
</httpHandlers>

If that doesn't work, then it might be a bug.

From: mono-list-bounces@... [mailto:mono-list-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Peter Hagen
Sent: 17 December 2009 3:50 AM
To: mono-list@...
Subject: [Mono-list] HttpHandler and 2.4.3+

Goodday

Last week I have upgraded my systems to 2.4.3 and one to the new 2.6, together with monodevelop 2.2. First of all, it works like a breeze! Very cool, and I'm very happy with these releases, and thanks allot to the Mono team! But, I do think I found a possible bug. Before i was running 2.0.1 and a 2.4.2-3. I created a HttpHandler system in which I can dynamically add services. One of these services is a trackback system for a mailinglist. The mailing has an url in it to an image, which is handled by the service. Such an url looks like this:

http://www.willow-net.nl/remote/trackmm/5,493,989/tb.gif

The idea is that "remote" is the httphandler, and trackmm is a dynamically added service to this. This service can 'decode' the id's, do some database action and reply with a 1x1 gif image. This works on 2.0.1 till 2.4.2-3. In apache i have an empty folder named remote, so it can send the request to mono. No problem here. Now i have the 2.4.3 and 2.6 mono installed, and I get an 'The resource cannot be found' exception when calling this url. After testing, i noticed that calling "http://www.willow-net.nl/remote/trackmm" does call the service, but when i add an / to it, it wont. So, it looks like, the newer versions doesn't allow any extra's in the path. Here is my httphandler definition in Web.Config:

<httpHandlers>
<add verb="*" path="remote/*" type="Willow.Cms.Common.WebServiceHandler, Willow.Cms.Common" />
</httpHandlers>

So, now its the question, is this a bug? Or is this the way it should have been working in the past?

Cheers

Peter

_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

Re: Malfunction of the DataGridView.

2009-12-17T09:02:20Z

for winforms, the best is vs, but yu also have sharpdevelop and if
your are very easy with .designer.cs code yu can use MonoDevelop.
Ivanz already started an winform designer running with mono

I don't see your original bug question, you should keep the original thread (FW)

2009/12/17 Amyco <achenriot@...>:

>
> Thank you for this answer to understanding the current situation.
> It's a pity for me and the users of my application requesting the
> portability on Mac OS.
>
> Do you know if it is difficult to make a WinForm application developed in
> Visual Studio under a different GUI? Which GUI is better?
>
> I think the best place to post bugs is the forum WinForm. Correct?
>
> Regards
> --
> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Malfunction-of-the-DataGridView.-tp26736811p26831041.html
> Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>

Re: Compil mono svn trunk

2009-12-17T09:01:08Z

to keep some trace of which is good and bad, here it is the good
configure arguments, after take off all bad/conflict one :
./autogen.sh --prefix=/usr --with-oprofile=/usr --with-monotouch=yes
--with-moonlight=yes --with-profile4=yes --with-x=yes --with-jit=yes
--with-large-heap=yes

2009/12/17 B.R. <severedcross@...>:

> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Petit Eric <surfzoid@...> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>> I try to compil mono from svn trunk revision.
>> If i use a basic configure :
>> ./autogen.sh --prefix=/usr
>> and make all is ok
>> but if i use some extra arguments like that :
>> ./autogen.sh --prefix=/usr --with-oprofile=/usr --with-monotouch=yes
>> --with-moonlight=yes --with-profile4=yes --with-x=yes --with-jit=yes
>> --with-large-heap=yes --with-interp=yes --with-malloc-mempools=yes
>>
>> <build log snipped>
>>
>> I use bad/incompatible arguments or there is a bug ?
>>
>> --
>> Cordially.
>>
>> Small Eric Quotations of the days:
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>
> I think you've got a case of bad arguments. I'm guessing --with-jit and
> --with-interp are pretty unlikely to work, as one builds Mono as an
> interpreter (is this even supported anymore) and the other builds the JITter
> we all know and love. --with-x should be automatically detected and
> shouldn't need to be told to configure explicitly, and I'm not sure about
> --with-malloc-mempools or --with-oprofile. I know what oprofile does, but
> I've never tried to link Mono with it. As far as --with-profile4,
> --with-moonlight and --with-monotouch, those should work fine--I've been
> able to build with those before.
>
> Regards,
> B.R.

Re: Malfunction of the DataGridView.

2009-12-17T08:50:46Z

Thank you for this answer to understanding the current situation.
It's a pity for me and the users of my application requesting the portability on Mac OS.

