|
»
Odd Table behavior using FOP 0.93
|
View:
New views
6 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
Odd Table behavior using FOP 0.93
by Nelson, Dean
::
Rate this Message:
All,
Has anyone seen a
difference in how the tables are done in FOP 0.93 vs 0.20.5?
With 0.20.5 all of
my tables showed up correctly. But with 0.93 the tables that are over two pages
show up on one page. They show up like they would on the last page of the
table but the table goes off the top.
I'm using Saxon
6.5.5, FOP 0.93 and Docbook 4.4 with the 1.71.1 stylesheets.
Dean Nelson "Obstacles are those frightful things you see when
you take your eyes off your goal." - Henry Ford
This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately. |
|
|
Re: Odd Table behavior using FOP 0.93
by offi83
::
Rate this Message:
Maybe that will help you?: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.93/extensions.html#widow-orphan-content-limit It's about two extensions who help you to keep your content together, maybe there is something set in the stylesheets that you don't want. |
|
|
AW: sectioning and toc
by Huber Evelyne
::
Rate this Message:
hi!
I have a rather big document which is basically split in multiple thematical units. In the first "unit" I'd like to use a toc and chunking for the maximal depth(5). however in the second unit the toc and chunking should only be effective up to level 2. Is there a smart way to do that? without changing everything manually in the toc (as I have loads of entries) thanks in advance --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-help@... |
|
|
RE: Odd Table behavior using FOP 0.93
by Nelson, Dean
::
Rate this Message:
I'm not sure this is the issue. I'm even less sure how I could use these
extensions. Would I use them as a PI on each table? Or just set them once in the stylesheets? Does FOP 0.93 have a limit to the size of the table? It almost looks like an overflow or wrapping issue, like when you over flow an integer. Is this an area that Docbook trips on due to the 0.93 version? Dean Nelson -----Original Message----- From: offi83 [mailto:fop@...] Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 4:06 AM To: docbook-apps@... Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Odd Table behavior using FOP 0.93 Nelson, Dean wrote: > > All, > Has anyone seen a difference in how the tables are done in FOP 0.93 vs > 0.20.5? > > With 0.20.5 all of my tables showed up correctly. But with 0.93 the > tables that are over two pages show up on one page. They show up like > they would on the last page of the table but the table goes off the > top. > > > I'm using Saxon 6.5.5, FOP 0.93 and Docbook 4.4 with the 1.71.1 > stylesheets. > > > Dean Nelson > Sr. Software Engineer > Enterprise Electronics Corp > http://www.EECradar.com <http://www.eecradar.com/> > > "Obstacles are those frightful things you see when you take your eyes > off your goal." - Henry Ford > > > This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or > proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity > to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the > intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is > hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of > this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, > please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this > e-mail immediately. > > > > > Maybe that will help you?: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.93/extensions.html#widow-orphan-cont ent-limit http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.93/extensions.html#widow-orphan-cont ent-limit It's about two extensions who help you to keep your content together, maybe there is something set in the stylesheets that you don't want. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Odd-Table-behavior-using-FOP-0.93-tf2969436.html#a 8369151 Sent from the docbook apps mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-help@... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-help@... |
|
|
Re: Odd Table behavior using FOP 0.93
by Bob Stayton
::
Rate this Message:
This sounds like it might be a bug related to the keep-together property.
