Multiple email recipients from notifiers

[Mat Schaffer-3]

I'm trying to have a notifier (defined in pom.xml) to email multiple  
recipients after a build in continuum.  But comma-seperated lists  
don't seem to work on continuum 1.1.  CONTINUUM-860 marks it as fixed  
in 1.1-alpha1, but I can't find anything in svn addressing it.

What's the right way to handle this?  Is there anything more succinct  
than the multiple notifier elements mentioned in the list archives? (http://tinyurl.com/39z9wk 
)

Thanks!
Mat

[boomtown15]

The only way I have gotten it to work is by adding multiple notifiers to the POM.  I had problems trying to do what you are and just resorted to adding this information to the POM.  Its a bit redundant looking in the POM file, but at least it works.

Kurt


 

> From: schapht@...
> To: continuum-users@...
> Subject: Multiple email recipients from notifiers
> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:15:41 -0500
>
> I'm trying to have a notifier (defined in pom.xml) to email multiple  
> recipients after a build in continuum.  But comma-seperated lists  
> don't seem to work on continuum 1.1.  CONTINUUM-860 marks it as fixed  
> in 1.1-alpha1, but I can't find anything in svn addressing it.
>
> What's the right way to handle this?  Is there anything more succinct  
> than the multiple notifier elements mentioned in the list archives? (http://tinyurl.com/39z9wk 
> )
>
> Thanks!
> Mat

[Mat Schaffer-3]

On Feb 19, 2008, at 1:38 PM, KURT TOMETICH wrote:
> The only way I have gotten it to work is by adding multiple  
> notifiers to the POM.  I had problems trying to do what you are and  
> just resorted to adding this information to the POM.  Its a bit  
> redundant looking in the POM file, but at least it works.

Thanks Kurt.  If this is the only way, then I guess I'll just have to  
live with it.  But like you said it's a bit redundant looking.

Anyone have any other recommendations?  Is anyone pursuing an  
<addresses> element for the mail configuration that could then support  
multiple <address> elements?  This would at least keep with XML  
standards?

Thanks,
Mat