Do you know if it is difficult to make a WinForm application developed in Visual Studio under a different GUI? Which GUI is better?

I think the best place to post bugs is the forum WinForm. Correct?

Regards

Re: Compil mono svn trunk

2009-12-17T08:35:54Z

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Petit Eric <surfzoid@...> wrote:

Hi
I try to compil mono from svn trunk revision.
If i use a basic configure :
./autogen.sh --prefix=/usr
and make all is ok
but if i use some extra arguments like that :
./autogen.sh --prefix=/usr --with-oprofile=/usr --with-monotouch=yes
--with-moonlight=yes --with-profile4=yes --with-x=yes --with-jit=yes
--with-large-heap=yes --with-interp=yes --with-malloc-mempools=yes

<build log snipped>

I use bad/incompatible arguments or there is a bug ?

--
Cordially.

Small Eric Quotations of the days:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious
_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

I think you've got a case of bad arguments. I'm guessing --with-jit and --with-interp are pretty unlikely to work, as one builds Mono as an interpreter (is this even supported anymore) and the other builds the JITter we all know and love. --with-x should be automatically detected and shouldn't need to be told to configure explicitly, and I'm not sure about --with-malloc-mempools or --with-oprofile. I know what oprofile does, but I've never tried to link Mono with it. As far as --with-profile4, --with-moonlight and --with-monotouch, those should work fine--I've been able to build with those before.

Regards,

B.R.

_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

Compil mono svn trunk

2009-12-17T08:11:39Z

Hi
I try to compil mono from svn trunk revision.
If i use a basic configure :
./autogen.sh --prefix=/usr
and make all is ok
but if i use some extra arguments like that :
./autogen.sh --prefix=/usr --with-oprofile=/usr --with-monotouch=yes
--with-moonlight=yes --with-profile4=yes --with-x=yes --with-jit=yes
--with-large-heap=yes --with-interp=yes --with-malloc-mempools=yes

Configure is okay , but make fail with this :
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/epetit/MonoSVN/mono/mono/cil'
Making all in metadata
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/epetit/MonoSVN/mono/mono/metadata'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/epetit/MonoSVN/mono/mono/metadata'
Making all in arch
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/epetit/MonoSVN/mono/mono/arch'
Making all in x86
make[4]: Entering directory `/home/epetit/MonoSVN/mono/mono/arch/x86'
CC tramp.lo
tramp.c: In function 'mono_arch_create_trampoline':
tramp.c:91: error: 'MonoClass' has no member named 'enum_basetype'
tramp.c:209: error: 'MonoClass' has no member named 'enum_basetype'
tramp.c:303: error: 'MonoClass' has no member named 'enum_basetype'
tramp.c: In function 'mono_arch_create_method_pointer':
tramp.c:372: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of
'mono_class_native_size' differ in signedness
../../../mono/metadata/marshal.h:95: note: expected 'guint32 *' but
argument is of type 'int *'
tramp.c:444: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of
'mono_type_native_stack_size' differ in signedness
../../../mono/metadata/marshal.h:105: note: expected 'guint32 *' but
argument is of type 'int *'
tramp.c:510: error: 'MonoClass' has no member named 'enum_basetype'
make[4]: *** [tramp.lo] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/epetit/MonoSVN/mono/mono/arch/x86'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/epetit/MonoSVN/mono/mono/arch'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/epetit/MonoSVN/mono/mono'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/epetit/MonoSVN/mono'
make: *** [all] Error 2

I use bad/incompatible arguments or there is a bug ?

--
Cordially.

Small Eric Quotations of the days:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious
_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

Re: Malfunction of the DataGridView.

2009-12-17T06:51:15Z

The thing is that most Mono developers and users aren't very interested in Windows.Forms. Most of them use GTK# or other GUI, while WinForms is mostly seen as something to increase compatibility with existing .NET applications, not something to write new apps in (especially if Linux is your primary target). Also, the fact that WinForms is not only old but also proprietary (hasn't been opened / standardized by Microsoft) probably doesn't help either.

I may be wrong, but I think there is only one Novell developer actively working on WinForms support (Carlos Alberto Cortez), plus benevolent contributors. Add to that the fact the WinForms implementation of Mono has been restarted from scratch twice already (http://www.mono-project.com/WinForms#History), and you understand why it's still not mature... but it's still getting better, slowly but surely.

Anyway, people who care about WinForms (I do) should submit bug reports and patches to help.

