Ontap 7.2.6 is under investigating
|
View:
New views
15 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
Ontap 7.2.6 is under investigating
by Kappe, Michael
::
Rate this Message:
Some parts of this message have been removed.
Learn more about Nabble's security policy.
Hi,
after Announcing Ontap 7.2.6 a few days ago, now it is not downloadable from the NOW-Page.
Anyone know whats happend?
Regards
Michael
|
|
|
AW: Ontap 7.2.6 is under investigating
by Kießl Walter
::
Rate this Message:
Some parts of this message have been removed.
Learn more about Nabble's security policy.
Hi, there are a few bugs in the release which caused NetApp to
withdraw it from NOW. As far as I know 7.2.6P1 will be released next week. Regards Walter Von:
owner-toasters@... [mailto:owner-toasters@...] Im
Auftrag von Kappe, Michael Hi, after
Announcing Ontap 7.2.6 a few days ago, now it is not downloadable from the
NOW-Page. Anyone
know whats happend? Regards Michael
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
|
|
RE: Ontap 7.2.6 is under investigating
by Leeds, Daniel
::
Rate this Message:
isn't this #2 in recent releases to be "released" and then withdrawn until it's 7.2.X.1 release... |
|
|
Re: Ontap 7.2.6 is under investigating
by Jack Lyons
::
Rate this Message:
726p1 will be available soon.
We hit a panic inducing bug - 5 times On 11/12/08, Kappe, Michael <Michael.Kappe@...> wrote: > Hi, > > after Announcing Ontap 7.2.6 a few days ago, now it is not downloadable from > the NOW-Page. > > Anyone know whats happend? > > > Regards > > Michael > > > -- Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com |
|
|
Re: Ontap 7.2.6 is under investigating
by Jack Lyons
::
Rate this Message:
I think you are correct. I know the 7.2.6 fasttracked to GD
status...1hat about 7.2.5? On 11/12/08, Leeds, Daniel <dleeds@...> wrote: > isn't this #2 in recent releases to be "released" and then withdrawn until > it's 7.2.X.1 release... > > > -- > Daniel Leeds > Manager, Storage Operations > Edmunds, Inc. > 1620 26th Street, Suite 400 South > Santa Monica, CA 90404 > > 310-309-4999 desk > 310-430-0536 cell > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-toasters@... on behalf of Kießl Walter > Sent: Wed 11/12/2008 1:46 AM > To: Kappe, Michael; toasters@... > Subject: AW: Ontap 7.2.6 is under investigating > > Hi, > > > > there are a few bugs in the release which caused NetApp to withdraw it from > NOW. As far as I know 7.2.6P1 will be released next week. > > > > Regards > > Walter > > > > Von: owner-toasters@... [mailto:owner-toasters@...] Im > Auftrag von Kappe, Michael > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. November 2008 10:09 > An: toasters@... > Betreff: Ontap 7.2.6 is under investigating > > > > Hi, > > > > after Announcing Ontap 7.2.6 a few days ago, now it is not downloadable from > the NOW-Page. > > > > Anyone know whats happend? > > > > > > Regards > > > > Michael > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Registergericht: Traunstein / Registry Court: HRB 275 - Sitz / Head Office: > Traunreut > Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender / Chairman of Supervisory Board: Rainer Burkhard > Geschäftsführung / Management Board: Thomas Sesselmann (Vorsitzender / > Chairman), > Michael Grimm, Rainer Hagl, Matthias Fauser > > E-Mail Haftungsausschluss / E-Mail Disclaimer > <http://www.heidenhain.de/disclaimer> > > > > > -- Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com |
|
|
Re: Ontap 7.2.6 is under investigating
by Jack Lyons
::
Rate this Message:
Has anyone deployed 7.2.6.1?
