New release

View: New views
2 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

New release

by Raphael Neider-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Dear developers,

in the course of preparing for a new release of SDCC (sdcc.sf.net, release  
planned for end of March 2009), I would like to add features to the  
PIC/PIC16-parts of the compiler that depend on a more recent gputils state  
than the last official release 0.13.6 from 2008-05-17.
In order not to annoy our users, it would be cool to have an official  
gputils release including the required changes (up to and including  
2008-12-03) to use with sdcc.

Could you please prepare a release of gputils (ideally available by end of  
March)?

Thank you for all your work.

Best regards,
Raphael

PS: This is a "duplicate" of my feature request #2584379.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: gnupic-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: gnupic-help@...


Re: New release

by David Barnett-3 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Raphael,

Sorry it's taken me a while to get back to you about this. I've been busy
and haven't had much time for gputils.

I'll tentatively aim to release 0.13.7 by the end of the week.

David

On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Raphael Neider <rneider@...> wrote:

> Dear developers,
>
> in the course of preparing for a new release of SDCC (sdcc.sf.net, release
> planned for end of March 2009), I would like to add features to the
> PIC/PIC16-parts of the compiler that depend on a more recent gputils state
> than the last official release 0.13.6 from 2008-05-17.
> In order not to annoy our users, it would be cool to have an official
> gputils release including the required changes (up to and including
> 2008-12-03) to use with sdcc.
>
> Could you please prepare a release of gputils (ideally available by end of
> March)?
>
> Thank you for all your work.
>
> Best regards,
> Raphael
>
> PS: This is a "duplicate" of my feature request #2584379.
>