Amyco wrote:

As DataGridView does not work well on very basic functions with Mono 2.4, I tried Mono 2.6. The results are slightly better but still very insufficient to achieve a real product.

I then tried the old DataGrid in 2.6. It works best in display but not in edit. And the operations seems unstables, that is to say that the same causes do not always produce the same effects.

I am surprised by the low functional level (this is not a criticism, just an observation).
How to view and edit numerical data from a single table? No developer has had this need before me?

Kind Regards,

Re: [Mono-dev] Announcing the release of Mono 2.6 and MonoDevelop 2.2

2009-12-17T06:28:16Z

Ok, thank you, Atsushi!!

You did a great work with WCF.

2009/12/17 Atsushi Eno <atsushieno@...>

Yes you can. Read my previous reply with:

- silverlight apps are based on 2.1 profile
- .NET apps (console, asp.net, gtk#, winforms etc.) are either in 2.0 or
4.0 profile.

Atsushi Eno

(2009年12月17日 22:39), Daniel Soto wrote:
> Hello.
>
> You said that moonlight there is no UDP support, that's right, but, I
> forgot to mention: I can build a console app (for example) using WCF?
> Or only in moonlight apps?
>
> Regards.
>
> Daniel.
>
> 2009/12/17 Atsushi Eno <atsushieno@...

> <mailto:atsushieno@...>>
>
> Hello,
>
> In moonlight there is no UDP support, so it is not possible. In 2.0 or
> 4.0 profile, you can implement UDP transport. But since there is no
> standard UDP binding, you will have to do it by yourself.
>
> Also notice that UDP transport channel will be simplex, unlike
> HTTP and
> TCP streaming ones.
>
> HTH,
> Atsushi Eno
>
>
> On 2009/12/17 21:24, Daniel Soto wrote:
>
> It's possible to change the transport protocol using UDP
> instead TCP?
>
> By the way, awesome new release of Mono, great work!!
>
> 2009/12/16 Atsushi Eno <atsushieno@...
> <mailto:atsushieno@...>
> <mailto:atsushieno@...
> <mailto:atsushieno@...>>>
>
>
> Yes and no. It is implemented, but I gave a quick fix to get
> binary
> encoder + HTTP
> transport yesterday in svn trunk.
> http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-patches/2009-December/163334.html
>
> The same fix should work for 2.6 branch (I'll batch import WCF
> fixes later).
>
> WCF tests on moonlight will be hopefully done at some stage.
>
> Atsushi Eno
>
> On 2009/12/17 2:31, Andrus wrote:
> > Is WCF binary protocol implemented ?
> > Is WCF binary protocol tested with SilverLight / Moonlight ?
> >
> > Andrus.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Atsushi Eno"<atsushieno@...
> <mailto:atsushieno@...>
> <mailto:atsushieno@...

> <mailto:atsushieno@...>>>
> > To: "J.P."<mailing@...
> <mailto:mailing@...>
> <mailto:mailing@...
> <mailto:mailing@...>>>
> > Cc:<mono-list@...
> <mailto:mono-list@...>
> <mailto:mono-list@...
> <mailto:mono-list@...>>>
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 7:26 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Mono-list] [Mono-dev] Announcing the release of
> Mono 2.6 and
> > MonoDevelop 2.2
> >
> >
> >
> >> If you are aware of WCF bugs, please file a bug ;-)
> >>
> >> Atsushi Eno
> >>
> >> On 2009/12/16 11:00, J.P. wrote:
> >>
> >>> Wow!! AWESOME!!! Wcf work correctly! (but has a simple bug..)
> >>>
> >>> Now I'm going to stress tests for my daemons.
> >>>
> >>> I'll love Mono, forever ^^
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
> <mailto:Mono-list@...>
> <mailto:Mono-list@...
> <mailto:Mono-list@...>>
>
> >>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
> >>>
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
> <mailto:Mono-list@...>
> <mailto:Mono-list@...
> <mailto:Mono-list@...>>
>
> >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
> <mailto:Mono-list@...>
> <mailto:Mono-list@...
> <mailto:Mono-list@...>>
>
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
> <mailto:Mono-list@...>
> <mailto:Mono-list@...
> <mailto:Mono-list@...>>
>
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

Re: [Mono-dev] Announcing the release of Mono 2.6 and MonoDevelop 2.2

2009-12-17T06:24:23Z

Yes you can. Read my previous reply with:

- silverlight apps are based on 2.1 profile
- .NET apps (console, asp.net, gtk#, winforms etc.) are either in 2.0 or
4.0 profile.

