One time string section: new group or separate ARs?
|
View:
New views
3 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
One time string section: new group or separate ARs?
by Age Bosma-2
::
Rate this Message:
Hi,
Have a look at the booklet page 7 at: http://www.cover-paradies.to/?Module=ViewEntry&ID=408676 There's a series of credits applying to two tracks on the Hard Candy release [1] by Counting Crows. In the booklet it is credited as 'Jerry Hey String Section', listing all artist performing in the string section. This was, however, just a one time string section for just the two tacks. I'm personally tempted to create a new group named 'Jerry Hey String Section' including all the artist credited in the booklet. I could also add the complete list of credits to both tracks separately. The disadvantage of the first option would be that the specific instrument credits will get lost (but can be stored in an annotation), the disadvantage of the second option is that the list of tracks ARs will get quite extensive. What is your opinion? Which option has you preference? Age [1] http://musicbrainz.org/release/55e9a60a-4d04-44c9-9b33-b62a778b1c78.html _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-users mailing list MusicBrainz-users@... http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users |
|
|
Re: One time string section: new group or separate ARs?
by gnu_andrew
::
Rate this Message:
2009/4/20 Age Bosma <agebosma@...>:
> Hi, > > Have a look at the booklet page 7 at: > http://www.cover-paradies.to/?Module=ViewEntry&ID=408676 > > There's a series of credits applying to two tracks on the Hard Candy > release [1] by Counting Crows. In the booklet it is credited as 'Jerry > Hey String Section', listing all artist performing in the string > section. This was, however, just a one time string section for just the > two tacks. > > I'm personally tempted to create a new group named 'Jerry Hey String > Section' including all the artist credited in the booklet. I could also > add the complete list of credits to both tracks separately. > The disadvantage of the first option would be that the specific > instrument credits will get lost (but can be stored in an annotation), > the disadvantage of the second option is that the list of tracks ARs > will get quite extensive. > > What is your opinion? Which option has you preference? > > Age > > > [1] http://musicbrainz.org/release/55e9a60a-4d04-44c9-9b33-b62a778b1c78.html > > _______________________________________________ > MusicBrainz-users mailing list > MusicBrainz-users@... > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users > I'd be for the second option. You can add each relationship just once if you use the option of relating to tracks on a release (via Relate To... release) to create two relationships simultaneously rather than relating to each track itself separately. -- Andrew :-) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) Support Free Java! Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath http://openjdk.java.net PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net) Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8 _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-users mailing list MusicBrainz-users@... http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users |
|
|
Re: One time string section: new group or separate ARs?
by symphonick
::
Rate this Message:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> 2009/4/20 Age Bosma <agebosma@...>: >> Hi, >> >> Have a look at the booklet page 7 at: >> http://www.cover-paradies.to/?Module=ViewEntry&ID=408676 >> >> There's a series of credits applying to two tracks on the Hard Candy >> release [1] by Counting Crows. In the booklet it is credited as 'Jerry >> Hey String Section', listing all artist performing in the string >> section. This was, however, just a one time string section for just the >> two tacks. >> >> I'm personally tempted to create a new group named 'Jerry Hey String >> Section' including all the artist credited in the booklet. I could also >> add the complete list of credits to both tracks separately. >> The disadvantage of the first option would be that the specific >> instrument credits will get lost (but can be stored in an annotation), >> the disadvantage of the second option is that the list of tracks ARs >> will get quite extensive. >> >> What is your opinion? Which option has you preference? >> >> Age >> >> >> [1] http://musicbrainz.org/release/55e9a60a-4d04-44c9-9b33-b62a778b1c78.html >> >> _______________________________________________ >> MusicBrainz-users mailing list >> MusicBrainz-users@... >> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users >> > > I'd be for the second option. You can add each relationship just once > if you use the option of relating to tracks on a release (via Relate > To... release) to create two relationships simultaneously rather than > relating to each track itself separately. +1 Creating both group + individual AR:s is what I recommend in every case, so an artist's "appears on"-page will contain a complete discography of that artist. /symphonick _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-users mailing list MusicBrainz-users@... http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
