PATCH: Mention -march=atom/-mtune=atom for gcc 4.5

View: New views
3 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

PATCH: Mention -march=atom/-mtune=atom for gcc 4.5

by H.J. Lu-10 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi,

Gcc 4.5 supports -march=atom/-mtune=atom.  OK to install?

Thanks.


H.J.
---
Index: gcc-4.5/changes.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.5/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -p -r1.20 changes.html
--- gcc-4.5/changes.html 30 Jun 2009 01:36:02 -0000 1.20
+++ gcc-4.5/changes.html 2 Jul 2009 22:39:18 -0000
@@ -202,6 +202,8 @@
     with <code>-fexcess-precision=standard</code> and with standards
     conformance options such as <code>-std=c99</code>, and may be
     disabled using <code>-fexcess-precision=fast</code>.</li>
+    <li>Support for Intel Atom processor is now available through the
+        <code>-march=atom</code> and <code>-mtune=atom</code> options.</li>
   </ul>
 
 <h3 id="mep">MeP</h3>

Re: PATCH: Mention -march=atom/-mtune=atom for gcc 4.5

by Gerald Pfeifer :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Thu, 2 Jul 2009, H.J. Lu wrote:
> +    <li>Support for Intel Atom processor is now available through the
> +        <code>-march=atom</code> and <code>-mtune=atom</code> options.</li>

I believe you may want to say "...for the Intel Atom processor..."; the
change as such looks fine.

Gerald

Re: PATCH: Mention -march=atom/-mtune=atom for gcc 4.5

by H.J. Lu-30 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Gerald Pfeifer<gerald@...> wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jul 2009, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> +    <li>Support for Intel Atom processor is now available through the
>> +        <code>-march=atom</code> and <code>-mtune=atom</code> options.</li>
>
> I believe you may want to say "...for the Intel Atom processor..."; the
> change as such looks fine.
>

Done. I made the change and checked it in.

Thanks.


--
H.J.