Atsushi Eno

(2009年12月17日 22:39), Daniel Soto wrote:

> Hello.
>
> You said that moonlight there is no UDP support, that's right, but, I
> forgot to mention: I can build a console app (for example) using WCF?
> Or only in moonlight apps?
>
> Regards.
>
> Daniel.
>
> 2009/12/17 Atsushi Eno <atsushieno@...
> <mailto:atsushieno@...>>
>
> Hello,
>
> In moonlight there is no UDP support, so it is not possible. In 2.0 or
> 4.0 profile, you can implement UDP transport. But since there is no
> standard UDP binding, you will have to do it by yourself.
>
> Also notice that UDP transport channel will be simplex, unlike
> HTTP and
> TCP streaming ones.
>
> HTH,
> Atsushi Eno
>
>
> On 2009/12/17 21:24, Daniel Soto wrote:
>
> It's possible to change the transport protocol using UDP
> instead TCP?
>
> By the way, awesome new release of Mono, great work!!
>
> 2009/12/16 Atsushi Eno <atsushieno@...
> <mailto:atsushieno@...>
> <mailto:atsushieno@...
> <mailto:atsushieno@...>>>
>
>
> Yes and no. It is implemented, but I gave a quick fix to get
> binary
> encoder + HTTP
> transport yesterday in svn trunk.
> http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-patches/2009-December/163334.html
>
> The same fix should work for 2.6 branch (I'll batch import WCF
> fixes later).
>
> WCF tests on moonlight will be hopefully done at some stage.
>
> Atsushi Eno
>
> On 2009/12/17 2:31, Andrus wrote:
> > Is WCF binary protocol implemented ?
> > Is WCF binary protocol tested with SilverLight / Moonlight ?
> >
> > Andrus.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Atsushi Eno"<atsushieno@...
> <mailto:atsushieno@...>
> <mailto:atsushieno@...
> <mailto:atsushieno@...>>>
> > To: "J.P."<mailing@...
> <mailto:mailing@...>
> <mailto:mailing@...
> <mailto:mailing@...>>>
> > Cc:<mono-list@...
> <mailto:mono-list@...>
> <mailto:mono-list@...
> <mailto:mono-list@...>>>
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 7:26 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Mono-list] [Mono-dev] Announcing the release of
> Mono 2.6 and
> > MonoDevelop 2.2
> >
> >
> >
> >> If you are aware of WCF bugs, please file a bug ;-)
> >>
> >> Atsushi Eno
> >>
> >> On 2009/12/16 11:00, J.P. wrote:
> >>
> >>> Wow!! AWESOME!!! Wcf work correctly! (but has a simple bug..)
> >>>
> >>> Now I'm going to stress tests for my daemons.
> >>>
> >>> I'll love Mono, forever ^^
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
> <mailto:Mono-list@...>
> <mailto:Mono-list@...
> <mailto:Mono-list@...>>
>
> >>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
> >>>
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
> <mailto:Mono-list@...>
> <mailto:Mono-list@...
> <mailto:Mono-list@...>>
>
> >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
> <mailto:Mono-list@...>
> <mailto:Mono-list@...
> <mailto:Mono-list@...>>
>
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
> <mailto:Mono-list@...>
> <mailto:Mono-list@...
> <mailto:Mono-list@...>>
>
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

Re: Malfunction of the DataGridView.

2009-12-17T05:51:08Z

As DataGridView does not work well on very basic functions with Mono 2.4, I tried Mono 2.6. The results are slightly better but still very insufficient to achieve a real product.

I then tried the old DataGrid in 2.6. It works best in display but not in edit. And the operations seems unstables, that is to say that the same causes do not always produce the same effects.

I am surprised by the low functional level (this is not a criticism, just an observation).
How to view and edit numerical data from a single table? No developer has had this need before me?

Kind Regards,

Re: [Mono-dev] Announcing the release of Mono 2.6 and MonoDevelop 2.2

2009-12-17T05:39:45Z

Hello.

You said that moonlight there is no UDP support, that's right, but, I forgot to mention: I can build a console app (for example) using WCF? Or only in moonlight apps?

Regards.

Daniel.

2009/12/17 Atsushi Eno <atsushieno@...>

Hello,

In moonlight there is no UDP support, so it is not possible. In 2.0 or
4.0 profile, you can implement UDP transport. But since there is no
standard UDP binding, you will have to do it by yourself.

