More amd64 build failure - lex-related

View: New views
2 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

More amd64 build failure - lex-related

by Paul Goyette :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

--- map_scan.o ---
#   compile  wsconsctl/map_scan.o
/build/netbsd-local/tools/x86_64/amd64/bin/x86_64--netbsd-gcc -O2  -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-traditional -Wa,--fatal-warnings -Wreturn-type -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wsign-compare -std=gnu99  -Werror   -I. -I/build/netbsd-local/src/sbin/wsconsctl -nostdinc -isystem /build/netbsd-local/dest/amd64/usr/include   -c    map_scan.c
map_scan.c:571:25: error: macro "yywrap" passed 1 arguments, but takes just 0


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   Paul Goyette   | PGP DSS Key fingerprint: |  E-mail addresses:      |
| Customer Service | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 |  paul at whooppee.com   |
| Network Engineer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette at juniper.net |
| Kernel Developer |                          | pgoyette at netbsd.org  |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: More amd64 build failure - lex-related

by Christos Zoulas-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

In article <Pine.NEB.4.64.0910281121310.12588@...>,
Paul Goyette  <paul@...> wrote:

>--- map_scan.o ---
>#   compile  wsconsctl/map_scan.o
>/build/netbsd-local/tools/x86_64/amd64/bin/x86_64--netbsd-gcc -O2  -Wall
>-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
>-Wno-sign-compare -Wno-traditional -Wa,--fatal-warnings -Wreturn-type
>-Wswitch -Wshadow -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wextra
>-Wno-unused-parameter -Wsign-compare -std=gnu99  -Werror   -I.
>-I/build/netbsd-local/src/sbin/wsconsctl -nostdinc -isystem
>/build/netbsd-local/dest/amd64/usr/include   -c    map_scan.c
>map_scan.c:571:25: error: macro "yywrap" passed 1 arguments, but takes just 0

I am caught up now, fixed.

christos