Moving code to github.com
|
View:
New views
11 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
Moving code to github.com
by Hubert Iwaniuk
::
Rate this Message:
Hi Grizzlies,
As you may have noticed: $ time svn update
svn: OPTIONS of 'https://grizzly.dev.java.net/svn/grizzly/trunk/code': could not connect to server (https://grizzly.dev.java.net)
real 3m27.766s
user 0m0.580s sys 0m0.456s
Is kind of frustrating, and lasts for quite some time now. I would like to start a vote to move source code out of this unreliable repository to http://github.com
Cheers, Hubert. |
||
|
|
Re: Moving code to github.com
by survivant
::
Rate this Message:
+1 to move.. but there is any good Windows based client for git ?
why not Kenai with subversion ? 2009/10/7 Hubert Iwaniuk <neotyk@...> Hi Grizzlies, -- Vous pouvez me suivre sur Twitter / You can follow me on Twitter : http://twitter.com/survivant |
||
|
|
Re: Moving code to github.com
by Jeanfrancois Arcand-2
::
Rate this Message:
Salut,
Hubert Iwaniuk wrote: > Hi Grizzlies, > > As you may have noticed: > $ time svn update > svn: OPTIONS of 'https://grizzly.dev.java.net/svn/grizzly/trunk/code': > could not connect to server (https://grizzly.dev.java.net) > > real 3m27.766s > user 0m0.580s > sys 0m0.456s > > Is kind of frustrating, and lasts for quite some time now. > > I would like to start a vote to move source code out of this unreliable > repository to http://github.com I agree it is a good recommendation. One thing I would like to keep is the current java.net workspace should be mirrored from gitub once a day so peoples that want still needs to work from java.net can checkout the code. We should not allow commits in java.net if we move. I would agree we should start with 1.9.19. I would keep the GlassFish branch/tags (1.9.18a/b/c/d....) here as anyway GF is also down when we are. +1 from me! -- Jeanfrancois > > Cheers, > Hubert. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
||
|
|
Re: Moving code to github.com
by paksegu
::
Rate this Message:
|
||
|
|
Re: Moving code to github.com
by Igor Minar
::
Rate this Message:
If we move to kenai, we should be able to get a hudson instance there
as well. In any case, anything other than java.net & subversion will be an improvement. /i On Oct 7, 2009, at 4:03 PM, paksegu wrote: > Kenai with mercurial seems to be another valid options beside it > does integrates with netbeans > > Ransford Segu-Baffoe > > paksegu@... > > http://www.noqmx.com/ > https://serenade.dev.java.net/ > > --- On Wed, 10/7/09, Survivant 00 <survivant00@...> wrote: > > From: Survivant 00 <survivant00@...> > Subject: Re: Moving code to github.com > To: dev@... > Date: Wednesday, October 7, 2009, 6:50 PM > > +1 to move.. but there is any good Windows based client for git ? > > why not Kenai with subversion ? > > > > 2009/10/7 Hubert Iwaniuk <neotyk@...> > Hi Grizzlies, > > As you may have noticed: > $ time svn update > svn: OPTIONS of 'https://grizzly.dev.java.net/svn/grizzly/trunk/ > code': could not connect to server (https://grizzly.dev.java.net) > > real 3m27.766s > user 0m0.580s > sys 0m0.456s > > Is kind of frustrating, and lasts for quite some time now. > > I would like to start a vote to move source code out of this > unreliable repository to http://github.com > > Cheers, > Hubert. > > > > -- > > Vous pouvez me suivre sur Twitter / You can follow me on Twitter : http://twitter.com/survivant > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
||
|
|
Re: Moving code to github.com
by ming qin
::
Rate this Message:
|
||
|
|
Re: Moving code to github.com
by Oleksiy Stashok
::
Rate this Message:
+1,
but I'd also take a look at kenai first. WBR, Alexey.
Hi Grizzlies, |
||
|
|
Re: Moving code to github.com
by Jeanfrancois Arcand-2
::
Rate this Message:
Oleksiy Stashok wrote: > +1, > > but I'd also take a look at kenai first. Why :-)? I'm so so about using mercurial when we can use git right away. Why Kenai (OK it is powered by Sun...for how log?) A+ -- Jeanfrancois > > WBR, > Alexey. > >> Hi Grizzlies, >> >> As you may have noticed: >> $ time svn update >> svn: OPTIONS of 'https://grizzly.dev.java.net/svn/grizzly/trunk/code': >> could not connect to server (https://grizzly.dev.java.net) >> >> real 3m27.766s >> user 0m0.580s >> sys 0m0.456s >> >> Is kind of frustrating, and lasts for quite some time now. >> >> I would like to start a vote to move source code out of this >> unreliable repository to http://github.com >> >> Cheers, >> Hubert. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
||
|
|
Re: Moving code to github.com
by Oleksiy Stashok
::
Rate this Message:
>> +1,
>> but I'd also take a look at kenai first. > > Why :-)? I'm so so about using mercurial when we can use git right > away. Why Kenai (OK it is powered by Sun...for how log?) Exactly, because Kenai is Sun and we have Igor for our complains :)) But I have nothing against git, except what I've mentioned above. WBR, Alexey. > > A+ > > -- Jeanfrancois > > >> WBR, >> Alexey. >>> Hi Grizzlies, >>> >>> As you may have noticed: >>> $ time svn update >>> svn: OPTIONS of 'https://grizzly.dev.java.net/svn/grizzly/trunk/code' >>> : could not connect to server (https://grizzly.dev.java.net) >>> >>> real 3m27.766s >>> user 0m0.580s >>> sys 0m0.456s >>> >>> Is kind of frustrating, and lasts for quite some time now. >>> >>> I would like to start a vote to move source code out of this >>> unreliable repository to http://github.com >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Hubert. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
||
|
|
Re: Moving code to github.com
by John J. Franey
::
Rate this Message:
Windows clients:
1) tortoise: http://code.google.com/p/tortoisegit/ 2) msysgit: http://code.google.com/p/msysgit/ 3) git on cygwin. 4) java git: jgit under BSD license and hosted at Eclipse. Can be used separately from eclipse (example, in a netbeans or intellij plugin). Put to use by eclipse git plugin. http://www.eclipse.org/egit/ 5) in progress: git compiled by msvc (could not easily find project url) Generally, a polished AND complete windows gui for git is not at hand. The most polished candidate I think is tortoise git. egit is comparitve in polish w/ eclipse. Both of these are pretty and will satisfy a workable subset of git use-cases. There are some git use-cases which stretch beyond current scm (cvs,svn) client use-cases (like stash, cherry-pick, multiway merge) and both tortoise and egit guis are at various stages defining new interface model for these. In the interim, the command line git tool w/ git's own gui satisfy majority of git use-cases and are stable. git brings its own gui (gitgui and gitk). These are workable, but not pretty in the 'windows' sense. git calls out to a configurable mergetool. There are some pretty merge tools available on windows, beyondcompare for one. These mergetools are not part of git, but you might already be using one. The command line git through msysgit or cygwin is stable and useable. Regards, John On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Oleksiy Stashok <Oleksiy.Stashok@...> wrote:
|
||
|
|
Re: Moving code to github.com
by survivant
::
Rate this Message:
thanks. with a good Windows GIu.. go for Git. even if I don't know the difference between with others system.
2009/10/8 John Franey <jjfraney@...> Windows clients: -- Vous pouvez me suivre sur Twitter / You can follow me on Twitter : http://twitter.com/survivant |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