Also notice that UDP transport channel will be simplex, unlike HTTP and
TCP streaming ones.

HTH,
Atsushi Eno

On 2009/12/17 21:24, Daniel Soto wrote:

It's possible to change the transport protocol using UDP instead TCP?

By the way, awesome new release of Mono, great work!!

2009/12/16 Atsushi Eno <atsushieno@... <mailto:atsushieno@...>>

Yes and no. It is implemented, but I gave a quick fix to get binary
encoder + HTTP
transport yesterday in svn trunk.
http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-patches/2009-December/163334.html

The same fix should work for 2.6 branch (I'll batch import WCF
fixes later).

WCF tests on moonlight will be hopefully done at some stage.

Atsushi Eno

On 2009/12/17 2:31, Andrus wrote:
> Is WCF binary protocol implemented ?
> Is WCF binary protocol tested with SilverLight / Moonlight ?
>
> Andrus.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Atsushi Eno"<atsushieno@...
<mailto:atsushieno@...>>
> To: "J.P."<mailing@...
<mailto:mailing@...>>
> Cc:<mono-list@... <mailto:mono-list@...>>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 7:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [Mono-list] [Mono-dev] Announcing the release of
Mono 2.6 and
> MonoDevelop 2.2
>
>
>
>> If you are aware of WCF bugs, please file a bug ;-)
>>
>> Atsushi Eno
>>
>> On 2009/12/16 11:00, J.P. wrote:
>>
>>> Wow!! AWESOME!!! Wcf work correctly! (but has a simple bug..)
>>>
>>> Now I'm going to stress tests for my daemons.
>>>
>>> I'll love Mono, forever ^^
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
<mailto:Mono-list@...>

>>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
<mailto:Mono-list@...>

>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
<mailto:Mono-list@...>

> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
<mailto:Mono-list@...>

http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

Re: PFX doesn't work in Mono 2.6

2009-12-17T05:33:23Z

Hey !

This is a know bug, it is fixed and the patch will be available in a bugfix release.

The workaround is to do a Parallel.For on a range of value greater than the number of core you have (16 it seems).

Yury Serdyuk wrote:

Hi !

I have tried a simple program

$ cat Test_PFX_For.cs
using System;
using System.Threading;

public class Test_PFX_For {

public static void Main ( String[] args ) {

int num_threads = 1;

Parallel.For ( 0, num_threads, i =>
{
long k = 0;
while ( true ){
k++;
k--;
}
});
}
}

under Mono 2.6 and Linux

Linux 2.6.18-128.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jan 21 10:41:14 EST 2009 x86_64 x86_64
x86_64 GNU/Linux

But the program doesn't work properly -
it loads all processors:

> bash-3.2$ mono -V
> Mono JIT compiler version 2.6 (tarball Thu Dec 17 11:17:37 MSK 2009)
> Copyright (C) 2002-2008 Novell, Inc and Contributors. www.mono-project.com
> TLS: __thread
> GC: Included Boehm (with typed GC and Parallel Mark)
> SIGSEGV: altstack
> Notifications: epoll
> Architecture: amd64
> Disabled: none
> bash-3.2$ dmcs Test_PFX_For.cs
> bash-3.2$ mono ./Test_PFX_For.exe

> -bash-3.2$ top
> top - 14:58:28 up 19 days, 19:43, 2 users, load average: 6.71, 4.27,
> 4.10
> Tasks: 279 total, 2 running, 277 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
> Cpu0 :100.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi,
> 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Cpu1 :100.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi,
> 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Cpu2 :100.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi,
> 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Cpu3 :100.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi,
> 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Cpu4 :100.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi,
> 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Cpu5 :100.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi,
> 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Cpu6 :100.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi,
> 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Cpu7 :100.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi,
> 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Cpu8 :100.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi,
> 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Cpu9 :100.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi,
> 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Cpu10 :100.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi,
> 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Cpu11 :100.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi,
> 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Cpu12 :100.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi,
> 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Cpu13 :100.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi,
> 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Cpu14 :100.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi,
> 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Cpu15 :100.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi,
> 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Mem: 49449700k total, 869124k used, 48580576k free, 166836k buffers
> Swap: 2096472k total, 0k used, 2096472k free, 502932k cached
>
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
> 11201 xxx 25 0 7134m 7532 3636 R 1599.7 0.0 7:18.81 mono

Any comments or suggestions ?

Yury.