It is GD but wanted to get some feedback - I had a lot of problems with 7.2.6 but it resolved my backup pains so I didn't down grade. Thanks. Jack On 11/12/08, Kappe, Michael <Michael.Kappe@...> wrote: > Hi, > > after Announcing Ontap 7.2.6 a few days ago, now it is not downloadable from > the NOW-Page. > > Anyone know whats happend? > > > Regards > > Michael > > > -- Sent from my mobile device |
|
|
RE: Ontap 7.2.6 is under investigating
by Langdon, Laughlin T. (Lock)
::
Rate this Message:
Personally, I'm waiting for this one to cook a little longer (safely
hiding behind 7.2.5.1p6). If you're already running 7.2.6 I'd say there isn't a lot of downside for you to upgrade, in fact I'd recommend it as there are some pretty nasty panic situations that might affect you. (see below) 1. Bug ID 267622: This can panic the storage controller during boot if an error causes a not-fully-initialized syslogd to need to report the problem, and/or if any of the following conditions match: -Lookup of a hostname specified in the /etc/syslog.conf file fails -The root volume is full -The /etc/syslog.conf file is misconfigured and contains invalid entries 2. Bug ID 318070: This affects only FAS270 systems with expansion shelves using ESH4 modules and where there are issues or configuration changes with those shelves. This results in a panic of the FAS270 storage controller. 3. Bug ID 324637: Under some circumstances, if a file with Windows NT ACL (access control list) is opened for overwrite by a CIFS client on a storage controller, it can cause a panic. This requires a high load on the system for quotas to be enabled, and for a Windows NT ACL to be associated with the file that is opened for overwrite by a CIFS client. Due to the high load, the Windows NT ACL buffer could potentially be recycled before it is used, leading to a panic. -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters@... [mailto:owner-toasters@...] On Behalf Of Jack Lyons Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 11:13 AM To: Kappe, Michael; toasters@... Subject: Re: Ontap 7.2.6 is under investigating Has anyone deployed 7.2.6.1? It is GD but wanted to get some feedback - I had a lot of problems with 7.2.6 but it resolved my backup pains so I didn't down grade. Thanks. Jack On 11/12/08, Kappe, Michael <Michael.Kappe@...> wrote: > Hi, > > after Announcing Ontap 7.2.6 a few days ago, now it is not downloadable from > the NOW-Page. > > Anyone know whats happend? > > > Regards > > Michael > > > -- Sent from my mobile device |
|
|
Re: Ontap 7.2.6 is under investigating (How are ONTAP builds lately?)
by Adam McDougall
::
Rate this Message:
We are currently running 7.2.4 on a pair of 3040 filers and considering
upgrading if there are reduplication improvements, but currently we don't have any panics or known problems. Are the waters safe with 7.2.6.1 or 7.3.1 lately, I haven't heard any complaints in a few months? Anything to watch out for? Langdon, Laughlin T. (Lock) wrote: > Personally, I'm waiting for this one to cook a little longer (safely > hiding behind 7.2.5.1p6). If you're already running 7.2.6 I'd say there > isn't a lot of downside for you to upgrade, in fact I'd recommend it as > there are some pretty nasty panic situations that might affect you. (see > below) > > 1. Bug ID 267622: This can panic the storage controller during boot > if an error causes a not-fully-initialized syslogd to need to report the > problem, and/or if any of the following conditions match: > -Lookup of a hostname specified in the /etc/syslog.conf file > fails > -The root volume is full > -The /etc/syslog.conf file is misconfigured and contains invalid > entries > > 2. Bug ID 318070: This affects only FAS270 systems with expansion > shelves using ESH4 modules and where there are issues or configuration > changes with those shelves. This results in a panic of the FAS270 > storage controller. > > 3. Bug ID 324637: Under some circumstances, if a file with Windows > NT ACL (access control list) is opened for overwrite by a CIFS client on > a storage controller, it can cause a panic. This requires a high > load on the system for quotas to be enabled, and for a Windows NT ACL to > be associated with the file that is opened for overwrite by a CIFS > client. Due to the high load, the Windows NT ACL buffer could > potentially be recycled before it is used, leading to a panic. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-toasters@... [mailto:owner-toasters@...] > On Behalf Of Jack Lyons > Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 11:13 AM > To: Kappe, Michael; toasters@... > Subject: Re: Ontap 7.2.6 is under investigating > > Has anyone deployed 7.2.6.1? > > It is GD but wanted to get some feedback - I had a lot of problems > with 7.2.6 but it resolved my backup pains so I didn't down grade. > > Thanks. > > Jack > > On 11/12/08, Kappe, Michael <Michael.Kappe@...> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> after Announcing Ontap 7.2.6 a few days ago, now it is not >> > downloadable from > >> the NOW-Page. >> >> Anyone know whats happend? >> >> >> Regards >> >> Michael >> >> >> >> > > |
|
|
RE: Ontap 7.2.6 is under investigating (How are ONTAP builds lately?)
