OK to merge Media Blogging into trunk?

[Dave-401]

I've taken another look at the Media Blogging work that Ganesh and
Tanuja have been doing in the roller_mediablogging branch and it looks
really good in terms of features and in terms of code. There are a
couple of features missing that we'll need before our next release
(e.g. ability to migrate existing file-uploads to the new system), but
I don't see any reason we cannot do that work in the trunk. And, it'll
be easier that way.

Any objections to merging the Media Blogging work to the trunk?

- Dave

[mraible]

Fine by me.

On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 6:30 AM, Dave <snoopdave@...> wrote:

> I've taken another look at the Media Blogging work that Ganesh and
> Tanuja have been doing in the roller_mediablogging branch and it looks
> really good in terms of features and in terms of code. There are a
> couple of features missing that we'll need before our next release
> (e.g. ability to migrate existing file-uploads to the new system), but
> I don't see any reason we cannot do that work in the trunk. And, it'll
> be easier that way.
>
> Any objections to merging the Media Blogging work to the trunk?
>
> - Dave
>

[Matthias Schmidt-14]

No objections, go on.

Dave wrote:

> I've taken another look at the Media Blogging work that Ganesh and
> Tanuja have been doing in the roller_mediablogging branch and it looks
> really good in terms of features and in terms of code. There are a
> couple of features missing that we'll need before our next release
> (e.g. ability to migrate existing file-uploads to the new system), but
> I don't see any reason we cannot do that work in the trunk. And, it'll
> be easier that way.
>
> Any objections to merging the Media Blogging work to the trunk?
>
> - Dave

[Dave-401]

Hi Ganesh,

You asked me to hold on this. Are you ready for the merge now?

- Dave



On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Matthias Schmidt
<matthias.schmidt@...> wrote:

> No objections, go on.
>
> Dave wrote:
>>
>> I've taken another look at the Media Blogging work that Ganesh and
>> Tanuja have been doing in the roller_mediablogging branch and it looks
>> really good in terms of features and in terms of code. There are a
>> couple of features missing that we'll need before our next release
>> (e.g. ability to migrate existing file-uploads to the new system), but
>> I don't see any reason we cannot do that work in the trunk. And, it'll
>> be easier that way.
>>
>> Any objections to merging the Media Blogging work to the trunk?
>>
>> - Dave
>
>

[Ganesh Mathrubootham]

Hi Dave,
I did one last round of cleanup, mainly around unit tests and committed my
changes. Please go ahead and do the merge now.    Thanks for your patience.

- Ganesh

On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Dave <snoopdave@...> wrote:

> Hi Ganesh,
>
> You asked me to hold on this. Are you ready for the merge now?
>
> - Dave
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Matthias Schmidt
> <matthias.schmidt@...> wrote:
> > No objections, go on.
> >
> > Dave wrote:
> >>
> >> I've taken another look at the Media Blogging work that Ganesh and
> >> Tanuja have been doing in the roller_mediablogging branch and it looks
> >> really good in terms of features and in terms of code. There are a
> >> couple of features missing that we'll need before our next release
> >> (e.g. ability to migrate existing file-uploads to the new system), but
> >> I don't see any reason we cannot do that work in the trunk. And, it'll
> >> be easier that way.
> >>
> >> Any objections to merging the Media Blogging work to the trunk?
> >>
> >> - Dave
> >
> >
>