_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

Re: Fw: [Mono-dev] Announcing the release of Mono 2.6 and MonoDevelop 2.2

2009-12-17T05:28:22Z

Well, no... 2.6.1 will be an immediate release for some urgent and
minimum bugfixes, which isn't this normal issue. Hopefully 2.6.2 will.

Atsushi Eno

On 2009/12/17 21:57, Andrus wrote:

> Thank you.
> I understand from this that Binary encoding for Silverlight/Moonlight will
> be usable in 2.6.1.
> When 2.6.1 will be released ?
>
> Andrus.
>
>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>
>>
>>> Yes and no. It is implemented, but I gave a quick fix to get binary
>>> encoder + HTTP
>>> transport yesterday in svn trunk.
>>> http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-patches/2009-December/163334.html
>>>
>>> The same fix should work for 2.6 branch (I'll batch import WCF fixes
>>> later).
>>>
>>> WCF tests on moonlight will be hopefully done at some stage.
>>>
>>> Atsushi Eno
>>>
>>> On 2009/12/17 2:31, Andrus wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is WCF binary protocol implemented ?
>>>> Is WCF binary protocol tested with SilverLight / Moonlight ?
>>>>
>>>> Andrus.
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Atsushi Eno"<atsushieno@...>
>>>> To: "J.P."<mailing@...>
>>>> Cc:<mono-list@...>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 7:26 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [Mono-list] [Mono-dev] Announcing the release of Mono 2.6
>>>> and
>>>> MonoDevelop 2.2
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> If you are aware of WCF bugs, please file a bug ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Atsushi Eno
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2009/12/16 11:00, J.P. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Wow!! AWESOME!!! Wcf work correctly! (but has a simple bug..)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now I'm going to stress tests for my daemons.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll love Mono, forever ^^
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
>>>>>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
>>>>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
>>>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

Re: [Mono-dev] Announcing the release of Mono 2.6 and MonoDevelop 2.2

2009-12-17T05:09:40Z

Hello,

In moonlight there is no UDP support, so it is not possible. In 2.0 or
4.0 profile, you can implement UDP transport. But since there is no
standard UDP binding, you will have to do it by yourself.

Also notice that UDP transport channel will be simplex, unlike HTTP and
TCP streaming ones.

HTH,
Atsushi Eno

On 2009/12/17 21:24, Daniel Soto wrote:

> It's possible to change the transport protocol using UDP instead TCP?
>
> By the way, awesome new release of Mono, great work!!
>
> 2009/12/16 Atsushi Eno <atsushieno@...
> <mailto:atsushieno@...>>
>
> Yes and no. It is implemented, but I gave a quick fix to get binary
> encoder + HTTP
> transport yesterday in svn trunk.
> http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-patches/2009-December/163334.html
>
> The same fix should work for 2.6 branch (I'll batch import WCF
> fixes later).
>
> WCF tests on moonlight will be hopefully done at some stage.
>
> Atsushi Eno
>
> On 2009/12/17 2:31, Andrus wrote:
> > Is WCF binary protocol implemented ?
> > Is WCF binary protocol tested with SilverLight / Moonlight ?
> >
> > Andrus.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Atsushi Eno"<atsushieno@...
> <mailto:atsushieno@...>>
> > To: "J.P."<mailing@...
> <mailto:mailing@...>>
> > Cc:<mono-list@... <mailto:mono-list@...>>
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 7:26 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Mono-list] [Mono-dev] Announcing the release of
> Mono 2.6 and
> > MonoDevelop 2.2
> >
> >
> >
> >> If you are aware of WCF bugs, please file a bug ;-)
> >>
> >> Atsushi Eno
> >>
> >> On 2009/12/16 11:00, J.P. wrote:
> >>
> >>> Wow!! AWESOME!!! Wcf work correctly! (but has a simple bug..)
> >>>
> >>> Now I'm going to stress tests for my daemons.
> >>>
> >>> I'll love Mono, forever ^^
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
> <mailto:Mono-list@...>
> >>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
> >>>
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
> <mailto:Mono-list@...>
> >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
> <mailto:Mono-list@...>
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
> <mailto:Mono-list@...>
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>
>

_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

Fw: [Mono-dev] Announcing the release of Mono 2.6 and MonoDevelop 2.2

2009-12-17T04:57:21Z

Thank you.
I understand from this that Binary encoding for Silverlight/Moonlight will
be usable in 2.6.1.
When 2.6.1 will be released ?

Andrus.