by Page, Jeremy
::
Rate this Message:
There is a bug I know of with 7.3.1 and 10gigE. I'd wait for 7.3.2 if
you're using them. -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters@... [mailto:owner-toasters@...] On Behalf Of Adam McDougall Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 2:41 PM To: toasters@... Subject: Re: Ontap 7.2.6 is under investigating (How are ONTAP builds lately?) We are currently running 7.2.4 on a pair of 3040 filers and considering upgrading if there are reduplication improvements, but currently we don't have any panics or known problems. Are the waters safe with 7.2.6.1 or 7.3.1 lately, I haven't heard any complaints in a few months? Anything to watch out for? Langdon, Laughlin T. (Lock) wrote: > Personally, I'm waiting for this one to cook a little longer (safely > hiding behind 7.2.5.1p6). If you're already running 7.2.6 I'd say there > isn't a lot of downside for you to upgrade, in fact I'd recommend it as > there are some pretty nasty panic situations that might affect you. (see > below) > > 1. Bug ID 267622: This can panic the storage controller during boot > if an error causes a not-fully-initialized syslogd to need to report the > problem, and/or if any of the following conditions match: > -Lookup of a hostname specified in the /etc/syslog.conf file > fails > -The root volume is full > -The /etc/syslog.conf file is misconfigured and contains invalid > entries > > 2. Bug ID 318070: This affects only FAS270 systems with expansion > shelves using ESH4 modules and where there are issues or configuration > changes with those shelves. This results in a panic of the FAS270 > storage controller. > > 3. Bug ID 324637: Under some circumstances, if a file with Windows > NT ACL (access control list) is opened for overwrite by a CIFS client > a storage controller, it can cause a panic. This requires a high > load on the system for quotas to be enabled, and for a Windows NT ACL to > be associated with the file that is opened for overwrite by a CIFS > client. Due to the high load, the Windows NT ACL buffer could > potentially be recycled before it is used, leading to a panic. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-toasters@... > On Behalf Of Jack Lyons > Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 11:13 AM > To: Kappe, Michael; toasters@... > Subject: Re: Ontap 7.2.6 is under investigating > > Has anyone deployed 7.2.6.1? > > It is GD but wanted to get some feedback - I had a lot of problems > with 7.2.6 but it resolved my backup pains so I didn't down grade. > > Thanks. > > Jack > > On 11/12/08, Kappe, Michael <Michael.Kappe@...> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> after Announcing Ontap 7.2.6 a few days ago, now it is not >> > downloadable from > >> the NOW-Page. >> >> Anyone know whats happend? >> >> >> Regards >> >> Michael >> >> >> >> > > Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy or re-transmit this email. If you have received this email in error, please notify us by email by replying to the sender and by telephone (call us collect at +1 202-828-0850) and delete this message and any attachments. Thank you in advance for your cooperation and assistance. In addition, Danaher and its subsidiaries disclaim that the content of this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any contract or agreement or any amendment thereto; provided that the foregoing disclaimer does not invalidate the binding effect of any digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is included in any attachment to this email. |
|
|
Re: Ontap 7.2.6 is under investigating (How are ONTAP builds lately?)