The DocBook FO stylesheet sets keep-together.within-column="always" in the formal.object.properties attribute-set, which is used by the table.properties attribute-set. What happens if you add this to your customization: <xsl:attribute-set name="table.properties"> <xsl:attribute name="keep-together.within-column">auto</xsl:attribute> </xsl:attribute-set> Bob Stayton Sagehill Enterprises DocBook Consulting bobs@... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nelson, Dean" <dean.nelson@...> To: "offi83" <fop@...>; <docbook-apps@...> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 9:54 AM Subject: RE: [docbook-apps] Odd Table behavior using FOP 0.93 I'm not sure this is the issue. I'm even less sure how I could use these extensions. Would I use them as a PI on each table? Or just set them once in the stylesheets? Does FOP 0.93 have a limit to the size of the table? It almost looks like an overflow or wrapping issue, like when you over flow an integer. Is this an area that Docbook trips on due to the 0.93 version? Dean Nelson -----Original Message----- From: offi83 [mailto:fop@...] Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 4:06 AM To: docbook-apps@... Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Odd Table behavior using FOP 0.93 Nelson, Dean wrote: > > All, > Has anyone seen a difference in how the tables are done in FOP 0.93 vs > 0.20.5? > > With 0.20.5 all of my tables showed up correctly. But with 0.93 the > tables that are over two pages show up on one page. They show up like > they would on the last page of the table but the table goes off the > top. > > > I'm using Saxon 6.5.5, FOP 0.93 and Docbook 4.4 with the 1.71.1 > stylesheets. > > > Dean Nelson > Sr. Software Engineer > Enterprise Electronics Corp > http://www.EECradar.com <http://www.eecradar.com/> > > "Obstacles are those frightful things you see when you take your eyes > off your goal." - Henry Ford > > > This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or > proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity > to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the > intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is > hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of > this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, > please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this > e-mail immediately. > > > > > Maybe that will help you?: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.93/extensions.html#widow-orphan-cont ent-limit http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.93/extensions.html#widow-orphan-cont ent-limit It's about two extensions who help you to keep your content together, maybe there is something set in the stylesheets that you don't want. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Odd-Table-behavior-using-FOP-0.93-tf2969436.html#a 8369151 Sent from the docbook apps mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-help@... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-help@... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-help@... |
|
|
RE: Odd Table behavior using FOP 0.93
by Nelson, Dean
::
Rate this Message:
Bob,
I agree. It appears to be a bug. I use the snippet below and now have sane tables. However, the "keep" is now broken and I have tables with one line on the first page and the rest on the next ;-) I previously had code that came from pg 452 of your book with the keep marked as "always" and then did a PI to place an "auto" in the tables that I wanted to break (i.e. the long ones). And I checked the FO output and it said "auto". Is there a work-around for this? Dean Nelson Sr. Software Engineer Enterprise Electronics Corp http://www.EECradar.com "Obstacles are those frightful things you see when you take your eyes off your goal." - Henry Ford This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately. -----Original Message----- From: Bob Stayton [mailto:bobs@...] Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 12:34 PM To: Nelson, Dean; offi83; docbook-apps@... Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Odd Table behavior using FOP 0.93 This sounds like it might be a bug related to the keep-together property. The DocBook FO stylesheet sets keep-together.within-column="always" in the formal.object.properties attribute-set, which is used by the table.properties attribute-set. What happens if you add this to your customization: <xsl:attribute-set name="table.properties"> <xsl:attribute name="keep-together.within-column">auto</xsl:attribute> </xsl:attribute-set> Bob Stayton Sagehill Enterprises DocBook Consulting bobs@... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nelson, Dean" <dean.nelson@...> To: "offi83" <fop@...>; <docbook-apps@...> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 9:54 AM Subject: RE: [docbook-apps] Odd Table behavior using FOP 0.93 I'm not sure this is the issue. I'm even less sure how I could use these extensions. Would I use them as a PI on each table? Or just set them once in the stylesheets? Does FOP 0.93 have a limit to the size of the table? It almost looks like an overflow or wrapping issue, like when you over flow an integer. Is this an area that Docbook trips on due to the 0.93 version? Dean Nelson -----Original Message----- From: offi83 [mailto:fop@...] Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 4:06 AM To: docbook-apps@... Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Odd Table behavior using FOP 0.93 Nelson, Dean wrote: > > All, > Has anyone seen a difference in how the tables are done in FOP 0.93 vs > 0.20.5? > > With 0.20.5 all of my tables showed up correctly. But with 0.93 the > tables that are over two pages show up on one page. They show up like > they would on the last page of the table but the table goes off the > top. > > > I'm using Saxon 6.5.5, FOP 0.93 and Docbook 4.4 with the 1.71.1 > stylesheets. > > > Dean Nelson > Sr. Software Engineer > Enterprise Electronics Corp > http://www.EECradar.com <http://www.eecradar.com/> > > "Obstacles are those frightful things you see when you take your eyes > off your goal." - Henry Ford > > > This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or > proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity > to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the > intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is > hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of > this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, > please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this > e-mail immediately. > > > > > Maybe that will help you?: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.93/extensions.html#widow-orphan-cont ent-limit http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.93/extensions.html#widow-orphan-cont ent-limit It's about two extensions who help you to keep your content together, maybe there is something set in the stylesheets that you don't want. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Odd-Table-behavior-using-FOP-0.93-tf2969436.html#a 8369151 Sent from the docbook apps mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-help@... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-help@... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-help@... |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
