New draft MWABP (24th Sept 09)

[Adam Connors]

Minor rev. based on the discussion in last call.

Document:

http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/Drafts/BestPractices-2.0/ED-mobile-bp2-20090924

Diff from previous version:

http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2005%2FMWI%2FBPWG%2FGroup%2FDrafts%2FBestPractices-2.0%2FED-mobile-bp2-20090917&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2005%2FMWI%2FBPWG%2FGroup%2FDrafts%2FBestPractices-2.0%2FED-mobile-bp2-20090924

(Note: Diff looks like bottom of document is corrupted, but the document itself seems fine, so hopefully this is okay).

Thanks,


Adam.

[Francois Daoust]

adamconnors wrote:
> (Note: Diff looks like bottom of document is corrupted, but the document
> itself seems fine, so hopefully this is okay).

Yes, there's a known bug on the online HTML diff tool that makes it
screw up the diff near the end of the documents from time to time.

Francois.

[Eduardo Casais]

Is the big yellow box "Incomplete draft. etc..." at the very
beginning, under "status of the document", still relevant?

Things like "This document is a Third Public Working Draft and is not complete. It is subject to major changes and is therefore not intended for implementation. In particular, the list of Best Practices is not settled yet."

or "Some Best Practices are still being investigated and appear as placeholders in the document:
best practices to ease sign-in on mobile devices with limited input capabilities, see Enable Automatic Sign-in
best practices around the use of canvas, see Use Canvas Tag For Dynamic Graphics"

seem either to have been settled, or become historical.

In the spirit of autumn clean-up...

E.Casais