by Maxwell Reid
::
Rate this Message:
> We are currently running 7.2.4 on a pair of 3040 filers and considering
> upgrading if there are reduplication improvements, but currently we > don't have any panics or known problems. Are the waters safe with > 7.2.6.1 or 7.3.1 lately, I haven't heard any complaints in a few > months? Anything to watch out for? I've done the bump from 7.2.4P5 to 7.3.1P2 on our two 3040 clusters and a stand alone 3040. No issues or scary bugs to report so far. A couple annoyances with the 7.2.x train have completely gone away (issues with netgroup and multistore, mbufs, dedupe glitches, and the notorious quota problems with 7.2.5) I haven't seen those at all. ~Max > > Langdon, Laughlin T. (Lock) wrote: >> Personally, I'm waiting for this one to cook a little longer (safely >> hiding behind 7.2.5.1p6). If you're already running 7.2.6 I'd say there >> isn't a lot of downside for you to upgrade, in fact I'd recommend it as >> there are some pretty nasty panic situations that might affect you. (see >> below) >> >> 1. Bug ID 267622: This can panic the storage controller during boot >> if an error causes a not-fully-initialized syslogd to need to report the >> problem, and/or if any of the following conditions match: >> -Lookup of a hostname specified in the /etc/syslog.conf file >> fails >> -The root volume is full >> -The /etc/syslog.conf file is misconfigured and contains invalid >> entries >> >> 2. Bug ID 318070: This affects only FAS270 systems with expansion >> shelves using ESH4 modules and where there are issues or configuration >> changes with those shelves. This results in a panic of the FAS270 >> storage controller. >> >> 3. Bug ID 324637: Under some circumstances, if a file with Windows >> NT ACL (access control list) is opened for overwrite by a CIFS client on >> a storage controller, it can cause a panic. This requires a high >> load on the system for quotas to be enabled, and for a Windows NT ACL to >> be associated with the file that is opened for overwrite by a CIFS >> client. Due to the high load, the Windows NT ACL buffer could >> potentially be recycled before it is used, leading to a panic. >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-toasters@... [mailto:owner-toasters@...] >> On Behalf Of Jack Lyons >> Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 11:13 AM >> To: Kappe, Michael; toasters@... >> Subject: Re: Ontap 7.2.6 is under investigating >> >> Has anyone deployed 7.2.6.1? >> >> It is GD but wanted to get some feedback - I had a lot of problems >> with 7.2.6 but it resolved my backup pains so I didn't down grade. >> >> Thanks. >> >> Jack >> >> On 11/12/08, Kappe, Michael <Michael.Kappe@...> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> after Announcing Ontap 7.2.6 a few days ago, now it is not >>> >> downloadable from >> >>> the NOW-Page. >>> >>> Anyone know whats happend? >>> >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Michael >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > |
|
|
Re: Ontap 7.2.6 is under investigating (How are ONTAP builds lately?)
by Jeff Bryer
::
Rate this Message:
We're in a similar situation. 7.2.4 on a pair of 3040 clusters.