> ----- Original Message -----
>
>> Yes and no. It is implemented, but I gave a quick fix to get binary
>> encoder + HTTP
>> transport yesterday in svn trunk.
>> http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-patches/2009-December/163334.html
>>
>> The same fix should work for 2.6 branch (I'll batch import WCF fixes
>> later).
>>
>> WCF tests on moonlight will be hopefully done at some stage.
>>
>> Atsushi Eno
>>
>> On 2009/12/17 2:31, Andrus wrote:
>>> Is WCF binary protocol implemented ?
>>> Is WCF binary protocol tested with SilverLight / Moonlight ?
>>>
>>> Andrus.
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Atsushi Eno"<atsushieno@...>
>>> To: "J.P."<mailing@...>
>>> Cc:<mono-list@...>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 7:26 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Mono-list] [Mono-dev] Announcing the release of Mono 2.6
>>> and
>>> MonoDevelop 2.2
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> If you are aware of WCF bugs, please file a bug ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Atsushi Eno
>>>>
>>>> On 2009/12/16 11:00, J.P. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Wow!! AWESOME!!! Wcf work correctly! (but has a simple bug..)
>>>>>
>>>>> Now I'm going to stress tests for my daemons.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll love Mono, forever ^^
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
>>>>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
>>>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
>>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

Re: [Mono-dev] Announcing the release of Mono 2.6 and MonoDevelop 2.2

2009-12-17T04:24:25Z

It's possible to change the transport protocol using UDP instead TCP?

By the way, awesome new release of Mono, great work!!

2009/12/16 Atsushi Eno <atsushieno@...>

Yes and no. It is implemented, but I gave a quick fix to get binary
encoder + HTTP
transport yesterday in svn trunk.
http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-patches/2009-December/163334.html

The same fix should work for 2.6 branch (I'll batch import WCF fixes later).

WCF tests on moonlight will be hopefully done at some stage.

Atsushi Eno

On 2009/12/17 2:31, Andrus wrote:
> Is WCF binary protocol implemented ?
> Is WCF binary protocol tested with SilverLight / Moonlight ?
>
> Andrus.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Atsushi Eno"<atsushieno@...>
> To: "J.P."<mailing@...>
> Cc:<mono-list@...>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 7:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [Mono-list] [Mono-dev] Announcing the release of Mono 2.6 and
> MonoDevelop 2.2
>
>
>
>> If you are aware of WCF bugs, please file a bug ;-)
>>
>> Atsushi Eno
>>
>> On 2009/12/16 11:00, J.P. wrote:
>>
>>> Wow!! AWESOME!!! Wcf work correctly! (but has a simple bug..)
>>>
>>> Now I'm going to stress tests for my daemons.
>>>
>>> I'll love Mono, forever ^^
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
>>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

PFX doesn't work in Mono 2.6

2009-12-17T04:00:57Z

Hi !

I have tried a simple program

$ cat Test_PFX_For.cs
using System;
using System.Threading;

public class Test_PFX_For {

public static void Main ( String[] args ) {

int num_threads = 1;

Parallel.For ( 0, num_threads, i =>
{
long k = 0;
while ( true ){
k++;
k--;
}
});
}
}

under Mono 2.6 and Linux

Linux 2.6.18-128.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jan 21 10:41:14 EST 2009 x86_64 x86_64
x86_64 GNU/Linux

But the program doesn't work properly -
it loads all processors:

> bash-3.2$ mono -V
> Mono JIT compiler version 2.6 (tarball Thu Dec 17 11:17:37 MSK 2009)
> Copyright (C) 2002-2008 Novell, Inc and Contributors. www.mono-project.com
> TLS: __thread
> GC: Included Boehm (with typed GC and Parallel Mark)
> SIGSEGV: altstack
> Notifications: epoll
> Architecture: amd64
> Disabled: none
> bash-3.2$ dmcs Test_PFX_For.cs
> bash-3.2$ mono ./Test_PFX_For.exe

> -bash-3.2$ top
> top - 14:58:28 up 19 days, 19:43, 2 users, load average: 6.71, 4.27,
> 4.10
> Tasks: 279 total, 2 running, 277 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
> Cpu0 :100.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi,
> 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Cpu1 :100.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi,
> 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Cpu2 :100.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi,
> 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Cpu3 :100.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi,
> 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Cpu4 :100.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi,
> 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Cpu5 :100.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi,
> 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Cpu6 :100.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi,
> 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Cpu7 :100.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi,
> 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Cpu8 :100.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi,
> 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Cpu9 :100.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi,
> 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Cpu10 :100.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi,
> 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Cpu11 :100.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi,
> 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Cpu12 :100.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi,
> 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Cpu13 :100.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi,
> 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Cpu14 :100.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi,
> 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Cpu15 :100.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi,
> 0.0%si, 0.0%st
> Mem: 49449700k total, 869124k used, 48580576k free, 166836k buffers
> Swap: 2096472k total, 0k used, 2096472k free, 502932k cached
>
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
> 11201 xxx 25 0 7134m 7532 3636 R 1599.7 0.0 7:18.81 mono

Any comments or suggestions ?