NetApp tech support is recommending we move to 7.2.6.1 which we hope to get a window next month. 7.3.1 was not recommended to us (for SnapVault reasons), we've been advised to wait until 7.3.2. On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 02:40:36PM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote: > We are currently running 7.2.4 on a pair of 3040 filers and considering > upgrading if there are reduplication improvements, but currently we > don't have any panics or known problems. Are the waters safe with > 7.2.6.1 or 7.3.1 lately, I haven't heard any complaints in a few months? > Anything to watch out for? > > Langdon, Laughlin T. (Lock) wrote: >> Personally, I'm waiting for this one to cook a little longer (safely >> hiding behind 7.2.5.1p6). If you're already running 7.2.6 I'd say there >> isn't a lot of downside for you to upgrade, in fact I'd recommend it as >> there are some pretty nasty panic situations that might affect you. (see >> below) >> >> 1. Bug ID 267622: This can panic the storage controller during boot >> if an error causes a not-fully-initialized syslogd to need to report the >> problem, and/or if any of the following conditions match: -Lookup of >> a hostname specified in the /etc/syslog.conf file >> fails -The root volume is full -The /etc/syslog.conf file is >> misconfigured and contains invalid >> entries >> >> 2. Bug ID 318070: This affects only FAS270 systems with expansion >> shelves using ESH4 modules and where there are issues or configuration >> changes with those shelves. This results in a panic of the FAS270 >> storage controller. >> >> 3. Bug ID 324637: Under some circumstances, if a file with Windows >> NT ACL (access control list) is opened for overwrite by a CIFS client on >> a storage controller, it can cause a panic. This requires a high >> load on the system for quotas to be enabled, and for a Windows NT ACL to >> be associated with the file that is opened for overwrite by a CIFS >> client. Due to the high load, the Windows NT ACL buffer could >> potentially be recycled before it is used, leading to a panic. >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-toasters@... [mailto:owner-toasters@...] >> On Behalf Of Jack Lyons >> Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 11:13 AM >> To: Kappe, Michael; toasters@... >> Subject: Re: Ontap 7.2.6 is under investigating >> >> Has anyone deployed 7.2.6.1? >> >> It is GD but wanted to get some feedback - I had a lot of problems >> with 7.2.6 but it resolved my backup pains so I didn't down grade. >> >> Thanks. >> >> Jack >> >> On 11/12/08, Kappe, Michael <Michael.Kappe@...> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> after Announcing Ontap 7.2.6 a few days ago, now it is not >>> >> downloadable from >> >>> the NOW-Page. >>> >>> Anyone know whats happend? >>> >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Michael >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > -- Jeff Bryer bryer@... Systems Administrator (778) 782-4935 IT Infrastructure, Simon Fraser University |
|
|
RE: Ontap 7.2.6 is under investigating (How are ONTAP builds lately?)
by Leeds, Daniel
::
Rate this Message:
we are using 10GBE and 7.3.1 under heavy load with no issues and even under netapp guidance. i saw the BURT but we couldnt get our or any support
to actually explain to us what the issue was or how it was triggered. i did however see several people having tons of issues with 7.2.6 on the lists that left me not feeling good about that release. ________________________________________ From: owner-toasters@... [owner-toasters@...] On Behalf Of Page, Jeremy [jeremy.page@...] Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 11:56 AM To: Adam McDougall; toasters@... Subject: RE: Ontap 7.2.6 is under investigating (How are ONTAP builds lately?) There is a bug I know of with 7.3.1 and 10gigE. I'd wait for 7.3.2 if you're using them. -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters@... [mailto:owner-toasters@...] On Behalf Of Adam McDougall Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 2:41 PM To: toasters@... Subject: Re: Ontap 7.2.6 is under investigating (How are ONTAP builds lately?) We are currently running 7.2.4 on a pair of 3040 filers and considering upgrading if there are reduplication improvements, but currently we don't have any panics or known problems. Are the waters safe with 7.2.6.1 or 7.3.1 lately, I haven't heard any complaints in a few months? Anything to watch out for? Langdon, Laughlin T. (Lock) wrote: > Personally, I'm waiting for this one to cook a little longer (safely > hiding behind 7.2.5.1p6). If you're already running 7.2.6 I'd say there > isn't a lot of downside for you to upgrade, in fact I'd recommend it as > there are some pretty nasty panic situations that might affect you. (see > below) > > 1. Bug ID 267622: This can panic the storage controller during boot > if an error causes a not-fully-initialized syslogd to need to report the > problem, and/or if any of the following conditions match: > -Lookup of a hostname specified in the /etc/syslog.conf file > fails > -The root volume is full > -The /etc/syslog.conf file is misconfigured and contains invalid > entries > > 2. Bug ID 318070: This affects only FAS270 systems with expansion > shelves using ESH4 modules and where there are issues or configuration > changes with those shelves. This results in a panic of the FAS270 > storage controller. > > 3. Bug ID 324637: Under some circumstances, if a file with Windows > NT ACL (access control list) is opened for overwrite by a CIFS client > a storage controller, it can cause a panic. This requires a high > load on the system for quotas to be enabled, and for a Windows NT ACL to > be associated with the file that is opened for overwrite by a CIFS > client. Due to the high load, the Windows NT ACL buffer could > potentially be recycled before it is used, leading to a panic. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-toasters@... > On Behalf Of Jack Lyons > Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 11:13 AM > To: Kappe, Michael; toasters@... > Subject: Re: Ontap 7.2.6 is under investigating > > Has anyone deployed 7.2.6.1? > > It is GD but wanted to get some feedback - I had a lot of problems > with 7.2.6 but it resolved my backup pains so I didn't down grade. > > Thanks. > > Jack > > On 11/12/08, Kappe, Michael <Michael.Kappe@...> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> after Announcing Ontap 7.2.6 a few days ago, now it is not >> > downloadable from > >> the NOW-Page. >> >> Anyone know whats happend? >> >> >> Regards >> >> Michael >> >> >> >> > > Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy or re-transmit this email. If you have received this email in error, please notify us by email by replying to the sender and by telephone (call us collect at +1 202-828-0850) and delete this message and any attachments. Thank you in advance for your cooperation and assistance. In addition, Danaher and its subsidiaries disclaim that the content of this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any contract or agreement or any amendment thereto; provided that the foregoing disclaimer does not invalidate the binding effect of any digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is included in any attachment to this email. |
|
|
Re: Ontap 7.2.6 is under investigating (How are ONTAP builds lately?)
by James Beal
::
Rate this Message:
On 17 Apr 2009, at 22:40, Leeds, Daniel wrote: > we are using 10GBE and 7.3.1 under heavy load with no issues and > even under netapp guidance. i saw the BURT but we couldnt get our > or any support > to actually explain to us what the issue was or how it was triggered. > > i did however see several people having tons of issues with 7.2.6 on > the lists that left me not feeling good about that release. We are running 7.3.1 with 10Gig ethernet, it has been stable, although from one bit of our network we where getting bad performance but turning toe off seemed to make that issue disappear. With toe turned on with 7.2.?? the systems where unusable. |
|
|
RE: Ontap 7.2.6 is under investigating (How are ONTAP builds lately?)
by Leeds, Daniel
::
Rate this Message:
I believe I am not hitting this issue because i utilize vifs and viftrunks which disable the TOE portion. So far we have had zero performance or issues with 7.3.1 and 10GBE
--daniel ________________________________________ From: James Beal [james_@...] Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 3:48 PM To: Leeds, Daniel Cc: Page, Jeremy; Adam McDougall; toasters@... Subject: Re: Ontap 7.2.6 is under investigating (How are ONTAP builds lately?) On 17 Apr 2009, at 22:40, Leeds, Daniel wrote: > we are using 10GBE and 7.3.1 under heavy load with no issues and > even under netapp guidance. i saw the BURT but we couldnt get our > or any support > to actually explain to us what the issue was or how it was triggered. > > i did however see several people having tons of issues with 7.2.6 on > the lists that left me not feeling good about that release. We are running 7.3.1 with 10Gig ethernet, it has been stable, although from one bit of our network we where getting bad performance but turning toe off seemed to make that issue disappear. With toe turned on with 7.2.?? the systems where unusable. |
|
|
Re: Ontap 7.2.6 is under investigating (How are ONTAP builds lately?)
by romeotheriault
::
Rate this Message:
We've been using 7.2.6.1 on a 3050 cluster for a little over a month now with no problems, though we don't currently use any asis on our cluster.
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 3:40 AM, Adam McDougall <mcdouga9@...> wrote: We are currently running 7.2.4 on a pair of 3040 filers and considering upgrading if there are reduplication improvements, but currently we don't have any panics or known problems. Are the waters safe with 7.2.6.1 or 7.3.1 lately, I haven't heard any complaints in a few months? Anything to watch out for? -- Romeo Theriault System Administrator Information Technology Services Ph#: 207-561-3517 Em@: romeo.theriault@... |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