Yury.

_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

HttpHandler and 2.4.3+

2009-12-17T01:49:48Z

Goodday

Last week I have upgraded my systems to 2.4.3 and one to the new 2.6, together with monodevelop 2.2. First of all, it works like a breeze! Very cool, and I'm very happy with these releases, and thanks allot to the Mono team! But, I do think I found a possible bug. Before i was running 2.0.1 and a 2.4.2-3. I created a HttpHandler system in which I can dynamically add services. One of these services is a trackback system for a mailinglist. The mailing has an url in it to an image, which is handled by the service. Such an url looks like this:

http://www.willow-net.nl/remote/trackmm/5,493,989/tb.gif

The idea is that "remote" is the httphandler, and trackmm is a dynamically added service to this. This service can 'decode' the id's, do some database action and reply with a 1x1 gif image. This works on 2.0.1 till 2.4.2-3. In apache i have an empty folder named remote, so it can send the request to mono. No problem here. Now i have the 2.4.3 and 2.6 mono installed, and I get an 'The resource cannot be found' exception when calling this url. After testing, i noticed that calling "http://www.willow-net.nl/remote/trackmm" does call the service, but when i add an / to it, it wont. So, it looks like, the newer versions doesn't allow any extra's in the path. Here is my httphandler definition in Web.Config:

<httpHandlers>
<add verb="*" path="remote/*" type="Willow.Cms.Common.WebServiceHandler, Willow.Cms.Common" />
</httpHandlers>

So, now its the question, is this a bug? Or is this the way it should have been working in the past?

Cheers

Peter
_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

Re: [Mono-dev] Announcing the release of Mono 2.6 and MonoDevelop 2.2

2009-12-16T17:21:48Z

Sure, I will as soon. It has a issue that cross access domain policy.

2009/12/17 Atsushi Eno <atsushieno@...>

If you are aware of WCF bugs, please file a bug ;-)

Atsushi Eno

On 2009/12/16 11:00, J.P. wrote:

Wow!! AWESOME!!! Wcf work correctly! (but has a simple bug..)

Now I'm going to stress tests for my daemons.

I'll love Mono, forever ^^

_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

Re: [Mono-dev] Announcing the release of Mono 2.6 and MonoDevelop 2.2

2009-12-16T14:25:21Z

Yes and no. It is implemented, but I gave a quick fix to get binary
encoder + HTTP
transport yesterday in svn trunk.
http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-patches/2009-December/163334.html

The same fix should work for 2.6 branch (I'll batch import WCF fixes later).

WCF tests on moonlight will be hopefully done at some stage.

Atsushi Eno

On 2009/12/17 2:31, Andrus wrote:

> Is WCF binary protocol implemented ?
> Is WCF binary protocol tested with SilverLight / Moonlight ?
>
> Andrus.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Atsushi Eno"<atsushieno@...>
> To: "J.P."<mailing@...>
> Cc:<mono-list@...>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 7:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [Mono-list] [Mono-dev] Announcing the release of Mono 2.6 and
> MonoDevelop 2.2
>
>
>
>> If you are aware of WCF bugs, please file a bug ;-)
>>
>> Atsushi Eno
>>
>> On 2009/12/16 11:00, J.P. wrote:
>>
>>> Wow!! AWESOME!!! Wcf work correctly! (but has a simple bug..)
>>>
>>> Now I'm going to stress tests for my daemons.
>>>
>>> I'll love Mono, forever ^^
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
>>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

Re: Announcing the release of Mono 2.6 and MonoDevelop 2.2

2009-12-16T11:27:58Z

On 12/16/2009 1:23 PM, Stifu wrote:
>
> Congrats on the release!
> You might want to remove the "Mono 2.6 is scheduled to be released in XXXX"
> line from the release notes, that doesn't look too good. :)

Done. Thanks for pointing it out! ;)

Jonathan
_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@...
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list